Head of Research, IPOs & Placements, Aequitas Research

Sumeet Singh

Head of Research, IPOs & Placements

IPOs and Placements coverage across Asia Pacific

Aequitas Research

We cover all listing across the Asia Pacific along with follow-up placements. As of Dec 2020, our team had covered 539 IPOs with a hit rate of 73.5% and 685 placements with a hit rate of 66.8%.

We combine fundamental bottom-up views with our proprietary quantitative framework to provide a holistic coverage across new listings and placements. Our coverage includes pre-IPO notes before the deal is launched, follow-up analysis once the deal is live and post-listing trading analysis as well.

Equity Capital Markets

Simplex Holdings / Equity Capital Markets

<div>
<p>Simplex Holdings’ shareholders aim to raise up to US$304m via selling some of their stake in the company. Simplex has consistently been ranked among the top companies in IDC Fintech rankings over the past nine years.</p>
<p>Simplex provides consulting, system development, maintenance and operations to banks, asset managers and insurance companies in Asia. Simplex was established in Sep 97. It was listed on JASDAQ in Feb 2002 and progressed to the First Section in Sep 2005. The company undertook an MBO, in Apr 2013 and was delisted in Oct 2013. Since delisting, Simplex has expanded its product offering further to cover life insurance and non-life insurance companies as well, along with crypto exchanges.</p>
</div><div><p>We have looked at the company’s past performance in our earlier notes, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/simplex-holdings-pre-ipo-steady-topline-growth-but-appears-to-be-at-peak-margins" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Simplex Holdings Pre-IPO - Steady topline growth but appears to be at peak margins</a> and  <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/simplex-holdings-pre-ipo-peer-comp-valuation-lagging-in-size-but-leading-in-growth-and-margins" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Simplex Holdings Pre-IPO - Peer Comp, Valuation - Lagging in Size but Leading in Growth and Margins</a>.</p></div><div><p>In this note we will undertake a peer comparison and talk about valuations.</p></div>


Simplex Holdings’ shareholders aim to raise up to US$304m via selling some of their stake in the company. Simplex has consistently been ranked among the top companies in IDC Fintech rankings over the past nine years.
Simplex provides consulting, system development, maintenance and operations to banks, asset managers and insurance companies in Asia. Simplex was established in Sep 97. It was listed on JASDAQ in Feb 2002 and progressed to the First Section in Sep 2005. The company undertook an MBO, in Apr 2013 and was delisted in Oct 2013. Since delisting, Simplex has expanded its product offering further to cover life insurance and non-life insurance companies as well, along with crypto exchanges.
We have looked at the company’s past performance in our earlier notes, Simplex Holdings Pre-IPO - Steady topline growth but appears to be at peak margins and  Simplex Holdings Pre-IPO - Peer Comp, Valuation - Lagging in Size but Leading in Growth and Margins.In this note we will undertake a peer comparison and talk about valuations.

Simplex Holdings IPO - Valuation Looks Ok, past Performance Will Weigh on Sentiment

<p>Simplex Holding’s shareholders aim to raise around US$300m via selling some of their stake in the company. Simplex has consistently been ranked among the top companies in IDC Fintech rankings over the past nine years.</p><p>Simplex provides consulting, system development, maintenance and operations to banks, asset managers and insurance companies in Asia. Simplex was established in Sep 97. It was listed on JASDAQ in Feb 2002 and progressed to the First Section in Sep 2005. The company undertook an MBO, in Apr 2013 and was delisted in Oct 2013.</p><p>Since delisting, Simplex has expanded its product offering further to cover life insurance and non-life insurance companies as well, along with crypto exchanges. It has been reporting steady revenue growth over the past few years, although its margins have been volatile. Its performance prior to delisting wasn’t great, as it missed its medium term targets, and it now appears to be at peak margins.</p><p>We have looked at the company’s past performance in our earlier note, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/simplex-holdings-pre-ipo-steady-topline-growth-but-appears-to-be-at-peak-margins" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Simplex Holdings Pre-IPO - Steady topline growth but appears to be at peak margins</a>.</p><p>In this note we will undertake a peer comparison and talk about valuations.</p>

Simplex Holding’s shareholders aim to raise around US$300m via selling some of their stake in the company. Simplex has consistently been ranked among the top companies in IDC Fintech rankings over the past nine years.Simplex provides consulting, system development, maintenance and operations to banks, asset managers and insurance companies in Asia. Simplex was established in Sep 97. It was listed on JASDAQ in Feb 2002 and progressed to the First Section in Sep 2005. The company undertook an MBO, in Apr 2013 and was delisted in Oct 2013.Since delisting, Simplex has expanded its product offering further to cover life insurance and non-life insurance companies as well, along with crypto exchanges. It has been reporting steady revenue growth over the past few years, although its margins have been volatile. Its performance prior to delisting wasn’t great, as it missed its medium term targets, and it now appears to be at peak margins.We have looked at the company’s past performance in our earlier note, Simplex Holdings Pre-IPO - Steady topline growth but appears to be at peak margins.In this note we will undertake a peer comparison and talk about valuations.

Simplex Holdings Pre-IPO - Peer Comp, Valuation - Lagging in Size but Leading in Growth and Margins

'Quantamental' Japan Specialist, LightStream Research

Campbell Gunn

'Quantamental' Japan Specialist

ja research

ja research is an independent research platform focused exclusively on Japanese equities. Leveraging data and graphic analysis provided by Japan Analytics, we provide insights on small and medium-sized companies that have been ignored by the sell-side as well as challenging conventional wisdom on larger companies. We also offer analyst and corporate access, the latter with translation if required. 

Quantitative Analysis

<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>• MARKET COMPOSITE - AGGREGATE RESULTS •</strong></p><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/095/865/original/2019-08-16_06-45-04.png?1565905530" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="95865"></figure><div class="content-caption">Source: Japan Analytics</div><p><strong>THIRD DOWN QUARTER</strong> - This Insight will review the aggregate results for the 3774 listed Japanese companies for the quarter just ended and updated our Results &amp; Revision Scores for the Market Composite and each of our 30 Sectors. Operating Income has declined by 1.8% since the end of May and is now 5.1% below the peak of December 21st last year. The decline in Net Income has been more significant - 15.7% from the peak and 3.5% since May.  Japan's aggregate trailing-twelve-month (TTM) Net Income will end this year at a lower level than two years ago. </p><p><strong>FORECASTS STILL OPTIMISTIC</strong> -  The 'gap' between current and forecast results is now the widest in two years; however, the 'roles' are reversed. Aggregate forecasts have declined by 1.4% for Operating Income and 1.6% for Net Income and the forecast 'improvements' by year-end are 3% and 6%, respectively, which we consider optimistic. </p><p><strong>UPSIDE LIMITED</strong> - The decline in the market in recent weeks has taken the forward multiple to the second-lowest level this year at 13.7 times. Alternatively, the market is implying a further 17% decline in Net Income, assuming a 'normal' market multiple of 16.7 times. We are more inclined to the latter possibility.</p><div class="content-caption">
<figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/095/770/original/2019-08-15_12-05-51.png?1565838392" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="95770"></figure><p>Source: Japan Analytics </p>
</div><p><strong>MARGIN ROLLOVER</strong> - Revenues are still increasing by 3.8% a year; however, the rolling quarterly rate of increase is slowing to just 0.4% in the quarter just ended while the forecast-implied growth rate for the next nine months is 2%.  Operating margins peaked at 7.78% one year ago and have since declined by 61 basis points since then.  TTM Net Margins are now 4.83% and have declined by 102 basis points in the last three quarters.</p><div class="content-caption">
<figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/095/772/original/2019-08-15_12-26-32.png?1565839621" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="95772"></figure><p>Source: Japan Analytics </p>
</div><p><strong>SECTOR MARGINS - TOP</strong> - <strong>Bank</strong> Sector margins continue to slide, but have yet to lose their leading position to <strong>Telecoms</strong> despite the latter's margins being unchanged over three months. <strong>Internet</strong> and b both saw large margins contractions as did <strong>Chemicals</strong> which may slip out of this group next quarter. The most robust performance came from our long-time preferred Sector, <strong>Infomation Technology</strong>.</p><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/095/773/original/2019-08-15_12-44-16.png?1565840676" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="95773"></figure><div class="content-caption">Source: Japan Analytics </div><p><strong>SECTOR MARGINS - MID</strong> - The <strong>Market Composite</strong> OPM has declined by 27 basis points in the last three months to 7.2%, and only nine of 29 Sectors have higher margins. Of the mid-ranked Sectors by margins, only <strong>Multi-Industry</strong> and <strong>Consumer Services</strong> saw margin increases of more than ten basis points. The worst-performing in this group were <strong>Food, Beverage &amp; Tobacco</strong> and <strong>Technology Hardwar</strong>e. Over a longer-term period, there has been a notable decline in <strong>Construction</strong> and<strong> Non-Bank Finance</strong> Sector margins. </p><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/095/774/original/2019-08-15_12-52-37.png?1565841201" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="95774"></figure><div class="content-caption">Source: Japan Analytics</div><p><strong>SECTOR MARGINS - BOTTOM </strong>- Only <strong>Utilities</strong> of the bottom-nine OPM Sectors saw a margin improvement in the last three months, while<strong> Building Materials</strong>, <strong>Autos</strong>,<strong> Metals</strong>, <strong>Energy</strong>, and <strong>Other Materials</strong> all had double-digit declines. <strong>Retail</strong> margins are the most stable amongst this group,</p><p><strong>OUTLOOK</strong> - Aggregate results are a lagging indicator for the market, having peaked one year after the market peak of January 2018 - which is why we prefer to rely more on our scoring methodology (see below). Accordingly, we expect the trend in profits and margins to continue to be negative for the rest of the fiscal year and look for revenues to join the trend next quarter.  A breach of the December market low would be required to keep the market multiple below 'normal' levels, and we would advise patience for all but the most committed investors in Japanese equities.  </p><hr><p style="text-align: center;"><strong>• RESULTS &amp; REVISION SCORE •</strong></p><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/095/869/original/2019-08-16_06-50-04.png?1565905842" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="95869"></figure><div class="content-caption">Source: Japan Analytics</div><p><strong>RESULT &amp; REVISION SCORE </strong>- After peaking in November 2017, our Results &amp; Revision Score has declined for six of the last seven quarters, the exception being the previous quarter which was 'supported' by the optimistic full-year forecasts made in May, As shown below, the Annual forecasts were at 'odds' with the more pessimistic forecasts for the half-year - half-way through the half-year, the latter are proving to be more reliable. Ove the last two years, the correlation between the Results &amp; Revision Score and Total Market Cap ex REITs has been 0.78.</p><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/095/838/original/2019-08-15_18-08-12.png?1565860115" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="95838"></figure><div class="content-caption">Source: Japan Analytics</div><p><strong>28-MONTH LOW</strong> - The Results &amp; Revision Score has three components, Results, Annual Forecasts &amp; Revisions and Interim Forecasts &amp; Revisions, and the last two can be combined to derive a Forecast &amp; Revision Score. The Forecast &amp; Revision Score is a good leading indicator for the Results Score with a lead-time of four to six months. Although still positive, the Results Score is at a new twenty-eight low of 1.25. The Score has only been negative for ten months since May 2010 reaching a nine-year low in December 2016. If current global macro indicators are correct, the Results Score should be heading into negative territory by the third-quarter results which will be released in February next year.</p><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/095/839/original/2019-08-15_18-23-10.png?1565861002" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="95839"></figure><div class="content-caption">Source: Japan Analytics</div><p><strong>INTERIM v FULL-YEAR FORECASTS</strong> - The Forecast &amp; Revision Score is a weighted combination of two forecast series based on the official company forecasts released and updated by most Japanese companies throughout the year. The Annual forecasts tend to receive more senior management attention than the Interim, which are often delegated to the CFO. As a result, the latter series is more volatile, leading on the downside from peaks and lagging on the upside from toughs. The current Interim Score is the second-lowest in nine years, after April 2016 and has offset the optimism implied in the uptick in the Annual Score this May. <strong>If the precedents of 2011 and 2016 are to be followed, the Results Score should bottom out eight months from now, in April 2020.</strong></p><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/095/870/original/2019-08-16_06-58-00.png?1565906307" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="95870"></figure><div class="content-caption">Source: Japan Analytics</div><p><strong>CURRENCY IN THE DRIVING SEAT</strong> - The importance of the currency as a key driver in the earnings cycle in Japan is well illustrated above where the peaks and troughs of the year-on-year change in the US$/Yen exchange rate lagged by six months align well with the changes the Results &amp; Revision Score (RRS), where the correlation is 0.79 since the beginning of 2014. The recent strengthening of the Yen suggests a new low for the RRS in the first half of 2020.</p><p>In the <strong>DETAIL</strong> section below, we shall examine the detailed trends in earnings results and forecasts for the 29 Sectors that make up our Market Composite as well as the Sector Results &amp; Revisions Scores.</p>

• MARKET COMPOSITE - AGGREGATE RESULTS •Source: Japan AnalyticsTHIRD DOWN QUARTER - This Insight will review the aggregate results for the 3774 listed Japanese companies for the quarter just ended and updated our Results &amp; Revision Scores for the Market Composite and each of our 30 Sectors. Operating Income has declined by 1.8% since the end of May and is now 5.1% below the peak of December 21st last year. The decline in Net Income has been more significant - 15.7% from the peak and 3.5% since May.  Japan's aggregate trailing-twelve-month (TTM) Net Income will end this year at a lower level than two years ago. FORECASTS STILL OPTIMISTIC -  The 'gap' between current and forecast results is now the widest in two years; however, the 'roles' are reversed. Aggregate forecasts have declined by 1.4% for Operating Income and 1.6% for Net Income and the forecast 'improvements' by year-end are 3% and 6%, respectively, which we consider optimistic. UPSIDE LIMITED - The decline in the market in recent weeks has taken the forward multiple to the second-lowest level this year at 13.7 times. Alternatively, the market is implying a further 17% decline in Net Income, assuming a 'normal' market multiple of 16.7 times. We are more inclined to the latter possibility.
Source: Japan Analytics 
MARGIN ROLLOVER - Revenues are still increasing by 3.8% a year; however, the rolling quarterly rate of increase is slowing to just 0.4% in the quarter just ended while the forecast-implied growth rate for the next nine months is 2%.  Operating margins peaked at 7.78% one year ago and have since declined by 61 basis points since then.  TTM Net Margins are now 4.83% and have declined by 102 basis points in the last three quarters.
Source: Japan Analytics 
SECTOR MARGINS - TOP - Bank Sector margins continue to slide, but have yet to lose their leading position to Telecoms despite the latter's margins being unchanged over three months. Internet and b both saw large margins contractions as did Chemicals which may slip out of this group next quarter. The most robust performance came from our long-time preferred Sector, Infomation Technology.Source: Japan Analytics SECTOR MARGINS - MID - The Market Composite OPM has declined by 27 basis points in the last three months to 7.2%, and only nine of 29 Sectors have higher margins. Of the mid-ranked Sectors by margins, only Multi-Industry and Consumer Services saw margin increases of more than ten basis points. The worst-performing in this group were Food, Beverage &amp; Tobacco and Technology Hardware. Over a longer-term period, there has been a notable decline in Construction and Non-Bank Finance Sector margins. Source: Japan AnalyticsSECTOR MARGINS - BOTTOM - Only Utilities of the bottom-nine OPM Sectors saw a margin improvement in the last three months, while Building Materials, Autos, Metals, Energy, and Other Materials all had double-digit declines. Retail margins are the most stable amongst this group,OUTLOOK - Aggregate results are a lagging indicator for the market, having peaked one year after the market peak of January 2018 - which is why we prefer to rely more on our scoring methodology (see below). Accordingly, we expect the trend in profits and margins to continue to be negative for the rest of the fiscal year and look for revenues to join the trend next quarter.  A breach of the December market low would be required to keep the market multiple below 'normal' levels, and we would advise patience for all but the most committed investors in Japanese equities.  • RESULTS &amp; REVISION SCORE •Source: Japan AnalyticsRESULT &amp; REVISION SCORE - After peaking in November 2017, our Results &amp; Revision Score has declined for six of the last seven quarters, the exception being the previous quarter which was 'supported' by the optimistic full-year forecasts made in May, As shown below, the Annual forecasts were at 'odds' with the more pessimistic forecasts for the half-year - half-way through the half-year, the latter are proving to be more reliable. Ove the last two years, the correlation between the Results &amp; Revision Score and Total Market Cap ex REITs has been 0.78.Source: Japan Analytics28-MONTH LOW - The Results &amp; Revision Score has three components, Results, Annual Forecasts &amp; Revisions and Interim Forecasts &amp; Revisions, and the last two can be combined to derive a Forecast &amp; Revision Score. The Forecast &amp; Revision Score is a good leading indicator for the Results Score with a lead-time of four to six months. Although still positive, the Results Score is at a new twenty-eight low of 1.25. The Score has only been negative for ten months since May 2010 reaching a nine-year low in December 2016. If current global macro indicators are correct, the Results Score should be heading into negative territory by the third-quarter results which will be released in February next year.Source: Japan AnalyticsINTERIM v FULL-YEAR FORECASTS - The Forecast &amp; Revision Score is a weighted combination of two forecast series based on the official company forecasts released and updated by most Japanese companies throughout the year. The Annual forecasts tend to receive more senior management attention than the Interim, which are often delegated to the CFO. As a result, the latter series is more volatile, leading on the downside from peaks and lagging on the upside from toughs. The current Interim Score is the second-lowest in nine years, after April 2016 and has offset the optimism implied in the uptick in the Annual Score this May. If the precedents of 2011 and 2016 are to be followed, the Results Score should bottom out eight months from now, in April 2020.Source: Japan AnalyticsCURRENCY IN THE DRIVING SEAT - The importance of the currency as a key driver in the earnings cycle in Japan is well illustrated above where the peaks and troughs of the year-on-year change in the US$/Yen exchange rate lagged by six months align well with the changes the Results &amp; Revision Score (RRS), where the correlation is 0.79 since the beginning of 2014. The recent strengthening of the Yen suggests a new low for the RRS in the first half of 2020.In the DETAIL section below, we shall examine the detailed trends in earnings results and forecasts for the 29 Sectors that make up our Market Composite as well as the Sector Results &amp; Revisions Scores.

🇯🇵 JAPAN • Summer Results & Revisions - Market Composite & Sectors - Third Down

<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>• RELATIVE PRICE SCORE</strong> • </p><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/090/226/original/2019-06-13_16-47-07.png?1560412038" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="90226"></figure><div class="content-caption">Source: Japan Analytics</div><p><strong>INTRODUCTION </strong>- The Relative Price Score (RPS) is a measure of stock price performance relative to TOPIX calculated by comparing the current deviation with the mean absolute deviation of monthly and daily relative share prices. As all companies are thus on a comparable scale, 'Overbought' and 'Oversold' outliers and changes in scoring can reveal short-term and longer-term trading opportunities. Company outlier thresholds are set at<strong> +4</strong> &amp; <strong>-2</strong> and equate to the top and bottom first-to-second percentiles of historical observations from which mean reversion takes a matter of months. RPS outliers with a Score of greater than 10.0 are rare outside of the 2000 tech 'bubble'. <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/goldwin-inc" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:410:1">Goldwin (8111 JP)</a> has the distinction of being one of only two large-cap RPS 'ten-baggers' since that time.</p><p><strong>This insight updates our list of Overbought and Oversold companies, reviews the best and worst performing companies in terms of RPS over the last three months and adds some specific comments on stocks on each category.</strong></p><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/090/196/original/2019-06-13_11-15-27.png?1560392157" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="90196"></figure><div class="content-caption">Source: Japan Analytics</div><p><strong>STATISTICS</strong> - Currently, of the 3,832 listed companies for which daily RPS data is available, 94 companies are 'Overbought', and 131 are 'Oversold' - 2.5% and 3.4%, respectively of the total. For the 758 companies with a market capitalisation of over ¥100b, there are 50 'Overbought' and 18 'Oversold' companies, 6.6% and 5.0%, respectively. As noted the companion Insight, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/japan-june-relative-price-scores-market-sectors-peer-groups-more-of-the-same" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:30323">🇯🇵 Japan • June Relative Price Scores: Market, Sectors &amp; Peer Groups - More of The Same</a>, these numbers and percentages are unusual and were last seen in the Japanese market in 2000. </p><hr><p style="text-align: center;"><strong>• RELATIVE PRICE SCORE TOPS •</strong></p><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/090/202/original/2019-06-13_13-06-49.png?1560398835" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="90202"></figure><div class="content-caption">Source: Japan Analytics</div><p><strong>RPS 'TOPS'</strong> - In the last two years, 444 companies have achieved an RPS of '4' or more and the average Overbought 'persistence' is 43 days. 1.4% of the total of 1.29 million traded stock days were by companies with an RPS of over 4. For companies with a market capitalisation higher than ¥100b, the numbers are 96 companies and 75 days - demonstrating the superior persistence of large capitalisation companies in this regard. Some examples of RPS mean reversion in the last three months have been <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/descente-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:8225:1">Descente (8114 JP)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/alfresa-holdings-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:10610:1">Alfresa (2784 JP)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/320" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:320:1">FamilyMart Uny (8028 JP)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/kikkoman-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:11720:1">Kikkoman (2801 JP)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/kobayashi-pharmaceutical-co" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:14930:1">Kobayashi Pharmaceutical (4967 JP)</a>, and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/eiken-chemical-co-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:12675:1">Eiken Chemical (4549 JP)</a>.  </p><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/090/201/original/2019-06-13_13-04-38.png?1560398780" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="90201"></figure><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/090/203/original/2019-06-13_13-08-46.png?1560398945" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="90203"></figure><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/090/204/original/2019-06-13_13-09-37.png?1560399049" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="90204"></figure><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/090/205/original/2019-06-13_13-12-01.png?1560399142" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="90205"></figure><div class="content-caption">
<figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/090/316/original/2019-06-15_19-45-47.png?1560595558" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="90316"></figure><p>Source: Japan Analytics</p>
</div><p><strong>RPS 'BOTTOMS'</strong> - 372 companies have seen their RPS fall to '-2' or below in the last two years, and the average Oversold 'persistence' is 61 days. 1.5% of the total of 1.29 million traded stock days were by companies with an RPS of less than -2.  For larger capitalisation companies, the numbers are 85 companies and 89 days. A recent example of positive RPS mean reversion is <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/k-o-energy-group-inc" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:17701:1">K&amp;O Energy (1663 JP)</a>.</p><div class="content-caption">
<figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/090/207/original/2019-06-13_13-14-03.png?1560399270" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="90207"></figure><p>Source: Japan Analytics</p>
</div><div class="content-highlight"><p>In the <strong>DETAIL </strong>section below, we list the current very overbought (RPS&gt;5), too late to buy (RPS &gt;4&lt;5) and oversold (RPS &lt;-2) stocks as well as the most substantial three-month positive and negative changes in RPS.</p></div>

• RELATIVE PRICE SCORE • Source: Japan AnalyticsINTRODUCTION - The Relative Price Score (RPS) is a measure of stock price performance relative to TOPIX calculated by comparing the current deviation with the mean absolute deviation of monthly and daily relative share prices. As all companies are thus on a comparable scale, 'Overbought' and 'Oversold' outliers and changes in scoring can reveal short-term and longer-term trading opportunities. Company outlier thresholds are set at +4 &amp; -2 and equate to the top and bottom first-to-second percentiles of historical observations from which mean reversion takes a matter of months. RPS outliers with a Score of greater than 10.0 are rare outside of the 2000 tech 'bubble'. Goldwin (8111 JP) has the distinction of being one of only two large-cap RPS 'ten-baggers' since that time.This insight updates our list of Overbought and Oversold companies, reviews the best and worst performing companies in terms of RPS over the last three months and adds some specific comments on stocks on each category.Source: Japan AnalyticsSTATISTICS - Currently, of the 3,832 listed companies for which daily RPS data is available, 94 companies are 'Overbought', and 131 are 'Oversold' - 2.5% and 3.4%, respectively of the total. For the 758 companies with a market capitalisation of over ¥100b, there are 50 'Overbought' and 18 'Oversold' companies, 6.6% and 5.0%, respectively. As noted the companion Insight, 🇯🇵 Japan • June Relative Price Scores: Market, Sectors &amp; Peer Groups - More of The Same, these numbers and percentages are unusual and were last seen in the Japanese market in 2000. • RELATIVE PRICE SCORE TOPS •Source: Japan AnalyticsRPS 'TOPS' - In the last two years, 444 companies have achieved an RPS of '4' or more and the average Overbought 'persistence' is 43 days. 1.4% of the total of 1.29 million traded stock days were by companies with an RPS of over 4. For companies with a market capitalisation higher than ¥100b, the numbers are 96 companies and 75 days - demonstrating the superior persistence of large capitalisation companies in this regard. Some examples of RPS mean reversion in the last three months have been Descente (8114 JP), Alfresa (2784 JP), FamilyMart Uny (8028 JP), Kikkoman (2801 JP), Kobayashi Pharmaceutical (4967 JP), and Eiken Chemical (4549 JP).  
Source: Japan Analytics
RPS 'BOTTOMS' - 372 companies have seen their RPS fall to '-2' or below in the last two years, and the average Oversold 'persistence' is 61 days. 1.5% of the total of 1.29 million traded stock days were by companies with an RPS of less than -2.  For larger capitalisation companies, the numbers are 85 companies and 89 days. A recent example of positive RPS mean reversion is K&amp;O Energy (1663 JP).
Source: Japan Analytics
In the DETAIL section below, we list the current very overbought (RPS&gt;5), too late to buy (RPS &gt;4&lt;5) and oversold (RPS &lt;-2) stocks as well as the most substantial three-month positive and negative changes in RPS.

🇯🇵 Japan • Relative Price Scores - Overbought & Oversold Companies - June 2019

Senior Bank Analyst - Japanese Banks, Windamee Research

J. Brian Waterhouse

Senior Bank Analyst - Japanese Banks

Windamee Research

Japanese Banks

Equity Bottom-Up

Fukuoka Financial Group / Equity Bottom-Up

<p>The formal decision by Japan's Fair Trade Commission (FTC) not to approve the merger of <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/11060" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:11060:1">Eighteenth Bank Ltd/The (8396 JP)</a> with <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/3712" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:3712:1">Fukuoka Financial Group Inc (8354 JP)</a> member Shinwa Bank, unless both banks shed substantial chunks of their loan portfolios in Nagasaki Prefecture, is no surprise, but creates a dilemma for all concerned.  It also potentially improves the chances of other rival banking groups approaching Eighteenth Bank to join them, rather than FFG.  Whatever the case, it looks like…</p>

The formal decision by Japan's Fair Trade Commission (FTC) not to approve the merger of Eighteenth Bank Ltd/The (8396 JP) with Fukuoka Financial Group Inc (8354 JP) member Shinwa Bank, unless both banks shed substantial chunks of their loan portfolios in Nagasaki Prefecture, is no surprise, but creates a dilemma for all concerned.  It also potentially improves the chances of other rival banking groups approaching Eighteenth Bank to join them, rather than FFG.  Whatever the case, it looks like…

FTC Decision Redraws the Battle Lines in Kyushu

Japan

BIPROGY Inc. offers technology services. The Company provides cloud computing and outsourcing, computer and network system sales, software development and sales, system related services, and other services. BIPROGY provides its services throughout Japan.

Price Gauge
52-week Range	0.00 - 0.00
Market Cap (USDm)	0.00
P/E	0.00
Dividend (Yield)	0.00

BIPROGY (8056 JP)

Simplex Holdings IPO - Valuation Looks Ok, past Performance Will Weigh on Sentiment

Simplex Holdings’ shareholders aim to raise up to US$304m via selling some of their stake in the company. Simplex has consistently been ranked...

Sumeet Singh

Simplex Holdings Pre-IPO - Peer Comp, Valuation - Lagging in Size but Leading in Growth and Margins

Simplex Holding’s shareholders aim to raise around US$300m via selling some of their stake in the company. Simplex has consistently been ranked...

Sumeet Singh

🇯🇵 JAPAN • Summer Results & Revisions - Market Composite & Sectors - Third Down

• MARKET COMPOSITE - AGGREGATE RESULTS •THIRD DOWN QUARTER - This Insight will review the aggregate results for the 3774 listed Japanese companies...

Campbell Gunn

🇯🇵 Japan • Relative Price Scores - Overbought & Oversold Companies - June 2019

• RELATIVE PRICE SCORE • INTRODUCTION - The Relative Price Score (RPS) is a measure of stock price performance relative to TOPIX calculated by...

Campbell Gunn

FTC Decision Redraws the Battle Lines in Kyushu

The formal decision by Japan's Fair Trade Commission (FTC) not to approve the merger of Eighteenth Bank Ltd/The (8396 JP) with Fukuoka Financial...

J. Brian Waterhouse

Price Gauge

52-week Range

Market Cap (USDm)

P/E

Dividend (Yield)