The Boston Federal Reserve put out a short white paper on the Silicon Valley Bank crash and the accounting for debt securities known as held-to-maturity or HTM.
It’s a nice short read and got me thinking about this issue again, which I examined back in May in Issue #100 (link below).
The question, which has not definitively resolved itself in academia or policy circles, centers around bank accounting and whether banks should be allowed to value bonds they’re not planning on selling (hence the term held-to-maturity) based on amortized cost.
Get started on the Smartkarma Research Network with a complimentary Preview Pass to:
Unlock all research summaries
Follow top, independent analysts
Receive personalised alerts and emails
Access Briefings, Analytics, and Events
Upgrade anytime to our paid plans for full-length research, real-time analyst discussions, and more.
Join a thriving community of 45,000+ investors, including the top global asset managers managing over $13trn in assets.