Pan-Asia Catalysts/Events, Quiddity Advisors

Travis Lundy

Pan-Asia Catalysts/Events

Quiddity Advisors

As noted in the last insight about <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/the-gpif-s-new-policy-mix" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:38000" rel="noopener">The GPIF's New Policy Mix</a> (and its preceding <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/gpif-policy-mix-changes-ride-to-global-risk-rescue" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:37770" rel="noopener">GPIF Policy Mix Changes Ride to Global Risk Rescue</a>), the GPIF has changed its policy mix.Apparently, going to exactly25% each, plus or minus a fair bit, on domestic bonds, foreign bonds, domestic equities, and foreign equities, provides the lowest risk profile while reaching the GPIF's real investment rate of return target of 1.7%.<figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/127/617/original/Screenshot%202020-04-12%20at%206.31.04%20PM.png?1586687503" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="127617"></figure><div class="content-highlight">
This is the target for the future. A target which it will meet. With 50%, or roughly 40% to up to 60+% of notional, and far more than that of mark-to-market risk, in foreign currency.
And that is the lowest risk portfolio tested. 
How do we know they will meet that target? Because they backtested the policy mix over the past 25yrs post-bubble returns to March 2019. Using annual data. It was also tested against the last 34yrs of returns. Using annual data. And everyone knows that using 25-34 data points over the past 25-34 years is likely to provide near certainty of what will happen to yen returns in foreign currency assets. [narrator: no, it won't].
As of the start of this new policy on 1 April, the yen-hedged 10yr US Treasury rate was about -0.6% rather than the average 4.1% yield over 25yrs less a yen hedge to get to 2.6%. 
The current prospective yen-hedged return is 3.2% below the bogey rate of 2.6% in yen. To get back to a yen-hedged rate of 2.6%, the entire GPIF portfolio has to take a loss of something like 7-8% at the policy mix of 25% foreign bonds. Either that or they can hold on to the bonds they have and expect USD/JPY to rise 2% a year to get to ¥130 to the dollar by March 2030.
But that is the base assumption. USD/JPY has to go up 2% a year to make this work.
Practically speaking, of course, that might not be required. If USD/yen rose and bond yields rose in the interim, the domestic equities portfolio might outperform the expected 5.6% annual return and make up for the interim losses, and income from the equity portfolio could be used to reinvest a larger amount at higher yields. The assumed correlation between the two assets in yen terms is close to zero. 
But all that requires aggressive rebalancing when the yen-denominated asset portfolios get out of whack with the policy mix rates. 
</div>All this should tell you is that the policy mix as it was when they decided this in March was substantially different than the history which informed the decision (markets move, who'da thunk?), and the result is that to match that return going forward, the yen has to weaken substantially, and consistently, and effectively permanently. That's the base investment case.<h2>The Other News Out From the GPIF is About ESG</h2>The <a href="https://www.gpif.go.jp/topics/Adoption%20of%20New%20Policy%20Portfolio_Jp_details.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">presentation</a> (only in Japanese) about the change in policy makes considerable mention of the concept of ESG and stewardship, and suggests an interesting breakdown of what stewardship means for passive investing and active investing conducted by the GPIF's sub-managers. The minutes of the last several Investment Committee and Governors' meetings also refer quite a lot to ESG. The presentation and minutes also talk quite interestingly about index construction and engagement with index providers. The result is an increased emphasis on <h2>And We Have March Data And May Glean What GPIF Did in FYQ4</h2>Late last week, the Japanese Ministry of Finance reported its survey of large asset managers and trust banks of the flows in international securities, and the TSE reported the weekly and therefore March totals for trust bank activity in equities.The picture painted may tell us something remarkable about what happened in the last quarter. Much more below.

As noted in the last insight about The GPIF's New Policy Mix (and its preceding GPIF Policy Mix Changes Ride to Global Risk Rescue), the GPIF has changed its policy mix.Apparently, going to exactly25% each, plus or minus a fair bit, on domestic bonds, foreign bonds, domestic equities, and foreign equities, provides the lowest risk profile while reaching the GPIF's real investment rate of return target of 1.7%.
This is the target for the future. A target which it will meet. With 50%, or roughly 40% to up to 60+% of notional, and far more than that of mark-to-market risk, in foreign currency.
And that is the lowest risk portfolio tested. 
How do we know they will meet that target? Because they backtested the policy mix over the past 25yrs post-bubble returns to March 2019. Using annual data. It was also tested against the last 34yrs of returns. Using annual data. And everyone knows that using 25-34 data points over the past 25-34 years is likely to provide near certainty of what will happen to yen returns in foreign currency assets. [narrator: no, it won't].
As of the start of this new policy on 1 April, the yen-hedged 10yr US Treasury rate was about -0.6% rather than the average 4.1% yield over 25yrs less a yen hedge to get to 2.6%. 
The current prospective yen-hedged return is 3.2% below the bogey rate of 2.6% in yen. To get back to a yen-hedged rate of 2.6%, the entire GPIF portfolio has to take a loss of something like 7-8% at the policy mix of 25% foreign bonds. Either that or they can hold on to the bonds they have and expect USD/JPY to rise 2% a year to get to ¥130 to the dollar by March 2030.
But that is the base assumption. USD/JPY has to go up 2% a year to make this work.
Practically speaking, of course, that might not be required. If USD/yen rose and bond yields rose in the interim, the domestic equities portfolio might outperform the expected 5.6% annual return and make up for the interim losses, and income from the equity portfolio could be used to reinvest a larger amount at higher yields. The assumed correlation between the two assets in yen terms is close to zero. 
But all that requires aggressive rebalancing when the yen-denominated asset portfolios get out of whack with the policy mix rates. 
All this should tell you is that the policy mix as it was when they decided this in March was substantially different than the history which informed the decision (markets move, who'da thunk?), and the result is that to match that return going forward, the yen has to weaken substantially, and consistently, and effectively permanently. That's the base investment case.The Other News Out From the GPIF is About ESGThe presentation (only in Japanese) about the change in policy makes considerable mention of the concept of ESG and stewardship, and suggests an interesting breakdown of what stewardship means for passive investing and active investing conducted by the GPIF's sub-managers. The minutes of the last several Investment Committee and Governors' meetings also refer quite a lot to ESG. The presentation and minutes also talk quite interestingly about index construction and engagement with index providers. The result is an increased emphasis on And We Have March Data And May Glean What GPIF Did in FYQ4Late last week, the Japanese Ministry of Finance reported its survey of large asset managers and trust banks of the flows in international securities, and the TSE reported the weekly and therefore March totals for trust bank activity in equities.The picture painted may tell us something remarkable about what happened in the last quarter. Much more below.

'Quantamental' Japan Specialist, LightStream Research

Campbell Gunn

'Quantamental' Japan Specialist

ja research

ja research is an independent research platform focused exclusively on Japanese equities. Leveraging data and graphic analysis provided by Japan Analytics, we provide insights on small and medium-sized companies that have been ignored by the sell-side as well as challenging conventional wisdom on larger companies. We also offer analyst and corporate access, the latter with translation if required. 

Thematic (Sector/Industry)

<figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/125/889/original/2020-04-01_12-59-11.png?1585713567" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="125889"></figure><div class="content-caption">Source • Japan Analytics</div>DIVIDENDS AT RISK - As noted in our daily Results &amp; Revisions Updates in the last few days, Japanese companies are starting to shore up their cash flow but cutting or eliminating their dividends. Following <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/hsbc-holdings-plc" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:516:1" rel="noopener">HSBC (5 HK) </a>and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/standard-chartered-plc" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:193:1" rel="noopener">Standard Chartered (STAN LN)</a> moves on April 1st, a wave of similar moves is expected in Japan. Although dividends are thought to be very 'sticky' in this market,  on average,  of the 75% of non-financial companies that pay dividends, 14% reduce their payouts each year. In FY2009 and FY2010, this ratio rose to one-third.<figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/125/899/original/2020-04-01_13-47-18.png?1585716458" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="125899"></figure><div class="content-caption">Source • Japan Analytics</div>30% HAIRCUT - The 'stickiness' of Japanese dividends is clear from the trends in absolute values. The total amount of cash dividends paid by non-financial companies declined by 30% from 2008 to 2010 or by ¥1.8 trillion. Since the 2010 'low', total cash dividends paid by these companies have increased by 168% to ¥11.8 trillion, a 'trailing yield' of 2.4%. A 30% dividend haircut to ¥8.3 trillion would reduce the yield on current market cap to 1.7%, slightly above the 2010 low of 1.63%.<figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/126/905/original/2020-04-07_13-29-26.png?1586233784" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="126905"></figure><div class="content-caption">Source • Japan Analytics</div>WHO'S CUTTING NEXT? - Some serial dividend 'cutters', like <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/nipro-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:18346:1" rel="noopener">Nipro (8086 JP)</a> above, have already announced a cut for the fiscal year just ended. In the DETAIL section below, we shall attempt to highlight those larger (Market Cap &gt; ¥50b) companies with the greatest risk of having to cut their dividends.

Source • Japan AnalyticsDIVIDENDS AT RISK - As noted in our daily Results &amp; Revisions Updates in the last few days, Japanese companies are starting to shore up their cash flow but cutting or eliminating their dividends. Following HSBC (5 HK) and Standard Chartered (STAN LN) moves on April 1st, a wave of similar moves is expected in Japan. Although dividends are thought to be very 'sticky' in this market,  on average,  of the 75% of non-financial companies that pay dividends, 14% reduce their payouts each year. In FY2009 and FY2010, this ratio rose to one-third.Source • Japan Analytics30% HAIRCUT - The 'stickiness' of Japanese dividends is clear from the trends in absolute values. The total amount of cash dividends paid by non-financial companies declined by 30% from 2008 to 2010 or by ¥1.8 trillion. Since the 2010 'low', total cash dividends paid by these companies have increased by 168% to ¥11.8 trillion, a 'trailing yield' of 2.4%. A 30% dividend haircut to ¥8.3 trillion would reduce the yield on current market cap to 1.7%, slightly above the 2010 low of 1.63%.Source • Japan AnalyticsWHO'S CUTTING NEXT? - Some serial dividend 'cutters', like Nipro (8086 JP) above, have already announced a cut for the fiscal year just ended. In the DETAIL section below, we shall attempt to highlight those larger (Market Cap &gt; ¥50b) companies with the greatest risk of having to cut their dividends.

🇯🇵 JAPAN • Dividends At Risk - The Serial 'Cutters'

<figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/118/403/original/2020-02-18_08-44-22.png?1581983074" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="118403"></figure><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/118/404/original/2020-02-18_08-42-56.png?1581983098" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="118404"></figure><div class="content-caption">Source • Japan Analytics</div>THREE-YEAR LOW - With <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/bridgestone-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:8914:1" rel="noopener">Bridgestone (5108 JP)</a>'s results and revision now added, our final tally for this season is a 196 basis point decline in our Results Sore - the lowest since March 2017.  In contrast, the Forecast/Revision Score reached a three-month high as the 470 companies with December year-ends put an optimistic gloss on their medium-term outlook. As we have noted in our recent daily roundups, a normal precondition for a cycle low is for the Forecast/Revision Score to rise above the Results Score. Forecast/Revision Score peaks and troughs usually occur one to two quarters ahead of those for the Results Score.  Covid-19's impact will likely see the 2016 'playbook' repeated next quarter with a lower Results Score and a 'sideways' Forecast/Results Score. The Results Score cycle low point will be reached with the mostly-interim results to be released in six months. <figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/118/405/original/2020-02-18_09-29-28.png?1581985792" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="118405"></figure><div class="content-caption">Source • Japan Analytics</div>LEADING INDICATOR - By including several momentum factors into our Scoring (see below), we can provide a better indication of future business conditions. Indeed there is a 0.83 correlation between the Cabinet Office's Business Condition Leading Indicator and the Forecast/Revision Score. Reported earnings, as well as company forecasts, are lagging indicators and, as shown in Part 1 of this Insight. Both data series peaked one year after our Scores and the market peaked in early 2018. SCORING METHODOLOGY - For those new to these Insights, we briefly recap our scoring methodology below:-<ul>
<li>Results Scores are calculated using the most recent eight quarters of company data for Revenues, Operating Income and Operating Margin and, for each, measure the rate, degree and consistency of change. The Results Score has a maximum of +30 and a minimum of -30 for each period. Our data series commences from the time a particular company issues quarterly results. The sample size becomes significant from March 2005.</li>
<li>The Forecast/Revision Score is based on both Annual and Interim period company forecasts and compares changes from previous forecasts as well as against the trailing twelve-month (TTM) or previous first-half results, with annual forecasts being double-weighted. This Score also has a maximum of +30 and a minimum of -30 for each period.  For this series, our data samples start from August 2008.</li>
<li>The combined Results &amp; Revision Score (RRS) is the average of the Results Score and the Forecasts/Revision Score.</li>
<li>
All company Scores are then cap-weight-aggregated into Sector, Peer Group and Market Composite Scores for which the seventeen-year monthly and two-year daily track records are shown above. Only currently listed-companies are covered in the aggregate Scores, and the Total Market Capitalisation excludes delisted entities. REITs are not included.
<hr>
• SECTOR SCORES •
<figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/118/410/original/2020-02-18_09-55-29.png?1581987489" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="118410"></figure><div class="content-caption">Source • Japan Analytics</div>
In the DETAIL Section below, we provide a detailed breakdown of our RRS Scoring for Sectors, Peer Groups and individual companies, highlighting this quarter's 'winners' and 'losers'. The chart above shows a  seventeen-year 'timeline' of the cap-weight-aggregated Sector RRS Scores and the ebbs and flows around the business cycles. The Metals Sector is the most volatile on the downside and has yet to 'bottom' this cycle. Technology Hardware appears to have already rebounded; however, Covid-19 suggests this Sector may relapse. On the upside, the Information Technology Sector has replaced the Internet and Telecoms Sectors as the contra-cyclical 'champion'. 
</li>
</ul>

Source • Japan AnalyticsTHREE-YEAR LOW - With Bridgestone (5108 JP)'s results and revision now added, our final tally for this season is a 196 basis point decline in our Results Sore - the lowest since March 2017.  In contrast, the Forecast/Revision Score reached a three-month high as the 470 companies with December year-ends put an optimistic gloss on their medium-term outlook. As we have noted in our recent daily roundups, a normal precondition for a cycle low is for the Forecast/Revision Score to rise above the Results Score. Forecast/Revision Score peaks and troughs usually occur one to two quarters ahead of those for the Results Score.  Covid-19's impact will likely see the 2016 'playbook' repeated next quarter with a lower Results Score and a 'sideways' Forecast/Results Score. The Results Score cycle low point will be reached with the mostly-interim results to be released in six months. Source • Japan AnalyticsLEADING INDICATOR - By including several momentum factors into our Scoring (see below), we can provide a better indication of future business conditions. Indeed there is a 0.83 correlation between the Cabinet Office's Business Condition Leading Indicator and the Forecast/Revision Score. Reported earnings, as well as company forecasts, are lagging indicators and, as shown in Part 1 of this Insight. Both data series peaked one year after our Scores and the market peaked in early 2018. SCORING METHODOLOGY - For those new to these Insights, we briefly recap our scoring methodology below:-
Results Scores are calculated using the most recent eight quarters of company data for Revenues, Operating Income and Operating Margin and, for each, measure the rate, degree and consistency of change. The Results Score has a maximum of +30 and a minimum of -30 for each period. Our data series commences from the time a particular company issues quarterly results. The sample size becomes significant from March 2005.
The Forecast/Revision Score is based on both Annual and Interim period company forecasts and compares changes from previous forecasts as well as against the trailing twelve-month (TTM) or previous first-half results, with annual forecasts being double-weighted. This Score also has a maximum of +30 and a minimum of -30 for each period.  For this series, our data samples start from August 2008.
The combined Results &amp; Revision Score (RRS) is the average of the Results Score and the Forecasts/Revision Score.

All company Scores are then cap-weight-aggregated into Sector, Peer Group and Market Composite Scores for which the seventeen-year monthly and two-year daily track records are shown above. Only currently listed-companies are covered in the aggregate Scores, and the Total Market Capitalisation excludes delisted entities. REITs are not included.

• SECTOR SCORES •
Source • Japan Analytics
In the DETAIL Section below, we provide a detailed breakdown of our RRS Scoring for Sectors, Peer Groups and individual companies, highlighting this quarter's 'winners' and 'losers'. The chart above shows a  seventeen-year 'timeline' of the cap-weight-aggregated Sector RRS Scores and the ebbs and flows around the business cycles. The Metals Sector is the most volatile on the downside and has yet to 'bottom' this cycle. Technology Hardware appears to have already rebounded; however, Covid-19 suggests this Sector may relapse. On the upside, the Information Technology Sector has replaced the Internet and Telecoms Sectors as the contra-cyclical 'champion'. 



🇯🇵 JAPAN • IT’S A WRAP! Part 2: 2020-Q1 Results & Revision Scores

<figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/115/540/original/2020-01-30_04-53-40.png?1580327644" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="115540"></figure><div class="content-caption">Source • Japan Analytics</div>29TH JANUARY ROUNDUP - Thre were 74 results and 30 forecasts or revisions announcements yesterday. Of the 32 larger-cap companies reporting results, seven saw year-on-year declines in their quarterly OP of greater than 25%, while three - <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/nec-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:17084:1" rel="noopener">NEC (6701 JP)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/cyberagent-inc" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:8197:1" rel="noopener">CyberAgent(4751 JP)</a>, and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/valuecommerce-co-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:7970:1" rel="noopener">ValueCommerce (2491 JP)</a> grew profits by more than 25%, with the last of the three showing the strongest revenue growth. <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/omron-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:15904:1" rel="noopener">Omron (6645 JP)</a> saw sales fall by 23%. Our market composite cap-weighted Results Score declined by 8bps to 0.99FORECASTS - <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/canon-inc" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:1:1" rel="noopener">Canon (7751 JP)</a> released the most optimistic forecasts and account for the 24bps uptick in our Forecast/Revision Score; however, in terms of OP the FY2020 forecast is the same as the FY2016 actual result which was the second-worst outcome in the last decade after FY2019. The weakest outlook came from <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/screen-holdings-co-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:5563:1" rel="noopener">Screen (7735 JP)</a> (-28% v TTM OP), which, when combined with <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/advantest-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:18107:1" rel="noopener">Advantest (6857 JP)</a>'s third-quarter results, should go some way to puncturing the current fad for owning SPE companies.<figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/115/543/original/2020-01-30_05-28-22.png?1580329720" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="115543"></figure><div class="content-caption">Source • Japan Analytics</div>POST-RELEASE RPS CHANGES - Of the larger-cap companies announcing the day before yesterday or pre-close yesterday, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/obic-co-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:1273:1" rel="noopener">OBIC (4684 JP)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/obic-business-consultants" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:17383:1" rel="noopener">Obic Business Consultants (4733 JP)</a>, and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/sakai-moving-service-co-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:10020:1" rel="noopener">Sakai Moving Service (9039 JP)</a> saw Relative Price Score declines. In contrast, the two Canon group companies, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/m3-inc" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:13316:1" rel="noopener">M3 (2413 JP)</a>, and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/sekisui-jushi-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:7654:1" rel="noopener">Sekisui Jushi (4212 JP)</a> rose.  In the DETAIL below, we review our Sector Timelines and the announcements from <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/fanuc-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:752:1" rel="noopener">Fanuc (6954 JP)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/canon-inc" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:1:1" rel="noopener">Canon (7751 JP)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/nec-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:17084:1" rel="noopener">NEC (6701 JP)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/cyberagent-inc" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:8197:1" rel="noopener">CyberAgent (4751 JP)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/omron-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:15904:1" rel="noopener">Omron (6645 JP)</a>, and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/advantest-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:18107:1" rel="noopener">Advantest(6857 JP)</a>.

Source • Japan Analytics29TH JANUARY ROUNDUP - Thre were 74 results and 30 forecasts or revisions announcements yesterday. Of the 32 larger-cap companies reporting results, seven saw year-on-year declines in their quarterly OP of greater than 25%, while three - NEC (6701 JP), CyberAgent(4751 JP), and ValueCommerce (2491 JP) grew profits by more than 25%, with the last of the three showing the strongest revenue growth. Omron (6645 JP) saw sales fall by 23%. Our market composite cap-weighted Results Score declined by 8bps to 0.99FORECASTS - Canon (7751 JP) released the most optimistic forecasts and account for the 24bps uptick in our Forecast/Revision Score; however, in terms of OP the FY2020 forecast is the same as the FY2016 actual result which was the second-worst outcome in the last decade after FY2019. The weakest outlook came from Screen (7735 JP) (-28% v TTM OP), which, when combined with Advantest (6857 JP)'s third-quarter results, should go some way to puncturing the current fad for owning SPE companies.Source • Japan AnalyticsPOST-RELEASE RPS CHANGES - Of the larger-cap companies announcing the day before yesterday or pre-close yesterday, OBIC (4684 JP), Obic Business Consultants (4733 JP), and Sakai Moving Service (9039 JP) saw Relative Price Score declines. In contrast, the two Canon group companies, M3 (2413 JP), and Sekisui Jushi (4212 JP) rose.  In the DETAIL below, we review our Sector Timelines and the announcements from Fanuc (6954 JP), Canon (7751 JP), NEC (6701 JP), CyberAgent (4751 JP), Omron (6645 JP), and Advantest(6857 JP). 

🇯🇵 JAPAN • Results & Revisions Daily Roundup - 29th January - 6954▲ 7751► 6701▲ 4751▲ 6645▼6857▼

Japan/Asia Long-Short, LightStream Research

Mio Kato

Japan/Asia Long-Short

Long-Short Analysis on Japan, Asia and the World

LightStream Research

LightStream conducts quantitatively rigorous and data-driven analysis with a focus on Japan and Asia.

We consistently cover the Tech, Consumer and Industrial sectors, and provide ECM and Events coverage more broadly.

We supplement traditional qualitative insights from company relationships with a robust quantitative foundation that examines as much historical data as is available.
We further refine the accuracy of our insights and calls through the use of alternative data to flesh out current trends, and through a valuation framework that emphasises non-superficial peer group selection and a proper attempt to understand the metrics and changes that have driven security valuations in the past.

We have been highlighting what we consider to be overexuberance in the rallies within the semiconductor and factory automation sectors lately. The sectors have demonstrated a high degree of correlation of late and we would argue that while fundamentals look like they are bottoming in both sectors, prospects for a strong recovery in the near-term look faint. We thus feel that the current rallies are building in excessive expectations whereas we expect a very tame recovery, due to a lack of strong upside drivers and the strength of the previous peak which needs to be digested.We would refer readers to Jim Handy’s excellent work on the semiconductor sector fundamentals, while we discuss the fundamentals for the FA sector below.

We have been highlighting what we consider to be overexuberance in the rallies within the semiconductor and factory automation sectors lately. The sectors have demonstrated a high degree of correlation of late and we would argue that while fundamentals look like they are bottoming in both sectors, prospects for a strong recovery in the near-term look faint. We thus feel that the current rallies are building in excessive expectations whereas we expect a very tame recovery, due to a lack of strong upside drivers and the strength of the previous peak which needs to be digested.We would refer readers to Jim Handy’s excellent work on the semiconductor sector fundamentals, while we discuss the fundamentals for the FA sector below.

Readthrough to Japanese FA Sector from Capital's SK Hynix Block Sale

Japan

FANUC CORPORATION manufactures factory automation (FA) systems and equipments, and robots. The Company's products include computerized numerically-controlled (CNC) equipment, servo motors, laser systems, industrial robots, wire-cut electric discharge machines, and CNC drill.  Fanuc participates in a joint venture with General Electric in the FA field.

Price Gauge
52-week Range	0.00 - 0.00
Market Cap (USDm)	0.00
P/E	0.00
Dividend (Yield)	0.00

Fanuc Corp Unsp Adr (FANUY US)

Recent GPIF Moves - Rebalancing & ESG

As noted in the last insight about The GPIF's New Policy Mix (and its preceding GPIF Policy Mix Changes Ride to Global Risk Rescue), the GPIF has...

Travis Lundy

🇯🇵 JAPAN • Dividends At Risk - The Serial 'Cutters'

DIVIDENDS AT RISK - As noted in our daily Results & Revisions Updates in the last few days, Japanese companies are starting to shore up their...

Campbell Gunn

🇯🇵 JAPAN • IT’S A WRAP! Part 2: 2020-Q1 Results & Revision Scores

THREE-YEAR LOW - With Bridgestone (5108 JP)'s results and revision now added, our final tally for this season is a 196 basis point decline in our...

Campbell Gunn

🇯🇵 JAPAN • Results & Revisions Daily Roundup - 29th January - 6954▲ 7751► 6701▲ 4751▲ 6645▼6857▼

29TH JANUARY ROUNDUP - Thre were 74 results and 30 forecasts or revisions announcements yesterday. Of the 32 larger-cap companies reporting...

Campbell Gunn

Readthrough to Japanese FA Sector from Capital's SK Hynix Block Sale

We have been highlighting what we consider to be overexuberance in the rallies within the semiconductor and factory automation sectors lately. The...

Mio Kato

Price Gauge

52-week Range

Market Cap (USDm)

P/E

Dividend (Yield)