bearish

JAPAN PASSIVE:  BOJ Heading For Trouble with Nikkei 225

1.6k Views19 Jul 2018 02:00
SUMMARY

The last couple of weeks have seen stories carried in the media about the impact of the BOJ in its equity index ETF buying program. Some of these stories point out how the BOJ is now the top shareholder, on a look-through basis, of more Japanese companies than ever before. The Nikkei reported in late June that the BOJ would be considered a top-10 shareholder in 40% of Japan's listed companies and suggested in another title last week "BOJ's huge share purchases cause investor unease."

Another article the week before last noted that Japanese stocks would suffer a "dividend hit" because when March-end dividends are paid out in early July (pay date for the biggest ones is early this week). Theoretically, it is the ex-date which matters not the pay-date. The delta risk comes off on the day before ex-date, which was around the time that article was written. It was a non-event.

The selldown was well-known, as is the buy-in at the end of March when the ETFs have to buy futures into the ex-date for the stock dividends to maintain their NAVs. It has also been arbed for years. Because 80+% of the ETFs which track the big three indices (Nikkei 225, TOPIX, JPX Nikkei 400) are owned by the BOJ, the dividends are received in the trust which owns the ETFs on behalf of the BOJ, and when I asked the BOJ a few years ago "What happens to those dividends?" the answer was, "It goes into the BOJ's income statement" [and is not added to the provisions]. So it does not get reinvested.

The BOJ certainly does own some ETFs. As of the end of June, by my calculations, the BOJ roughly 80.7% of the outstanding ETFs of those three major indices, and a mark-to-market portfolio value of some ¥25.5 trillion.

data sources: BOJ, JPX, ETF filings, Bloomberg, TL

For kicks I measured the Top 10, Top 5, and #1 shareholder for each of the 2000+ names in TOPIX, and by my calculation, the BOJ's combined look-through holdings would have been a Top 10 shareholder for 1365 TOPIX names according to the Bloomberg public filing data (and therefore 36.3% of the companies listed in Japan). It would have been Top 5 shareholder for 350 names and the number one shareholder for 51 stocks.

That is less of a problem than it looks. The BOJ owns a whopping 4% of listed Japan. That is neither here nor there. It could be higher, it could be zero. If all of listed Japan were float, and all of the indices float-weighted, that would be fine.

But there's the rub. They're not.

The BOJ on a look-through basis owns more than 10% of 39 companies by my calculation. In terms of economic ownership, its top stake is 23%. It owns 15-20% of market cap of some well-known large companies such as Taiyo Yuden Co Ltd (6976 JP), TDK Corp (6762 JP), Trend Micro Inc (4704 JP), Konami Holdings Corp (9766 JP), Tokyo Electron Ltd (8035 JP), Nitto Denko Corp (6988 JP), and Fast Retailing Co Ltd (9983 JP). It generally owns 20-35% of the "float" of those companies.

But that is in the past. It is already bought. The bigger problem is what is to come.

At its current pace and methodology, in the next 12 months, the BOJ's ETF buying will purchase more than 5% of the remaining float of 13 stocks. With two of them at rates of higher than 15%.

One name is truly special because of a corporate action. THAT name will see - if nothing is done about it - between 25-55% of its remaining float purchased by the BOJ's ETF buying in the next 12 months.

I continue to believe a Nikkei 225 reshuffle may be in the cards.

The History

The history is that in 2010 the Bank of Japan started buying ETFs in order to implement quantitative easing.

  • The original Asset Purchase Plan announced in the release of the November 5, 2010 Monetary Policy Meeting stated that the BOJ would purchase TOPIX and Nikkei 225 ETFs in the market (at VWAP) at a rate of ¥1.0 trillion/year, purchasing ETFs in a ratio to their outstanding notional (with some subtle aspects related to trading volume and frequency). The BOJ would also purchase J-REITs.
  • At the "Big Bazooka" meeting of October 31, 2014, the release noted the ETF purchase quantity was lifted to ¥3 trillion per annum and the BOJ said it would start purchasing ETFs tracking the JPX-Nikkei 400 Index.
  • In late July 2016, the BOJ announced the results of its Monetary Policy Committee meeting and announced a further increase in ETF buying to ¥5.7 trillion a year of "regular ETFs" (TOPIX, Nikkei 225, and JPX-Nikkei 400 Index-tracking ETFs) and ¥300 billion/year of "ETFs to support investment in physical and human capital", purchases of which had commenced in April at a slightly lower pace (but now continue at a pace of ¥1.2bn a day - every day).
  • In September 2016, the BOJ announced it would twist its ETF buys so that the original ¥3 trillion would be split amongst TOPIX, Nikkei 225, and JPX-Nikkei 400 according to the methodology prior to July, whereas the additional ¥2.7trln/year would be all TOPIX.
  • The BOJ continues to purchase ETFs at the rate of roughly ¥5.7 trillion a year. In the year between 1 April 2016 and 31 March 2017, the BOJ purchased ¥5.29 trillion. In the year to 31 March 2018 it was ¥5.29 trillion. In the last 6 months it is ¥3.3 trillion - all of regular ETFs.

To repeat what I wrote in February - in addition to the history...

What is done is done. What might be more interesting is what to come. The issues then are the issues now, except they are worse.

We know from various media reports from 6-18 months ago that there are murmurings inside the BOJ about the possible market impact of its ETF buying. In the past, when BOJ Governor Kuroda has been asked about this topic in a general way, he has stated that the BOJ could alter its methods if it became a problem.

Looking back, it is pretty close to having been a problem in the case of several stocks. Going forward it will be more of one.

I continue to think that one of two things is likely before long.

  1. The BOJ will significantly amend its purchase patterns... OR
  2. The committee which manages the Nikkei 225 Average will change the methodology of the Average.

The first would solve some issues, but not all of them.

The second would solve most of the past and future issues, and would be really, really interesting.

To do it right would mean (at current levels) a gross rebalance trade of US$70 billion, with 15 different stocks seeing a US$1 billion flow, and one name seeing (as of now) an $8bn flow. But it would solve the BOJ's "problems" regarding ETF impact on the market and single names for years to come.


The Last Five Insights in the BOJ vs ETF Series

24 April 2018JAPAN PASSIVE: Update on the BOJ and Its ETF Buying
12 Feb 2018Trading the BOJ-Nikkei 225 Baskets
4 Feb 2018The BOJ's Ongoing ETF Impact - Is a Nikkei 225 Reshuffle in the Cards?
12 Jan 2018Fast Retailing: Still Squeezable
19 Jul 2017JAPAN PASSIVE: The BOJ and Japan ETFs

This is a long insight with some technical detail. You can jump down to the table at the bottom with the "To Buy" and "To Sell" headers. If you own any in the right hand side, beware. If you are short any on the left hand side, beware. It is worth a think of how a change in the Nikkei 225 might affect you.

Get started on the Smartkarma Research Network with a complimentary Preview Pass to:
  • Unlock all research summaries
  • Follow top, independent analysts
  • Receive personalised alerts and emails
  • Access Briefings, Analytics, and Events

Upgrade anytime to our paid plans for full-length research, real-time analyst discussions, and more.

Join a thriving community of 45,000+ investors, including the top global asset managers managing over $13trn in assets.

or
Already have an account? Sign In Now
Discussions
(Paid Plans Only)
chart-bar
Logo
Top 5%
Travis Lundy
Pan-Asia Catalysts/Events
Quiddity Advisors
Japan & Hong KongEquitiesEvent-DrivenQuantitative Analysis
x