Japan/Asia Long-Short, LightStream Research

Mio Kato

Japan/Asia Long-Short

Long-Short Analysis on Japan, Asia and the World

LightStream Research

LightStream conducts quantitatively rigorous and data-driven analysis with a focus on Japan and Asia.

We consistently cover the Tech, Consumer and Industrial sectors, and provide ECM and Events coverage more broadly.

We supplement traditional qualitative insights from company relationships with a robust quantitative foundation that examines as much historical data as is available.
We further refine the accuracy of our insights and calls through the use of alternative data to flesh out current trends, and through a valuation framework that emphasises non-superficial peer group selection and a proper attempt to understand the metrics and changes that have driven security valuations in the past.

Event-Driven

We have examined the proposals made by Oasis in their A Better Tokyo Dome, one by one and generally find the suggestions to be a little one-sided, and in some cases a little optimistic about the ability to change typical Japanese customs around baseball. Nevertheless, on the opinion that Tokyo Dome could be noticeably better managed overall and that ¥1,300 looks exceedingly cheap, we wholeheartedly agree.

We have examined the proposals made by Oasis in their A Better Tokyo Dome, one by one and generally find the suggestions to be a little one-sided, and in some cases a little optimistic about the ability to change typical Japanese customs around baseball. Nevertheless, on the opinion that Tokyo Dome could be noticeably better managed overall and that ¥1,300 looks exceedingly cheap, we wholeheartedly agree.

Tokyo Dome – Assessing the Realism of Oasis Estimates

Pan-Asia Catalysts/Events, Quiddity Advisors

Travis Lundy

Pan-Asia Catalysts/Events

Quiddity Advisors

Friday morning, the Nikkei said there was a deal in the offing where Mitsui Fudosan would bid for <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/tokyo-dome-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:6421:1" rel="noopener">Tokyo Dome Corp (9681 JP)</a>.  As someone concerned with the governance weakness shown too many times in Japanese takeover situations, I am almost automatically disappointed to see such headlines. It leads me to expect that later the same day I will be mumbling words at my monitor that I should not say aloud. 
I did Friday.
My constant question is HOW can independent directors of companies with unique and valuable assets deign to sell them at such inexpensive prices? Often those unique and valuable assets are uniquely valuable items such as cash, portfolios of listed securities, and land and property assets with an easily external valuation. 
Sometimes cash and securities get tossed into a DCF as being assets which need to be discounted 9-11% a year on their ability to throw off cash, never mind the fact that the equity holdings are purchased at cash flow yields of 2-3% and bonds are bought with yields of 0-1%. Real estate holdings are usually purchased at yields of 4-6%. So automatically, anything of any real value and inherently low cash-flow yield gets marked down for the friendly buyer. Extra cash is almost never dividended out, and there is never (with the one exception of the takeover of <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/asatsu-dk-inc" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:8715:1" rel="noopener">Asatsu Dk Inc (9747 JP)</a> a few years ago) any tally of what the non-operating assets are worth to create an Adjusted Enterprise Value. 
This time is no different. 
This is a big fat piece of land in central Tokyo, and a fair number of unique, quite unreplaceable assets and businesses which should command a moat. And earnings have been penalized for years by a total lack of effective maintenance and stewardship by management. 
Oasis proposed buying the company at ¥1300/share in January but said the stock was worth well over ¥2000/share in its public <a href="https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5dd62b05f226644911c6d4e1/t/5efabd9b2d98f71482b79156/1593490878125/OASIS+-+A+Better+Tokyo+Dome+Presentation.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">presentation</a> at the same time. Mitsui Fudosan - a professional strategic owner of prime property assets - bid ¥1200/share earlier this month before being asked to bid ¥1350/share. They bid ¥1300/share.
I am not sure the conversation ends there.
My analysis continues below.

Friday morning, the Nikkei said there was a deal in the offing where Mitsui Fudosan would bid for Tokyo Dome Corp (9681 JP).  As someone concerned with the governance weakness shown too many times in Japanese takeover situations, I am almost automatically disappointed to see such headlines. It leads me to expect that later the same day I will be mumbling words at my monitor that I should not say aloud. 
I did Friday.
My constant question is HOW can independent directors of companies with unique and valuable assets deign to sell them at such inexpensive prices? Often those unique and valuable assets are uniquely valuable items such as cash, portfolios of listed securities, and land and property assets with an easily external valuation. 
Sometimes cash and securities get tossed into a DCF as being assets which need to be discounted 9-11% a year on their ability to throw off cash, never mind the fact that the equity holdings are purchased at cash flow yields of 2-3% and bonds are bought with yields of 0-1%. Real estate holdings are usually purchased at yields of 4-6%. So automatically, anything of any real value and inherently low cash-flow yield gets marked down for the friendly buyer. Extra cash is almost never dividended out, and there is never (with the one exception of the takeover of Asatsu Dk Inc (9747 JP) a few years ago) any tally of what the non-operating assets are worth to create an Adjusted Enterprise Value. 
This time is no different. 
This is a big fat piece of land in central Tokyo, and a fair number of unique, quite unreplaceable assets and businesses which should command a moat. And earnings have been penalized for years by a total lack of effective maintenance and stewardship by management. 
Oasis proposed buying the company at ¥1300/share in January but said the stock was worth well over ¥2000/share in its public presentation at the same time. Mitsui Fudosan - a professional strategic owner of prime property assets - bid ¥1200/share earlier this month before being asked to bid ¥1350/share. They bid ¥1300/share.
I am not sure the conversation ends there.
My analysis continues below.

Tokyo Dome Sells Itself For the Wrong Price

The Nikkei Asia <a href="https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Business-deals/1bn-bid-for-Tokyo-Dome-planned-by-developer-Mitsui-Fudosan" target="_blank" rel="noopener">reported</a> this morning (Japanese article link <a href="https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXMZO66704090X21C20A1MM8000" target="_blank" rel="noopener">here</a>) that <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/mitsui-fudosan-co-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:565:1" rel="noopener">Mitsui Fudosan (8801 JP)</a> intended to partner with someone to launch a Tender Offer to take private <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/tokyo-dome-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:6421:1" rel="noopener">Tokyo Dome Corp (9681 JP)</a>, spending "more than ¥100bn" (vs the ¥85.9bn of yesterday's close) based on the idea that there would be a premium to market price. The Tender Offer could start before 2020 ends.The bigger story here, of course, is that hedge fund Oasis Management has been on the case, urging Tokyo Dome management to do more to improve value for shareholders. Oasis said earlier this month they had been trying to engage with Tokyo Dome since 2018. They went over 5% in December 2019 and according to filings lifted their stake to 9.71% in January 2020. Covid-19 later hit Japan and as a result, the number of events and therefore visitor count at the various features and venues within Tokyo Dome have slowed, and the company is on its back foot. Early this year, Oasis set up a website with a fair bit of material for their case at <a href="https://www.abettertokyodome.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">abettertokyodome.com</a>. There main presentation is linked <a href="https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5dd62b05f226644911c6d4e1/t/5efabd9b2d98f71482b79156/1593490878125/OASIS+-+A+Better+Tokyo+Dome+Presentation.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">here</a>. The claims are clear, and frankly, anyone who has been to Tokyo Dome recently will know exactly what Oasis is pointing at in terms of efforts which could make Tokyo Dome a better place to visit and a better company. Among the proposals by Oasis, there are substantially improved digital signage to improve ad revenue, a naming rights agreement like seen at other major Japan venues which could bring in ¥500mm a year or more, overhauled technology to match other world-class venues, substantially improved F&amp;B strategy, etc.  The deck was really an informative read when presented in January of this year and the opportunity seemed clear to me. The onset of covid-19 was a highly unfortunate development in the timeline, and this has disrupted what might have been a much more lively activist discussion. As it is, in October, Oasis called for a shareholder meeting for Tokyo Dome, asking to replace three directors including President Tsutomu Nagaoka. On 10 November, Tokyo Dome held a press conference which saw some floundering, and Oasis <a href="https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20201111005501/en/Oasis-Key-Messages-for-Tokyo-Dome-Shareholders-Regarding-the-EGM-on-December-17-2020" target="_blank" rel="noopener">responded</a> the day after. The shareholder meeting is now set for 17 December. It is somehow not surprising that Corporate Japan is circling the wagons. Tokyo Dome is indicated limit up at ¥1047 now. The past 15+ years looks like the below.<section class="figure"><figure class="editor-figure mceNonEditable"><img src="https://static-prod.smartkarma.com/images/media/000/174/563/original/Screenshot%202020-11-27%20at%2010.27.27%20AM.png?1606444069" class="editor-image img-responsive" data-smartkarma-image-id="174563"></figure></section>As a reminder, the stock traded at ¥5000+ in the 1990s.The companies (<a href="https://www.mitsuifudosan.co.jp/corporate/ir/library/news/2020/pdf/news_201127.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Mitsui Fudosan</a>, <a href="https://contents.xj-storage.jp/xcontents/AS01950/1667e514/ffcc/4644/b6a6/6313ea0899ad/140120201127428865.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Tokyo Dome</a>) have both responded to the article first thing this morning saying that they will be holding board meetings to discuss this situation later today and will announce anything which needs to be announced as soon as possible thereafter.The old saying goes "Where there is smoke there is fire" but the question is whether it will be hot enough. As a pure tear-down project, the real estate and history of location/brand would likely be worth well more than ¥100bn. Word in the local press is that Mitsui's partner will be Yomiuri Shinbun, which is taking subsidiary/affiliate <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/yomiuri-land-co-ltd" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:12813:1" rel="noopener">Yomiuri Land (9671 JP)</a> private as discussed in <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/yomiuri-land-9671-takeover-probably-the-wrong-price-but-whaddya-gonna-do" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:45025" rel="noopener">Yomiuri Land (9671) Takeover - Probably The Wrong Price But Whaddya Gonna Do?</a>. Yomiuri Land is a cross-holder in Tokyo Dome.I expect I will be writing another episode of <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/japan-needs-more-cowbell" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:41191" rel="noopener">Japan Needs More Cowbell</a> shortly. It is depressing to me that one needs to write it so often, but needs, I expect, must.More on the situation and the potential valuation methodology/constraints below the fold.

The Nikkei Asia reported this morning (Japanese article link here) that Mitsui Fudosan (8801 JP) intended to partner with someone to launch a Tender Offer to take private Tokyo Dome Corp (9681 JP), spending "more than ¥100bn" (vs the ¥85.9bn of yesterday's close) based on the idea that there would be a premium to market price. The Tender Offer could start before 2020 ends.The bigger story here, of course, is that hedge fund Oasis Management has been on the case, urging Tokyo Dome management to do more to improve value for shareholders. Oasis said earlier this month they had been trying to engage with Tokyo Dome since 2018. They went over 5% in December 2019 and according to filings lifted their stake to 9.71% in January 2020. Covid-19 later hit Japan and as a result, the number of events and therefore visitor count at the various features and venues within Tokyo Dome have slowed, and the company is on its back foot. Early this year, Oasis set up a website with a fair bit of material for their case at abettertokyodome.com. There main presentation is linked here. The claims are clear, and frankly, anyone who has been to Tokyo Dome recently will know exactly what Oasis is pointing at in terms of efforts which could make Tokyo Dome a better place to visit and a better company. Among the proposals by Oasis, there are substantially improved digital signage to improve ad revenue, a naming rights agreement like seen at other major Japan venues which could bring in ¥500mm a year or more, overhauled technology to match other world-class venues, substantially improved F&amp;B strategy, etc.  The deck was really an informative read when presented in January of this year and the opportunity seemed clear to me. The onset of covid-19 was a highly unfortunate development in the timeline, and this has disrupted what might have been a much more lively activist discussion. As it is, in October, Oasis called for a shareholder meeting for Tokyo Dome, asking to replace three directors including President Tsutomu Nagaoka. On 10 November, Tokyo Dome held a press conference which saw some floundering, and Oasis responded the day after. The shareholder meeting is now set for 17 December. It is somehow not surprising that Corporate Japan is circling the wagons. Tokyo Dome is indicated limit up at ¥1047 now. The past 15+ years looks like the below.As a reminder, the stock traded at ¥5000+ in the 1990s.The companies (Mitsui Fudosan, Tokyo Dome) have both responded to the article first thing this morning saying that they will be holding board meetings to discuss this situation later today and will announce anything which needs to be announced as soon as possible thereafter.The old saying goes "Where there is smoke there is fire" but the question is whether it will be hot enough. As a pure tear-down project, the real estate and history of location/brand would likely be worth well more than ¥100bn. Word in the local press is that Mitsui's partner will be Yomiuri Shinbun, which is taking subsidiary/affiliate Yomiuri Land (9671 JP) private as discussed in Yomiuri Land (9671) Takeover - Probably The Wrong Price But Whaddya Gonna Do?. Yomiuri Land is a cross-holder in Tokyo Dome.I expect I will be writing another episode of Japan Needs More Cowbell shortly. It is depressing to me that one needs to write it so often, but needs, I expect, must.More on the situation and the potential valuation methodology/constraints below the fold.

Mitsui Fudosan Tender For Tokyo Dome (9681) Mooted

Pan-Asia Index Rebalances/ Events/ Delta One, Periscope Analytics

Brian Freitas

Pan-Asia Index Rebalances/ Events/ Delta One

Quantitative Analysis

<div>The short notional in the market for the week ending 24 January is US$24.53bn (down by US$250mm) with the largest short positions in <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/itochu-corp" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:18448:1">Itochu Corp (8001 JP)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/toyota-motor-corp" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:73:1">Toyota Motor (7203 JP)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/taiyo-yuden-co-ltd" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:9924:1">Taiyo Yuden (6976 JP)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/canon-inc" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:1:1">Canon Inc (7751 JP)</a> and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/kddi-corp" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:639:1">KDDI Corp (9433 JP)</a>. <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/sumitomo-mitsui-financial-gr" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:217:1"></a></div><div>Most shorted stocks as a percentage of free float are <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/taiyo-yuden-co-ltd" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:9924:1">Taiyo Yuden (6976 JP)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/leopalace21-corp" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:8244:1">Leopalace21 Corp (8848 JP)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/tokai-carbon-co-ltd" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:9145:1">Tokai Carbon (5301 JP)</a> and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/anritsu-corp" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:3700:1">Anritsu Corp (6754 JP)</a> while the stocks with the highest days to cover are <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/vital-ksk-holdings-inc" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:7398:1">Vital Ksk Holdings (3151 JP)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/aruhi-corp" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:26072:1"></a><a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/katakura-industries-co-ltd" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:2007:1">Katakura Industries (3001 JP)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/j-trust-co-ltd" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:20246:1">J Trust Co Ltd (8508 JP)</a> and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/edion-corp" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:14358:1">Edion Corp (2730 JP)</a>.  <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/dcm-holdings-co-ltd" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:13042:1"></a></div><div>The largest increases in short notional over the week were <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/fast-retailing-co-ltd" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:751:1">Fast Retailing (9983 JP)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/tokyo-dome-corp" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:6421:1">Tokyo Dome Corp (9681 JP)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/tokyo-electron-ltd" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:280:1">Tokyo Electron (8035 JP)</a> and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/nabtesco-corp" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:13176:1">Nabtesco Corp (6268 JP)</a> while shorts were covered in <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/yamaha-corp" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:17841:1">Yamaha Corp (7951 JP)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/ricoh-co-ltd" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:15359:1">Ricoh Co Ltd (7752 JP)</a>, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/zozo-inc" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:18379:1">ZOZO Inc (3092 JP)</a> and <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/dentsu-inc" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:12434:1">Dentsu Inc (4324 JP)</a>.  </div><div>Sectorally, short positions were increased in Consumer Discretionary (US$339mm), Information Technology (US$86mm) and Industrials (US$79mm) while shorts were covered in Communication Services (US$71m) and Health Care (US$62m).</div>

The short notional in the market for the week ending 24 January is US$24.53bn (down by US$250mm) with the largest short positions in Itochu Corp (8001 JP), Toyota Motor (7203 JP), Taiyo Yuden (6976 JP), Canon Inc (7751 JP) and KDDI Corp (9433 JP). Most shorted stocks as a percentage of free float are Taiyo Yuden (6976 JP), Leopalace21 Corp (8848 JP), Tokai Carbon (5301 JP) and Anritsu Corp (6754 JP) while the stocks with the highest days to cover are Vital Ksk Holdings (3151 JP), Katakura Industries (3001 JP), J Trust Co Ltd (8508 JP) and Edion Corp (2730 JP).  The largest increases in short notional over the week were Fast Retailing (9983 JP), Tokyo Dome Corp (9681 JP), Tokyo Electron (8035 JP) and Nabtesco Corp (6268 JP) while shorts were covered in Yamaha Corp (7951 JP), Ricoh Co Ltd (7752 JP), ZOZO Inc (3092 JP) and Dentsu Inc (4324 JP).  Sectorally, short positions were increased in Consumer Discretionary (US$339mm), Information Technology (US$86mm) and Industrials (US$79mm) while shorts were covered in Communication Services (US$71m) and Health Care (US$62m).

Japan - Sharp Rise in Consumer Discretionary Shorts

When the Nikkei 225 <a href="https://indexes.nikkei.co.jp/en/nkave/archives/news/20190904E_1.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">announced</a> its Annual Review results on 4 September, <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/tokyo-dome-corp" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:6421:1" rel="noopener">Tokyo Dome Corp (9681 JP)</a> came out and was replaced by <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/entities/m3-inc" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="entities:13316:1" rel="noopener">M3 Inc (2413 JP)</a>, the Japanese market was just starting a rally. Between the close of 4 Sep and the close of 30 Sep, the market rose 5.4%, M3 rose 16.5%, and Tokyo Dome fell 2.9%. If one assumes the first day is an over-reaction and compares the close of Day 2 (6 Sep) to end-September,<ul>
<li>M3 was up 7.7% and TOPIX was up 3.3%.</li>
<li>Tokyo Dome was up 5.5%.</li>
<li>On the day after inclusion, M3 was up a further 2.8% in big volume, TOPIX was +1%, Tokyo Dome was -1%.</li>
</ul>In the Nikkei 225 itself, there was a rise in the divisor to 27.760 from 27.497 - or just about 1%. The number of baskets carried by ETFs dropped a bit more, indicating there was some ETF destruction in the rise of the market (possibly indicating the market rose more on the collection of single stock buying than large-scale delta buying. The squeeze-ability of both M3 and Tokyo Dome, as discussed in my insight <a href="https://www.smartkarma.com/insights/nikkei-225-rebal-m3-in-tokyo-dome-out" target="_blank" data-smartkarma-citation="insights:32218" rel="noopener">Nikkei 225 Rebal - M3 IN, Tokyo Dome OUT</a> before the 5 Sep open, turned out to be defining factors. I reminded investors to not be short either at the inclusion (unless M3 was a lot higher). Admittedly, there is a possibility today's rise in M3 was due to a misunderstanding of the data.Going forward, there is a serious mismatch in the borrow availability and liquidity provision in the two stocks. M3 is the more interesting and important. I look to one particular clue to see if it squeezes.More commentary below.

When the Nikkei 225 announced its Annual Review results on 4 September, Tokyo Dome Corp (9681 JP) came out and was replaced by M3 Inc (2413 JP), the Japanese market was just starting a rally. Between the close of 4 Sep and the close of 30 Sep, the market rose 5.4%, M3 rose 16.5%, and Tokyo Dome fell 2.9%. If one assumes the first day is an over-reaction and compares the close of Day 2 (6 Sep) to end-September,
M3 was up 7.7% and TOPIX was up 3.3%.
Tokyo Dome was up 5.5%.
On the day after inclusion, M3 was up a further 2.8% in big volume, TOPIX was +1%, Tokyo Dome was -1%.
In the Nikkei 225 itself, there was a rise in the divisor to 27.760 from 27.497 - or just about 1%. The number of baskets carried by ETFs dropped a bit more, indicating there was some ETF destruction in the rise of the market (possibly indicating the market rose more on the collection of single stock buying than large-scale delta buying. The squeeze-ability of both M3 and Tokyo Dome, as discussed in my insight Nikkei 225 Rebal - M3 IN, Tokyo Dome OUT before the 5 Sep open, turned out to be defining factors. I reminded investors to not be short either at the inclusion (unless M3 was a lot higher). Admittedly, there is a possibility today's rise in M3 was due to a misunderstanding of the data.Going forward, there is a serious mismatch in the borrow availability and liquidity provision in the two stocks. M3 is the more interesting and important. I look to one particular clue to see if it squeezes.More commentary below.

Nikkei 225 Rebal Post-Mortem - Be Careful!

Japan

TOKYO DOME CORPORATION operates an air dome-type baseball stadium and an urban amusement center.  The Company also sells sundry goods and operates financing, hotels, real estate, restaurants, and convention and exhibition halls.

Price Gauge
52-week Range	0.00 - 0.00
Market Cap (USDm)	0.00
P/E	0.00
Dividend (Yield)	0.00

Tokyo Dome Corp (9681 JP)

Tokyo Dome – Assessing the Realism of Oasis Estimates

We assess the realism of Oasis' proposed NP improving measures to find a mixed picture, but not one which obfuscates the view of an asset that is...

Mio Kato

Tokyo Dome Sells Itself For the Wrong Price

Tokyo Dome is the subject of an activist effort to improve shareholder value for everyone with a stated target from improvements of 140+%. So Tokyo...

Travis Lundy

Mitsui Fudosan Tender For Tokyo Dome (9681) Mooted

It appears Mitsui Fudosan and Yomiuri Land will be bidding for Tokyo Dome in order to fend off the activism of 9.7% holder Oasis. That's a pity....

Travis Lundy

Japan - Sharp Rise in Consumer Discretionary Shorts

The short notional in the market for the week ending 24 January is US$24.53bn (down by US$250mm) with the largest short positions in Itochu Corp...

Brian Freitas

Nikkei 225 Rebal Post-Mortem - Be Careful!

When the Nikkei 225 announced its Annual Review results on 4 September, Tokyo Dome Corp (9681 JP) came out and was replaced by M3 Inc (2413 JP),...

Travis Lundy

Price Gauge

52-week Range

Market Cap (USDm)

P/E

Dividend (Yield)