We believe Baidu’s stock price has been fairly impacted.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
We launched coverage of Dali Foods Group (3799 HK) in February with a Sell rating and a HK$4.18 target price. FY18 financial results, which were released late Tuesday March 26th, appear to confirm at least half of our negative thesis (slowing revenue growth), though the other half (margin compression) has failed to materialize so far.
Dali Foods appears to have met — just — the FY18 consensus EPS target of HK$0.307 per share. The company cut its Final dividend from HK$0.10 to HK$0.075 per share.
However, the pace of revenue growth plummeted in H218. From solid growth of +11.4% YoY in H118, H218 revenues actually declined by -0.6% YoY in the latter half of the year. This result was beyond even our pessimistic view and we believe bulls on the company will be forced to revisit their overly optimistic assumptions about double-digit revenue growth in 2019e.
Besides assuming slower revenue growth going forward, the other leg of our negative thesis on Dali Foods was the expectation of margin compression due to rising raw materials costs, specifically for paper and key food and beverage ingredients. Although H218 gross margin declined versus H217 (to 37.7% from 37.8%), it did so only marginally, and probably due to a change in product mix (ie, a decline in high-margin beverage sales).
After reviewing FY and H218 results, we see no reasons to change our negative view of Dali Foods, and our HK$4.18 price target (-26% potential downside) and Sell rating remain unchanged.
Ping An Bank Co Ltd A (000001 CH) results show gradual erosion in fundamental trends. We believe that positive fundamental momentum (within our quantamental approach) leads to higher stock prices.
Behind the headline numbers, there lies an acute rise in funding costs in excess of the growth in interest income on earnings assets. As elsewhere in China, there is a festering asset quality issue too. While not as toxic versus diverse peers, it is notable: the impaired asset portfolio more than doubled YoY.
Valuations are not especially cheap relative to the region (including Japan). Franchise Valuation at 10% and P/Book of 0.94x are at a premium to the regional medians of 8% and 0.77x, respectively. The Total Return Ratio is <1x.
In conclusion, we do not see a lot that has changed for the better at Ping An Bank (funding, liquidity, efficiency, profitability and asset quality) though the headline deterioration is not so drastic. Underlying concerns lie with core interest income generation given sky-high funding expenses and pervasive asset quality issues.
SamE voluntarily red flagged its 1Q19 earnings even before 1Q ends. SamE mentioned two things: 1. Falling memory chip prices and 2. slowing demand for display panels. Given the ‘usual’ profit size of DP business, this should be all about memory chips, specifically server DRAM.
Memory chip price falling should not be enough to explain this much 1Q profit loss. It must be that SamE has decided to reflect huge inventory losses and pay bills from Amazon and Google on the book in this first quarter. Of course, SamE wouldn’t want to talk about this explicitly.
SamE shares aren’t reacting to this a lot right now. It is mainly because local street already heavily adjusted 1Q OP to as low as ₩6.5~7tril. This 1Q earnings shock factor must have been already reflected into the price. Even below ₩6tril level wouldn’t be taken as a huge surprise.
SamE said last month that memory sales would be revived starting 2H this year. I think this is still a valid and crucial point. This suggests that server DRAM demand from Amazon and Google will likely be back starting 3Q19. This means SamE is confident that it can handle the server DRAM optimization issue by then.
I’m still sticking to my previous OP forecast for FY19. It should be ₩8tril more than the current street consensus. At this, SamE Common is trading at a 8.73x PER. SamE is scheduled to deliver 1Q19 interim numbers next week on Apr 5.
It should be no surprise to see China Zheshang Bank (2016 HK; “CZB”) reveal a dramatic rise of impairment costs in 4Q18. It is one of only few China banks to yet announced quarterly results, and here it reported profit at -12% YoY in 4Q18. The doubling of impairment costs in the period goes to our long-standing concerns of continued credit tdeterioration in China and well more than headline figures suggest. This is partly based on our China corporate analysis of interest cover and debt/ebitda, which remain weak. It is also notable that CZB has been one of the faster growing banks in the country, putting its ‘unseasoned’ loans higher than many others; where we believe these banks are more likely to see higher impairment costs. Perhaps that is now coming through? And with RMB250bn of write-offs in December 2018 for China’s bank system, this suggests there will have to sizeable impairment costs to replenish balance sheet provisions.
Chris Hoare downgraded China Mobile (941 HK) some time ago on rising concerns that 5G capex would be higher than expected. While China Unicom (762 HK) and China Telecom (728 HK) both laid out very modest 2019 5G capex plans, China Mobile did not. And despite what we saw as reasonable results, earnings guidance was weak and the lack of a rising dividend payout suggests internal concerns over 5G spending. We had seen China Mobile as a defensive stock, but recent strong performance and rising 5G worries led us to downgrade our recommendation. It remains at Reduce with a HK$75 target.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
China Telecom (728 HK), having delivered strong revenue growth but weak margins in 3Q18, delivered better 4Q numbers. Like its peers however, the business is under some pressure with ARPUs weak despite strong data growth. We see the Chinese Telcos as vulnerable to policy demands for accelerated 5G spending. While the market may like the look of a joint roll-out of 5G with China Unicom (762 HK), that may be simplistic. Chris Hoare thinks the cost of a combined roll-out is likely to be even higher than China Mobile (941 HK). Recent price strength makes our Reduce recommendation clearer.
China Unicom’s (762 HK) recent 4Q18 results were not great. The overall figures look ok due to strength in the fixed line business which offset weakness in mobile. However, they were the weakest of the three operators and the stock, which has had a strong run, now looks due for a pause. We have turned more cautious on the Chinese telcos on concerns that 5G spending could be higher than expected. Chris Hoare believes a major reason for the Chinese telcos outperforming in the past year has come from declining capex spending expectations. That trend may now start to reverse. While China Unicom has guided for only modest 5G capex in 2019 the focus will turn to 2020 where it is a much bigger issue and while we expect China Unicom to do a joint roll-out with China Telecom (728 HK) we expect the scale of the spending to be larger than an individual build.
F&F Co Ltd (007700 KS) shares have been soaring this year (up 95% YTD), versus KOSPI which is up only 5% YTD. F&F Co has been one of the top performing stocks in KOSPI this year. We believe it is time to take profits on this name and take it out of our model portfolio.
One of the main reasons why F&F Co has been soaring this year has been due to the MLB (Major League Baseball) apparel business expansion in China. In February 2019, F&F Co secured the selling rights of the MLB branded apparel products in China from the MLB headquarters in the US.
Baseball is becoming increasingly popular in China. According to the Chinese Baseball Association, more than 4 million Chinese play the game. The historical resistance to baseball is breaking down in China.For example, In April 2018, Tencent announced a deal to live stream 125 MLB games on platforms such as its its Tencent Sports app to Chinese audiences via their computers and mobile devices.
The shares are cheap. The company is cash rich and owns 10% in treasury stock; it owned more last year but has cancelled 4%. It has some Y6bn in long term investment. EV in our view is Y57bn vs the current market cap of Y110bn. With ebitda next year coming in at Y15bn, EV/ebitda is under 4x. The shares yield 3.4% and trade at book. They have slightly underperformed the market over the last 12 months. For now, we view this as a defensive buy. There remain many issues longer term as to its place in the global elevator world. A potential positive, however, is that in May the company will announce a new mid-term plan and in it, they will outline their view as regards to shareholder returns for the next three years. They are aware that they are very over capitalised, so greater returns are a real possibility.
Bank Of Tianjin (1578 HK) results at first look quite encouraging with firmer profitability, enhanced efficiency, improved capital adequacy, and increased provisioning.
Valuations are optically attractive: p/book of 0.5x, franchise valuation of 7%, earnings yield of 17%, and a total return ratio of 2.5x. These metrics are within the bargain hunter space.
However, optimism fades fast on closer inspection.
“Underlying” Income decreased by 21% YoY as the bank was squeezed by higher funding costs and non-interest expenses. Expenses on wholesale funding increased by 30% YoY. Debt funding now represents 71% of Gross Loans. Debt now stands at 4.3x SH. Funds. This type of funding has exploded by 10x since 2014. At the same time, deposits declined YoY. Deposits have increased by a more sedate 18% since 2014.
PT Profit would have been CNY1.4bn rather than CNY5.2bn but for hefty gains on securities. Loan loss provisions almost tripled YoY.
Regarding the Balance Sheet, Special Mention Loans rose sharply (+25% YoY) and represent 2.8x NPLs. A 127% and 108% YoY increase in “doubtful loans” and “loss loans” puts some perspective on a seemingly respectable NPL ratio of 1.64% and a LLR/NPLs of 250%.
Thus, Bank Of Tianjin (1578 HK) is cheap for a reason. We are reluctant to recommend taking a position at this juncture given the ongoing stresses in source of funding and asset quality.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
MGM Resorts International announced plans to partner 50/50 with Japan’s financial services operator, Orix, the first such deal made public.
A bet on both or either company now at near their 52 week lows bears a good risk/yield proposition for investors in the consumer discretionary space.
Japan’s IR’s will potentially grow into a US$15.8b to US$17.5B industry by 2024/5 or before. We expect the three licenses will go to partnerships between global gaming giants and Japan financial or game manufacturing partners.
The trademarked PH Score comes in at 8.2. P/Book is a lowly 0.42x. Earnings Yield stands at 20%. Franchise valuation is 7%. Total return Ratio lies at 1.4x. RSI is low.
2018 numbers were solid enough though deeper analysis shows that they were not as good as they seem to be:
The specific IBK model is reliant on debt to fund SME growth and interest expense growth is running well ahead of expansion in interest income.
The squeeze on the top-line, despite firm fee income growth, means that “underlying jaws” were negative. The CIR may be declining but OPEX growth remains somewhat elevated, and in excess of “underlying” income.
PT Profit expansion of 23% YoY is flattered by high contributions from “other non-interest income” and gains on securities. Combined, these lower quality income streams make up 40% of PT Profit. This means that Profitability metrics (which are in excess of the Asian median) may not be as benign as they seem. In fact, we would argue that when one takes the aforementioned items into consideration, PT Profit was essentially flat at best.
Insurance operations again reported a negative result.
While Asset Quality looks relatively respectable, we note a 17% increase in “precautionary” or SMLs which were in excess of impaired loans or even NPLs. Regarding the latter, there may be some bad asset migration into the “loss” category: up 12% YoY.
Cupid Ltd one of the largest manufacturers of condoms in India 9MFY19 revenue was largely as per our expectations, as there was some order slippages. As forecasted in our initiation report Cupid Ltd: Protecting the Needy, the company reported a 20% decline in revenue at Rs 505mn, which also resulted in lower profitability both at the operating as well as net level. EBITDA stood at INR 161.6 mn declining by 32.53% with EBITDA margin at 31.95%. PAT was INR 108.5 mn declining by 24.58% with PAT margin at 21.46%.
Despite this below-par performance in the 9MFY19, we are fairly positive on the future growth prospects of the company. As of March 2019, it has a healthy order book of INR 1300 m with Book to Bill ratio of 1.99 times on its TTM sales. We expect revenues to grow at 15% over FY18-19 and margins to improve in medium to long term horizon.
Having corrected by 67% from its peak, the stock currently trades at 10.20x its FY19 EPS and 8.34x its FY20 EPS; we believe that this provides a good entry point for this niche high margin healthcare company with attractive long term growth possibilities.
Keyence Corp (6861 JP) has long been a standout within the Japanese machinery sector for its exceptional margins, with only Fanuc Corp (6954 JP) and perhaps Smc Corp (6273 JP) really operating in the same the stratosphere. But while Fanuc has faded, with its OPM now struggling to stay over 30% and SMC has only recently peaked its head over the 30% level, Keyence has been powering ahead and is on the cusp of recording five straight years over 50% OPM.
With relatively limited disclosures to go along with such stellar performance it is understandable then that some investors are concerned that the story is too good to be true, and even the FT has written a series of articles with a slightly critical bent: 1234
Having recently visited the company, we analyse below, the nature of its competitive advantages by comparing it with its most similar peer Cognex Corp (CGNX US).
We launched coverage of Dali Foods Group (3799 HK) in February with a Sell rating and a HK$4.18 target price. FY18 financial results, which were released late Tuesday March 26th, appear to confirm at least half of our negative thesis (slowing revenue growth), though the other half (margin compression) has failed to materialize so far.
Dali Foods appears to have met — just — the FY18 consensus EPS target of HK$0.307 per share. The company cut its Final dividend from HK$0.10 to HK$0.075 per share.
However, the pace of revenue growth plummeted in H218. From solid growth of +11.4% YoY in H118, H218 revenues actually declined by -0.6% YoY in the latter half of the year. This result was beyond even our pessimistic view and we believe bulls on the company will be forced to revisit their overly optimistic assumptions about double-digit revenue growth in 2019e.
Besides assuming slower revenue growth going forward, the other leg of our negative thesis on Dali Foods was the expectation of margin compression due to rising raw materials costs, specifically for paper and key food and beverage ingredients. Although H218 gross margin declined versus H217 (to 37.7% from 37.8%), it did so only marginally, and probably due to a change in product mix (ie, a decline in high-margin beverage sales).
After reviewing FY and H218 results, we see no reasons to change our negative view of Dali Foods, and our HK$4.18 price target (-26% potential downside) and Sell rating remain unchanged.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
In this report, we provide an update on Lg Electronics (066570 KS), including the potential impact of the war on Huawei on the company, dividend policy, debt issue, sales of non-core assets, and the launch of new smartphones.
Although LG’s V50 ThinQ product is a bit disappointing, another new LG smartphone called G8ThinQ appears to be promising.This is one of the first smartphones to use “air motion” technology to activate some of the features including playing a song or video or adjusting volume (remember Tom Cruise in the movie Minority Report)? The airmotion technology could bring back the “thrill” of using a smartphone.
Many investors around the world are asking, “What companies will benefit from the continued war on Huawei by the US government?” LG Electronics, the 7th largest smartphone maker globally, could be one of the key beneficiaries of the war on Huawei.
LG Electronics recently announced that it will pay DPS of 750 won for its common shareholders in 2018, which is nearly twice as high the DPS of 400 won in 2017.
The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requested a federal judge to hold Tesla CEO Elon Musk in contempt of court yesterday regarding recent misleading tweets about the company’s unit production volumes for 2019. This latest move comes not long after Musk bragged that he does not respect the SEC and that his tweets were not being censored by the Board according to the terms of the agreement reached with the SEC following his controversial “Am considering taking Tesla private at $420. Funding secured” tweet on August 8’th last.
Separately, Musk has been talking up the capabilities of the company’s Autopilot technology, claiming that it will deliver “Full Self Driving” by the end of the year, that its in-house developed hardware is 2000% better than NVIDIA’s and that by the end of next year, it would be safe for somebody to fall asleep with Autopilot in control. We find these claims to be ludicrous and Elon Musk delusional in thinking that the SEC would stand idly by while he publicly admits to ignoring the terms of his settlement with them barely four months ago.
In this series under Smartkarma Originals, CrossASEAN Research insight providers Angus Mackintosh and Jessica Irene seek to determine whether or not we are close to the end of the rainbow and to a period of outperformance for the property sector. Our end conclusions will be based on a series of company visits to the major listed property companies in Indonesia, conversations with local banks, property agents, and other relevant channel checks.
The second company we explore is leading township developer Bumi Serpong Damai (BSDE IJ), with exposure ranging from landed housing, shophouses, condominiums, as well as the defensive and growing buffer of nearly 20% of revenues coming from recurrent rental income.
Bumi Serpong Damai (BSDE IJ) has one of the largest land banks of any developer, with a land bank of over 4,000 ha, more than half of which is in its flagship township of BSD City in Serpong.
Given its breadth of exposure to the property segment, the company has the flexibility to switch its exposure between different segments depending on the health of the overall market.
Its projects are well connected by toll-roads and railway but it is well positioned to benefit from new infrastructure such as the new MRT, LRT, as well as new toll road extensions, which will enhance the attractiveness of its developments.
Management suggests that they will take a cautious start to the year ahead of the election but see a window for a pick-up in marketing sales in May, with the potential for a much better 2H19.
Despite a run-up in the share price since the start of the year, valuations do not look challenging from a historical basis especially looking at its PBV. It also trades at a significant discount to NAV of 67%, as well as being below its 5 yr historical mean on a forward PER basis.
Catalysts ahead include a post-election pick-up in activity leading to more project launches, completion of infrastructure projects, aggressive mortgage lending by the banks, and a more dovish interest rate outlook. Valuations are already attractive but a rise in property market activity should also lead to earnings upgrades, which if sustained, may lead to property prices moving upwards.
We believe Baidu’s stock price has been fairly impacted.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
The trademarked PH Score comes in at 8.2. P/Book is a lowly 0.42x. Earnings Yield stands at 20%. Franchise valuation is 7%. Total return Ratio lies at 1.4x. RSI is low.
2018 numbers were solid enough though deeper analysis shows that they were not as good as they seem to be:
The specific IBK model is reliant on debt to fund SME growth and interest expense growth is running well ahead of expansion in interest income.
The squeeze on the top-line, despite firm fee income growth, means that “underlying jaws” were negative. The CIR may be declining but OPEX growth remains somewhat elevated, and in excess of “underlying” income.
PT Profit expansion of 23% YoY is flattered by high contributions from “other non-interest income” and gains on securities. Combined, these lower quality income streams make up 40% of PT Profit. This means that Profitability metrics (which are in excess of the Asian median) may not be as benign as they seem. In fact, we would argue that when one takes the aforementioned items into consideration, PT Profit was essentially flat at best.
Insurance operations again reported a negative result.
While Asset Quality looks relatively respectable, we note a 17% increase in “precautionary” or SMLs which were in excess of impaired loans or even NPLs. Regarding the latter, there may be some bad asset migration into the “loss” category: up 12% YoY.
Cupid Ltd one of the largest manufacturers of condoms in India 9MFY19 revenue was largely as per our expectations, as there was some order slippages. As forecasted in our initiation report Cupid Ltd: Protecting the Needy, the company reported a 20% decline in revenue at Rs 505mn, which also resulted in lower profitability both at the operating as well as net level. EBITDA stood at INR 161.6 mn declining by 32.53% with EBITDA margin at 31.95%. PAT was INR 108.5 mn declining by 24.58% with PAT margin at 21.46%.
Despite this below-par performance in the 9MFY19, we are fairly positive on the future growth prospects of the company. As of March 2019, it has a healthy order book of INR 1300 m with Book to Bill ratio of 1.99 times on its TTM sales. We expect revenues to grow at 15% over FY18-19 and margins to improve in medium to long term horizon.
Having corrected by 67% from its peak, the stock currently trades at 10.20x its FY19 EPS and 8.34x its FY20 EPS; we believe that this provides a good entry point for this niche high margin healthcare company with attractive long term growth possibilities.
Keyence Corp (6861 JP) has long been a standout within the Japanese machinery sector for its exceptional margins, with only Fanuc Corp (6954 JP) and perhaps Smc Corp (6273 JP) really operating in the same the stratosphere. But while Fanuc has faded, with its OPM now struggling to stay over 30% and SMC has only recently peaked its head over the 30% level, Keyence has been powering ahead and is on the cusp of recording five straight years over 50% OPM.
With relatively limited disclosures to go along with such stellar performance it is understandable then that some investors are concerned that the story is too good to be true, and even the FT has written a series of articles with a slightly critical bent: 1234
Having recently visited the company, we analyse below, the nature of its competitive advantages by comparing it with its most similar peer Cognex Corp (CGNX US).
We launched coverage of Dali Foods Group (3799 HK) in February with a Sell rating and a HK$4.18 target price. FY18 financial results, which were released late Tuesday March 26th, appear to confirm at least half of our negative thesis (slowing revenue growth), though the other half (margin compression) has failed to materialize so far.
Dali Foods appears to have met — just — the FY18 consensus EPS target of HK$0.307 per share. The company cut its Final dividend from HK$0.10 to HK$0.075 per share.
However, the pace of revenue growth plummeted in H218. From solid growth of +11.4% YoY in H118, H218 revenues actually declined by -0.6% YoY in the latter half of the year. This result was beyond even our pessimistic view and we believe bulls on the company will be forced to revisit their overly optimistic assumptions about double-digit revenue growth in 2019e.
Besides assuming slower revenue growth going forward, the other leg of our negative thesis on Dali Foods was the expectation of margin compression due to rising raw materials costs, specifically for paper and key food and beverage ingredients. Although H218 gross margin declined versus H217 (to 37.7% from 37.8%), it did so only marginally, and probably due to a change in product mix (ie, a decline in high-margin beverage sales).
After reviewing FY and H218 results, we see no reasons to change our negative view of Dali Foods, and our HK$4.18 price target (-26% potential downside) and Sell rating remain unchanged.
Ping An Bank Co Ltd A (000001 CH) results show gradual erosion in fundamental trends. We believe that positive fundamental momentum (within our quantamental approach) leads to higher stock prices.
Behind the headline numbers, there lies an acute rise in funding costs in excess of the growth in interest income on earnings assets. As elsewhere in China, there is a festering asset quality issue too. While not as toxic versus diverse peers, it is notable: the impaired asset portfolio more than doubled YoY.
Valuations are not especially cheap relative to the region (including Japan). Franchise Valuation at 10% and P/Book of 0.94x are at a premium to the regional medians of 8% and 0.77x, respectively. The Total Return Ratio is <1x.
In conclusion, we do not see a lot that has changed for the better at Ping An Bank (funding, liquidity, efficiency, profitability and asset quality) though the headline deterioration is not so drastic. Underlying concerns lie with core interest income generation given sky-high funding expenses and pervasive asset quality issues.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
Cupid Ltd one of the largest manufacturers of condoms in India 9MFY19 revenue was largely as per our expectations, as there was some order slippages. As forecasted in our initiation report Cupid Ltd: Protecting the Needy, the company reported a 20% decline in revenue at Rs 505mn, which also resulted in lower profitability both at the operating as well as net level. EBITDA stood at INR 161.6 mn declining by 32.53% with EBITDA margin at 31.95%. PAT was INR 108.5 mn declining by 24.58% with PAT margin at 21.46%.
Despite this below-par performance in the 9MFY19, we are fairly positive on the future growth prospects of the company. As of March 2019, it has a healthy order book of INR 1300 m with Book to Bill ratio of 1.99 times on its TTM sales. We expect revenues to grow at 15% over FY18-19 and margins to improve in medium to long term horizon.
Having corrected by 67% from its peak, the stock currently trades at 10.20x its FY19 EPS and 8.34x its FY20 EPS; we believe that this provides a good entry point for this niche high margin healthcare company with attractive long term growth possibilities.
Keyence Corp (6861 JP) has long been a standout within the Japanese machinery sector for its exceptional margins, with only Fanuc Corp (6954 JP) and perhaps Smc Corp (6273 JP) really operating in the same the stratosphere. But while Fanuc has faded, with its OPM now struggling to stay over 30% and SMC has only recently peaked its head over the 30% level, Keyence has been powering ahead and is on the cusp of recording five straight years over 50% OPM.
With relatively limited disclosures to go along with such stellar performance it is understandable then that some investors are concerned that the story is too good to be true, and even the FT has written a series of articles with a slightly critical bent: 1234
Having recently visited the company, we analyse below, the nature of its competitive advantages by comparing it with its most similar peer Cognex Corp (CGNX US).
We launched coverage of Dali Foods Group (3799 HK) in February with a Sell rating and a HK$4.18 target price. FY18 financial results, which were released late Tuesday March 26th, appear to confirm at least half of our negative thesis (slowing revenue growth), though the other half (margin compression) has failed to materialize so far.
Dali Foods appears to have met — just — the FY18 consensus EPS target of HK$0.307 per share. The company cut its Final dividend from HK$0.10 to HK$0.075 per share.
However, the pace of revenue growth plummeted in H218. From solid growth of +11.4% YoY in H118, H218 revenues actually declined by -0.6% YoY in the latter half of the year. This result was beyond even our pessimistic view and we believe bulls on the company will be forced to revisit their overly optimistic assumptions about double-digit revenue growth in 2019e.
Besides assuming slower revenue growth going forward, the other leg of our negative thesis on Dali Foods was the expectation of margin compression due to rising raw materials costs, specifically for paper and key food and beverage ingredients. Although H218 gross margin declined versus H217 (to 37.7% from 37.8%), it did so only marginally, and probably due to a change in product mix (ie, a decline in high-margin beverage sales).
After reviewing FY and H218 results, we see no reasons to change our negative view of Dali Foods, and our HK$4.18 price target (-26% potential downside) and Sell rating remain unchanged.
Ping An Bank Co Ltd A (000001 CH) results show gradual erosion in fundamental trends. We believe that positive fundamental momentum (within our quantamental approach) leads to higher stock prices.
Behind the headline numbers, there lies an acute rise in funding costs in excess of the growth in interest income on earnings assets. As elsewhere in China, there is a festering asset quality issue too. While not as toxic versus diverse peers, it is notable: the impaired asset portfolio more than doubled YoY.
Valuations are not especially cheap relative to the region (including Japan). Franchise Valuation at 10% and P/Book of 0.94x are at a premium to the regional medians of 8% and 0.77x, respectively. The Total Return Ratio is <1x.
In conclusion, we do not see a lot that has changed for the better at Ping An Bank (funding, liquidity, efficiency, profitability and asset quality) though the headline deterioration is not so drastic. Underlying concerns lie with core interest income generation given sky-high funding expenses and pervasive asset quality issues.
SamE voluntarily red flagged its 1Q19 earnings even before 1Q ends. SamE mentioned two things: 1. Falling memory chip prices and 2. slowing demand for display panels. Given the ‘usual’ profit size of DP business, this should be all about memory chips, specifically server DRAM.
Memory chip price falling should not be enough to explain this much 1Q profit loss. It must be that SamE has decided to reflect huge inventory losses and pay bills from Amazon and Google on the book in this first quarter. Of course, SamE wouldn’t want to talk about this explicitly.
SamE shares aren’t reacting to this a lot right now. It is mainly because local street already heavily adjusted 1Q OP to as low as ₩6.5~7tril. This 1Q earnings shock factor must have been already reflected into the price. Even below ₩6tril level wouldn’t be taken as a huge surprise.
SamE said last month that memory sales would be revived starting 2H this year. I think this is still a valid and crucial point. This suggests that server DRAM demand from Amazon and Google will likely be back starting 3Q19. This means SamE is confident that it can handle the server DRAM optimization issue by then.
I’m still sticking to my previous OP forecast for FY19. It should be ₩8tril more than the current street consensus. At this, SamE Common is trading at a 8.73x PER. SamE is scheduled to deliver 1Q19 interim numbers next week on Apr 5.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requested a federal judge to hold Tesla CEO Elon Musk in contempt of court yesterday regarding recent misleading tweets about the company’s unit production volumes for 2019. This latest move comes not long after Musk bragged that he does not respect the SEC and that his tweets were not being censored by the Board according to the terms of the agreement reached with the SEC following his controversial “Am considering taking Tesla private at $420. Funding secured” tweet on August 8’th last.
Separately, Musk has been talking up the capabilities of the company’s Autopilot technology, claiming that it will deliver “Full Self Driving” by the end of the year, that its in-house developed hardware is 2000% better than NVIDIA’s and that by the end of next year, it would be safe for somebody to fall asleep with Autopilot in control. We find these claims to be ludicrous and Elon Musk delusional in thinking that the SEC would stand idly by while he publicly admits to ignoring the terms of his settlement with them barely four months ago.
In this series under Smartkarma Originals, CrossASEAN Research insight providers Angus Mackintosh and Jessica Irene seek to determine whether or not we are close to the end of the rainbow and to a period of outperformance for the property sector. Our end conclusions will be based on a series of company visits to the major listed property companies in Indonesia, conversations with local banks, property agents, and other relevant channel checks.
The second company we explore is leading township developer Bumi Serpong Damai (BSDE IJ), with exposure ranging from landed housing, shophouses, condominiums, as well as the defensive and growing buffer of nearly 20% of revenues coming from recurrent rental income.
Bumi Serpong Damai (BSDE IJ) has one of the largest land banks of any developer, with a land bank of over 4,000 ha, more than half of which is in its flagship township of BSD City in Serpong.
Given its breadth of exposure to the property segment, the company has the flexibility to switch its exposure between different segments depending on the health of the overall market.
Its projects are well connected by toll-roads and railway but it is well positioned to benefit from new infrastructure such as the new MRT, LRT, as well as new toll road extensions, which will enhance the attractiveness of its developments.
Management suggests that they will take a cautious start to the year ahead of the election but see a window for a pick-up in marketing sales in May, with the potential for a much better 2H19.
Despite a run-up in the share price since the start of the year, valuations do not look challenging from a historical basis especially looking at its PBV. It also trades at a significant discount to NAV of 67%, as well as being below its 5 yr historical mean on a forward PER basis.
Catalysts ahead include a post-election pick-up in activity leading to more project launches, completion of infrastructure projects, aggressive mortgage lending by the banks, and a more dovish interest rate outlook. Valuations are already attractive but a rise in property market activity should also lead to earnings upgrades, which if sustained, may lead to property prices moving upwards.
PATMI for 4Q18 dropped 20.5% YoY to S$81.4 mil. Excluding the impact of the tax provision for Hotel Windsor, underlying PATMI would have remained stable at approximately S$101.7 mil.
HBL’s real estate business had performed within expectations. There were also improvements in the financial position of HBL, such as the increase in cash balance, lower net gearing ratio, refinancing of bridging loan and extension of debt maturity.
Fair value of HBL is pegged at S$3.32 per share, translating to an upside of 32%. REIT listing remains a potential catalyst. I maintain my BUY rating on HBL.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
In this series under Smartkarma Originals, CrossASEAN Research insight providers Angus Mackintosh and Jessica Irene seek to determine whether or not we are close to the end of the rainbow and to a period of outperformance for the property sector. Our end conclusions will be based on a series of company visits to the major listed property companies in Indonesia, conversations with local banks, property agents, and other relevant channel checks.
The second company we explore is leading township developer Bumi Serpong Damai (BSDE IJ), with exposure ranging from landed housing, shophouses, condominiums, as well as the defensive and growing buffer of nearly 20% of revenues coming from recurrent rental income.
Bumi Serpong Damai (BSDE IJ) has one of the largest land banks of any developer, with a land bank of over 4,000 ha, more than half of which is in its flagship township of BSD City in Serpong.
Given its breadth of exposure to the property segment, the company has the flexibility to switch its exposure between different segments depending on the health of the overall market.
Its projects are well connected by toll-roads and railway but it is well positioned to benefit from new infrastructure such as the new MRT, LRT, as well as new toll road extensions, which will enhance the attractiveness of its developments.
Management suggests that they will take a cautious start to the year ahead of the election but see a window for a pick-up in marketing sales in May, with the potential for a much better 2H19.
Despite a run-up in the share price since the start of the year, valuations do not look challenging from a historical basis especially looking at its PBV. It also trades at a significant discount to NAV of 67%, as well as being below its 5 yr historical mean on a forward PER basis.
Catalysts ahead include a post-election pick-up in activity leading to more project launches, completion of infrastructure projects, aggressive mortgage lending by the banks, and a more dovish interest rate outlook. Valuations are already attractive but a rise in property market activity should also lead to earnings upgrades, which if sustained, may lead to property prices moving upwards.
PATMI for 4Q18 dropped 20.5% YoY to S$81.4 mil. Excluding the impact of the tax provision for Hotel Windsor, underlying PATMI would have remained stable at approximately S$101.7 mil.
HBL’s real estate business had performed within expectations. There were also improvements in the financial position of HBL, such as the increase in cash balance, lower net gearing ratio, refinancing of bridging loan and extension of debt maturity.
Fair value of HBL is pegged at S$3.32 per share, translating to an upside of 32%. REIT listing remains a potential catalyst. I maintain my BUY rating on HBL.
On the eve of the Chinese New Year holiday Nine Dragon Paper (NDP) released a profit warning regarding their H1 FY19 fiscal earnings. This warning came ahead of the 26th February 2019 Board Meeting.
Management guidance calls for a decrease for H1-2019 of approximately 45% YoY and revenue line of not less than RMB2.4bn. NDP cites an increase in raw materials and a decrease in the selling price of the products.
Despite the negative news, the share price has rallied 15% since the announcement. We examine the implications.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
We notice that the growth rate of cost of revenues exceeded the growth rate of membership revenues.
We believe that the margins will continue to decline even if the advertising business recovers.
IQ has the largest monthly active users in the video market, but it does not have an obvious advantage over Tencent Holdings (700 HK) .
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
