Silver Point

Thomas J. Monaco

Silver Point is a boutique research firm that focuses on the broader financial services sector, with a particular focus on troubled institutions globally. 

Asia Ex Japan

Equity Bottom-Up

*Results Materially Supported By Provision Reversals and Principal Transactions: Citigroup (C.US) [Citi] reported 1Q21 bottom-line results of USD 7.6 bn, increasing USD 3.7 bn (89.0%) linked quarter. Citi reversed provisions of USD 2.1 bn - increasing 43.7x versus 4Q20. In addition to the negative provision, Citi’s results were also supported by a USD 2.0 bn (99.7%) increase in principal transaction gains;*Credit Weaker But Coverage Strong: Net new NPLs came in about 1/3 of the previous quarter’s result came in at USD 635 mn or increasing 48.0% on an annualized basis – still far worse than JPM for the last three consecutive quarters. Citi’s loan loss reserve declined to 422% of NPLs and 325 bp of total loans – but still pretty darn good for the known and potential risk in the loan portfolio; and *Puzzling EM Exit: Citi also announced strategic changes in the Global Consumer Bank (GCB), where they are exiting 13 markets, of which ten are in Asia-Pacific. As rationale for the move, new CEO Jane Fraser believe that Citi "does not have the scale" to compete in those markets which account for USD 7 bn in allocated equity and USD 70 bn in loans. We await clarity on the potential restructuring costs and the capital release from these divestitures.

*Results Materially Supported By Provision Reversals and Principal Transactions: Citigroup (C.US) [Citi] reported 1Q21 bottom-line results of USD 7.6 bn, increasing USD 3.7 bn (89.0%) linked quarter. Citi reversed provisions of USD 2.1 bn - increasing 43.7x versus 4Q20. In addition to the negative provision, Citi’s results were also supported by a USD 2.0 bn (99.7%) increase in principal transaction gains;*Credit Weaker But Coverage Strong: Net new NPLs came in about 1/3 of the previous quarter’s result came in at USD 635 mn or increasing 48.0% on an annualized basis – still far worse than JPM for the last three consecutive quarters. Citi’s loan loss reserve declined to 422% of NPLs and 325 bp of total loans – but still pretty darn good for the known and potential risk in the loan portfolio; and *Puzzling EM Exit: Citi also announced strategic changes in the Global Consumer Bank (GCB), where they are exiting 13 markets, of which ten are in Asia-Pacific. As rationale for the move, new CEO Jane Fraser believe that Citi "does not have the scale" to compete in those markets which account for USD 7 bn in allocated equity and USD 70 bn in loans. We await clarity on the potential restructuring costs and the capital release from these divestitures.

*Results Better, But Likely Unsustainable: Bank of America (BAC.US) [BAC] reported 1Q21 bottom-line results of USD 7.6 bn, increasing USD 2.4 bn (45.2%) linked quarter. Results were driven by two factors: a) a negative USD 1.9 bn, in contravention to overall credit performance; and b) a USD 2.1 bn (147.3%) increase trading activities, the sustainability of which we call into question; and*BAC Still Needs To Focus On Credit Quality: Given the USD 774 mn in NCOs (33 bp annualized of total loans), we note that net new NPLs reversed course – increasing a a high 74.8% on an annualized basis. JPM and Citigroup each reported declines. Relative to NPLs, however, reserves – while still significant – declined 67.4% to 3.00x while declining 24 bp to 1.79% against total loans.

*Results Better, But Likely Unsustainable: Bank of America (BAC.US) [BAC] reported 1Q21 bottom-line results of USD 7.6 bn, increasing USD 2.4 bn (45.2%) linked quarter. Results were driven by two factors: a) a negative USD 1.9 bn, in contravention to overall credit performance; and b) a USD 2.1 bn (147.3%) increase trading activities, the sustainability of which we call into question; and*BAC Still Needs To Focus On Credit Quality: Given the USD 774 mn in NCOs (33 bp annualized of total loans), we note that net new NPLs reversed course – increasing a a high 74.8% on an annualized basis. JPM and Citigroup each reported declines. Relative to NPLs, however, reserves – while still significant – declined 67.4% to 3.00x while declining 24 bp to 1.79% against total loans.

Bank of America – Not Exactly A Shining Result

*Results Should Only Get Better: JP Morgan Chase &amp; Co (JPM.US) [JPM] reported 1Q21 bottom-line results of USD 13.9 bn, increasing USD 2.2 bn (18.4%) linked quarter. Results were essentially driven by two factors: a) revenue growth at the Corporate &amp; Investment Bank (CIB) of USD 3.3 bn (28.7%) due primarily to principal transactions which increased USD 3.0 bn (103%); and b) a reserve reversal of USD 4.2 bn – increasing USD 2.3 bn (120%) over 4Q20’s provision reversal. The strength of the bottom-line, should allow larger capital returns in 2Q21 predicated on the Federal Reserve Board’s (FRB) dividend payout ratio test; and*Credit Improvement: JPM’s net new NPLs linked quarter amounted to just USD 638 mn or a 22.2% increase on an annualized basis – which is incredibly good. Given the current risk profile of JPM’s loan portfolio that the company remains over-provided for and that we will continue to see loss provision reversals until loan growth returns in some meaningful way.

*Results Should Only Get Better: JP Morgan Chase &amp; Co (JPM.US) [JPM] reported 1Q21 bottom-line results of USD 13.9 bn, increasing USD 2.2 bn (18.4%) linked quarter. Results were essentially driven by two factors: a) revenue growth at the Corporate &amp; Investment Bank (CIB) of USD 3.3 bn (28.7%) due primarily to principal transactions which increased USD 3.0 bn (103%); and b) a reserve reversal of USD 4.2 bn – increasing USD 2.3 bn (120%) over 4Q20’s provision reversal. The strength of the bottom-line, should allow larger capital returns in 2Q21 predicated on the Federal Reserve Board’s (FRB) dividend payout ratio test; and*Credit Improvement: JPM’s net new NPLs linked quarter amounted to just USD 638 mn or a 22.2% increase on an annualized basis – which is incredibly good. Given the current risk profile of JPM’s loan portfolio that the company remains over-provided for and that we will continue to see loss provision reversals until loan growth returns in some meaningful way.

Financials Credit Analyst

Hank Calenti, CFA

CreditContinuum

Credit

Executive Summary: <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/credit-suisse-group-ag" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:22253:1" rel="noopener">Credit Suisse Group's (CSGN VX)</a> press release of this morning is no reason to buy its Contingent Capital (CoCos). Credit Suisse is skating on thin ice from a capital perspective. Another loss of less than CHF2bn (US$2.1bn) could result in the suspension of coupons on CS’ Contingent Capital securities. This is one-half the charges related to the Archegos Capital Management affair. This leaves little room for maneuver.A warm wind blowing from a hot US economy could crack the ice. Low interest rates, which are pushing investors to take more risk, are generating asset bubbles. CS, like other banks, intermediates in this asset-inflated environment. Unlike other banks, something as simple as an unexpected spike in interest rates could be the catalyst which leads to a fissure in the firm’s capital layer. Another family or hedge fund disaster like Archegos and CS’ CoCo coupons could be at risk.Bank capital analysis is arcane and further complicated by selective disclosure. CoCo investors may not be aware of how slim CS’ capital buffer truly is. And yet, this is at the core of whether the security is under- or over- priced. We deconstruct the press release to determine this level within.As we noted in <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/compose/insight/49970/Credit%20Suisse:%20Where%20There%E2%80%99s%20Smoke,%20There%E2%80%99s%20a%20Capital%20Raise.%20Read%20more:%20https:/skr.ma/yxeJd" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Credit Suisse: Where There’s Smoke, There’s a Capital Raise</a>, we were fortunate to be ahead of the market with our Underweight recommendation on CS bonds. When we initiated this call, the CS 4.5% coupon 2030 callable Additional Tier 1 bond was trading close to par. It is now trading around $95.We continue to believe that Credit Suisse needs to enhance its capital base. Assuming no additional cracks in the ice – a large assumption - it may take CS two quarters to achieve current UBS-type capital buffer levels. However, CS has a materially higher risk tolerance and is clearly impaired from a risk management perspective. At least, one full year of earnings retention may be needed to address these deficiencies. Furthermore, there are weak spots yet to traverse including legacy RMBS costs, CS Supply Chain Fund shortfalls and a debt scandal in Mozambique to say nothing of increased regulatory capital charges following recent events. Together, these may see to it that share buybacks are suspended for some time to come. This would be beneficial for CS’ debt capital over time. In the interim CS’ CoCos may recover somewhat; however, we continue to believe that these securities will lag the market until the layer of capital is strengthened. As such, we remain Underweight.

Executive Summary: Credit Suisse Group's (CSGN VX) press release of this morning is no reason to buy its Contingent Capital (CoCos). Credit Suisse is skating on thin ice from a capital perspective. Another loss of less than CHF2bn (US$2.1bn) could result in the suspension of coupons on CS’ Contingent Capital securities. This is one-half the charges related to the Archegos Capital Management affair. This leaves little room for maneuver.A warm wind blowing from a hot US economy could crack the ice. Low interest rates, which are pushing investors to take more risk, are generating asset bubbles. CS, like other banks, intermediates in this asset-inflated environment. Unlike other banks, something as simple as an unexpected spike in interest rates could be the catalyst which leads to a fissure in the firm’s capital layer. Another family or hedge fund disaster like Archegos and CS’ CoCo coupons could be at risk.Bank capital analysis is arcane and further complicated by selective disclosure. CoCo investors may not be aware of how slim CS’ capital buffer truly is. And yet, this is at the core of whether the security is under- or over- priced. We deconstruct the press release to determine this level within.As we noted in Credit Suisse: Where There’s Smoke, There’s a Capital Raise, we were fortunate to be ahead of the market with our Underweight recommendation on CS bonds. When we initiated this call, the CS 4.5% coupon 2030 callable Additional Tier 1 bond was trading close to par. It is now trading around $95.We continue to believe that Credit Suisse needs to enhance its capital base. Assuming no additional cracks in the ice – a large assumption - it may take CS two quarters to achieve current UBS-type capital buffer levels. However, CS has a materially higher risk tolerance and is clearly impaired from a risk management perspective. At least, one full year of earnings retention may be needed to address these deficiencies. Furthermore, there are weak spots yet to traverse including legacy RMBS costs, CS Supply Chain Fund shortfalls and a debt scandal in Mozambique to say nothing of increased regulatory capital charges following recent events. Together, these may see to it that share buybacks are suspended for some time to come. This would be beneficial for CS’ debt capital over time. In the interim CS’ CoCos may recover somewhat; however, we continue to believe that these securities will lag the market until the layer of capital is strengthened. As such, we remain Underweight.

Credit Suisse: Skating on a Thin Layer of Capital

Executive Summary: The <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/credit-suisse-group-ag" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:22253:1" rel="noopener">Credit Suisse Group (CSGN VX)</a> requires between CHF4 to 8bn in additional Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) to remain competitive and bring its capital buffer in-line with peers. We noted several week ago that the firm’s capital buffer was too thin to absorb large losses while its Contingent Capital (CoCo) securities continued to trade rich relative to peers. The thin, and likely declining, buffer may now affect its ability to compete. In our view, the issue is quickly moving from damage control towards a capital raise.We derive our capital estimates by starting with the amount required to bring the CET1 buffer up to peer levels. To this we add various exceptional charges which are increasing every other week. Details within.We were ahead of the market with our Underweight recommendation on CS bonds. When we initiated this call, the CS 4.5% coupon 2030 callable Additional Tier 1 bond was trading close to par. It is now below $95. Our recommendation was based on a fundamental assessment of CS’ business model, risk tolerance and capitalization. Please see: <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/compose/insight/49775/Credit%20Suisse%20%E2%80%93%20Perfection%20Priced%20into%20Long-Dated%20AT1.%20Read%20more:%20https:/skr.ma/7w5Cm" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Credit Suisse – Perfection Priced into Long-Dated AT1</a> for more details. These negative factors were magnified by the Greensill episode. Please see: <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/compose/insight/49775/Credit%20Suisse:%20Greensill%20Sows%20Reputation%20Risks,%20Underweight%20CS%20Bonds.%20Read%20more:%20https:/skr.ma/tq31o" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Credit Suisse: Greensill Sows Reputation Risks, Underweight CS Bonds</a> and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/compose/insight/49775/Credit%20Suisse:%20Greensill's%20Capital%20Implications%20Outweigh%20Asset%20Management%20Corrective%20Action.%20Read%20more:%20https:/skr.ma/WWiXU" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Credit Suisse: Greensill's Capital Implications Outweigh Asset Management Corrective Action</a>. The Archegos affair adds fuel to this fire.It is too early to consider this a buying opportunity. While we believe in our recapitalization call, we do not anticipate an immediate move towards improving the firms’ competitive position. The flames are rising and more fuel could be added before the capital blanket is applied. As such, we believe CS’ bonds may continue to lag that of its peers.However, the Swiss regulator may be unwilling to wait for the smoke to dampen and the arrival of a new Board Chairman should create the opportunity to clear the air at Credit Suisse. Obviously in addition to raising equity, CS would need to take serious action concerning its risk management and tolerance. Risk tolerance needs to be reduced until risk management is improved as these are the embers which stated this fire. This should be beneficial to AT1 investors over the long-run.

Executive Summary: The Credit Suisse Group (CSGN VX) requires between CHF4 to 8bn in additional Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) to remain competitive and bring its capital buffer in-line with peers. We noted several week ago that the firm’s capital buffer was too thin to absorb large losses while its Contingent Capital (CoCo) securities continued to trade rich relative to peers. The thin, and likely declining, buffer may now affect its ability to compete. In our view, the issue is quickly moving from damage control towards a capital raise.We derive our capital estimates by starting with the amount required to bring the CET1 buffer up to peer levels. To this we add various exceptional charges which are increasing every other week. Details within.We were ahead of the market with our Underweight recommendation on CS bonds. When we initiated this call, the CS 4.5% coupon 2030 callable Additional Tier 1 bond was trading close to par. It is now below $95. Our recommendation was based on a fundamental assessment of CS’ business model, risk tolerance and capitalization. Please see: Credit Suisse – Perfection Priced into Long-Dated AT1 for more details. These negative factors were magnified by the Greensill episode. Please see: Credit Suisse: Greensill Sows Reputation Risks, Underweight CS Bonds and Credit Suisse: Greensill's Capital Implications Outweigh Asset Management Corrective Action. The Archegos affair adds fuel to this fire.It is too early to consider this a buying opportunity. While we believe in our recapitalization call, we do not anticipate an immediate move towards improving the firms’ competitive position. The flames are rising and more fuel could be added before the capital blanket is applied. As such, we believe CS’ bonds may continue to lag that of its peers.However, the Swiss regulator may be unwilling to wait for the smoke to dampen and the arrival of a new Board Chairman should create the opportunity to clear the air at Credit Suisse. Obviously in addition to raising equity, CS would need to take serious action concerning its risk management and tolerance. Risk tolerance needs to be reduced until risk management is improved as these are the embers which stated this fire. This should be beneficial to AT1 investors over the long-run. 

Credit Suisse: Where There’s Smoke, There’s a Capital Raise

United Kingdom

HSBC Holdings plc is the holding company for the HSBC Group. The Company provides a variety of international banking and financial services, including retail and corporate banking, trade, trusteeship, securities, custody, capital markets, treasury, private and investment banking, and insurance. HSBC Holdings operates worldwide.

Price Gauge
52-week Range	0.00 - 0.00
Market Cap (USDm)	0.00
P/E	0.00
Dividend (Yield)	0.00

HSBC Holdings (HSBC US)

Citigroup – Shifting Winds

CITIGROUP: Citi reported a QOQ 1Q21 bottom-line result increase of 89.0% due to provision reversals and principal transactions. Net new NPLs...

Thomas J. Monaco

Bank of America – Not Exactly A Shining Result

BANK OF AMERICA: BAC's QOQ 1Q21 bottom-line increased 45.2% driven by reserve releases and trading (not sustainable). Net new NPLs reversed course...

Thomas J. Monaco

J.P Morgan Chase & Co. – Well On Track

JP MORGAN CHASE: JPM 1Q21 bottom-line results increased 18.4% linked quarter due to principal transactions and provision reversals. This should...

Thomas J. Monaco

Credit Suisse: Skating on a Thin Layer of Capital

CS is skating on thin ice from a capital perspective while its risk management blade is dulled. Asset bubbles could crack the ice. A loss of less...

Hank Calenti, CFA

Credit Suisse: Where There’s Smoke, There’s a Capital Raise

CS needs as much as CHF8bn in common equity to bring its capital buffer in-line with peers. The Archegos affair adds fuel to risk management and...

Hank Calenti, CFA

Price Gauge

52-week Range

Market Cap (USDm)

P/E

Dividend (Yield)