Pan-Asia Catalysts/Events, Quiddity Advisors

Travis Lundy

HK Type 4 license through Ballingal Investment Advisors Ltd. ("BIA" or "BIAL")

BACKGROUND
I have 20+yrs experience in Asia doing alternative strategies (i.e. non-delta1 non long-only) in fixed income, equity derivatives, and activist/catalyst/event-driven and long-short equity strategies with most of that time spent managing money. 

4 years in fixed income macro, 8 years running internal hedge fund and 4yrs investment banking at Citi in Japan, 3 years running an Asia multi-strat portfolio at a hedge fund, 4+yrs as an independent special situations analyst.

Pan-Asia Catalysts/Events

Smartkarma North Asia Weekly: Asian Healthcare,JD Health, Evergrande Services, & LG NewCo + SpinOff

Tokyo Dome Sells Itself For the Wrong Price

Yomiuri Land (9671) Takeover - Probably The Wrong Price But Whaddya Gonna Do?

The Amended FamilyMart Document Is A MUST READ For Investor-Stewards

Quiddity Advisors

Event-Driven

The Nikkei Asia <a href="https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Business-deals/1bn-bid-for-Tokyo-Dome-planned-by-developer-Mitsui-Fudosan" target="_blank" rel="noopener">reported</a> this morning (Japanese article link <a href="https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXMZO66704090X21C20A1MM8000" target="_blank" rel="noopener">here</a>) that <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/mitsui-fudosan-co-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:565:1" rel="noopener">Mitsui Fudosan (8801 JP)</a> intended to partner with someone to launch a Tender Offer to take private <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/tokyo-dome-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:6421:1" rel="noopener">Tokyo Dome Corp (9681 JP)</a>, spending "more than ¥100bn" (vs the ¥85.9bn of yesterday's close) based on the idea that there would be a premium to market price. The Tender Offer could start before 2020 ends.The bigger story here, of course, is that hedge fund Oasis Management has been on the case, urging Tokyo Dome management to do more to improve value for shareholders. Oasis said earlier this month they had been trying to engage with Tokyo Dome since 2018. They went over 5% in December 2019 and according to filings lifted their stake to 9.71% in January 2020. Covid-19 later hit Japan and as a result, the number of events and therefore visitor count at the various features and venues within Tokyo Dome have slowed, and the company is on its back foot. Early this year, Oasis set up a website with a fair bit of material for their case at <a href="https://www.abettertokyodome.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">abettertokyodome.com</a>. There main presentation is linked <a href="https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5dd62b05f226644911c6d4e1/t/5efabd9b2d98f71482b79156/1593490878125/OASIS+-+A+Better+Tokyo+Dome+Presentation.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">here</a>. The claims are clear, and frankly, anyone who has been to Tokyo Dome recently will know exactly what Oasis is pointing at in terms of efforts which could make Tokyo Dome a better place to visit and a better company. Among the proposals by Oasis, there are substantially improved digital signage to improve ad revenue, a naming rights agreement like seen at other major Japan venues which could bring in ¥500mm a year or more, overhauled technology to match other world-class venues, substantially improved F&amp;B strategy, etc.  The deck was really an informative read when presented in January of this year and the opportunity seemed clear to me. The onset of covid-19 was a highly unfortunate development in the timeline, and this has disrupted what might have been a much more lively activist discussion. As it is, in October, Oasis called for a shareholder meeting for Tokyo Dome, asking to replace three directors including President Tsutomu Nagaoka. On 10 November, Tokyo Dome held a press conference which saw some floundering, and Oasis <a href="https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20201111005501/en/Oasis-Key-Messages-for-Tokyo-Dome-Shareholders-Regarding-the-EGM-on-December-17-2020" target="_blank" rel="noopener">responded</a> the day after. The shareholder meeting is now set for 17 December. It is somehow not surprising that Corporate Japan is circling the wagons. Tokyo Dome is indicated limit up at ¥1047 now. The past 15+ years looks like the below.<section class="figure"><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/174/563/original/Screenshot%202020-11-27%20at%2010.27.27%20AM.png?1606444069" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="174563"></figure></section>As a reminder, the stock traded at ¥5000+ in the 1990s.The companies (<a href="https://www.mitsuifudosan.co.jp/corporate/ir/library/news/2020/pdf/news_201127.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Mitsui Fudosan</a>, <a href="https://contents.xj-storage.jp/xcontents/AS01950/1667e514/ffcc/4644/b6a6/6313ea0899ad/140120201127428865.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Tokyo Dome</a>) have both responded to the article first thing this morning saying that they will be holding board meetings to discuss this situation later today and will announce anything which needs to be announced as soon as possible thereafter.The old saying goes "Where there is smoke there is fire" but the question is whether it will be hot enough. As a pure tear-down project, the real estate and history of location/brand would likely be worth well more than ¥100bn. Word in the local press is that Mitsui's partner will be Yomiuri Shinbun, which is taking subsidiary/affiliate <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/yomiuri-land-co-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:12813:1" rel="noopener">Yomiuri Land (9671 JP)</a> private as discussed in <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/yomiuri-land-9671-takeover-probably-the-wrong-price-but-whaddya-gonna-do" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:45025" rel="noopener">Yomiuri Land (9671) Takeover - Probably The Wrong Price But Whaddya Gonna Do?</a>. Yomiuri Land is a cross-holder in Tokyo Dome.I expect I will be writing another episode of <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/japan-needs-more-cowbell" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:41191" rel="noopener">Japan Needs More Cowbell</a> shortly. It is depressing to me that one needs to write it so often, but needs, I expect, must.More on the situation and the potential valuation methodology/constraints below the fold.

The Nikkei Asia reported this morning (Japanese article link here) that Mitsui Fudosan (8801 JP) intended to partner with someone to launch a Tender Offer to take private Tokyo Dome Corp (9681 JP), spending "more than ¥100bn" (vs the ¥85.9bn of yesterday's close) based on the idea that there would be a premium to market price. The Tender Offer could start before 2020 ends.The bigger story here, of course, is that hedge fund Oasis Management has been on the case, urging Tokyo Dome management to do more to improve value for shareholders. Oasis said earlier this month they had been trying to engage with Tokyo Dome since 2018. They went over 5% in December 2019 and according to filings lifted their stake to 9.71% in January 2020. Covid-19 later hit Japan and as a result, the number of events and therefore visitor count at the various features and venues within Tokyo Dome have slowed, and the company is on its back foot. Early this year, Oasis set up a website with a fair bit of material for their case at abettertokyodome.com. There main presentation is linked here. The claims are clear, and frankly, anyone who has been to Tokyo Dome recently will know exactly what Oasis is pointing at in terms of efforts which could make Tokyo Dome a better place to visit and a better company. Among the proposals by Oasis, there are substantially improved digital signage to improve ad revenue, a naming rights agreement like seen at other major Japan venues which could bring in ¥500mm a year or more, overhauled technology to match other world-class venues, substantially improved F&amp;B strategy, etc.  The deck was really an informative read when presented in January of this year and the opportunity seemed clear to me. The onset of covid-19 was a highly unfortunate development in the timeline, and this has disrupted what might have been a much more lively activist discussion. As it is, in October, Oasis called for a shareholder meeting for Tokyo Dome, asking to replace three directors including President Tsutomu Nagaoka. On 10 November, Tokyo Dome held a press conference which saw some floundering, and Oasis responded the day after. The shareholder meeting is now set for 17 December. It is somehow not surprising that Corporate Japan is circling the wagons. Tokyo Dome is indicated limit up at ¥1047 now. The past 15+ years looks like the below.As a reminder, the stock traded at ¥5000+ in the 1990s.The companies (Mitsui Fudosan, Tokyo Dome) have both responded to the article first thing this morning saying that they will be holding board meetings to discuss this situation later today and will announce anything which needs to be announced as soon as possible thereafter.The old saying goes "Where there is smoke there is fire" but the question is whether it will be hot enough. As a pure tear-down project, the real estate and history of location/brand would likely be worth well more than ¥100bn. Word in the local press is that Mitsui's partner will be Yomiuri Shinbun, which is taking subsidiary/affiliate Yomiuri Land (9671 JP) private as discussed in Yomiuri Land (9671) Takeover - Probably The Wrong Price But Whaddya Gonna Do?. Yomiuri Land is a cross-holder in Tokyo Dome.I expect I will be writing another episode of Japan Needs More Cowbell shortly. It is depressing to me that one needs to write it so often, but needs, I expect, must.More on the situation and the potential valuation methodology/constraints below the fold.

Mitsui Fudosan Tender For Tokyo Dome (9681) Mooted