Global Bank Equity Specialist, Creative Portfolios

Paul Hollingworth

Global Bank Equity Specialist

Creative Portfolios

Equity Bottom-Up

Guangzhou Rural Commercial Ban / Equity Bottom-Up

I am partial to a bit of Confucius. Or to such thinking. Now and again. The chairman of <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/23738" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:23738:1">Guangzhou Rural Commercial Bank (1551 HK)</a> has a Confucian message (scholars will no doubt berate me) at the beginning of the report and accounts: "A single spark can start a prairie fire while a crack can lead to ice breaking". From what I can glean, the chairman is alluding to the forty year process of China's emergence. No satanic conflagration intended or any portends of global warming. For some reason, a tune by the 1970s new-wave group, The Stranglers, passed through my mind: "He got an ice pick that made his ears burn" and "They watched their Rome burn". Cultural differences perhaps.<a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/23738" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:23738:1">Guangzhou Rural Commercial Bank (1551 HK)</a> shares many of the issues that affect Chinese lenders today.  (The "Big four" are much less susceptible to deep stresses in this environment). Unsurprisingly, Asset Quality issues weigh on these results and earnings quality is subpar with trading gains and other assorted non-operating or "other items" playing a big part in the composition of Pre-Tax Profit. The latter flatters the "improving" headline Cost-Income ratio which is not really an indicator of greater efficiency here. In fact underlying "jaws" are highly negative. It is thus surprising that the wage bill should shoot up 30% YoY in such austere times. Given the aforementioned Asset Quality issues, such as booming substandard loans, ballooning credit costs, and high charge-offs, the "improving" NPL ratio is flattered by an exuberant denominator. Asset Quality does look volatile. The Liquidity Coverage Ratio and LDR duly eroded.Where the bank does better, in contrast to many other Chinese lenders, is on Net Interest Income.  Guangzhou seems to have reduced its funding costs markedly. The bank managed to lower its corporate time deposit rates especially. The result is that Interest Expenses on Deposits rose by just 6.4% YoY. Liability management seems to be behind a reduction in Debt/Equity from 2.79x to 1.62x, thus decreasing Debt funding costs by 24% YoY. Spurred by corporate credit growth of 38% YoY, Interest Income on Loans climbed by 31% YoY. However, the bank does share an issue with some other lenders - a collapse in Interest Income on non-credit earning assets. This is, in part, due to a shrinkage of its FI holdings by some CN89.5bn. This means that despite the credit spurt, Interest Income in its totality edged up by barely 1% YoY. A disappointing performance on fee income (custody, wealth management, advisory) reduced Total underlying Income growth to 6% YoY. That 6% is all about rampant corporate credit supply and lower corporate deposit and debt interest costs.Trends are thus decidedly mixed given the underlying picture behind the positive headline fundamental change in Efficiency, Asset Quality and ROAA. Liquidity deteriorated. It must be said that Provisioning was enhanced, Capitalisation moved in the right direction, while NIM and Interest Spread both improved.<div class="content-highlight">Shares are trading at optically quite tempting levels: Earnings Yield of 17%, P/Book of 0.8x, and FV of 8%. But if you desire a Dividend Yield of 5%, or a similar level of aforementioned valuation, a safer bet would be with "The Big Four".</div>

I am partial to a bit of Confucius. Or to such thinking. Now and again. The chairman of Guangzhou Rural Commercial Bank (1551 HK) has a Confucian message (scholars will no doubt berate me) at the beginning of the report and accounts: "A single spark can start a prairie fire while a crack can lead to ice breaking". From what I can glean, the chairman is alluding to the forty year process of China's emergence. No satanic conflagration intended or any portends of global warming. For some reason, a tune by the 1970s new-wave group, The Stranglers, passed through my mind: "He got an ice pick that made his ears burn" and "They watched their Rome burn". Cultural differences perhaps.Guangzhou Rural Commercial Bank (1551 HK) shares many of the issues that affect Chinese lenders today.  (The "Big four" are much less susceptible to deep stresses in this environment). Unsurprisingly, Asset Quality issues weigh on these results and earnings quality is subpar with trading gains and other assorted non-operating or "other items" playing a big part in the composition of Pre-Tax Profit. The latter flatters the "improving" headline Cost-Income ratio which is not really an indicator of greater efficiency here. In fact underlying "jaws" are highly negative. It is thus surprising that the wage bill should shoot up 30% YoY in such austere times. Given the aforementioned Asset Quality issues, such as booming substandard loans, ballooning credit costs, and high charge-offs, the "improving" NPL ratio is flattered by an exuberant denominator. Asset Quality does look volatile. The Liquidity Coverage Ratio and LDR duly eroded.Where the bank does better, in contrast to many other Chinese lenders, is on Net Interest Income.  Guangzhou seems to have reduced its funding costs markedly. The bank managed to lower its corporate time deposit rates especially. The result is that Interest Expenses on Deposits rose by just 6.4% YoY. Liability management seems to be behind a reduction in Debt/Equity from 2.79x to 1.62x, thus decreasing Debt funding costs by 24% YoY. Spurred by corporate credit growth of 38% YoY, Interest Income on Loans climbed by 31% YoY. However, the bank does share an issue with some other lenders - a collapse in Interest Income on non-credit earning assets. This is, in part, due to a shrinkage of its FI holdings by some CN89.5bn. This means that despite the credit spurt, Interest Income in its totality edged up by barely 1% YoY. A disappointing performance on fee income (custody, wealth management, advisory) reduced Total underlying Income growth to 6% YoY. That 6% is all about rampant corporate credit supply and lower corporate deposit and debt interest costs.Trends are thus decidedly mixed given the underlying picture behind the positive headline fundamental change in Efficiency, Asset Quality and ROAA. Liquidity deteriorated. It must be said that Provisioning was enhanced, Capitalisation moved in the right direction, while NIM and Interest Spread both improved.Shares are trading at optically quite tempting levels: Earnings Yield of 17%, P/Book of 0.8x, and FV of 8%. But if you desire a Dividend Yield of 5%, or a similar level of aforementioned valuation, a safer bet would be with "The Big Four".

Guangzhou Rural Commercial Ban

Guangzhou Rural: All the Shakespearoes?