Silver Point

Thomas J. Monaco

Silver Point is a boutique research firm that focuses on the broader financial services sector, with a particular focus on troubled institutions globally. 

Asia Ex Japan

Equity Bottom-Up

*Results Materially Supported By Provision Reversals and Principal Transactions: Citigroup (C.US) [Citi] reported 1Q21 bottom-line results of USD 7.6 bn, increasing USD 3.7 bn (89.0%) linked quarter. Citi reversed provisions of USD 2.1 bn - increasing 43.7x versus 4Q20. In addition to the negative provision, Citi’s results were also supported by a USD 2.0 bn (99.7%) increase in principal transaction gains;*Credit Weaker But Coverage Strong: Net new NPLs came in about 1/3 of the previous quarter’s result came in at USD 635 mn or increasing 48.0% on an annualized basis – still far worse than JPM for the last three consecutive quarters. Citi’s loan loss reserve declined to 422% of NPLs and 325 bp of total loans – but still pretty darn good for the known and potential risk in the loan portfolio; and *Puzzling EM Exit: Citi also announced strategic changes in the Global Consumer Bank (GCB), where they are exiting 13 markets, of which ten are in Asia-Pacific. As rationale for the move, new CEO Jane Fraser believe that Citi "does not have the scale" to compete in those markets which account for USD 7 bn in allocated equity and USD 70 bn in loans. We await clarity on the potential restructuring costs and the capital release from these divestitures.

*Results Materially Supported By Provision Reversals and Principal Transactions: Citigroup (C.US) [Citi] reported 1Q21 bottom-line results of USD 7.6 bn, increasing USD 3.7 bn (89.0%) linked quarter. Citi reversed provisions of USD 2.1 bn - increasing 43.7x versus 4Q20. In addition to the negative provision, Citi’s results were also supported by a USD 2.0 bn (99.7%) increase in principal transaction gains;*Credit Weaker But Coverage Strong: Net new NPLs came in about 1/3 of the previous quarter’s result came in at USD 635 mn or increasing 48.0% on an annualized basis – still far worse than JPM for the last three consecutive quarters. Citi’s loan loss reserve declined to 422% of NPLs and 325 bp of total loans – but still pretty darn good for the known and potential risk in the loan portfolio; and *Puzzling EM Exit: Citi also announced strategic changes in the Global Consumer Bank (GCB), where they are exiting 13 markets, of which ten are in Asia-Pacific. As rationale for the move, new CEO Jane Fraser believe that Citi "does not have the scale" to compete in those markets which account for USD 7 bn in allocated equity and USD 70 bn in loans. We await clarity on the potential restructuring costs and the capital release from these divestitures.

*Results Should Only Get Better: JP Morgan Chase &amp; Co (JPM.US) [JPM] reported 1Q21 bottom-line results of USD 13.9 bn, increasing USD 2.2 bn (18.4%) linked quarter. Results were essentially driven by two factors: a) revenue growth at the Corporate &amp; Investment Bank (CIB) of USD 3.3 bn (28.7%) due primarily to principal transactions which increased USD 3.0 bn (103%); and b) a reserve reversal of USD 4.2 bn – increasing USD 2.3 bn (120%) over 4Q20’s provision reversal. The strength of the bottom-line, should allow larger capital returns in 2Q21 predicated on the Federal Reserve Board’s (FRB) dividend payout ratio test; and*Credit Improvement: JPM’s net new NPLs linked quarter amounted to just USD 638 mn or a 22.2% increase on an annualized basis – which is incredibly good. Given the current risk profile of JPM’s loan portfolio that the company remains over-provided for and that we will continue to see loss provision reversals until loan growth returns in some meaningful way.

*Results Should Only Get Better: JP Morgan Chase &amp; Co (JPM.US) [JPM] reported 1Q21 bottom-line results of USD 13.9 bn, increasing USD 2.2 bn (18.4%) linked quarter. Results were essentially driven by two factors: a) revenue growth at the Corporate &amp; Investment Bank (CIB) of USD 3.3 bn (28.7%) due primarily to principal transactions which increased USD 3.0 bn (103%); and b) a reserve reversal of USD 4.2 bn – increasing USD 2.3 bn (120%) over 4Q20’s provision reversal. The strength of the bottom-line, should allow larger capital returns in 2Q21 predicated on the Federal Reserve Board’s (FRB) dividend payout ratio test; and*Credit Improvement: JPM’s net new NPLs linked quarter amounted to just USD 638 mn or a 22.2% increase on an annualized basis – which is incredibly good. Given the current risk profile of JPM’s loan portfolio that the company remains over-provided for and that we will continue to see loss provision reversals until loan growth returns in some meaningful way.

*Archegos Charges Higher, 1Q21 Results Reduce Capital Raise Risk: The immediate financial impact from Archegos is larger than expected (USD 4.7 bn). The combination of stellar 1Q21 results plus the decision to manage 1H21 capital charges has allowed Credit Suisse Group (CSGN.VX) [Credit Suisse] to preserve its a 2020 dividend. Fortunately, the big profit beat has cushioned the blow from poor risk management allowing CET1 to remain above 12%. The fear of an equity capital raise seems to have abated for the moment; and *Outclassed By US Counterparts: Goldman Sachs &amp; Co. (GS.US) [Goldman], in typically fashion, always to seems to have the best information at the earliest possible instance, and as a result were able to act early and decisively – coming through the Archegos liquidations thus far relatively unscathed.  Other prime brokers, including Credit Suisse which didn’t have close to the full Archegos picture, were caught with their pants down in what was supposed to be an orderly unwind descended into chaos.

*Archegos Charges Higher, 1Q21 Results Reduce Capital Raise Risk: The immediate financial impact from Archegos is larger than expected (USD 4.7 bn). The combination of stellar 1Q21 results plus the decision to manage 1H21 capital charges has allowed Credit Suisse Group (CSGN.VX) [Credit Suisse] to preserve its a 2020 dividend. Fortunately, the big profit beat has cushioned the blow from poor risk management allowing CET1 to remain above 12%. The fear of an equity capital raise seems to have abated for the moment; and *Outclassed By US Counterparts: Goldman Sachs &amp; Co. (GS.US) [Goldman], in typically fashion, always to seems to have the best information at the earliest possible instance, and as a result were able to act early and decisively – coming through the Archegos liquidations thus far relatively unscathed.  Other prime brokers, including Credit Suisse which didn’t have close to the full Archegos picture, were caught with their pants down in what was supposed to be an orderly unwind descended into chaos.

Financials Credit Analyst

Hank Calenti, CFA

CreditContinuum

Credit

Executive Summary: <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/credit-suisse-group-ag" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:22253:1" rel="noopener">Credit Suisse Group's (CSGN VX)</a> press release of this morning is no reason to buy its Contingent Capital (CoCos). Credit Suisse is skating on thin ice from a capital perspective. Another loss of less than CHF2bn (US$2.1bn) could result in the suspension of coupons on CS’ Contingent Capital securities. This is one-half the charges related to the Archegos Capital Management affair. This leaves little room for maneuver.A warm wind blowing from a hot US economy could crack the ice. Low interest rates, which are pushing investors to take more risk, are generating asset bubbles. CS, like other banks, intermediates in this asset-inflated environment. Unlike other banks, something as simple as an unexpected spike in interest rates could be the catalyst which leads to a fissure in the firm’s capital layer. Another family or hedge fund disaster like Archegos and CS’ CoCo coupons could be at risk.Bank capital analysis is arcane and further complicated by selective disclosure. CoCo investors may not be aware of how slim CS’ capital buffer truly is. And yet, this is at the core of whether the security is under- or over- priced. We deconstruct the press release to determine this level within.As we noted in <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/compose/insight/49970/Credit%20Suisse:%20Where%20There%E2%80%99s%20Smoke,%20There%E2%80%99s%20a%20Capital%20Raise.%20Read%20more:%20https:/skr.ma/yxeJd" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Credit Suisse: Where There’s Smoke, There’s a Capital Raise</a>, we were fortunate to be ahead of the market with our Underweight recommendation on CS bonds. When we initiated this call, the CS 4.5% coupon 2030 callable Additional Tier 1 bond was trading close to par. It is now trading around $95.We continue to believe that Credit Suisse needs to enhance its capital base. Assuming no additional cracks in the ice – a large assumption - it may take CS two quarters to achieve current UBS-type capital buffer levels. However, CS has a materially higher risk tolerance and is clearly impaired from a risk management perspective. At least, one full year of earnings retention may be needed to address these deficiencies. Furthermore, there are weak spots yet to traverse including legacy RMBS costs, CS Supply Chain Fund shortfalls and a debt scandal in Mozambique to say nothing of increased regulatory capital charges following recent events. Together, these may see to it that share buybacks are suspended for some time to come. This would be beneficial for CS’ debt capital over time. In the interim CS’ CoCos may recover somewhat; however, we continue to believe that these securities will lag the market until the layer of capital is strengthened. As such, we remain Underweight.

Executive Summary: Credit Suisse Group's (CSGN VX) press release of this morning is no reason to buy its Contingent Capital (CoCos). Credit Suisse is skating on thin ice from a capital perspective. Another loss of less than CHF2bn (US$2.1bn) could result in the suspension of coupons on CS’ Contingent Capital securities. This is one-half the charges related to the Archegos Capital Management affair. This leaves little room for maneuver.A warm wind blowing from a hot US economy could crack the ice. Low interest rates, which are pushing investors to take more risk, are generating asset bubbles. CS, like other banks, intermediates in this asset-inflated environment. Unlike other banks, something as simple as an unexpected spike in interest rates could be the catalyst which leads to a fissure in the firm’s capital layer. Another family or hedge fund disaster like Archegos and CS’ CoCo coupons could be at risk.Bank capital analysis is arcane and further complicated by selective disclosure. CoCo investors may not be aware of how slim CS’ capital buffer truly is. And yet, this is at the core of whether the security is under- or over- priced. We deconstruct the press release to determine this level within.As we noted in Credit Suisse: Where There’s Smoke, There’s a Capital Raise, we were fortunate to be ahead of the market with our Underweight recommendation on CS bonds. When we initiated this call, the CS 4.5% coupon 2030 callable Additional Tier 1 bond was trading close to par. It is now trading around $95.We continue to believe that Credit Suisse needs to enhance its capital base. Assuming no additional cracks in the ice – a large assumption - it may take CS two quarters to achieve current UBS-type capital buffer levels. However, CS has a materially higher risk tolerance and is clearly impaired from a risk management perspective. At least, one full year of earnings retention may be needed to address these deficiencies. Furthermore, there are weak spots yet to traverse including legacy RMBS costs, CS Supply Chain Fund shortfalls and a debt scandal in Mozambique to say nothing of increased regulatory capital charges following recent events. Together, these may see to it that share buybacks are suspended for some time to come. This would be beneficial for CS’ debt capital over time. In the interim CS’ CoCos may recover somewhat; however, we continue to believe that these securities will lag the market until the layer of capital is strengthened. As such, we remain Underweight.

Credit Suisse: Skating on a Thin Layer of Capital

*Taking It On The Chin…Again:Having finally seen enough of this feckless global investment bank, S&amp;P Global Ratings has finally come around (took you long enough) and downgraded its outlook on all Credit Suisse entities to negative from stable. Putting S&amp;P over the edge was Credit Suisse’ exposure to Archegos Capital Management (Archegos) share liquidation as a result of margin calls whereby the bank is amongst the most exposed;  and*Ratings Agency Concerns: While Credit Suisse seems to be in competition with Deutsche Bank (DBK.GY) as the world’s most poorly managed bank, we find it incredulous that its actually S&amp;P calling out Credit Suisse for risk management. There are too many market participants have very little discipline, and to make matters worse, central banks have been all too happy to remove the moral hazard involved with excessive risk taking. In our view, the credit ratings agency model is permanently broken as waterfall risks in various corporates, rated pools and tranches have become increasingly significant with the markets unable to self-regulate and regulators either unable to regulate (or told not to regulate).

*Taking It On The Chin…Again:Having finally seen enough of this feckless global investment bank, S&amp;P Global Ratings has finally come around (took you long enough) and downgraded its outlook on all Credit Suisse entities to negative from stable. Putting S&amp;P over the edge was Credit Suisse’ exposure to Archegos Capital Management (Archegos) share liquidation as a result of margin calls whereby the bank is amongst the most exposed;  and*Ratings Agency Concerns: While Credit Suisse seems to be in competition with Deutsche Bank (DBK.GY) as the world’s most poorly managed bank, we find it incredulous that its actually S&amp;P calling out Credit Suisse for risk management. There are too many market participants have very little discipline, and to make matters worse, central banks have been all too happy to remove the moral hazard involved with excessive risk taking. In our view, the credit ratings agency model is permanently broken as waterfall risks in various corporates, rated pools and tranches have become increasingly significant with the markets unable to self-regulate and regulators either unable to regulate (or told not to regulate). 

Credit Suisse Group – Hit Parade Continues

Switzerland

UBS Group AG provides financial services to private, corporate and institutional clients. The Company offers investment banking, retail banking, corporate and institutional banking, as well as holistic wealth management planning and asset management services. UBS also offers securities services such as fund administration and third-party fund management.

Price Gauge
52-week Range	0.00 - 0.00
Market Cap (USDm)	0.00
P/E	0.00
Dividend (Yield)	0.00

UBS Group AG (UBSG VX)

Citigroup – Shifting Winds

CITIGROUP: Citi reported a QOQ 1Q21 bottom-line result increase of 89.0% due to provision reversals and principal transactions. Net new NPLs...

Thomas J. Monaco

J.P Morgan Chase & Co. – Well On Track

JP MORGAN CHASE: JPM 1Q21 bottom-line results increased 18.4% linked quarter due to principal transactions and provision reversals. This should...

Thomas J. Monaco

Credit Suisse Group – Painful To Watch

CREDIT SUISSE GROUP: The immediate impact from Archegos is larger than expected. However, the stellar 1Q21 results plus managing 1H21 capital...

Thomas J. Monaco

Credit Suisse: Skating on a Thin Layer of Capital

CS is skating on thin ice from a capital perspective while its risk management blade is dulled. Asset bubbles could crack the ice. A loss of less...

Hank Calenti, CFA

Credit Suisse Group – Hit Parade Continues

CREDIT SUISSE GROUP: S&P Global Ratings has finally downgraded its outlook on all Credit Suisse entities to negative resultant over its exposure to...

Thomas J. Monaco

Price Gauge

52-week Range

Market Cap (USDm)

P/E

Dividend (Yield)