Pan-Asia Catalysts/Events, Quiddity Advisors

Travis Lundy

Pan-Asia Catalysts/Events

Quiddity Advisors

Event-Driven

<p>On 6 July 2020, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/sina-corp-china" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:22691:1" rel="noopener">Sina Corp (Class A) (SINA US)</a> made an <a href="http://ir.sina.com/index.php/static-files/69e95aee-2729-457f-be56-73628090b8ea" target="_blank" rel="noopener">announcement</a> they had received a preliminary non-binding “going private” proposal from New Wave MMXV - a company controlled by its chairman and CEO Charles Chao. The bid was US$41/share. The GlobalTimes had an <a href="https://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1202472.shtml" target="_blank" rel="noopener">article</a> where sources opined Sina would "go home" to list in HK or on the STAR Market. This was followed by an <a href="http://ir.sina.com/static-files/de1ddd0f-354f-42de-9b33-b1bc414ab1b4" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Agreement and Plan of Merger</a> pursuant to which New Wave would acquire all of outstanding ordinary shares not owned at US$43.30/share. Shareholders approved the merger on <a href="http://ir.sina.com/static-files/ea4a5614-30e8-472c-895c-31e120de3261" target="_blank" rel="noopener">23 December</a> 2020.</p><p>The importance of Sina Corp was that it owned a very large stake in China's premier micro-blogging (twitter-equivalent) service, operated by <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/weibo-corp-adr" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:3826:1" rel="noopener">Weibo Corp (Adr) (WB US)</a>. </p><p>Prior to that EGM, according to <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/profiles/david-blennerhassett" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="accounts:840" rel="noopener">David Blennerhassett</a>'s excellent write-ups of the deal in <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/sina-corp-management-buyout-offer" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:41035" rel="noopener">Sina Corp: Management Buyout Offer</a>, and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/what-s-going-on-with-sina-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:48344" rel="noopener">What's Going On With Sina Corp?</a> (along with a fabulous initial cut at dissenters' appraisal rights for Chinese companies coming home in <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/sina-corp-appraisal-rights-and-fair-value" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:41068" rel="noopener">Homecoming For Chinese Companies: Appraisal Rights &amp; Fair Value</a>), Sina had intended to issue written notices of authorization to objecting shareholders (prior to the EGM, <a href="http://ir.sina.com/static-files/722deb54-0426-4b43-a58a-1c8be8b59b61" target="_blank" rel="noopener">21.5mn shares or 35.9%</a> of the outstanding shares of Sina issued notices of objections to the company). </p><p>The dissenting total was quite high, and <em>could have</em> been a reason for Charles Chao to walk away from the deal, but despite the "requirement" to issue authorization notices by early Feb, there was no public acknowledgment of the situation by SINA until 22 March when the company issued a <a href="https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/sina-announces-completion-of-merger-301253197.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">press release</a> saying the merger had been completed.</p><p>So that was done.</p><p>Back in February, the Hong Kong capital markets world was atwitter (woefully bad pun intended) with the news (<a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-02-18/china-s-twitter-like-weibo-said-to-plan-hong-kong-second-listing" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Bloomberg</a>, <a href="https://www.reuters.com/world/china/chinas-weibo-hires-banks-hong-kong-secondary-listing-sources-say-2021-02-23/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Reuters</a>, that <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/weibo-corp-adr" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:3826:1" rel="noopener">Weibo Corp (Adr) (WB US)</a>, China's largest micro-blogging service (China twitter) intended to launch a secondary offering in Hong Kong, like many other US ADR-listed Chinese companies, and had hired banks (GS, CLSA, CS) to do so. </p><p>But since then, there has been no follow-up news. </p><h2>But There is Now NEW "News"... Which is Not Yet News</h2><p>Late in the Asia evening on 6 July 2021, Reuters had an <a href="https://www.reuters.com/technology/exclusive-weibo-chairman-state-firm-plan-take-chinas-twitter-private-sources-2021-07-06/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">EXCLUSIVE</a> which said Weibo chairman Charles Chao - with 45% of shares out but 71% of voting rights - would team up with an as-yet unnamed Shanghai-based state firm to take the company private. </p><p>One goal would be to get <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/alibaba-group-holding-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:787:1" rel="noopener">Alibaba Group (BABA US)</a> out of their 30% stake. Two sources told Reuters the consortium plans to offer $90-100/share.</p><section class="figure"><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/217/007/original/Screenshot+2021-07-06+at+8.35.37+PM.png?1625574980" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="217007"></figure></section><p>As I wrote that sentence, the shares were indicated +30% at just over US$71/share. </p><p>My first thought was that the shares would trade "wide" to these early-reported terms as there are political considerations (will the State Council appreciate that a regional SASAC puts up money to buy out an internet firm?), questions about where BABA would agree to sell, timeline, and questions about what Charles Chao and the unnamed Shanghai entity would do if materially all the minorities dissented.</p><p>As I finish that paragraph, Bloomberg appears to have reached a <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/weibo-corp-adr" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:3826:1" rel="noopener">Weibo Corp (Adr) (WB US)</a> spokesperson who says that this rumour is not true. </p><p>And a while later, we have a Weibo release which offers a pretty strong denial. </p><section class="figure"><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/217/010/original/Screenshot+2021-07-06+at+9.39.13+PM.png?1625578767" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="217010"></figure><p></p></section><p>Of course, that doesn't mean it isn't true. It just means that it isn't true for public consumption yet.</p><p>But it is a big interesting situation so we take a closer look at the parameters! And the shares opened up 10%.</p>

On 6 July 2020, Sina Corp (Class A) (SINA US) made an announcement they had received a preliminary non-binding “going private” proposal from New Wave MMXV - a company controlled by its chairman and CEO Charles Chao. The bid was US$41/share. The GlobalTimes had an article where sources opined Sina would "go home" to list in HK or on the STAR Market. This was followed by an Agreement and Plan of Merger pursuant to which New Wave would acquire all of outstanding ordinary shares not owned at US$43.30/share. Shareholders approved the merger on 23 December 2020.The importance of Sina Corp was that it owned a very large stake in China's premier micro-blogging (twitter-equivalent) service, operated by Weibo Corp (Adr) (WB US). Prior to that EGM, according to David Blennerhassett's excellent write-ups of the deal in Sina Corp: Management Buyout Offer, and What's Going On With Sina Corp? (along with a fabulous initial cut at dissenters' appraisal rights for Chinese companies coming home in Homecoming For Chinese Companies: Appraisal Rights &amp; Fair Value), Sina had intended to issue written notices of authorization to objecting shareholders (prior to the EGM, 21.5mn shares or 35.9% of the outstanding shares of Sina issued notices of objections to the company). The dissenting total was quite high, and could have been a reason for Charles Chao to walk away from the deal, but despite the "requirement" to issue authorization notices by early Feb, there was no public acknowledgment of the situation by SINA until 22 March when the company issued a press release saying the merger had been completed.So that was done.Back in February, the Hong Kong capital markets world was atwitter (woefully bad pun intended) with the news (Bloomberg, Reuters, that Weibo Corp (Adr) (WB US), China's largest micro-blogging service (China twitter) intended to launch a secondary offering in Hong Kong, like many other US ADR-listed Chinese companies, and had hired banks (GS, CLSA, CS) to do so. But since then, there has been no follow-up news. But There is Now NEW "News"... Which is Not Yet NewsLate in the Asia evening on 6 July 2021, Reuters had an EXCLUSIVE which said Weibo chairman Charles Chao - with 45% of shares out but 71% of voting rights - would team up with an as-yet unnamed Shanghai-based state firm to take the company private. One goal would be to get Alibaba Group (BABA US) out of their 30% stake. Two sources told Reuters the consortium plans to offer $90-100/share.As I wrote that sentence, the shares were indicated +30% at just over US$71/share. My first thought was that the shares would trade "wide" to these early-reported terms as there are political considerations (will the State Council appreciate that a regional SASAC puts up money to buy out an internet firm?), questions about where BABA would agree to sell, timeline, and questions about what Charles Chao and the unnamed Shanghai entity would do if materially all the minorities dissented.As I finish that paragraph, Bloomberg appears to have reached a Weibo Corp (Adr) (WB US) spokesperson who says that this rumour is not true. And a while later, we have a Weibo release which offers a pretty strong denial. Of course, that doesn't mean it isn't true. It just means that it isn't true for public consumption yet.But it is a big interesting situation so we take a closer look at the parameters! And the shares opened up 10%.

Alpha-Centric ESG Research

Kyle Rudden

<p>Well, that sure escalated quickly.</p><p>Early last week, in the Insight <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/pre-ipo-esg-analysis-didi-s-exemplary-esg-achievements-eclipsed-by-regulatory-risks-and-uncertainty" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:53687" rel="noopener">Pre-IPO ESG Analysis: DiDi's Exemplary ESG Achievements Eclipsed By Regulatory Risks and Uncertainty</a>, I juxtaposed <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/didi-chuxing-inc" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:27467:1" rel="noopener">DiDi's (DIDI US)</a> relatively strong ESG results in areas under its control with serious concerns about regulatory risk outside of its direct control.</p><p>Late last week, days after DiDi's successful US$4.4 billion initial public offering, Chinese regulators ordered the removal of DiDi's business-critical ride-hailing apps from online app markets, until the company rectifies "serious violations" pertaining to collection and use of customer data.</p><p>DiDi is down 5.3% so far (delayed open today).</p><p>Regulatory risk was central to my thesis in the first Insight. I hardly anticipated this, but I referred to regulatory risk as real, near-term, tangible investment risk; not just some fuzzy ESG risk. Given that, I felt obliged to follow up. At the same time, however, this news is covered <em>ad nauseam.</em></p><p>No sense in beating a dead horse with a broken record.</p><p>So, I decided to do something different. That statement about regulatory risk being a real tangible investment risk is primarily based on anecdotal evidence – i.e., when regulators flex their muscle, stocks go down, not up. But "anecdotal" isn't good enough.</p><p>Which is why I took this opportunity to quantify the impacts of adverse regulatory events in China. Specifically, with event studies measuring abnormal returns around major regulatory events across four broad categories. That's what most of this Insight is about. But back to DiDi for a moment.</p><p>Regulatory risk and uncertainty for DiDi is much worse today than it was last week. Typically, the opposite would be true; a negative event out in the open is better than a possible event lurking in the shadows. But not this time. Barring an immediate change of heart by the PRC, this is bad.</p><p>Therefore, downgrading to bearish.</p>

Well, that sure escalated quickly.Early last week, in the Insight Pre-IPO ESG Analysis: DiDi's Exemplary ESG Achievements Eclipsed By Regulatory Risks and Uncertainty, I juxtaposed DiDi's (DIDI US) relatively strong ESG results in areas under its control with serious concerns about regulatory risk outside of its direct control.Late last week, days after DiDi's successful US$4.4 billion initial public offering, Chinese regulators ordered the removal of DiDi's business-critical ride-hailing apps from online app markets, until the company rectifies "serious violations" pertaining to collection and use of customer data.DiDi is down 5.3% so far (delayed open today).Regulatory risk was central to my thesis in the first Insight. I hardly anticipated this, but I referred to regulatory risk as real, near-term, tangible investment risk; not just some fuzzy ESG risk. Given that, I felt obliged to follow up. At the same time, however, this news is covered ad nauseam.No sense in beating a dead horse with a broken record.So, I decided to do something different. That statement about regulatory risk being a real tangible investment risk is primarily based on anecdotal evidence – i.e., when regulators flex their muscle, stocks go down, not up. But "anecdotal" isn't good enough.Which is why I took this opportunity to quantify the impacts of adverse regulatory events in China. Specifically, with event studies measuring abnormal returns around major regulatory events across four broad categories. That's what most of this Insight is about. But back to DiDi for a moment.Regulatory risk and uncertainty for DiDi is much worse today than it was last week. Typically, the opposite would be true; a negative event out in the open is better than a possible event lurking in the shadows. But not this time. Barring an immediate change of heart by the PRC, this is bad.Therefore, downgrading to bearish.

PRC Shows DiDi Who's Boss: An Analysis of Adverse Regulatory Events on Stock Prices

IPOs and Catalysts/Events, Global Equity Research Ltd

Arun George

IPOs and Catalysts/Events

Uncompromised, Independent, Conflict-Free Research

Global Equity Research Ltd

Global Equity Research was started in 2017 by a group of experienced research professionals. It was founded on a passionate belief in the importance and the need for uncompromised, independent, conflict-free research. We aim to provide differentiated and actionable primary and bottom up fundamental research.

Equity Capital Markets

<div><p><a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/soulgate-inc" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:33304:1" rel="noopener">Soulgate (SSR US)</a> is an alternative social networking platform that lets users have virtual identities and aims to recommend to each user (referred to as a Souler) curated content and other Soulers with similar personalities, lifestyles and interests, enabling more in-depth interactions and more meaningful connections. Soulgate is backed by <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/tencent-holdings-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:26:1" rel="noopener">Tencent (700 HK)</a> (49.9% of outstanding shares, 25.7% of outstanding shares). </p></div><div>
<p>At the mid-point of the proposed IPO price range of $13.0-15.00 per ADS, Soulgate will have a market cap of $1.7 billion. New investors Janus Henderson and Boyu Capital intend to purchase a total of $80 million worth of ADSs in the offering (43.3% of the deal). At the mid-point of the IPO price range, the net proceeds including the concurrent private placement are $257.3 million. </p>
<p>Soulgate will also raise an additional $89 million in a concurrent private placement with miHoYo. miHoYo was founded in 2012 by three Shanghai Jiaotong University graduate students. miHoYo is the creator of <em>Genshin Impact</em>, an open-world action role-playing game released in 2020, and one of the highest-grossing mobile games. It is not entirely clear if there are any near-term synergies through this investment. Currently, Soulgate's exposure to games is largely limited to its <em>Werewolf Rooms</em> (a subset of its <em>Animated Partyroom</em> app functionality) which enable users to play the popular board game <em>Werewolf</em>.</p>
</div><div><div>
<p>In <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/soulgate-ipo-initiation-lost-soul" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:51651" rel="noopener">Soulgate IPO Initiation: Lost Soul,</a> we opined at first glance, Soulgate is well-positioned to benefit from a sizeable China’s mobile social networking market. The strong growth in users, fast-paced revenue growth and ongoing revenue diversification suggest that Soulgate is heading in the right direction. However, the high S&amp;M expenses which exceeded revenue in each of the last three quarters, suggests that Soulgate is aggressively chasing user growth without paying much heed to monetisation and payback periods. This modus operandi is highly reflective of growth at all costs strategy. Overall, we think that the negatives in the Soulgate story warrant a pass.  </p>
<div class="content-highlight"><p>Our valuation analysis suggests that the IPO price range fairly values Soulgate for its forecasted growth. Overall, as we remain unconvinced that Soulgate's growth at all costs strategy will generate shareholder value, we are inclined to give this IPO a pass. </p></div>
</div></div>

Soulgate (SSR US) is an alternative social networking platform that lets users have virtual identities and aims to recommend to each user (referred to as a Souler) curated content and other Soulers with similar personalities, lifestyles and interests, enabling more in-depth interactions and more meaningful connections. Soulgate is backed by Tencent (700 HK) (49.9% of outstanding shares, 25.7% of outstanding shares). 
At the mid-point of the proposed IPO price range of $13.0-15.00 per ADS, Soulgate will have a market cap of $1.7 billion. New investors Janus Henderson and Boyu Capital intend to purchase a total of $80 million worth of ADSs in the offering (43.3% of the deal). At the mid-point of the IPO price range, the net proceeds including the concurrent private placement are $257.3 million. 
Soulgate will also raise an additional $89 million in a concurrent private placement with miHoYo. miHoYo was founded in 2012 by three Shanghai Jiaotong University graduate students. miHoYo is the creator of Genshin Impact, an open-world action role-playing game released in 2020, and one of the highest-grossing mobile games. It is not entirely clear if there are any near-term synergies through this investment. Currently, Soulgate's exposure to games is largely limited to its Werewolf Rooms (a subset of its Animated Partyroom app functionality) which enable users to play the popular board game Werewolf.

In Soulgate IPO Initiation: Lost Soul, we opined at first glance, Soulgate is well-positioned to benefit from a sizeable China’s mobile social networking market. The strong growth in users, fast-paced revenue growth and ongoing revenue diversification suggest that Soulgate is heading in the right direction. However, the high S&amp;M expenses which exceeded revenue in each of the last three quarters, suggests that Soulgate is aggressively chasing user growth without paying much heed to monetisation and payback periods. This modus operandi is highly reflective of growth at all costs strategy. Overall, we think that the negatives in the Soulgate story warrant a pass.  
Our valuation analysis suggests that the IPO price range fairly values Soulgate for its forecasted growth. Overall, as we remain unconvinced that Soulgate's growth at all costs strategy will generate shareholder value, we are inclined to give this IPO a pass. 


APAC IPOs & Placements

Zhen Zhou, Toh

IPOs and Placements coverage across Asia Pacific

Aequitas Research

We cover all listing across the Asia Pacific along with follow-up placements. As of Dec 2020, our team had covered 539 IPOs with a hit rate of 73.5% and 685 placements with a hit rate of 66.8%.

We combine fundamental bottom-up views with our proprietary quantitative framework to provide a holistic coverage across new listings and placements. Our coverage includes pre-IPO notes before the deal is launched, follow-up analysis once the deal is live and post-listing trading analysis as well.

<p><a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/soulgate-inc" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:33304:1" rel="noopener">Soulgate (SSR US)</a> is looking to raise up to US$293m in its U.S. IPO. This includes the US$89 concurrent placement to be sold to MIHOYO.</p><p>Soulgate Inc. (SGI) operates Soul app which is an algorithm-driven online social playground. The app is targeted at the younger generations audience (usually born after 1990s) and it aims to provide a virtual space for users (often referred to as Soulers) to connect and build social relationships through virtual identities and multi-media content. </p><p>In this note, we will take a brief look at the app, compare Soulgate to other Chinese social media platforms, and share our thoughts on valuation and deal dynamics.</p><p>We previously covered the IPO in:</p><ul><li>
<a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/soulgate-pre-ipo-unsustainable-virtual-connection" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:51473" rel="noopener">Soulgate Pre-IPO - Unsustainable Virtual Connection</a> </li></ul>

Soulgate (SSR US) is looking to raise up to US$293m in its U.S. IPO. This includes the US$89 concurrent placement to be sold to MIHOYO.Soulgate Inc. (SGI) operates Soul app which is an algorithm-driven online social playground. The app is targeted at the younger generations audience (usually born after 1990s) and it aims to provide a virtual space for users (often referred to as Soulers) to connect and build social relationships through virtual identities and multi-media content. In this note, we will take a brief look at the app, compare Soulgate to other Chinese social media platforms, and share our thoughts on valuation and deal dynamics.We previously covered the IPO in:
Soulgate Pre-IPO - Unsustainable Virtual Connection 

Soulgate IPO - MIHOYO Could Change the Game, Worth a Bet

<div><p><a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/ximalaya-inc" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:33232:1" rel="noopener">Ximalaya (XIMA US)</a> is the largest online audio platform in China as measured by average MAUs (monthly active users), total mobile listening time, and total revenues in 2020, according to CIC. Ximalaya also has the largest audio content library and the most audio content creators in China. <br>Ximalaya is backed by <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/tencent-holdings-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:26:1" rel="noopener">Tencent (700 HK)</a> (5.4% of outstanding shares), <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/tal-education-group" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:1124:1" rel="noopener">TAL Education (TAL US)</a>, Sony Music Entertainment and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/china-literature-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:24388:1" rel="noopener">China Literature (772 HK)</a>. Ximalaya has filed for an NYSE IPO to raise proceeds of $0.5-1.0 billion, according to press reports.   </p></div><div><div class="content-highlight"><p>In <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/ximalaya-ipo-initiation-out-of-tune" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:51169" rel="noopener">Ximalaya IPO Initiation: Out of Tune</a>, we stated that Ximalaya is well-positioned to benefit from this sizeable China online audio market opportunity. The strong user engagement, fast-paced revenue growth and declining loss margin suggest that Ximalaya is heading in the right direction. However, a closer look reveals concerning developments on several fronts. We concluded that the negatives in the Ximalaya story warrant a pass. In this note, we present our forecasts and take the first look at Ximalaya's potential valuation range. </p></div></div>

Ximalaya (XIMA US) is the largest online audio platform in China as measured by average MAUs (monthly active users), total mobile listening time, and total revenues in 2020, according to CIC. Ximalaya also has the largest audio content library and the most audio content creators in China.  Ximalaya is backed by Tencent (700 HK) (5.4% of outstanding shares), TAL Education (TAL US), Sony Music Entertainment and China Literature (772 HK). Ximalaya has filed for an NYSE IPO to raise proceeds of $0.5-1.0 billion, according to press reports.   In Ximalaya IPO Initiation: Out of Tune, we stated that Ximalaya is well-positioned to benefit from this sizeable China online audio market opportunity. The strong user engagement, fast-paced revenue growth and declining loss margin suggest that Ximalaya is heading in the right direction. However, a closer look reveals concerning developments on several fronts. We concluded that the negatives in the Ximalaya story warrant a pass. In this note, we present our forecasts and take the first look at Ximalaya's potential valuation range. 

China

Weibo Corp is a social media platform for people to create, distribute and discover Chinese-language content.  The Company offers users public self-expression in real time with a powerful platform for social interaction, as well as content aggregation and distribution.

Price Gauge
52-week Range	0.00 - 0.00
Market Cap (USDm)	0.00
P/E	0.00
Dividend (Yield)	0.00

Weibo Corp (WB US)

What's Going On With Weibo?

Weibo was in the news as a story suggested the chairman would join with a state entity to take the company private. This was denied shortly after....

Travis Lundy

PRC Shows DiDi Who's Boss: An Analysis of Adverse Regulatory Events on Stock Prices

Last week, I wrote about DiDi's regulatory risk. This week, it's worse. Hence the downgrade. But this is mostly an analysis of how regulatory...

Kyle Rudden

Soulgate IPO: Valuation Insights

The IPO price range fairly values Soulgate for its forecasted growth. However, as we remain unconvinced that Soulgate's strategy will generate...

Arun George

Soulgate IPO - MIHOYO Could Change the Game, Worth a Bet

Soulgate (SSR US) is looking to raise up to US$293m in its U.S. IPO. This includes the US$89 concurrent placement to be sold to MIHOYO.

Zhen Zhou, Toh

Ximalaya IPO: Valuation First-Look

Ximalaya has filed for an NYSE IPO to raise proceeds of $0.5-1.0 billion. In this note, we present our forecasts and take the first look at...

Arun George

Price Gauge

52-week Range

Market Cap (USDm)

P/E

Dividend (Yield)