Japan/Asia Long-Short, LightStream Research

Mio Kato

Japan/Asia Long-Short

Long-Short Analysis on Japan, Asia and the World

LightStream Research

LightStream conducts quantitatively rigorous and data-driven analysis with a focus on Japan and Asia.

We consistently cover the Tech, Consumer and Industrial sectors, and provide ECM and Events coverage more broadly.

We supplement traditional qualitative insights from company relationships with a robust quantitative foundation that examines as much historical data as is available.
We further refine the accuracy of our insights and calls through the use of alternative data to flesh out current trends, and through a valuation framework that emphasises non-superficial peer group selection and a proper attempt to understand the metrics and changes that have driven security valuations in the past.

Thematic (Sector/Industry)

<h3>What’s Original?</h3>
In this original, we have discussed some of the key aspects highlighted in Kishida’s policy statements along with the current status of these policies and companies that are likely to benefit.

What’s Original?
In this original, we have discussed some of the key aspects highlighted in Kishida’s policy statements along with the current status of these policies and companies that are likely to benefit.

Kishida as Prime Minister: The Path Ahead

Senior Technology Analyst, Japanese Equities, LightStream Research

Scott Foster

Senior Technology Analyst, Japanese Equities

Equity Bottom-Up

In this morning's news: "Merger talks between Western Digital and Kioxia stall" (Reuters, October 22, 2021, updated 9:07 a.m. JST). It is yet not clear how serious this might be.On October 19, the Nikkei reported that Toshiba affiliate Kioxia, Canon (7751) and Dai Nippon Printing (7912) are aiming to use nanoimprint lithography in Kioxia's NAND flash memory production in 2025.The potential savings in terms of equipment and operational costs could be great enough to give Kioxia a competitive advantage. It would also justify years of development and give Canon and Dai Nippon Printing important new products.But 2025 is a long time from now and technical hurdles remain. For the time being, more immediate issues are likely to move the stocks. LightStream's Mio Kato continues to see upside potential for Toshiba, but primarily as an exit opportunity (see <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/toshiba-possibility-of-a-kioxia-western-digital-deal" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:56685" rel="noopener">Toshiba – Possibility of a Kioxia-Western Digital Deal</a> )

In this morning's news: "Merger talks between Western Digital and Kioxia stall" (Reuters, October 22, 2021, updated 9:07 a.m. JST). It is yet not clear how serious this might be.On October 19, the Nikkei reported that Toshiba affiliate Kioxia, Canon (7751) and Dai Nippon Printing (7912) are aiming to use nanoimprint lithography in Kioxia's NAND flash memory production in 2025.The potential savings in terms of equipment and operational costs could be great enough to give Kioxia a competitive advantage. It would also justify years of development and give Canon and Dai Nippon Printing important new products.But 2025 is a long time from now and technical hurdles remain. For the time being, more immediate issues are likely to move the stocks. LightStream's Mio Kato continues to see upside potential for Toshiba, but primarily as an exit opportunity (see Toshiba – Possibility of a Kioxia-Western Digital Deal )

Toshiba (6502 JP): Nanoimprint Litho Could Add Value to Kioxia, but Not Soon

Event-Driven

<a href="https://www.ft.com/content/8c1c3cf0-951d-4032-9826-8c4576824db5?shareType=nongift" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The FT notes</a> that Elliot has now gotten involved in the Toshiba drama following its successful bid to get Softbank to return more cash to shareholders. While the news is very welcome we do not believe it materially changes how the Toshiba drama is likely to unfold.

The FT notes that Elliot has now gotten involved in the Toshiba drama following its successful bid to get Softbank to return more cash to shareholders. While the news is very welcome we do not believe it materially changes how the Toshiba drama is likely to unfold.

Toshiba – We View Elliot’s Entry as Only Marginally Positive

Global Special Situations & Strategy, SR Services Ltd

David Lepper

Global Special Situations & Strategy

SR Services Ltd

SR Services provides Strategic Knowledge and Solutions services for Family Offices and Corporate Business. 

We deliver this via advisory services, strategic planning, opportunity analysis/sourcing, as well as solution implementation. 

Whilst, we create intellectual discipline and operational leverage for your projects or daily activities, our ultimate objective is to empower whilst enhancing your decision making. 

Strategic Knowledge and Solutions

The <a href="https://www.ft.com/content/8c1c3cf0-951d-4032-9826-8c4576824db5?emailId=6155a3af79f37900047eb494&amp;segmentId=ce31c7f5-c2de-09db-abdc-f2fd624da608" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Financial Times</a> has reported that Elliott Management (“Elliott”) has built a “sizeable” stake in Toshiba. The article released on 30th September 2021 in the <a href="https://www.ft.com/content/10abee22-941e-4a6a-be24-12058f312dcb" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Financial Times</a>, comes some nine days after the publication reported that activist shareholders were starting to lose the power that they had secured following the last AGM.There is no reason to believe that management will have the ability to remain silent for much longer when it comes to advising shareholders of its progress of three key events. We discuss why these events and why the unlocking of value is now a real possibility.

The Financial Times has reported that Elliott Management (“Elliott”) has built a “sizeable” stake in Toshiba. The article released on 30th September 2021 in the Financial Times, comes some nine days after the publication reported that activist shareholders were starting to lose the power that they had secured following the last AGM.There is no reason to believe that management will have the ability to remain silent for much longer when it comes to advising shareholders of its progress of three key events. We discuss why these events and why the unlocking of value is now a real possibility.

Toshiba Corp (6502 JP) Chapter 7: Elliott Appears to Have Arrived “just-In-Time”

Pan-Asia Catalysts/Events, Quiddity Advisors

Travis Lundy

Pan-Asia Catalysts/Events

Quiddity Advisors

<a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/toshiba-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:637:1" rel="noopener">Toshiba Corp (6502 JP)</a> has had a tough time of things for years, but they have been problems largely of the company's own manufacture. Ill-fated investments led to accounting mishaps, which led to management and internal control issues, which when cleaned up led to more significant tone at the top issues, and in its zeal to remain listed when it probably should have arranged for a take-private rescue in 2017-2018, it ended up being owned to a level of more than 50% by foreign activist investors. The company did a giant buyback, re-upped its dividend, and eventually returned to the TOPIX Index this past spring as it returned to the TSE First Section. But "new management" in the form of Nobuaki Kurumatani, who was looking for something to do after not making the top slot at SMBC, was somewhat autocratic, and eventually that triggered the problems which come when not-as-powerful-as-they'd-like autocrats have to rely on others (in this case, regulators) to do their dirty work for them. About 18 months ago when it looked like the activists might decide to oust Kurumatani from his Board seat (and by default, CEO-ship), the company went into Entrenchment Mode and undertook activity about which some activists eventually complained. An internal investigation by the Parents pretended to look under the bed and decided there were No Monsters There. Activists knew what they had experienced was not reflected in that No Monsters Review and demanded an EGM to call an independent review, which The Parents (management) opposed. They got it, then they got the review, and partway through, Kurumatani-san was running out of internal support, so the Board was apparently going to give him the axe. Magically, he found someone - his old shop - to say "hey, we'd like to buy out Toshiba, but only if Kurumatani-san stays" (discussed in <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/toshiba-the-ceo-gets-his-mbo-bidder-and-toshiba-will-get-interestinger" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:50058" rel="noopener">Toshiba - The CEO Gets His MBO Bidder and Toshiba Will Get Interestinger</a> and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/gaming-out-a-cvc-bid-for-toshiba-the-right-noises-the-wrong-price-and-toast" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:50229" rel="noopener">Gaming Out a CVC Bid for Toshiba - The Right Noises, The Wrong Price, and Toast</a> (the first of which, coincidentally, followed on exactly a year after I wrote <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/an-mbo-for-toshiba-not-as-silly-as-it-sounds" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:38199" rel="noopener">An MBO for Toshiba? Not As Silly As It Sounds</a>)).  The board looked at that and decided that was a little too coincidental, and Kurumatani-san was gone (discussed in <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/toshiba-the-king-is-dead-long-live-the-king" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:50309" rel="noopener">Toshiba - The King Is Dead, Long Live the King</a>). The chatter of an MBO/LBO died down somewhat but did not die as earnings came out, a capital return became possible, then just two weeks before the AGM (one where Kurumatani-san was surely going to have problems if he had stayed) the Independent Report came out (<a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/toshiba-s-2020-agm-investigative-report-is-damning" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:52868" rel="noopener">Toshiba's 2020 AGM Investigative Report Is Damning</a>). The report made it absolutely clear that indeed, there were lots of Monsters Under the Bed, and some of them were actually the Parents themselves, and there were tapes and emails, and a few conveniently destroyed mobile phones. In the interim, about 10% of the company had been bought by TOPIX trackers, and that shifted the mix of voting rights for the AGM, but when the damning report came out, some directors were livid because it turned out some directors and old management had effectively lied to them in presenting the first report. It was mayhem. The result? A bunch of directors were ousted and/or not re-elected. Toshiba now has fewer directors than it needed, the former CEO and one-time chairman is back as interim CEO and a search is on for a new CEO and new Chairman, more directors and a Strategic Review for the business is under way. There are noises of either an IPO (more likely) or a take-private of the <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/kioxia" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:29243:1" rel="noopener">Kioxia (6600 JP)</a> unit, but given global sensitivity to access to semiconductors and memory, I think an IPO much more likely. A couple of weeks ago, Toshiba made a <a href="https://www.global.toshiba/ww/news/corporate/2021/09/news-20210908-01.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">press release</a> regarding the progress the Board was making in its strategic review, saying that any talk of a take-private situation would need to wait until that review was finished. This seemed to upset some investors but it makes utter sense from the standpoint of a Board lacking a full-time CEO, a complete complement of Board members, and a professional Chairman. It also needed some time to deflate expectations and upset on both sides after the Independent Report came out blaming both Toshiba and METI, saying illegality by one or both might have been committed, and METI came out very much defiant because of natsec concerns (which really only affect a small portion of the business). <h2>Today's News Is BIG</h2>The FT posted an <a href="https://www.ft.com/content/8c1c3cf0-951d-4032-9826-8c4576824db5?shareType=nongift" target="_blank" rel="noopener">article</a> this evening Tokyo time, saying that famed US-based activist firm Elliott Management Corp had bought a significant stake in Toshiba and held talks with management and the Board and advisers. "people close to Toshiba said that Elliott's stake did not exceed 5 per cent." Bloomberg touched base with Elliott who said that Elliott confirmed they were a "large shareholder." Generally, in Japan, that means a 5% stake, but we will see. If they are not over 5% in a Large Shareholder Report by next Thursday, then they aren't a 5% stakeholder today. But the FT article is super-interesting, and deserves to be read closely.And I have some more thoughts about that below the fold.

Toshiba Corp (6502 JP) has had a tough time of things for years, but they have been problems largely of the company's own manufacture. Ill-fated investments led to accounting mishaps, which led to management and internal control issues, which when cleaned up led to more significant tone at the top issues, and in its zeal to remain listed when it probably should have arranged for a take-private rescue in 2017-2018, it ended up being owned to a level of more than 50% by foreign activist investors. The company did a giant buyback, re-upped its dividend, and eventually returned to the TOPIX Index this past spring as it returned to the TSE First Section. But "new management" in the form of Nobuaki Kurumatani, who was looking for something to do after not making the top slot at SMBC, was somewhat autocratic, and eventually that triggered the problems which come when not-as-powerful-as-they'd-like autocrats have to rely on others (in this case, regulators) to do their dirty work for them. About 18 months ago when it looked like the activists might decide to oust Kurumatani from his Board seat (and by default, CEO-ship), the company went into Entrenchment Mode and undertook activity about which some activists eventually complained. An internal investigation by the Parents pretended to look under the bed and decided there were No Monsters There. Activists knew what they had experienced was not reflected in that No Monsters Review and demanded an EGM to call an independent review, which The Parents (management) opposed. They got it, then they got the review, and partway through, Kurumatani-san was running out of internal support, so the Board was apparently going to give him the axe. Magically, he found someone - his old shop - to say "hey, we'd like to buy out Toshiba, but only if Kurumatani-san stays" (discussed in Toshiba - The CEO Gets His MBO Bidder and Toshiba Will Get Interestinger and Gaming Out a CVC Bid for Toshiba - The Right Noises, The Wrong Price, and Toast (the first of which, coincidentally, followed on exactly a year after I wrote An MBO for Toshiba? Not As Silly As It Sounds)).  The board looked at that and decided that was a little too coincidental, and Kurumatani-san was gone (discussed in Toshiba - The King Is Dead, Long Live the King). The chatter of an MBO/LBO died down somewhat but did not die as earnings came out, a capital return became possible, then just two weeks before the AGM (one where Kurumatani-san was surely going to have problems if he had stayed) the Independent Report came out (Toshiba's 2020 AGM Investigative Report Is Damning). The report made it absolutely clear that indeed, there were lots of Monsters Under the Bed, and some of them were actually the Parents themselves, and there were tapes and emails, and a few conveniently destroyed mobile phones. In the interim, about 10% of the company had been bought by TOPIX trackers, and that shifted the mix of voting rights for the AGM, but when the damning report came out, some directors were livid because it turned out some directors and old management had effectively lied to them in presenting the first report. It was mayhem. The result? A bunch of directors were ousted and/or not re-elected. Toshiba now has fewer directors than it needed, the former CEO and one-time chairman is back as interim CEO and a search is on for a new CEO and new Chairman, more directors and a Strategic Review for the business is under way. There are noises of either an IPO (more likely) or a take-private of the Kioxia (6600 JP) unit, but given global sensitivity to access to semiconductors and memory, I think an IPO much more likely. A couple of weeks ago, Toshiba made a press release regarding the progress the Board was making in its strategic review, saying that any talk of a take-private situation would need to wait until that review was finished. This seemed to upset some investors but it makes utter sense from the standpoint of a Board lacking a full-time CEO, a complete complement of Board members, and a professional Chairman. It also needed some time to deflate expectations and upset on both sides after the Independent Report came out blaming both Toshiba and METI, saying illegality by one or both might have been committed, and METI came out very much defiant because of natsec concerns (which really only affect a small portion of the business). Today's News Is BIGThe FT posted an article this evening Tokyo time, saying that famed US-based activist firm Elliott Management Corp had bought a significant stake in Toshiba and held talks with management and the Board and advisers. "people close to Toshiba said that Elliott's stake did not exceed 5 per cent." Bloomberg touched base with Elliott who said that Elliott confirmed they were a "large shareholder." Generally, in Japan, that means a 5% stake, but we will see. If they are not over 5% in a Large Shareholder Report by next Thursday, then they aren't a 5% stakeholder today. But the FT article is super-interesting, and deserves to be read closely.And I have some more thoughts about that below the fold.  

Japan

Toshiba Corporation manufactures and markets electrical and electronic products. The Company's products include digital products such as PCs and televisions, NAND flash memories, and system LSIs (large-scale integrated), as well as social infrastructures such as power generators, medical equipment, and home appliances.

Price Gauge
52-week Range	0.00 - 0.00
Market Cap (USDm)	0.00
P/E	0.00
Dividend (Yield)	0.00

Toshiba Corp (6502 JP)

Kishida as Prime Minister: The Path Ahead

In this original, we have discussed some of the key aspects highlighted in Kishida’s policy statements along with the current status of these...

Mio Kato

Toshiba (6502 JP): Nanoimprint Litho Could Add Value to Kioxia, but Not Soon

Merger talks between Kioxia and Western Digital have reportedly stalled. This should be the focus of investor attention, not the recent Nikkei...

Scott Foster

Toshiba – We View Elliot’s Entry as Only Marginally Positive

While the news of Elliot's entry into the Toshiba saga is very welcome we do not believe it materially changes how results are likely to unfold.

Mio Kato

Toshiba Corp (6502 JP) Chapter 7: Elliott Appears to Have Arrived “just-In-Time”

Elliott Appears to Have Arrived “just-in-time”. There is no reason to believe that Toshiba management has the ability to remain silent much longer....

David Lepper

Toshiba - Elliott Jumps Into The Fray

Elliott has joined the fray. They probably own 10-20mm shares to start. The rest of the register has changed by an additional 38mm shares since...

Travis Lundy

Price Gauge

52-week Range

Market Cap (USDm)

P/E

Dividend (Yield)