Smartkarma AI Primers, Smartkarma

αSK Primers

Smartkarma AI Primers

Smartkarma

Smartkarma unites the fragmented investment industry, connecting institutional investors, independent research providers, and corporates within a single network.

Research Reinvented

Equity Bottom-Up

<ul>
  <li>THK is the global market leader in Linear Motion (LM) Guides, a critical component for precision and automation in high-growth sectors like semiconductor manufacturing and factory automation. This dominant position, built on pioneering technology and a strong patent portfolio, provides a significant competitive advantage.</li>
  <li>The company is currently facing cyclical headwinds, evidenced by a sharp decline in revenue and a significant net loss in the most recent fiscal year. This performance reflects volatility in its key end markets, particularly in the electronics and machine tool industries.</li>
  <li>Despite the recent downturn in profitability, THK has demonstrated a strong commitment to shareholder returns, evidenced by a high dividend yield and a remarkable 5-year dividend CAGR. However, the sustainability of this payout level is a key consideration given the recent negative net income.</li>
</ul><p><em>This content is AI-generated and displayed for general informational purposes only. Please verify independently before use.</em></p>


  THK is the global market leader in Linear Motion (LM) Guides, a critical component for precision and automation in high-growth sectors like semiconductor manufacturing and factory automation. This dominant position, built on pioneering technology and a strong patent portfolio, provides a significant competitive advantage.
  The company is currently facing cyclical headwinds, evidenced by a sharp decline in revenue and a significant net loss in the most recent fiscal year. This performance reflects volatility in its key end markets, particularly in the electronics and machine tool industries.
  Despite the recent downturn in profitability, THK has demonstrated a strong commitment to shareholder returns, evidenced by a high dividend yield and a remarkable 5-year dividend CAGR. However, the sustainability of this payout level is a key consideration given the recent negative net income.
This content is AI-generated and displayed for general informational purposes only. Please verify independently before use.

Technical Analyst, Vermilion Research

Joe Jasper

Technical Analyst

Technical and Quantitative Research

Vermilion Research

Vermilion’s objective is to deliver timely, actionable, and unique technical research to professional investors through the application of our various technical indicators.

Our research strategists seek to highlight securities which we believe are at major inflection points, based on our various technical and quantitative indicators, and offer asymmetric risk/return profiles. Our unique research methodology, centered on relative strength, enables our strategists to deliver superior investment recommendations.

Our process begins by organizing the universe of actively traded stocks into discrete sectors, then into industry groups. We then apply our technical and quantitative tools to identify developing price trends. Once attractive trends are identified within a selected sector or group, we screen for individual stocks which we believe offer the best risk/reward profile. We provide a historical perspective that often reveals, through our long-term charts, how price patterns often repeat themselves over time.

Technical Analysis

EURO STOXX 50 Price EUR / Technical Analysis

<ul>
<li>It appears the recent pullback is over, and we could see the MSCI ACWI (ACWI-US) test YTD highs at $93. We still expect $93 to cap upside in 2023.</li>
<li>Overweight Europe/UK and non-U.S., we are buyers on pullbacks as long as FTSE 100 is above 7700, STOXX Europe 50 is above 3800, and EURO STOXX 50 is above 4000.</li>
<li>As long as these support levels are holding, we are constructive from a price perspective</li>
</ul>


It appears the recent pullback is over, and we could see the MSCI ACWI (ACWI-US) test YTD highs at $93. We still expect $93 to cap upside in 2023.
Overweight Europe/UK and non-U.S., we are buyers on pullbacks as long as FTSE 100 is above 7700, STOXX Europe 50 is above 3800, and EURO STOXX 50 is above 4000.
As long as these support levels are holding, we are constructive from a price perspective


Remain Overweight Europe/UK & Non-US Equities; Pullback Over?; Buys in Industrials and Financials

'Quantamental' Japan Specialist, LightStream Research

Campbell Gunn

'Quantamental' Japan Specialist

Long-Short Analysis on Japan, Asia and the World

LightStream Research

LightStream conducts quantitatively rigorous and data-driven analysis with a focus on Japan and Asia.

We consistently cover the Tech, Consumer and Industrial sectors, and provide ECM and Events coverage more broadly.

We supplement traditional qualitative insights from company relationships with a robust quantitative foundation that examines as much historical data as is available.
We further refine the accuracy of our insights and calls through the use of alternative data to flesh out current trends, and through a valuation framework that emphasises non-superficial peer group selection and a proper attempt to understand the metrics and changes that have driven security valuations in the past.

Thematic (Sector/Industry)

<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>•BEST &amp; WORST 6th AUGUST •</strong></p><p style="text-align: left;">The 'best' and 'worst' from yesterday's large-cap announcements came from <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/square-enix-holdings-co-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:15003:1" rel="noopener">Square Enix (9684 JP)</a> and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/shiseido-company-limited" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:5718:1" rel="noopener">Shiseido (4911 JP)</a>, respectively - the latter as flagged in <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/shiseido-4911-jp-downward-revision-imminent" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:41874" rel="noopener">Downward Revision Imminent</a>  More extensive coverage follows in the DETAIL section below.</p><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/151/081/original/2020-08-07_05-30-09.png?1596745840" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="151081"></figure><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/151/082/original/2020-08-07_05-31-27.png?1596745907" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="151082"></figure><div style="text-align: center;" class="content-caption">Source • Japan Analytics<hr>
</div><p></p><div><p style="text-align: center;"><strong>DAILY STATS</strong></p></div><hr><div><p><strong>PERCENTAGES</strong> -<strong> 64%</strong> of quarterly results,  <strong>78%</strong> of annual forecasts/revisions and<strong> 79%</strong> of interim forecasts have negative Scores and <strong>28%</strong> of companies reporting lost money for the quarter.</p></div><hr><div><p style="text-align: center;"><strong>332 Quarterly Results</strong></p></div><div><ul>
<li>
<strong>Results Score: </strong>29% Positive / 7% Neutral / 64% Negative</li>
<li>
<strong>Average Results Score Change:</strong> -3.0 points</li>
<li>
<strong>Average % Change in Revenue: </strong>-9.7% Quarter YoY / -3.5% Rolling TTM YoY </li>
<li>
<strong>Average Operating Profit Margin Change:</strong> -0.7 ppt</li>
<li>
<strong>Percentage Making Quarterly Losses:</strong> 28%</li>
</ul></div><hr><div><p style="text-align: center;"><strong>121 Annual • 76 Interim Forecasts/Revisions</strong></p></div><div><ul>
<li>
<strong>Annual Forecast/Revision Score:</strong> 17% Positive / 6% Neutral / 78% Negative</li>
<li>
<strong>Interim Forecast/Revision Score Change:</strong> 17% Positive / 4% Neutral / 79% Negative</li>
<li>
<strong>Average Forecast/Revision Score Change:</strong> -11.2 points</li>
</ul></div>

•BEST &amp; WORST 6th AUGUST •The 'best' and 'worst' from yesterday's large-cap announcements came from Square Enix (9684 JP) and Shiseido (4911 JP), respectively - the latter as flagged in Downward Revision Imminent  More extensive coverage follows in the DETAIL section below.Source • Japan Analytics
DAILY STATSPERCENTAGES - 64% of quarterly results,  78% of annual forecasts/revisions and 79% of interim forecasts have negative Scores and 28% of companies reporting lost money for the quarter.332 Quarterly Results

Results Score: 29% Positive / 7% Neutral / 64% Negative

Average Results Score Change: -3.0 points

Average % Change in Revenue: -9.7% Quarter YoY / -3.5% Rolling TTM YoY 

Average Operating Profit Margin Change: -0.7 ppt

Percentage Making Quarterly Losses: 28%
121 Annual • 76 Interim Forecasts/Revisions

Annual Forecast/Revision Score: 17% Positive / 6% Neutral / 78% Negative

Interim Forecast/Revision Score Change: 17% Positive / 4% Neutral / 79% Negative

Average Forecast/Revision Score Change: -11.2 points


🇯🇵 JAPAN • Results & Revisions 6th August - Nintendo, Yamada Denki, Terumo, Toyota, Shiseido

<figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/135/795/original/2020-05-26_06-26-15.png?1590441998" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="135795"></figure><div class="content-caption">Source • Japan Analytics</div><div><p>In the <strong>DETAIL</strong> section below, we shall review Monday's announcements:-</p></div><div><ul>
<li>The balance between positive/neutral/negative of the 59 results announcements was 24:5:30. The average change in Results Score was -1.4.</li>
<li>For the 37 revisions/initial forecasts, the split was 4:3:20, and the average Forecast/Revision Score was -7.9. Only 38% of companies reporting full-year results chose to make current year forecasts. </li>
<li>45 companies will announce results on Monday. The largest of these by market cap will be <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/suzuki-motor-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:732:1" rel="noopener">Suzuki (7269 JP)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/yamaha-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:17841:1" rel="noopener">Yamaha (7951 JP)</a>, and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/isuzu-motors-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:14726:1" rel="noopener">Isuzu (7202 JP)</a>. </li>
</ul></div>

Source • Japan AnalyticsIn the DETAIL section below, we shall review Monday's announcements:-
The balance between positive/neutral/negative of the 59 results announcements was 24:5:30. The average change in Results Score was -1.4.
For the 37 revisions/initial forecasts, the split was 4:3:20, and the average Forecast/Revision Score was -7.9. Only 38% of companies reporting full-year results chose to make current year forecasts. 
45 companies will announce results on Monday. The largest of these by market cap will be Suzuki (7269 JP), Yamaha (7951 JP), and Isuzu (7202 JP). 


🇯🇵 JAPAN • Results & Revisions 25th May - Ajinomoto, Oji, THK, Fujikura

ja research

ja research is an independent research platform focused exclusively on Japanese equities. Leveraging data and graphic analysis provided by Japan Analytics, we provide insights on small and medium-sized companies that have been ignored by the sell-side as well as challenging conventional wisdom on larger companies. We also offer analyst and corporate access, the latter with translation if required. 

<figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/118/403/original/2020-02-18_08-44-22.png?1581983074" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="118403"></figure><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/118/404/original/2020-02-18_08-42-56.png?1581983098" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="118404"></figure><div class="content-caption">Source • Japan Analytics</div><p><strong>THREE-YEAR LOW</strong> - With <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/bridgestone-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:8914:1" rel="noopener">Bridgestone (5108 JP)</a>'s results and revision now added, our final tally for this season is a 196 basis point decline in our <strong>Results Sore</strong> - the lowest since March 2017.  In contrast, the Forecast/Revision Score reached a three-month high as the 470 companies with December year-ends put an optimistic gloss on their medium-term outlook. As we have noted in our recent daily roundups, a normal precondition for a cycle low is for the <strong>Forecast/Revision Score</strong> to rise above the <strong>Results Score</strong>. <strong>Forecast/Revision Score</strong> peaks and troughs usually occur one to two quarters ahead of those for the <strong>Results Score</strong>.  Covid-19's impact will likely see the 2016 'playbook' repeated next quarter with a lower Results Score and a 'sideways' Forecast/Results Score. The <strong>Results Score</strong> cycle low point will be reached with the mostly-interim results to be released in six months. </p><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/118/405/original/2020-02-18_09-29-28.png?1581985792" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="118405"></figure><div class="content-caption">Source • Japan Analytics</div><p><strong>LEADING INDICATOR</strong> - By including several momentum factors into our Scoring (see below), we can provide a better indication of future business conditions. Indeed there is a 0.83 correlation between the Cabinet Office's Business Condition Leading Indicator and the<strong> Forecast/Revision Score</strong>. Reported earnings, as well as company forecasts, are <em>lagging</em> indicators and, as shown in Part 1 of this Insight. Both data series peaked one year after our Scores and the market peaked in early 2018. </p><p><strong>SCORING METHODOLOGY</strong> - For those new to these Insights, we briefly recap our scoring methodology below:-</p><ul>
<li><p><strong>Results Scores</strong> are calculated using the most recent eight quarters of company data for Revenues, Operating Income and Operating Margin and, for each, measure the rate, degree and consistency of change. The Results Score has a maximum of +30 and a minimum of -30 for each period. Our data series commences from the time a particular company issues quarterly results. The sample size becomes significant from March 2005.</p></li>
<li><p>The <strong>Forecast/Revision Score</strong> is based on both Annual and Interim period company forecasts and compares changes from previous forecasts as well as against the trailing twelve-month (TTM) or previous first-half results, with annual forecasts being double-weighted. This Score also has a maximum of +30 and a minimum of -30 for each period.  For this series, our data samples start from August 2008.</p></li>
<li><p>The combined <strong>Results &amp; Revision Score (RRS)</strong> is the average of the <strong>Results Score</strong> and the<strong> Forecasts/Revision Score</strong>.</p></li>
<li>
<p>All company Scores are then cap-weight-aggregated into <strong>Sector</strong>, <strong>Peer Group</strong> and <strong>Market Composite</strong> Scores for which the seventeen-year monthly and two-year daily track records are shown above. Only currently listed-companies are covered in the aggregate Scores, and the Total Market Capitalisation excludes delisted entities. REITs are not included.</p>
<hr>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>• SECTOR SCORES •</strong></p>
<figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/118/410/original/2020-02-18_09-55-29.png?1581987489" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="118410"></figure><div class="content-caption">Source • Japan Analytics</div>
<p>In the <strong>DETAIL</strong> Section below, we provide a detailed breakdown of our RRS Scoring for Sectors, Peer Groups and individual companies, highlighting this quarter's 'winners' and 'losers'. The chart above shows a  seventeen-year 'timeline' of the cap-weight-aggregated Sector RRS Scores and the ebbs and flows around the business cycles. The <strong>Metals</strong> Sector is the most volatile on the downside and has yet to 'bottom' this cycle. <strong>Technology Hardware</strong> appears to have already rebounded; however, Covid-19 suggests this Sector may relapse. On the upside, the<strong> Information Technology</strong> Sector has replaced the <strong>Internet</strong> and <strong>Telecoms</strong> Sectors as the contra-cyclical 'champion'. </p>
</li>
</ul>

Source • Japan AnalyticsTHREE-YEAR LOW - With Bridgestone (5108 JP)'s results and revision now added, our final tally for this season is a 196 basis point decline in our Results Sore - the lowest since March 2017.  In contrast, the Forecast/Revision Score reached a three-month high as the 470 companies with December year-ends put an optimistic gloss on their medium-term outlook. As we have noted in our recent daily roundups, a normal precondition for a cycle low is for the Forecast/Revision Score to rise above the Results Score. Forecast/Revision Score peaks and troughs usually occur one to two quarters ahead of those for the Results Score.  Covid-19's impact will likely see the 2016 'playbook' repeated next quarter with a lower Results Score and a 'sideways' Forecast/Results Score. The Results Score cycle low point will be reached with the mostly-interim results to be released in six months. Source • Japan AnalyticsLEADING INDICATOR - By including several momentum factors into our Scoring (see below), we can provide a better indication of future business conditions. Indeed there is a 0.83 correlation between the Cabinet Office's Business Condition Leading Indicator and the Forecast/Revision Score. Reported earnings, as well as company forecasts, are lagging indicators and, as shown in Part 1 of this Insight. Both data series peaked one year after our Scores and the market peaked in early 2018. SCORING METHODOLOGY - For those new to these Insights, we briefly recap our scoring methodology below:-
Results Scores are calculated using the most recent eight quarters of company data for Revenues, Operating Income and Operating Margin and, for each, measure the rate, degree and consistency of change. The Results Score has a maximum of +30 and a minimum of -30 for each period. Our data series commences from the time a particular company issues quarterly results. The sample size becomes significant from March 2005.
The Forecast/Revision Score is based on both Annual and Interim period company forecasts and compares changes from previous forecasts as well as against the trailing twelve-month (TTM) or previous first-half results, with annual forecasts being double-weighted. This Score also has a maximum of +30 and a minimum of -30 for each period.  For this series, our data samples start from August 2008.
The combined Results &amp; Revision Score (RRS) is the average of the Results Score and the Forecasts/Revision Score.

All company Scores are then cap-weight-aggregated into Sector, Peer Group and Market Composite Scores for which the seventeen-year monthly and two-year daily track records are shown above. Only currently listed-companies are covered in the aggregate Scores, and the Total Market Capitalisation excludes delisted entities. REITs are not included.

• SECTOR SCORES •
Source • Japan Analytics
In the DETAIL Section below, we provide a detailed breakdown of our RRS Scoring for Sectors, Peer Groups and individual companies, highlighting this quarter's 'winners' and 'losers'. The chart above shows a  seventeen-year 'timeline' of the cap-weight-aggregated Sector RRS Scores and the ebbs and flows around the business cycles. The Metals Sector is the most volatile on the downside and has yet to 'bottom' this cycle. Technology Hardware appears to have already rebounded; however, Covid-19 suggests this Sector may relapse. On the upside, the Information Technology Sector has replaced the Internet and Telecoms Sectors as the contra-cyclical 'champion'. 



🇯🇵 JAPAN • IT’S A WRAP! Part 2: 2020-Q1 Results & Revision Scores

Japan

THK CO., LTD. manufactures industrial linear motion systems, applied in such products as robots, machine tools, and semiconductor equipment.  The Company also produces feed screws, bearings, joints, actuators, and other mechanical parts and equipment.

Price Gauge
52-week Range	0.00 - 0.00
Market Cap (USDm)	0.00
P/E	0.00
Dividend (Yield)	0.00

Thk Co Ltd (6481 JP)

Primer: Thk Co Ltd (6481 JP) - Apr 2026

THK is the global market leader in Linear Motion (LM) Guides, a critical component for precision and automation in high-growth sectors like...

αSK Primers

Remain Overweight Europe/UK & Non-US Equities; Pullback Over?; Buys in Industrials and Financials

Remain overweight Europe/UK and non-US equities; we are buyers on pullbacks as long as the FTSE 100 is above 7700, the STOXX Europe 50 is above...

Vermilion Research

🇯🇵 JAPAN • Results & Revisions 6th August - Nintendo, Yamada Denki, Terumo, Toyota, Shiseido

•BEST & WORST 6th AUGUST •The 'best' and 'worst' from yesterday's large-cap announcements came from Square Enix (9684 JP) and Shiseido (4911...

Campbell Gunn

🇯🇵 JAPAN • Results & Revisions 25th May - Ajinomoto, Oji, THK, Fujikura

In the DETAIL section below, we shall review Monday's announcements:- The balance between positive/neutral/negative of the 59 results announcements...

Campbell Gunn

🇯🇵 JAPAN • IT’S A WRAP! Part 2: 2020-Q1 Results & Revision Scores

THREE-YEAR LOW - With Bridgestone (5108 JP)'s results and revision now added, our final tally for this season is a 196 basis point decline in our...

Campbell Gunn

Price Gauge

52-week Range

Market Cap (USDm)

P/E

Dividend (Yield)