Silver Point

Thomas J. Monaco

Silver Point is a boutique research firm that focuses on the broader financial services sector, with a particular focus on troubled institutions globally. 

Asia Ex Japan

Equity Bottom-Up

China Construction Bank H / Equity Bottom-Up

*Hefty Expense Load In 4Q20: China Construction Bank (939.HK) [CCB] reported 4Q20 results of CNY 65.2 bn, declining CNY 3.0 bn or 4.4% linked quarter. On an operating basis, core earnings declined CNY 4.8 bn (7.5%) linked quarter to CNY 59.1 bn. Results weakness can be attributed to a massive increase in operating expenses and higher taxes; and *Credit Risk Rising: CCB’s While the stated NPL increase in not alarming on its face, the level of net new NPLs – inclusive of NCOs of CNY 27.3 bn – amounted to CNY 32.5 bn or increasing 50.9% on an annualized basis. We also believe that there will be an impact from WMPs. CCB's Non-standard credit asset faced some impact in LGFV and infrastructure. However, when one considers the continued high level break-down in credit quality, reserves would appear to be incredibly light – in the neighborhood of CNY 300 bn which amounts to nearly a year of pre-tax results at CCB.

*Hefty Expense Load In 4Q20: China Construction Bank (939.HK) [CCB] reported 4Q20 results of CNY 65.2 bn, declining CNY 3.0 bn or 4.4% linked quarter. On an operating basis, core earnings declined CNY 4.8 bn (7.5%) linked quarter to CNY 59.1 bn. Results weakness can be attributed to a massive increase in operating expenses and higher taxes; and *Credit Risk Rising: CCB’s While the stated NPL increase in not alarming on its face, the level of net new NPLs – inclusive of NCOs of CNY 27.3 bn – amounted to CNY 32.5 bn or increasing 50.9% on an annualized basis. We also believe that there will be an impact from WMPs. CCB's Non-standard credit asset faced some impact in LGFV and infrastructure. However, when one considers the continued high level break-down in credit quality, reserves would appear to be incredibly light – in the neighborhood of CNY 300 bn which amounts to nearly a year of pre-tax results at CCB.      

China Construction Bank – Still Chunky NPL Increases

Postal Savings Bank of China C / Equity Bottom-Up

*Excess Provisioning Eats Away At 4Q20 Results: Established in 2007, Postal Savings Bank of China (1658.HK) [PSB] is mainland China’s youngest large commercial bank. PSB reported 4Q20 results of CNY 11.4 bn – decreasing CNY 7.8 bn (40.8%) linked quarter. PSB’s struggles were twofold: loss provisions were too high; and an operating expenses accelerated; and * Credit Quality Risk Peaking: HOH, stated NPLs nominally increased CNY 605 mn or 1.2% to CNY 50.4 bn and amount to 88 bp to total loans – flat linked quarter. The growth in level of net new NPLs was CNY 9.3 bn or decelerating to 18.4% on an annualized basis. PSB’s loss provision increased CNY 2.9 bn (41.1%) linked quarter, almost seeming pointless given the reserve cover of 4.01x (4.03x at 3Q20) and the annualized NCO rate of 61 bp.

*Excess Provisioning Eats Away At 4Q20 Results: Established in 2007, Postal Savings Bank of China (1658.HK) [PSB] is mainland China’s youngest large commercial bank. PSB reported 4Q20 results of CNY 11.4 bn – decreasing CNY 7.8 bn (40.8%) linked quarter. PSB’s struggles were twofold: loss provisions were too high; and an operating expenses accelerated; and * Credit Quality Risk Peaking: HOH, stated NPLs nominally increased CNY 605 mn or 1.2% to CNY 50.4 bn and amount to 88 bp to total loans – flat linked quarter. The growth in level of net new NPLs was CNY 9.3 bn or decelerating to 18.4% on an annualized basis. PSB’s loss provision increased CNY 2.9 bn (41.1%) linked quarter, almost seeming pointless given the reserve cover of 4.01x (4.03x at 3Q20) and the annualized NCO rate of 61 bp.

Postal Savings Bank of China – Excess Provisioning

*Don’t Be Misled By Better Numbers: Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (1398.HK) [ICBC] reported 4Q20 results of CNY 87.2 bn, increasing CNY 7.3 bn or 9.2% linked quarter. The linked quarter improvement, in our view, can solely be attributed to an unjustified and massive linked quarter reduction in loss provisions of CNY 31.3 bn (57.7%).  In addition, 4Q20 results can be highlighted by ICBC’s negative operating jaws; and *Credit Risk Rising: As ICBC is the benchmark name to which all mainland Chinese banks are measured, an increase of such magnitude is more than alarming – and intimates mainland Chinese bank credit risk is moving in oppositive directions to their counterparts in India. When one considers the current break in credit quality reserves would appear to be incredibly light – in the neighborhood of CNY 410 bn which amounts to over a year of pre-tax results at ICBC.

*Don’t Be Misled By Better Numbers: Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (1398.HK) [ICBC] reported 4Q20 results of CNY 87.2 bn, increasing CNY 7.3 bn or 9.2% linked quarter. The linked quarter improvement, in our view, can solely be attributed to an unjustified and massive linked quarter reduction in loss provisions of CNY 31.3 bn (57.7%).  In addition, 4Q20 results can be highlighted by ICBC’s negative operating jaws; and *Credit Risk Rising: As ICBC is the benchmark name to which all mainland Chinese banks are measured, an increase of such magnitude is more than alarming – and intimates mainland Chinese bank credit risk is moving in oppositive directions to their counterparts in India. When one considers the current break in credit quality reserves would appear to be incredibly light – in the neighborhood of CNY 410 bn which amounts to over a year of pre-tax results at ICBC.   

Industrial and Commercial Bank of China – Troubling Result

Financials Credit Analyst

Hank Calenti, CFA

CreditContinuum

Credit

Slower near-term growth may be risk asset positive. A slower growth trajectory may engender reduced inflation expectations which could translate into lower Treasury yields and a lower dollar value. This could produce a longer, more sustainable, recovery rather than the current soufflé economy track. That would be Emerging Market positive. Germany announced, then retracted, plans to institute a tougher lock-down over the Easter weekend. This raised fears that a third wave of Coronavirus cases could impact demand globally. This may have contributed to a flight to safety and increased bearish pressure across risk assets as investors re-assessed near term GDP expectations.Risk assets have been discounting an inflationary surge in growth ahead. However, as US Covid-19 cases rise and European vaccination programs lag, prospects for US Q1 and Q2 GDP are deteriorating by the day. Ironically, various supply-chain disruptions, which could negatively impact production in coming month, may slow growth more than it boosts inflation. This could also be Emerging Market positive.US Treasuries continued their sawtooth upwards pattern of declining then rising. Transitory and more permanent factors impacted US Treasury and risk-asset returns this week. Notably, real rates remained steady.Transitory effects included supply plus month-end and quarter-end rebalancing which put pressure on yields. More permanent factors likely included less draconian SLR exemption interpretations and possibly the economic demand impact of vaccine distribution difficulties as Covid-19 infections rise. Amongst Asia EM banks, India bank equity continued its underperformance while Thai banks remained relatively unchanged following notable banking-related announcements in each country.The decline in India’s bank shares exceeded others in Asia. The interest-on-interest accrual decision, and the valuation of Additional Tier 1 bond guidance by the Supreme Court and the Securities &amp; Exchange Board of India (SEBI), respectively, are particularly onerous and damaging to bank valuations.In Asia, short duration bank bonds outperformed although most bank notes generated total positive returns on Treasury price strength.  Liquidity in Turkish bank bonds dried-up as the fall-out from the unexpected firing of the Central Bank Governor last week.Market Outlook: The question for next week is how much portfolio re-balancing out of stocks and into bonds has already occurred. This normally would take place during the last week of the quarter. However, with month-end just before Easter market holidays, trading conditions may be relatively thin next week. As such, portfolio adjustments may have been pulled forward. From a risk asset perspective, it may be wise to jump back into the market before the quarter-end to get ahead of the pack. From 1 April, with the start of Japan’s fiscal year, Japanese investors are typically net buyers of risk assets over the following months. This adds to a seasonality affect that usually pushes risk assets higher while safe-haven securities retreat.

Slower near-term growth may be risk asset positive. A slower growth trajectory may engender reduced inflation expectations which could translate into lower Treasury yields and a lower dollar value. This could produce a longer, more sustainable, recovery rather than the current soufflé economy track. That would be Emerging Market positive. Germany announced, then retracted, plans to institute a tougher lock-down over the Easter weekend. This raised fears that a third wave of Coronavirus cases could impact demand globally. This may have contributed to a flight to safety and increased bearish pressure across risk assets as investors re-assessed near term GDP expectations.Risk assets have been discounting an inflationary surge in growth ahead. However, as US Covid-19 cases rise and European vaccination programs lag, prospects for US Q1 and Q2 GDP are deteriorating by the day. Ironically, various supply-chain disruptions, which could negatively impact production in coming month, may slow growth more than it boosts inflation. This could also be Emerging Market positive.US Treasuries continued their sawtooth upwards pattern of declining then rising. Transitory and more permanent factors impacted US Treasury and risk-asset returns this week. Notably, real rates remained steady.Transitory effects included supply plus month-end and quarter-end rebalancing which put pressure on yields. More permanent factors likely included less draconian SLR exemption interpretations and possibly the economic demand impact of vaccine distribution difficulties as Covid-19 infections rise. Amongst Asia EM banks, India bank equity continued its underperformance while Thai banks remained relatively unchanged following notable banking-related announcements in each country.The decline in India’s bank shares exceeded others in Asia. The interest-on-interest accrual decision, and the valuation of Additional Tier 1 bond guidance by the Supreme Court and the Securities &amp; Exchange Board of India (SEBI), respectively, are particularly onerous and damaging to bank valuations.In Asia, short duration bank bonds outperformed although most bank notes generated total positive returns on Treasury price strength.  Liquidity in Turkish bank bonds dried-up as the fall-out from the unexpected firing of the Central Bank Governor last week.Market Outlook: The question for next week is how much portfolio re-balancing out of stocks and into bonds has already occurred. This normally would take place during the last week of the quarter. However, with month-end just before Easter market holidays, trading conditions may be relatively thin next week. As such, portfolio adjustments may have been pulled forward. From a risk asset perspective, it may be wise to jump back into the market before the quarter-end to get ahead of the pack. From 1 April, with the start of Japan’s fiscal year, Japanese investors are typically net buyers of risk assets over the following months. This adds to a seasonality affect that usually pushes risk assets higher while safe-haven securities retreat.

Bank Credit Weekly: Growth Concerns May Be Total Return Positive

Pan-Asia Index Rebalances/ Events/ Delta One, Periscope Analytics

Brian Freitas

Pan-Asia Index Rebalances/ Events/ Delta One

Index Rebalance

Hang Seng China Enterprises Index / Index Rebalance

The announcement of 2020 full year results is bringing some certainty to the HSCEI 2021 dividend index points. With <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/bank-of-communications-co-h" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:659:1" rel="noopener">Bank Of Communications Co H (3328 HK)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/ind-comm-bk-of-china-h" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:1119:1" rel="noopener">ICBC (H) (1398 HK)</a> and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/china-construction-bank-h" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:45:1" rel="noopener">China Construction Bank H (939 HK)</a> announcing results (and dividends) today, and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/postal-savings-bank-of-china" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:22848:1" rel="noopener">Postal Savings Bank of China (1658 HK)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/agricultural-bank-of-china-limited" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:1120:1" rel="noopener">Agricultural Bank Of China (1288 HK)</a> and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/bank-of-china-ltd-h" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:656:1" rel="noopener">Bank Of China Ltd (H) (3988 HK)</a> announcing on Monday and Tuesday next week, over 85% of the 2021 dividend index points will be known by end of the month.With <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/baidu-inc-a55ca720-5968-48f0-8194-ac94390d065c" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:32212:1" rel="noopener">Baidu (9888 HK)</a> included in the <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/hang-seng-china-enterprises-index" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:22900:1" rel="noopener">Hang Seng China Enterprises Index (HSCEI INDEX)</a> at the close of trading on 8 April, potential changes to the index at the June review that will be implemented at the close on 4 June, and capping changes that will be implemented at 8% of the index weight for all stocks at the June review, the dividend ex-date for the stocks (and banks in particular) will play a big role in determining the fair value of the 2021 dividend futures.With the SEC pushing forward with the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act, US listed Chinese stocks could look to bring forward their plans to Secondary List on the <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/hong-kong-exchanges-clearing" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:490:1" rel="noopener">HKEX (388 HK)</a>. <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/bilibili-inc-83a27302-cd7d-4e6a-a1de-bcf93eb022c3" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:32215:1" rel="noopener">Bilibili Inc (9626 HK)</a> lists on Monday and media indicates that other Chinese companies are evaluating listing in Hong Kong. <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/jd-logistics" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:31500:1" rel="noopener">JD Logistics (JDL HK)</a> has already filed papers to list in Hong Kong. Then there are companies like <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/didi-chuxing-inc" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:27467:1" rel="noopener">DiDi Chuxing (1284375D CH)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/bytedance-technology" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:27936:1" rel="noopener">ByteDance (1460967D CH)</a> and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/ant-group-co-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:24240:1" rel="noopener">Ant Financial Services Group (6688 HK)</a> that could primary list in Hong Kong in the near future. While this will have minimal impact on the 2021 dividends, the impact on the 2022 and later dividend futures would be a lot higher.We see little downside from the current market on the HSCEI 2021 dividend futures, but believe that the HSCEI 2021/22 dividend steepener is trading too high. Potential changes to the index constituents should put downward pressure on the 2022 dividends with low dividend yield or zero dividend paying companies joining the index at high index weights, and high dividend paying companies being deleted from the index.

The announcement of 2020 full year results is bringing some certainty to the HSCEI 2021 dividend index points. With Bank Of Communications Co H (3328 HK), ICBC (H) (1398 HK) and China Construction Bank H (939 HK) announcing results (and dividends) today, and Postal Savings Bank of China (1658 HK), Agricultural Bank Of China (1288 HK) and Bank Of China Ltd (H) (3988 HK) announcing on Monday and Tuesday next week, over 85% of the 2021 dividend index points will be known by end of the month.With Baidu (9888 HK) included in the Hang Seng China Enterprises Index (HSCEI INDEX) at the close of trading on 8 April, potential changes to the index at the June review that will be implemented at the close on 4 June, and capping changes that will be implemented at 8% of the index weight for all stocks at the June review, the dividend ex-date for the stocks (and banks in particular) will play a big role in determining the fair value of the 2021 dividend futures.With the SEC pushing forward with the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act, US listed Chinese stocks could look to bring forward their plans to Secondary List on the HKEX (388 HK). Bilibili Inc (9626 HK) lists on Monday and media indicates that other Chinese companies are evaluating listing in Hong Kong. JD Logistics (JDL HK) has already filed papers to list in Hong Kong. Then there are companies like DiDi Chuxing (1284375D CH), ByteDance (1460967D CH) and Ant Financial Services Group (6688 HK) that could primary list in Hong Kong in the near future. While this will have minimal impact on the 2021 dividends, the impact on the 2022 and later dividend futures would be a lot higher.We see little downside from the current market on the HSCEI 2021 dividend futures, but believe that the HSCEI 2021/22 dividend steepener is trading too high. Potential changes to the index constituents should put downward pressure on the 2022 dividends with low dividend yield or zero dividend paying companies joining the index at high index weights, and high dividend paying companies being deleted from the index.

HSCEI Dividend Futures: June Index Review, Bank Divs, HFCAA - Sell the 2021/22 Steepener

China

China Construction Bank Corporation provides banking services. The Company offers deposits, loans, fund management, foreign exchange, and other services. China Construction Bank provides its services to individuals, enterprises, and other clients.

Price Gauge
52-week Range	0.00 - 0.00
Market Cap (USDm)	0.00
P/E	0.00
Dividend (Yield)	0.00

China Construction Bank (601939 CH)

China Construction Bank – Still Chunky NPL Increases

CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK: CCB reported a 4Q20 core earnings results decline 7.5% QOQ. Weakness can be attributed to a massive increase in costs and...

Thomas J. Monaco

Postal Savings Bank of China – Excess Provisioning

POSTAL SAVINGS BANK: PSB reported a 40.8% decline in QOQ results, as loss provisioning was too high relative to risk is peaking; and an operating...

Thomas J. Monaco

Industrial and Commercial Bank of China – Troubling Result

ICBC: ICBC reported a 9.2% QOQ increase in 4Q20 results, which is solely attributed to an unjustified and massive linked quarter reduction in loss...

Thomas J. Monaco

Bank Credit Weekly: Growth Concerns May Be Total Return Positive

A slower growth trajectory may reduce inflation expectations which could translate into lower yields and $ value. This could produce a longer...

Hank Calenti, CFA

HSCEI Dividend Futures: June Index Review, Bank Divs, HFCAA - Sell the 2021/22 Steepener

While the HSCEI 2021 dividend futures are trading near our estimated fair, the HSCEI 2021/22 div steepener is not. We recommend selling the...

Brian Freitas

Price Gauge

52-week Range

Market Cap (USDm)

P/E

Dividend (Yield)