Event-Driven

In this briefing:

1. Saputo to Buy Crest Dairy; Initial Market Response Wants a Bump
2. Will Rakuten Get A Near-Term Lyft?
3. Doosan E&C Rights Offer: Conditions & Timetable
4. DHICO (Doosan Heavy) Rights Offer: Conditions & Timetable
5. GrainCorp (GNC AU): Pressure Mounts, Diminishing the Prospects of a Bump to the LTAP Bid

1. Saputo to Buy Crest Dairy; Initial Market Response Wants a Bump

Saputo Inc (SAP CN) and Dairy Crest (DCG LN) today announced an all-cash deal where Saputo will buy Dairy Crest for 620p/share, to be implemented through a Scheme of Arrangement which the two parties say is likely to close in Q2 2019.

Saputo is a Canada-listed dairy company which has grown through serial acquisition – more than 30 acquisitions in the last twenty years – but curiously none of the acquisitions have left it with any operations in the UK. Dairy Crest is a leading UK-based dairy and cooking staples company whose best-known products are Cathedral City Cheddar Cheese, Clover margarine, Country Life butter, and Frylight cooking oil as well as other minor butter-similars and butter-replacement spreads.

This would be Saputo’s largest purchase in ten years – by a factor of three over their second largest – the purchase of Warrnambool Cheese & Butter Factory in Q1 2014.

Shares are trading through terms early, perhaps on expectations the wide open register means shareholders can try to hold out for a higher price. 

At a decent premium (13.9x TTM EV/EBITDA at 620p) to where the rest of the smaller-cap dairy products sector trades (below 10x on a median basis), and the highest EV/Revenue or EV/EBITDA multiple that I can find Saputo having paid, asking for more may not get you more, but investors clearly think it worth a try. 

An extra 10% would clear out most of the naysayers who bought in the frothier “we’re going to be an asset-light branded goods company” days of 2015-2017. It would put March 2019 PER at just under 20x and just under 13.9x March 2019 expected EV/EBITDA.

2. Will Rakuten Get A Near-Term Lyft?

Rakuten Inc (4755 JP) is much in the news for many reasons – one of which being a plunge into the deeper waters of being the fourth Type I Mobile Network Operator in Japan, having officially applied for the license in February 2018 and seeing it approved in April.  – the license for which it applied a year ago, with approval received in April 2018. The goal has been to use its initial foray into the MVNO business where it has more than 1.5 million users, and increase its footprint to attract some of its 100+mm Rakuten IDs, 7mm Rakuten Bank accountholders, 3mm Rakuten Securities accountholders, so that it can increase the LTV (LifeTimeValue) of its existing customer base. 

The goal is to introduce service this year (also a requirement of the terms of its license), growing steadily to have 15mm subs in 10 years. The estimated hardware spend is said to be ¥600-700bn on base stations and equipment, initially concentrating on areas in and around mass transit stations in urban areas such as Tokyo and Osaka, and then expand outward. The company has signed deals with numerous partners in electricity distribution such as Tokyo Electric Power Co (9501 JP), Chubu Electric Power Co (9502 JP), and Kansai Electric Power Co (9503 JP) to install transmission equipment on these companies’ power poles and other infrastructure.

The shares have suffered mightily since the plan came to light in mid-December 2015, underperforming the TOPIX Info & Communications Sector Index by more than 20% in the fourteen months through yesterday. The sharp drop on the left hand side of the chart was a two-day sell-a-thon by investors convinced the company was about to waste billions of dollars. The Info & Communications Sector Index also dropped sharply on that day on fears that a fourth entrant with a declared goal of dropping monthly charges by 40% would increase churn at the existing Big Three (NTT Docomo Inc (9437 JP), Softbank Corp (9434 JP), and KDDI Corp (9433 JP)) and possibly cause a price war. The shares dropped from about ¥1140 to ¥1020/share, and then slid another 30-odd percent in the next six months to ¥700/share.

The shares have rebounded, fell back in autumn general market weakness, rebounded a tie-up on payments with KDDI announced Nov1 and decent Q3 numbes announced less than 2 weeks later, got crushed in the sharp global selloff in November and December, then had a v-shaped rebound at the start of 2019. 

At the end of January Rakuten Mobile Network received blanket licenses to transmit on 1.7Ghz in the major regions  covering Tokyo, Kyoto, Osaka, Nagoya and Yokohama from the local Bureaus of Communication, and expects to receive others soon. Last week, Rakuten reported full-year earnings through end-December with revenues up 16.6%yoy to just over ¥1.1 trillion, OP (IFRS) at ¥170.4bn, and Net Income at ¥142bn and on the same day announced Nokia had been granted the contract to deploy a turnkey solution as had been previously tested and speculated. 

There are numerous telecom and retailing experts publishing on Smartkarma who have more expertise on Rakuten’s telecom plans and their plans to compete harder against Amazon Japan and Yahoo Japan and others in the e-tailing space. 

I am not going to pretend to their level of knowledge on telecom or retailing (I found Kirk Boodry’s piece on the upcoming 5G allocations in March to be particularly informative) but I will note that Rakuten has a) the ability to borrow against the hardware and licenses, b) can roll out hardware quarter-by-quarter, and c) the KDDI/Rakuten deal is important. In it, KDDI will give Rakuten access to its nationwide roaming network, and Rakuten will provide KDDI with expertise on mobile payments – especially relevant as KDDI is now building out au Financial as briefly discussed here. 

But There is More NewsFlow To Come, And THAT is Interesting

In March 2015, Rakuten CEO Hiroshi Mikitani announced that Rakuten had invested US$300mm in a then just-become-unicorn ride-sharing company called Lyft Inc (0812823D US), which at the end of the Series E round in May 2015 would leave it with ~11.9% of the company at a ~US$2.4-2.5bn post-money valuation. Recent articles suggest that Rakuten remains the top investor (though a WSJ article 2 weeks ago noted there would be golden shares. Hiroshi Mikitani remains a board member of Lyft.

That becomes important as by all accounts I can find (much more detail below), Rakuten continued investing in the four subsequent funding rounds through last summer, leaving the company as the largest single shareholder in Lyft as it prepares for its IPO later this spring. Lyft confidentially filed its IPO paperwork (a “draft S-1”) with the SEC in early December 2018, leaping ahead of Uber in the race to IPO first so the much larger Uber valuation doesn’t block Lyft’s chances for raising funds.

Reuters carried an article Thursday night Asia time saying Lyft planned to start its roadshow the week of March 18th, with an expected valuation of US$20-25 billion, and the first-mover advantage would allow Lyft to set the metrics it wants to use upon which to be judged and priced (if it waited, it would have to be compared to Uber). That could mean more emphasis on the company’s strong suite of self-driving partnerships (drive.ai, Ford, GM, Jaguar, Nutonomy, Waymo, others). A March 18th roadshow would require a full S-1 filing two weeks prior to that.

A successful IPO story based on picking up market share (reportedly doubled to 28% by end-2018 vs end-2016) might make Rakuten’s other investments look good too (Rakuten led Series B, C, D, and E funding for Spanish-language ride-hailing app cabify from 2014-2018 (and reportedly pushed cabify to merge with Lyft last year) and has invested in multiple rounds in SE Asian version GoJek.

The runup to this IPO and the clarity a filing could provide on ownership could provide a near-term fillip to Rakuten’s share price. 

3. Doosan E&C Rights Offer: Conditions & Timetable

• Doosan E&C’s rights offer is pretty much in line with the street’s initial expectation. They raise an estimated ₩420bil at an offer price of ₩1,255. The recently amended KRX rule allows an issuer to freely set an offer price. They set it at ₩1,255 based on the Feb 13~20 prices with a 15% discount.
• Final price will be fixed on Apr 30. Whichever higher of ₩1,255 or Apr 26~30 VWAP at a 40% discount will be a final offering price. So, offering price must be at least ₩1,255. Mar 27 will be the ex-rights day. Subscription rights will be listed and traded on Apr 18~24. New shares will be listed on May 24.
• ₩1,255 is a lot more aggressive than generally viewed. DHICO owns nearly two thirds of E&C stake. With a 20% oversubscription, nearly ₩300bil will likely come from DHICO. This is like DHICO is helping E&C at an even heftier price. This is why the market is being much softer on E&C relative to DHICO.

4. DHICO (Doosan Heavy) Rights Offer: Conditions & Timetable

• This is a total ₩608.4bil rights offer. This is larger than initially expected. A projected ₩543bil will be raised through common share issuance. The other ₩65bil will be raised in the form of RCPS. This is a combined 72.56% capital increase with a 42.05% share dilution.
• 80% will be allocated to the stockholders. Per share allocation for the stockholders is 0.58. Mar 27 is the ex-rights day for both Common and RCPS. Subscription rights will be listed and trade on Apr 19~25 only for Common. May 2 is for final pricing. New Common shares will be listed on May 29.
• Offering size is much larger than initially expected. In the short-term, DHICO shares will likely take a harsh beating. At this point, we’d better stay away from it for now.

5. GrainCorp (GNC AU): Pressure Mounts, Diminishing the Prospects of a Bump to the LTAP Bid

Frustration on the slow progress of the LTAP bid came to a head at the recent AGM, where shareholders registered what appeared to be protest votes aimed at Graincorp Ltd A (GNC AU)’s director elections and remuneration. The Board has currently three options to unlock shareholder value – achieve a binding LTAP bid, commence the portfolio review driven sale process or adopt the Tanarra Capital proposal.

In this briefing:

1. Will Rakuten Get A Near-Term Lyft?
2. Doosan E&C Rights Offer: Conditions & Timetable
3. DHICO (Doosan Heavy) Rights Offer: Conditions & Timetable
4. GrainCorp (GNC AU): Pressure Mounts, Diminishing the Prospects of a Bump to the LTAP Bid
5. Petrus Doubles Down On Ophir Energy

1. Will Rakuten Get A Near-Term Lyft?

Rakuten Inc (4755 JP) is much in the news for many reasons – one of which being a plunge into the deeper waters of being the fourth Type I Mobile Network Operator in Japan, having officially applied for the license in February 2018 and seeing it approved in April.  – the license for which it applied a year ago, with approval received in April 2018. The goal has been to use its initial foray into the MVNO business where it has more than 1.5 million users, and increase its footprint to attract some of its 100+mm Rakuten IDs, 7mm Rakuten Bank accountholders, 3mm Rakuten Securities accountholders, so that it can increase the LTV (LifeTimeValue) of its existing customer base. 

The goal is to introduce service this year (also a requirement of the terms of its license), growing steadily to have 15mm subs in 10 years. The estimated hardware spend is said to be ¥600-700bn on base stations and equipment, initially concentrating on areas in and around mass transit stations in urban areas such as Tokyo and Osaka, and then expand outward. The company has signed deals with numerous partners in electricity distribution such as Tokyo Electric Power Co (9501 JP), Chubu Electric Power Co (9502 JP), and Kansai Electric Power Co (9503 JP) to install transmission equipment on these companies’ power poles and other infrastructure.

The shares have suffered mightily since the plan came to light in mid-December 2015, underperforming the TOPIX Info & Communications Sector Index by more than 20% in the fourteen months through yesterday. The sharp drop on the left hand side of the chart was a two-day sell-a-thon by investors convinced the company was about to waste billions of dollars. The Info & Communications Sector Index also dropped sharply on that day on fears that a fourth entrant with a declared goal of dropping monthly charges by 40% would increase churn at the existing Big Three (NTT Docomo Inc (9437 JP), Softbank Corp (9434 JP), and KDDI Corp (9433 JP)) and possibly cause a price war. The shares dropped from about ¥1140 to ¥1020/share, and then slid another 30-odd percent in the next six months to ¥700/share.

The shares have rebounded, fell back in autumn general market weakness, rebounded a tie-up on payments with KDDI announced Nov1 and decent Q3 numbes announced less than 2 weeks later, got crushed in the sharp global selloff in November and December, then had a v-shaped rebound at the start of 2019. 

At the end of January Rakuten Mobile Network received blanket licenses to transmit on 1.7Ghz in the major regions  covering Tokyo, Kyoto, Osaka, Nagoya and Yokohama from the local Bureaus of Communication, and expects to receive others soon. Last week, Rakuten reported full-year earnings through end-December with revenues up 16.6%yoy to just over ¥1.1 trillion, OP (IFRS) at ¥170.4bn, and Net Income at ¥142bn and on the same day announced Nokia had been granted the contract to deploy a turnkey solution as had been previously tested and speculated. 

There are numerous telecom and retailing experts publishing on Smartkarma who have more expertise on Rakuten’s telecom plans and their plans to compete harder against Amazon Japan and Yahoo Japan and others in the e-tailing space. 

I am not going to pretend to their level of knowledge on telecom or retailing (I found Kirk Boodry’s piece on the upcoming 5G allocations in March to be particularly informative) but I will note that Rakuten has a) the ability to borrow against the hardware and licenses, b) can roll out hardware quarter-by-quarter, and c) the KDDI/Rakuten deal is important. In it, KDDI will give Rakuten access to its nationwide roaming network, and Rakuten will provide KDDI with expertise on mobile payments – especially relevant as KDDI is now building out au Financial as briefly discussed here. 

But There is More NewsFlow To Come, And THAT is Interesting

In March 2015, Rakuten CEO Hiroshi Mikitani announced that Rakuten had invested US$300mm in a then just-become-unicorn ride-sharing company called Lyft Inc (0812823D US), which at the end of the Series E round in May 2015 would leave it with ~11.9% of the company at a ~US$2.4-2.5bn post-money valuation. Recent articles suggest that Rakuten remains the top investor (though a WSJ article 2 weeks ago noted there would be golden shares. Hiroshi Mikitani remains a board member of Lyft.

That becomes important as by all accounts I can find (much more detail below), Rakuten continued investing in the four subsequent funding rounds through last summer, leaving the company as the largest single shareholder in Lyft as it prepares for its IPO later this spring. Lyft confidentially filed its IPO paperwork (a “draft S-1”) with the SEC in early December 2018, leaping ahead of Uber in the race to IPO first so the much larger Uber valuation doesn’t block Lyft’s chances for raising funds.

Reuters carried an article Thursday night Asia time saying Lyft planned to start its roadshow the week of March 18th, with an expected valuation of US$20-25 billion, and the first-mover advantage would allow Lyft to set the metrics it wants to use upon which to be judged and priced (if it waited, it would have to be compared to Uber). That could mean more emphasis on the company’s strong suite of self-driving partnerships (drive.ai, Ford, GM, Jaguar, Nutonomy, Waymo, others). A March 18th roadshow would require a full S-1 filing two weeks prior to that.

A successful IPO story based on picking up market share (reportedly doubled to 28% by end-2018 vs end-2016) might make Rakuten’s other investments look good too (Rakuten led Series B, C, D, and E funding for Spanish-language ride-hailing app cabify from 2014-2018 (and reportedly pushed cabify to merge with Lyft last year) and has invested in multiple rounds in SE Asian version GoJek.

The runup to this IPO and the clarity a filing could provide on ownership could provide a near-term fillip to Rakuten’s share price. 

2. Doosan E&C Rights Offer: Conditions & Timetable

• Doosan E&C’s rights offer is pretty much in line with the street’s initial expectation. They raise an estimated ₩420bil at an offer price of ₩1,255. The recently amended KRX rule allows an issuer to freely set an offer price. They set it at ₩1,255 based on the Feb 13~20 prices with a 15% discount.
• Final price will be fixed on Apr 30. Whichever higher of ₩1,255 or Apr 26~30 VWAP at a 40% discount will be a final offering price. So, offering price must be at least ₩1,255. Mar 27 will be the ex-rights day. Subscription rights will be listed and traded on Apr 18~24. New shares will be listed on May 24.
• ₩1,255 is a lot more aggressive than generally viewed. DHICO owns nearly two thirds of E&C stake. With a 20% oversubscription, nearly ₩300bil will likely come from DHICO. This is like DHICO is helping E&C at an even heftier price. This is why the market is being much softer on E&C relative to DHICO.

3. DHICO (Doosan Heavy) Rights Offer: Conditions & Timetable

• This is a total ₩608.4bil rights offer. This is larger than initially expected. A projected ₩543bil will be raised through common share issuance. The other ₩65bil will be raised in the form of RCPS. This is a combined 72.56% capital increase with a 42.05% share dilution.
• 80% will be allocated to the stockholders. Per share allocation for the stockholders is 0.58. Mar 27 is the ex-rights day for both Common and RCPS. Subscription rights will be listed and trade on Apr 19~25 only for Common. May 2 is for final pricing. New Common shares will be listed on May 29.
• Offering size is much larger than initially expected. In the short-term, DHICO shares will likely take a harsh beating. At this point, we’d better stay away from it for now.

4. GrainCorp (GNC AU): Pressure Mounts, Diminishing the Prospects of a Bump to the LTAP Bid

Frustration on the slow progress of the LTAP bid came to a head at the recent AGM, where shareholders registered what appeared to be protest votes aimed at Graincorp Ltd A (GNC AU)’s director elections and remuneration. The Board has currently three options to unlock shareholder value – achieve a binding LTAP bid, commence the portfolio review driven sale process or adopt the Tanarra Capital proposal.

5. Petrus Doubles Down On Ophir Energy

Petrus Advisors (3.5% shareholder) has dialled up the pressure on its opposition to Medco Energi Internasional T (MEDC IJ)‘s £0.55/share offer for Ophir Energy (OPHR LN), specifically calling into question Bill Schrader (Ophir’s Chairman) “unprofessionalism”.

Petrus (again) highlighted the premature termination of the Fortuna licence. Ophir announced a $300mn non-cash impairment in early January following the denial of the license extension for the Fortuna project in Equatorial Guinea (EG), having previously written down $310mn back in September. Ophir had invested ~US$700mn in the licence. Petrus accused Schrader of dropping the ball after the departure of CEO Nick Cooper in April 2018, who held key businesses relationships in EQ.

In its prior letter to Ophir on the 14 January, Petrus recommended selling the South-East Asian (SEA) assets to Medco, with a low-end fair value, before synergies, of £0.64/share, through to £1.42/share on a blue sky basis.

Furthermore, Petrus reckons no marketing effort has been for the Mexican license and the 20% ownership in Blocks 1 & 2 in Tanzania, which together have low-end value of $60mn (£0.065/share).  Petrus added that Schrader had not actively solicited and considered alternative offers from other buyers; together with stonewalling demands for Ophir to return capital to shareholders.

Petrus signed off its latest salvo with a cordial “This is your final reminder to preserve and build value. We reserve all our legal rights in this situation“.

Further stirring the pot is alternative hedge fund Sand Grove, who has increased its exposure, via cash-settled derivatives, to 17.28% (as at13 February), up from 6.79% on the 1st February. I have heard, but yet to confirm, there are other shareholders seeking to disrupt this Offer.  Ian Hannam, who advised Ophir’s board on its 2013 right issue, is understood to have also written to Ophir’s interim CEO Alan Booth and the board saying Medco’s offer is too low.

Trading marginally through terms. Medco’s Offer is conditional on 75%+ approval from Ophir’s shareholders, which appears tenuous.

Medco has the option to switch into a Takeover Offer, which in theory could be conditional on a 50% acceptance level, if Medco was in any way inclined to maintain Ophir’s listing. And a switch to a Tender Offer with a reduced shareholder condition, may further flesh out an alternative bidder to come over the top.

Ophir appears a worthwhile punt up at or just below terms. The next key event is the expected issuance of the Scheme booklet on the 28 February.

In this briefing:

1. Doosan E&C Rights Offer: Conditions & Timetable
2. DHICO (Doosan Heavy) Rights Offer: Conditions & Timetable
3. GrainCorp (GNC AU): Pressure Mounts, Diminishing the Prospects of a Bump to the LTAP Bid
4. Petrus Doubles Down On Ophir Energy
5. BGF Duo Stub Trade: Short Sub / Long Holdco with a Very Short-Term Horizon

1. Doosan E&C Rights Offer: Conditions & Timetable

• Doosan E&C’s rights offer is pretty much in line with the street’s initial expectation. They raise an estimated ₩420bil at an offer price of ₩1,255. The recently amended KRX rule allows an issuer to freely set an offer price. They set it at ₩1,255 based on the Feb 13~20 prices with a 15% discount.
• Final price will be fixed on Apr 30. Whichever higher of ₩1,255 or Apr 26~30 VWAP at a 40% discount will be a final offering price. So, offering price must be at least ₩1,255. Mar 27 will be the ex-rights day. Subscription rights will be listed and traded on Apr 18~24. New shares will be listed on May 24.
• ₩1,255 is a lot more aggressive than generally viewed. DHICO owns nearly two thirds of E&C stake. With a 20% oversubscription, nearly ₩300bil will likely come from DHICO. This is like DHICO is helping E&C at an even heftier price. This is why the market is being much softer on E&C relative to DHICO.

2. DHICO (Doosan Heavy) Rights Offer: Conditions & Timetable

• This is a total ₩608.4bil rights offer. This is larger than initially expected. A projected ₩543bil will be raised through common share issuance. The other ₩65bil will be raised in the form of RCPS. This is a combined 72.56% capital increase with a 42.05% share dilution.
• 80% will be allocated to the stockholders. Per share allocation for the stockholders is 0.58. Mar 27 is the ex-rights day for both Common and RCPS. Subscription rights will be listed and trade on Apr 19~25 only for Common. May 2 is for final pricing. New Common shares will be listed on May 29.
• Offering size is much larger than initially expected. In the short-term, DHICO shares will likely take a harsh beating. At this point, we’d better stay away from it for now.

3. GrainCorp (GNC AU): Pressure Mounts, Diminishing the Prospects of a Bump to the LTAP Bid

Frustration on the slow progress of the LTAP bid came to a head at the recent AGM, where shareholders registered what appeared to be protest votes aimed at Graincorp Ltd A (GNC AU)’s director elections and remuneration. The Board has currently three options to unlock shareholder value – achieve a binding LTAP bid, commence the portfolio review driven sale process or adopt the Tanarra Capital proposal.

4. Petrus Doubles Down On Ophir Energy

Petrus Advisors (3.5% shareholder) has dialled up the pressure on its opposition to Medco Energi Internasional T (MEDC IJ)‘s £0.55/share offer for Ophir Energy (OPHR LN), specifically calling into question Bill Schrader (Ophir’s Chairman) “unprofessionalism”.

Petrus (again) highlighted the premature termination of the Fortuna licence. Ophir announced a $300mn non-cash impairment in early January following the denial of the license extension for the Fortuna project in Equatorial Guinea (EG), having previously written down $310mn back in September. Ophir had invested ~US$700mn in the licence. Petrus accused Schrader of dropping the ball after the departure of CEO Nick Cooper in April 2018, who held key businesses relationships in EQ.

In its prior letter to Ophir on the 14 January, Petrus recommended selling the South-East Asian (SEA) assets to Medco, with a low-end fair value, before synergies, of £0.64/share, through to £1.42/share on a blue sky basis.

Furthermore, Petrus reckons no marketing effort has been for the Mexican license and the 20% ownership in Blocks 1 & 2 in Tanzania, which together have low-end value of $60mn (£0.065/share).  Petrus added that Schrader had not actively solicited and considered alternative offers from other buyers; together with stonewalling demands for Ophir to return capital to shareholders.

Petrus signed off its latest salvo with a cordial “This is your final reminder to preserve and build value. We reserve all our legal rights in this situation“.

Further stirring the pot is alternative hedge fund Sand Grove, who has increased its exposure, via cash-settled derivatives, to 17.28% (as at13 February), up from 6.79% on the 1st February. I have heard, but yet to confirm, there are other shareholders seeking to disrupt this Offer.  Ian Hannam, who advised Ophir’s board on its 2013 right issue, is understood to have also written to Ophir’s interim CEO Alan Booth and the board saying Medco’s offer is too low.

Trading marginally through terms. Medco’s Offer is conditional on 75%+ approval from Ophir’s shareholders, which appears tenuous.

Medco has the option to switch into a Takeover Offer, which in theory could be conditional on a 50% acceptance level, if Medco was in any way inclined to maintain Ophir’s listing. And a switch to a Tender Offer with a reduced shareholder condition, may further flesh out an alternative bidder to come over the top.

Ophir appears a worthwhile punt up at or just below terms. The next key event is the expected issuance of the Scheme booklet on the 28 February.

5. BGF Duo Stub Trade: Short Sub / Long Holdco with a Very Short-Term Horizon

• The BGF Holdco/Sub duo is making a very dynamic movement. Yesterday, they made a 2σ jump. Sub went up 5.38%. Holdco stayed flat with a 0.24% gain. The day before yesterday, they made an exact opposite movement. Holdco was up 2%. Sub suffered a 3% loss. This also resulted in a 2σ jump, just the opposite way.
• Still, local street sentiments are heavily divided on Sub’s fundamentals. There is no news or anything that may possibly reverse the tide at this point. Shorting on Sub is still going very strong. It seems that a lot of short-term traders both at home and abroad are trading on the duo lately.
• On a 120D horizon, Holdco is still undervalued relative to Sub by about 10%. The duo should be again reverted back to a mean in favor of Holdco today. I’d suggest going long Holdco and short Sub now if you had closed the previous position which we initiated last week on Feb 13.

In this briefing:

1. DHICO (Doosan Heavy) Rights Offer: Conditions & Timetable
2. GrainCorp (GNC AU): Pressure Mounts, Diminishing the Prospects of a Bump to the LTAP Bid
3. Petrus Doubles Down On Ophir Energy
4. BGF Duo Stub Trade: Short Sub / Long Holdco with a Very Short-Term Horizon
5. Delta Thailand’s Tender Offer: Updated Timetable

1. DHICO (Doosan Heavy) Rights Offer: Conditions & Timetable

• This is a total ₩608.4bil rights offer. This is larger than initially expected. A projected ₩543bil will be raised through common share issuance. The other ₩65bil will be raised in the form of RCPS. This is a combined 72.56% capital increase with a 42.05% share dilution.
• 80% will be allocated to the stockholders. Per share allocation for the stockholders is 0.58. Mar 27 is the ex-rights day for both Common and RCPS. Subscription rights will be listed and trade on Apr 19~25 only for Common. May 2 is for final pricing. New Common shares will be listed on May 29.
• Offering size is much larger than initially expected. In the short-term, DHICO shares will likely take a harsh beating. At this point, we’d better stay away from it for now.

2. GrainCorp (GNC AU): Pressure Mounts, Diminishing the Prospects of a Bump to the LTAP Bid

Frustration on the slow progress of the LTAP bid came to a head at the recent AGM, where shareholders registered what appeared to be protest votes aimed at Graincorp Ltd A (GNC AU)’s director elections and remuneration. The Board has currently three options to unlock shareholder value – achieve a binding LTAP bid, commence the portfolio review driven sale process or adopt the Tanarra Capital proposal.

3. Petrus Doubles Down On Ophir Energy

Petrus Advisors (3.5% shareholder) has dialled up the pressure on its opposition to Medco Energi Internasional T (MEDC IJ)‘s £0.55/share offer for Ophir Energy (OPHR LN), specifically calling into question Bill Schrader (Ophir’s Chairman) “unprofessionalism”.

Petrus (again) highlighted the premature termination of the Fortuna licence. Ophir announced a $300mn non-cash impairment in early January following the denial of the license extension for the Fortuna project in Equatorial Guinea (EG), having previously written down $310mn back in September. Ophir had invested ~US$700mn in the licence. Petrus accused Schrader of dropping the ball after the departure of CEO Nick Cooper in April 2018, who held key businesses relationships in EQ.

In its prior letter to Ophir on the 14 January, Petrus recommended selling the South-East Asian (SEA) assets to Medco, with a low-end fair value, before synergies, of £0.64/share, through to £1.42/share on a blue sky basis.

Furthermore, Petrus reckons no marketing effort has been for the Mexican license and the 20% ownership in Blocks 1 & 2 in Tanzania, which together have low-end value of $60mn (£0.065/share).  Petrus added that Schrader had not actively solicited and considered alternative offers from other buyers; together with stonewalling demands for Ophir to return capital to shareholders.

Petrus signed off its latest salvo with a cordial “This is your final reminder to preserve and build value. We reserve all our legal rights in this situation“.

Further stirring the pot is alternative hedge fund Sand Grove, who has increased its exposure, via cash-settled derivatives, to 17.28% (as at13 February), up from 6.79% on the 1st February. I have heard, but yet to confirm, there are other shareholders seeking to disrupt this Offer.  Ian Hannam, who advised Ophir’s board on its 2013 right issue, is understood to have also written to Ophir’s interim CEO Alan Booth and the board saying Medco’s offer is too low.

Trading marginally through terms. Medco’s Offer is conditional on 75%+ approval from Ophir’s shareholders, which appears tenuous.

Medco has the option to switch into a Takeover Offer, which in theory could be conditional on a 50% acceptance level, if Medco was in any way inclined to maintain Ophir’s listing. And a switch to a Tender Offer with a reduced shareholder condition, may further flesh out an alternative bidder to come over the top.

Ophir appears a worthwhile punt up at or just below terms. The next key event is the expected issuance of the Scheme booklet on the 28 February.

4. BGF Duo Stub Trade: Short Sub / Long Holdco with a Very Short-Term Horizon

• The BGF Holdco/Sub duo is making a very dynamic movement. Yesterday, they made a 2σ jump. Sub went up 5.38%. Holdco stayed flat with a 0.24% gain. The day before yesterday, they made an exact opposite movement. Holdco was up 2%. Sub suffered a 3% loss. This also resulted in a 2σ jump, just the opposite way.
• Still, local street sentiments are heavily divided on Sub’s fundamentals. There is no news or anything that may possibly reverse the tide at this point. Shorting on Sub is still going very strong. It seems that a lot of short-term traders both at home and abroad are trading on the duo lately.
• On a 120D horizon, Holdco is still undervalued relative to Sub by about 10%. The duo should be again reverted back to a mean in favor of Holdco today. I’d suggest going long Holdco and short Sub now if you had closed the previous position which we initiated last week on Feb 13.

5. Delta Thailand’s Tender Offer: Updated Timetable

With Form 247-3 (Intention to Make a Tender Offer) and the FY18 dividend  (Bt2.30/share) for Delta Electronics Thai (DELTA TB) having been announced, this insight briefly provides an updated indicative timetable for investors.

The next key date is the submission of Form 247-4, the Tender Offer for Securities, which will provide full details of the Offer.

This above indicative timetable assumes a conditional offer based on a minimum acceptance level of at least 50%. Payment under the offer may indeed be earlier, as explained below, which also ties in with a shareholders’ right to revoke shares tendered. 

In addition, investors should not tender once the offer opens – assuming the tender period commences on the 25 February – but wait until their shares are on the registry as at 4 March to receive the FY18 dividend.

Currently trading at a 2.2%/22% gross/annualised spread. Bear in mind the dividend is subject to 10% tax.

In this briefing:

1. GrainCorp (GNC AU): Pressure Mounts, Diminishing the Prospects of a Bump to the LTAP Bid
2. Petrus Doubles Down On Ophir Energy
3. BGF Duo Stub Trade: Short Sub / Long Holdco with a Very Short-Term Horizon
4. Delta Thailand’s Tender Offer: Updated Timetable
5. Glovis/Mobis Pair Trade: Glovis Being Overpriced Relative to Mobis on Unsubstantiated Speculation

1. GrainCorp (GNC AU): Pressure Mounts, Diminishing the Prospects of a Bump to the LTAP Bid

Frustration on the slow progress of the LTAP bid came to a head at the recent AGM, where shareholders registered what appeared to be protest votes aimed at Graincorp Ltd A (GNC AU)’s director elections and remuneration. The Board has currently three options to unlock shareholder value – achieve a binding LTAP bid, commence the portfolio review driven sale process or adopt the Tanarra Capital proposal.

2. Petrus Doubles Down On Ophir Energy

Petrus Advisors (3.5% shareholder) has dialled up the pressure on its opposition to Medco Energi Internasional T (MEDC IJ)‘s £0.55/share offer for Ophir Energy (OPHR LN), specifically calling into question Bill Schrader (Ophir’s Chairman) “unprofessionalism”.

Petrus (again) highlighted the premature termination of the Fortuna licence. Ophir announced a $300mn non-cash impairment in early January following the denial of the license extension for the Fortuna project in Equatorial Guinea (EG), having previously written down $310mn back in September. Ophir had invested ~US$700mn in the licence. Petrus accused Schrader of dropping the ball after the departure of CEO Nick Cooper in April 2018, who held key businesses relationships in EQ.

In its prior letter to Ophir on the 14 January, Petrus recommended selling the South-East Asian (SEA) assets to Medco, with a low-end fair value, before synergies, of £0.64/share, through to £1.42/share on a blue sky basis.

Furthermore, Petrus reckons no marketing effort has been for the Mexican license and the 20% ownership in Blocks 1 & 2 in Tanzania, which together have low-end value of $60mn (£0.065/share).  Petrus added that Schrader had not actively solicited and considered alternative offers from other buyers; together with stonewalling demands for Ophir to return capital to shareholders.

Petrus signed off its latest salvo with a cordial “This is your final reminder to preserve and build value. We reserve all our legal rights in this situation“.

Further stirring the pot is alternative hedge fund Sand Grove, who has increased its exposure, via cash-settled derivatives, to 17.28% (as at13 February), up from 6.79% on the 1st February. I have heard, but yet to confirm, there are other shareholders seeking to disrupt this Offer.  Ian Hannam, who advised Ophir’s board on its 2013 right issue, is understood to have also written to Ophir’s interim CEO Alan Booth and the board saying Medco’s offer is too low.

Trading marginally through terms. Medco’s Offer is conditional on 75%+ approval from Ophir’s shareholders, which appears tenuous.

Medco has the option to switch into a Takeover Offer, which in theory could be conditional on a 50% acceptance level, if Medco was in any way inclined to maintain Ophir’s listing. And a switch to a Tender Offer with a reduced shareholder condition, may further flesh out an alternative bidder to come over the top.

Ophir appears a worthwhile punt up at or just below terms. The next key event is the expected issuance of the Scheme booklet on the 28 February.

3. BGF Duo Stub Trade: Short Sub / Long Holdco with a Very Short-Term Horizon

• The BGF Holdco/Sub duo is making a very dynamic movement. Yesterday, they made a 2σ jump. Sub went up 5.38%. Holdco stayed flat with a 0.24% gain. The day before yesterday, they made an exact opposite movement. Holdco was up 2%. Sub suffered a 3% loss. This also resulted in a 2σ jump, just the opposite way.
• Still, local street sentiments are heavily divided on Sub’s fundamentals. There is no news or anything that may possibly reverse the tide at this point. Shorting on Sub is still going very strong. It seems that a lot of short-term traders both at home and abroad are trading on the duo lately.
• On a 120D horizon, Holdco is still undervalued relative to Sub by about 10%. The duo should be again reverted back to a mean in favor of Holdco today. I’d suggest going long Holdco and short Sub now if you had closed the previous position which we initiated last week on Feb 13.

4. Delta Thailand’s Tender Offer: Updated Timetable

With Form 247-3 (Intention to Make a Tender Offer) and the FY18 dividend  (Bt2.30/share) for Delta Electronics Thai (DELTA TB) having been announced, this insight briefly provides an updated indicative timetable for investors.

The next key date is the submission of Form 247-4, the Tender Offer for Securities, which will provide full details of the Offer.

This above indicative timetable assumes a conditional offer based on a minimum acceptance level of at least 50%. Payment under the offer may indeed be earlier, as explained below, which also ties in with a shareholders’ right to revoke shares tendered. 

In addition, investors should not tender once the offer opens – assuming the tender period commences on the 25 February – but wait until their shares are on the registry as at 4 March to receive the FY18 dividend.

Currently trading at a 2.2%/22% gross/annualised spread. Bear in mind the dividend is subject to 10% tax.

5. Glovis/Mobis Pair Trade: Glovis Being Overpriced Relative to Mobis on Unsubstantiated Speculation

• There are still two schools of thought on the HMG restructuring. Glovis/Mobis merged entity as a holdco is the one. Only Glovis as a holdco with Mobis→HM→Kia below is the other. Since late 3Q last year, the local street started speculating on the latter.
• This has pushed up Glovis price relative to Mobis. They are now near 200% of σ in favor of Glovis on a 20D MA. Glovis made a 2+σ jump upwardly just in 4 trading days. On a 120D horizon, they are almost at the 120D high.
• At this point, neither is a hassle free way. In the latter, Glovis has to come up with nearly ₩2tril to buy Kia’s Mobis stake, highly likely through new debts. This financial burden wouldn’t be light on Glovis. Glovis may also be facing a risk of forceful holdco conversion. This will create a serious headache with Kia as a grand grand son subsidiary.
• The current speculation pushing up Glovis relative to Mobis has yet to be sufficiently substantiated/justified. This suggests Glovis is being overbought on a speculation that will very likely be short-lived. I expect there will soon be a mean reversion for Mobis. I’d go long Mobis and short Glovis at this point.

In this briefing:

1. Petrus Doubles Down On Ophir Energy
2. BGF Duo Stub Trade: Short Sub / Long Holdco with a Very Short-Term Horizon
3. Delta Thailand’s Tender Offer: Updated Timetable
4. Glovis/Mobis Pair Trade: Glovis Being Overpriced Relative to Mobis on Unsubstantiated Speculation
5. StubWorld: Can One’s Offer For Kian Joo Can; Mahindra At Possible Set-Up Levels

1. Petrus Doubles Down On Ophir Energy

Petrus Advisors (3.5% shareholder) has dialled up the pressure on its opposition to Medco Energi Internasional T (MEDC IJ)‘s £0.55/share offer for Ophir Energy (OPHR LN), specifically calling into question Bill Schrader (Ophir’s Chairman) “unprofessionalism”.

Petrus (again) highlighted the premature termination of the Fortuna licence. Ophir announced a $300mn non-cash impairment in early January following the denial of the license extension for the Fortuna project in Equatorial Guinea (EG), having previously written down $310mn back in September. Ophir had invested ~US$700mn in the licence. Petrus accused Schrader of dropping the ball after the departure of CEO Nick Cooper in April 2018, who held key businesses relationships in EQ.

In its prior letter to Ophir on the 14 January, Petrus recommended selling the South-East Asian (SEA) assets to Medco, with a low-end fair value, before synergies, of £0.64/share, through to £1.42/share on a blue sky basis.

Furthermore, Petrus reckons no marketing effort has been for the Mexican license and the 20% ownership in Blocks 1 & 2 in Tanzania, which together have low-end value of $60mn (£0.065/share).  Petrus added that Schrader had not actively solicited and considered alternative offers from other buyers; together with stonewalling demands for Ophir to return capital to shareholders.

Petrus signed off its latest salvo with a cordial “This is your final reminder to preserve and build value. We reserve all our legal rights in this situation“.

Further stirring the pot is alternative hedge fund Sand Grove, who has increased its exposure, via cash-settled derivatives, to 17.28% (as at13 February), up from 6.79% on the 1st February. I have heard, but yet to confirm, there are other shareholders seeking to disrupt this Offer.  Ian Hannam, who advised Ophir’s board on its 2013 right issue, is understood to have also written to Ophir’s interim CEO Alan Booth and the board saying Medco’s offer is too low.

Trading marginally through terms. Medco’s Offer is conditional on 75%+ approval from Ophir’s shareholders, which appears tenuous.

Medco has the option to switch into a Takeover Offer, which in theory could be conditional on a 50% acceptance level, if Medco was in any way inclined to maintain Ophir’s listing. And a switch to a Tender Offer with a reduced shareholder condition, may further flesh out an alternative bidder to come over the top.

Ophir appears a worthwhile punt up at or just below terms. The next key event is the expected issuance of the Scheme booklet on the 28 February.

2. BGF Duo Stub Trade: Short Sub / Long Holdco with a Very Short-Term Horizon

• The BGF Holdco/Sub duo is making a very dynamic movement. Yesterday, they made a 2σ jump. Sub went up 5.38%. Holdco stayed flat with a 0.24% gain. The day before yesterday, they made an exact opposite movement. Holdco was up 2%. Sub suffered a 3% loss. This also resulted in a 2σ jump, just the opposite way.
• Still, local street sentiments are heavily divided on Sub’s fundamentals. There is no news or anything that may possibly reverse the tide at this point. Shorting on Sub is still going very strong. It seems that a lot of short-term traders both at home and abroad are trading on the duo lately.
• On a 120D horizon, Holdco is still undervalued relative to Sub by about 10%. The duo should be again reverted back to a mean in favor of Holdco today. I’d suggest going long Holdco and short Sub now if you had closed the previous position which we initiated last week on Feb 13.

3. Delta Thailand’s Tender Offer: Updated Timetable

With Form 247-3 (Intention to Make a Tender Offer) and the FY18 dividend  (Bt2.30/share) for Delta Electronics Thai (DELTA TB) having been announced, this insight briefly provides an updated indicative timetable for investors.

The next key date is the submission of Form 247-4, the Tender Offer for Securities, which will provide full details of the Offer.

This above indicative timetable assumes a conditional offer based on a minimum acceptance level of at least 50%. Payment under the offer may indeed be earlier, as explained below, which also ties in with a shareholders’ right to revoke shares tendered. 

In addition, investors should not tender once the offer opens – assuming the tender period commences on the 25 February – but wait until their shares are on the registry as at 4 March to receive the FY18 dividend.

Currently trading at a 2.2%/22% gross/annualised spread. Bear in mind the dividend is subject to 10% tax.

4. Glovis/Mobis Pair Trade: Glovis Being Overpriced Relative to Mobis on Unsubstantiated Speculation

• There are still two schools of thought on the HMG restructuring. Glovis/Mobis merged entity as a holdco is the one. Only Glovis as a holdco with Mobis→HM→Kia below is the other. Since late 3Q last year, the local street started speculating on the latter.
• This has pushed up Glovis price relative to Mobis. They are now near 200% of σ in favor of Glovis on a 20D MA. Glovis made a 2+σ jump upwardly just in 4 trading days. On a 120D horizon, they are almost at the 120D high.
• At this point, neither is a hassle free way. In the latter, Glovis has to come up with nearly ₩2tril to buy Kia’s Mobis stake, highly likely through new debts. This financial burden wouldn’t be light on Glovis. Glovis may also be facing a risk of forceful holdco conversion. This will create a serious headache with Kia as a grand grand son subsidiary.
• The current speculation pushing up Glovis relative to Mobis has yet to be sufficiently substantiated/justified. This suggests Glovis is being overbought on a speculation that will very likely be short-lived. I expect there will soon be a mean reversion for Mobis. I’d go long Mobis and short Glovis at this point.

5. StubWorld: Can One’s Offer For Kian Joo Can; Mahindra At Possible Set-Up Levels

This week in StubWorld …

• Can One Bhd (CAN MK)‘s gets shareholder approval to launch a Mandatory General Offer for 33%-held Kian Joo Can Factory (KJC MK). (note, both legs are illiquid)
• Curtis Lehnert sees Mahindra & Mahindra (MM IN)‘s discount to NAV at its widest since 2015.

Preceding my comments on Can One/Kian Joo, Mahindra and other stubs are the weekly setup/unwind tables for Asia-Pacific Holdcos.

These relationships trade with a minimum liquidity threshold of US$1mn on a 90-day moving average, and a % market capitalisation threshold – the $ value of the holding/opco held, over the parent’s market capitalisation, expressed in percent – of at least 20%.

In this briefing:

1. BGF Duo Stub Trade: Short Sub / Long Holdco with a Very Short-Term Horizon
2. Delta Thailand’s Tender Offer: Updated Timetable
3. Glovis/Mobis Pair Trade: Glovis Being Overpriced Relative to Mobis on Unsubstantiated Speculation
4. StubWorld: Can One’s Offer For Kian Joo Can; Mahindra At Possible Set-Up Levels
5. Korean Stubs Spotlight: Close the Pair Trade Between BGF Co. & BGF Retail

1. BGF Duo Stub Trade: Short Sub / Long Holdco with a Very Short-Term Horizon

• The BGF Holdco/Sub duo is making a very dynamic movement. Yesterday, they made a 2σ jump. Sub went up 5.38%. Holdco stayed flat with a 0.24% gain. The day before yesterday, they made an exact opposite movement. Holdco was up 2%. Sub suffered a 3% loss. This also resulted in a 2σ jump, just the opposite way.
• Still, local street sentiments are heavily divided on Sub’s fundamentals. There is no news or anything that may possibly reverse the tide at this point. Shorting on Sub is still going very strong. It seems that a lot of short-term traders both at home and abroad are trading on the duo lately.
• On a 120D horizon, Holdco is still undervalued relative to Sub by about 10%. The duo should be again reverted back to a mean in favor of Holdco today. I’d suggest going long Holdco and short Sub now if you had closed the previous position which we initiated last week on Feb 13.

2. Delta Thailand’s Tender Offer: Updated Timetable

With Form 247-3 (Intention to Make a Tender Offer) and the FY18 dividend  (Bt2.30/share) for Delta Electronics Thai (DELTA TB) having been announced, this insight briefly provides an updated indicative timetable for investors.

The next key date is the submission of Form 247-4, the Tender Offer for Securities, which will provide full details of the Offer.

This above indicative timetable assumes a conditional offer based on a minimum acceptance level of at least 50%. Payment under the offer may indeed be earlier, as explained below, which also ties in with a shareholders’ right to revoke shares tendered. 

In addition, investors should not tender once the offer opens – assuming the tender period commences on the 25 February – but wait until their shares are on the registry as at 4 March to receive the FY18 dividend.

Currently trading at a 2.2%/22% gross/annualised spread. Bear in mind the dividend is subject to 10% tax.

3. Glovis/Mobis Pair Trade: Glovis Being Overpriced Relative to Mobis on Unsubstantiated Speculation

• There are still two schools of thought on the HMG restructuring. Glovis/Mobis merged entity as a holdco is the one. Only Glovis as a holdco with Mobis→HM→Kia below is the other. Since late 3Q last year, the local street started speculating on the latter.
• This has pushed up Glovis price relative to Mobis. They are now near 200% of σ in favor of Glovis on a 20D MA. Glovis made a 2+σ jump upwardly just in 4 trading days. On a 120D horizon, they are almost at the 120D high.
• At this point, neither is a hassle free way. In the latter, Glovis has to come up with nearly ₩2tril to buy Kia’s Mobis stake, highly likely through new debts. This financial burden wouldn’t be light on Glovis. Glovis may also be facing a risk of forceful holdco conversion. This will create a serious headache with Kia as a grand grand son subsidiary.
• The current speculation pushing up Glovis relative to Mobis has yet to be sufficiently substantiated/justified. This suggests Glovis is being overbought on a speculation that will very likely be short-lived. I expect there will soon be a mean reversion for Mobis. I’d go long Mobis and short Glovis at this point.

4. StubWorld: Can One’s Offer For Kian Joo Can; Mahindra At Possible Set-Up Levels

This week in StubWorld …

• Can One Bhd (CAN MK)‘s gets shareholder approval to launch a Mandatory General Offer for 33%-held Kian Joo Can Factory (KJC MK). (note, both legs are illiquid)
• Curtis Lehnert sees Mahindra & Mahindra (MM IN)‘s discount to NAV at its widest since 2015.

Preceding my comments on Can One/Kian Joo, Mahindra and other stubs are the weekly setup/unwind tables for Asia-Pacific Holdcos.

These relationships trade with a minimum liquidity threshold of US$1mn on a 90-day moving average, and a % market capitalisation threshold – the $ value of the holding/opco held, over the parent’s market capitalisation, expressed in percent – of at least 20%.

5. Korean Stubs Spotlight: Close the Pair Trade Between BGF Co. & BGF Retail

On January 8th, 2019, we wrote a report on initiating a pair trade of going long BGF Co Ltd (027410 KS) and going short Bgf Retail (282330 KS). (Korean Stubs Spotlight: A Pair Trade Between BGF Co. & BGF Retail) This trade has worked out well and now we think this is a good time to close this trade.

The return on this pair trade was 7.5%. (This assumes no commission costs, pricing spreads, taxes, or borrowing cost) using closing share price as of January 8th to February 19th, 2019. This trade was made over a period of 42 days so the annualized returns would be nearly 65%. 

It appears that many traders and investors agreed that BGF was excessively undervalued versus BGF Retail early in 2019. Among the factors cited above, the excessive NAV discount to its intrinsic value as well as the market’s overt concerns about the size of the tender offer between BGF and BGF Retail in 2018 appear to be the key factors that drove the share prices of these two firms diverging excessively in 2H 2018 but then converging back to their norms so far in 2019. 

In this briefing:

1. Delta Thailand’s Tender Offer: Updated Timetable
2. Glovis/Mobis Pair Trade: Glovis Being Overpriced Relative to Mobis on Unsubstantiated Speculation
3. StubWorld: Can One’s Offer For Kian Joo Can; Mahindra At Possible Set-Up Levels
4. Korean Stubs Spotlight: Close the Pair Trade Between BGF Co. & BGF Retail
5. TRADE IDEA – Mahindra & Mahindra (MM IN) Stub: Rise

1. Delta Thailand’s Tender Offer: Updated Timetable

With Form 247-3 (Intention to Make a Tender Offer) and the FY18 dividend  (Bt2.30/share) for Delta Electronics Thai (DELTA TB) having been announced, this insight briefly provides an updated indicative timetable for investors.

The next key date is the submission of Form 247-4, the Tender Offer for Securities, which will provide full details of the Offer.

This above indicative timetable assumes a conditional offer based on a minimum acceptance level of at least 50%. Payment under the offer may indeed be earlier, as explained below, which also ties in with a shareholders’ right to revoke shares tendered. 

In addition, investors should not tender once the offer opens – assuming the tender period commences on the 25 February – but wait until their shares are on the registry as at 4 March to receive the FY18 dividend.

Currently trading at a 2.2%/22% gross/annualised spread. Bear in mind the dividend is subject to 10% tax.

2. Glovis/Mobis Pair Trade: Glovis Being Overpriced Relative to Mobis on Unsubstantiated Speculation

• There are still two schools of thought on the HMG restructuring. Glovis/Mobis merged entity as a holdco is the one. Only Glovis as a holdco with Mobis→HM→Kia below is the other. Since late 3Q last year, the local street started speculating on the latter.
• This has pushed up Glovis price relative to Mobis. They are now near 200% of σ in favor of Glovis on a 20D MA. Glovis made a 2+σ jump upwardly just in 4 trading days. On a 120D horizon, they are almost at the 120D high.
• At this point, neither is a hassle free way. In the latter, Glovis has to come up with nearly ₩2tril to buy Kia’s Mobis stake, highly likely through new debts. This financial burden wouldn’t be light on Glovis. Glovis may also be facing a risk of forceful holdco conversion. This will create a serious headache with Kia as a grand grand son subsidiary.
• The current speculation pushing up Glovis relative to Mobis has yet to be sufficiently substantiated/justified. This suggests Glovis is being overbought on a speculation that will very likely be short-lived. I expect there will soon be a mean reversion for Mobis. I’d go long Mobis and short Glovis at this point.

3. StubWorld: Can One’s Offer For Kian Joo Can; Mahindra At Possible Set-Up Levels

This week in StubWorld …

• Can One Bhd (CAN MK)‘s gets shareholder approval to launch a Mandatory General Offer for 33%-held Kian Joo Can Factory (KJC MK). (note, both legs are illiquid)
• Curtis Lehnert sees Mahindra & Mahindra (MM IN)‘s discount to NAV at its widest since 2015.

Preceding my comments on Can One/Kian Joo, Mahindra and other stubs are the weekly setup/unwind tables for Asia-Pacific Holdcos.

These relationships trade with a minimum liquidity threshold of US$1mn on a 90-day moving average, and a % market capitalisation threshold – the $ value of the holding/opco held, over the parent’s market capitalisation, expressed in percent – of at least 20%.

4. Korean Stubs Spotlight: Close the Pair Trade Between BGF Co. & BGF Retail

On January 8th, 2019, we wrote a report on initiating a pair trade of going long BGF Co Ltd (027410 KS) and going short Bgf Retail (282330 KS). (Korean Stubs Spotlight: A Pair Trade Between BGF Co. & BGF Retail) This trade has worked out well and now we think this is a good time to close this trade.

The return on this pair trade was 7.5%. (This assumes no commission costs, pricing spreads, taxes, or borrowing cost) using closing share price as of January 8th to February 19th, 2019. This trade was made over a period of 42 days so the annualized returns would be nearly 65%. 

It appears that many traders and investors agreed that BGF was excessively undervalued versus BGF Retail early in 2019. Among the factors cited above, the excessive NAV discount to its intrinsic value as well as the market’s overt concerns about the size of the tender offer between BGF and BGF Retail in 2018 appear to be the key factors that drove the share prices of these two firms diverging excessively in 2H 2018 but then converging back to their norms so far in 2019. 

5. TRADE IDEA – Mahindra & Mahindra (MM IN) Stub: Rise

The company that brought the off-road vehicle to post-war India in the 1940s has grown into a leading personal vehicle manufacturer covering land, air and sea. Merely making cars, planes and boats wasn’t ambitious enough for this company though, the conglomerate wouldn’t be complete without a financial services and tech consulting business under the corporate umbrella. 

Indian holding companies typically trade a wider discount to NAV than their East Asian counterparts, however the 42% discount to NAV that Mahindra & Mahindra (MM IN) currently trades at, is a trough level historically for the company. In the body of this insight I will present my case for a stub trade on the company, detailing the business structure, performance and the unlisted stub businesses.

In this insight I will cover:

I. The Trade

II. Group Overview and Stub Business Review

III. My Track Record with Stub Trades

In this briefing:

1. Glovis/Mobis Pair Trade: Glovis Being Overpriced Relative to Mobis on Unsubstantiated Speculation
2. StubWorld: Can One’s Offer For Kian Joo Can; Mahindra At Possible Set-Up Levels
3. Korean Stubs Spotlight: Close the Pair Trade Between BGF Co. & BGF Retail
4. TRADE IDEA – Mahindra & Mahindra (MM IN) Stub: Rise
5. Kosaido TOB (7868 JP) Situation Gets Weird – Activists and Independent Opposition to an MBO.

1. Glovis/Mobis Pair Trade: Glovis Being Overpriced Relative to Mobis on Unsubstantiated Speculation

• There are still two schools of thought on the HMG restructuring. Glovis/Mobis merged entity as a holdco is the one. Only Glovis as a holdco with Mobis→HM→Kia below is the other. Since late 3Q last year, the local street started speculating on the latter.
• This has pushed up Glovis price relative to Mobis. They are now near 200% of σ in favor of Glovis on a 20D MA. Glovis made a 2+σ jump upwardly just in 4 trading days. On a 120D horizon, they are almost at the 120D high.
• At this point, neither is a hassle free way. In the latter, Glovis has to come up with nearly ₩2tril to buy Kia’s Mobis stake, highly likely through new debts. This financial burden wouldn’t be light on Glovis. Glovis may also be facing a risk of forceful holdco conversion. This will create a serious headache with Kia as a grand grand son subsidiary.
• The current speculation pushing up Glovis relative to Mobis has yet to be sufficiently substantiated/justified. This suggests Glovis is being overbought on a speculation that will very likely be short-lived. I expect there will soon be a mean reversion for Mobis. I’d go long Mobis and short Glovis at this point.

2. StubWorld: Can One’s Offer For Kian Joo Can; Mahindra At Possible Set-Up Levels

This week in StubWorld …

• Can One Bhd (CAN MK)‘s gets shareholder approval to launch a Mandatory General Offer for 33%-held Kian Joo Can Factory (KJC MK). (note, both legs are illiquid)
• Curtis Lehnert sees Mahindra & Mahindra (MM IN)‘s discount to NAV at its widest since 2015.

Preceding my comments on Can One/Kian Joo, Mahindra and other stubs are the weekly setup/unwind tables for Asia-Pacific Holdcos.

These relationships trade with a minimum liquidity threshold of US$1mn on a 90-day moving average, and a % market capitalisation threshold – the $ value of the holding/opco held, over the parent’s market capitalisation, expressed in percent – of at least 20%.

3. Korean Stubs Spotlight: Close the Pair Trade Between BGF Co. & BGF Retail

On January 8th, 2019, we wrote a report on initiating a pair trade of going long BGF Co Ltd (027410 KS) and going short Bgf Retail (282330 KS). (Korean Stubs Spotlight: A Pair Trade Between BGF Co. & BGF Retail) This trade has worked out well and now we think this is a good time to close this trade.

The return on this pair trade was 7.5%. (This assumes no commission costs, pricing spreads, taxes, or borrowing cost) using closing share price as of January 8th to February 19th, 2019. This trade was made over a period of 42 days so the annualized returns would be nearly 65%. 

It appears that many traders and investors agreed that BGF was excessively undervalued versus BGF Retail early in 2019. Among the factors cited above, the excessive NAV discount to its intrinsic value as well as the market’s overt concerns about the size of the tender offer between BGF and BGF Retail in 2018 appear to be the key factors that drove the share prices of these two firms diverging excessively in 2H 2018 but then converging back to their norms so far in 2019. 

4. TRADE IDEA – Mahindra & Mahindra (MM IN) Stub: Rise

The company that brought the off-road vehicle to post-war India in the 1940s has grown into a leading personal vehicle manufacturer covering land, air and sea. Merely making cars, planes and boats wasn’t ambitious enough for this company though, the conglomerate wouldn’t be complete without a financial services and tech consulting business under the corporate umbrella. 

Indian holding companies typically trade a wider discount to NAV than their East Asian counterparts, however the 42% discount to NAV that Mahindra & Mahindra (MM IN) currently trades at, is a trough level historically for the company. In the body of this insight I will present my case for a stub trade on the company, detailing the business structure, performance and the unlisted stub businesses.

In this insight I will cover:

I. The Trade

II. Group Overview and Stub Business Review

III. My Track Record with Stub Trades

5. Kosaido TOB (7868 JP) Situation Gets Weird – Activists and Independent Opposition to an MBO.

When the Tender Offer / MBO for Kosaido Co Ltd (7868 JP) was announced last month, my first reaction was that this was wrong. It was couched as being management-supportive, had one large independent shareholder agreeing to tender, and the it was touted as an effort to improve the printing and other “info” businesses such as staffing, and similar.

There was no mention of the fact that 94+% of the profits the last few years came from a majority stake in an external company which conducted funeral rites and services across a well-known chain of six large funeral parlours in Tokyo. Neither that company’s name nor the business segment it operates in were mentioned in the document (Japanese only) announcing the intention to conduct the MBO and if you look on the Kosaido website, you have to dig somewhat deeply to figure out that it is even a thing. In the company’s quarterly statements and semi-annual presentations of earnings, there is one line with revenues. One has to go into the fine print of the yukashoken hokokusho to discover more, and if one does, one sees that it is the profitable funeral parlour business which is effectively being purchased at 0.5x book and the rest of the company is being purchased at 1x book. 

I published my original opinion in Smallcap Kosaido (7868 JP) Tender Offer: Wrong Price But Whaddya Gonna Do? suggesting that the only way this was likely to not get done is if some brave activist came forward. I concluded…

• This is a virtual asset strip in progress. It is the kind of thing which gives activist hedge funds a bad name, but when cloaked in the finery of “Private Equity”, it looks like renewal of a business.

• This company is an example of why investors should be spending more time on their stewardship and the governance of their portfolio companies.

• It is also why investors should be taking a very close look at the METI request for public comment on what constitutes “Fair M&A.”

  It is a decent premium but an underwhelming valuation. Because of the premium, and its smallcap nature, I expect this gets done. 

  If deals like this start to not get done, that would be a bullish sign. Investors will finally be taking the blinders off to unfair M&A practices.

Shortly afterwards, an activist did come forward. Long-time Japan activist Yoshiaki Murakami bought 5% through his entity Reno KK, and later lifted his stake (combined with affiliates) to 9.55%. I thought the stock had run too far at that point (¥775/share). While still cheap, I did not expect Bain to lift its price by 30+% and I did not expect a white knight to arrive quickly enough.  This was discussed in Kosaido: Activism Drives Price 30+% Through Terms. 

The New News

In the wee hours of Monday 18 February, with 11 days left to the Tender Offer, toyokeizai.net published an article (partially paywalled) suggesting that the longstanding external auditor Mr. Nakatsuji and lead shareholder Sakurai Mie (descendent of the founder of Kosaido, who originally founded a company called 桜井謄写堂 (Sakurai Transcription) in 1949, which later became Sakurai Kosaido, then just Kosaido) were against the takeover. 

THAT is interesting. And the backstory here is even more interesting. 

In this briefing:

1. StubWorld: Can One’s Offer For Kian Joo Can; Mahindra At Possible Set-Up Levels
2. Korean Stubs Spotlight: Close the Pair Trade Between BGF Co. & BGF Retail
3. TRADE IDEA – Mahindra & Mahindra (MM IN) Stub: Rise
4. Kosaido TOB (7868 JP) Situation Gets Weird – Activists and Independent Opposition to an MBO.
5. Best World (BEST SP): Not the Best Financials to Disprove The Business Times Allegations

1. StubWorld: Can One’s Offer For Kian Joo Can; Mahindra At Possible Set-Up Levels

This week in StubWorld …

• Can One Bhd (CAN MK)‘s gets shareholder approval to launch a Mandatory General Offer for 33%-held Kian Joo Can Factory (KJC MK). (note, both legs are illiquid)
• Curtis Lehnert sees Mahindra & Mahindra (MM IN)‘s discount to NAV at its widest since 2015.

Preceding my comments on Can One/Kian Joo, Mahindra and other stubs are the weekly setup/unwind tables for Asia-Pacific Holdcos.

These relationships trade with a minimum liquidity threshold of US$1mn on a 90-day moving average, and a % market capitalisation threshold – the $ value of the holding/opco held, over the parent’s market capitalisation, expressed in percent – of at least 20%.

2. Korean Stubs Spotlight: Close the Pair Trade Between BGF Co. & BGF Retail

On January 8th, 2019, we wrote a report on initiating a pair trade of going long BGF Co Ltd (027410 KS) and going short Bgf Retail (282330 KS). (Korean Stubs Spotlight: A Pair Trade Between BGF Co. & BGF Retail) This trade has worked out well and now we think this is a good time to close this trade.

The return on this pair trade was 7.5%. (This assumes no commission costs, pricing spreads, taxes, or borrowing cost) using closing share price as of January 8th to February 19th, 2019. This trade was made over a period of 42 days so the annualized returns would be nearly 65%. 

It appears that many traders and investors agreed that BGF was excessively undervalued versus BGF Retail early in 2019. Among the factors cited above, the excessive NAV discount to its intrinsic value as well as the market’s overt concerns about the size of the tender offer between BGF and BGF Retail in 2018 appear to be the key factors that drove the share prices of these two firms diverging excessively in 2H 2018 but then converging back to their norms so far in 2019. 

3. TRADE IDEA – Mahindra & Mahindra (MM IN) Stub: Rise

The company that brought the off-road vehicle to post-war India in the 1940s has grown into a leading personal vehicle manufacturer covering land, air and sea. Merely making cars, planes and boats wasn’t ambitious enough for this company though, the conglomerate wouldn’t be complete without a financial services and tech consulting business under the corporate umbrella. 

Indian holding companies typically trade a wider discount to NAV than their East Asian counterparts, however the 42% discount to NAV that Mahindra & Mahindra (MM IN) currently trades at, is a trough level historically for the company. In the body of this insight I will present my case for a stub trade on the company, detailing the business structure, performance and the unlisted stub businesses.

In this insight I will cover:

I. The Trade

II. Group Overview and Stub Business Review

III. My Track Record with Stub Trades

4. Kosaido TOB (7868 JP) Situation Gets Weird – Activists and Independent Opposition to an MBO.

When the Tender Offer / MBO for Kosaido Co Ltd (7868 JP) was announced last month, my first reaction was that this was wrong. It was couched as being management-supportive, had one large independent shareholder agreeing to tender, and the it was touted as an effort to improve the printing and other “info” businesses such as staffing, and similar.

There was no mention of the fact that 94+% of the profits the last few years came from a majority stake in an external company which conducted funeral rites and services across a well-known chain of six large funeral parlours in Tokyo. Neither that company’s name nor the business segment it operates in were mentioned in the document (Japanese only) announcing the intention to conduct the MBO and if you look on the Kosaido website, you have to dig somewhat deeply to figure out that it is even a thing. In the company’s quarterly statements and semi-annual presentations of earnings, there is one line with revenues. One has to go into the fine print of the yukashoken hokokusho to discover more, and if one does, one sees that it is the profitable funeral parlour business which is effectively being purchased at 0.5x book and the rest of the company is being purchased at 1x book. 

I published my original opinion in Smallcap Kosaido (7868 JP) Tender Offer: Wrong Price But Whaddya Gonna Do? suggesting that the only way this was likely to not get done is if some brave activist came forward. I concluded…

• This is a virtual asset strip in progress. It is the kind of thing which gives activist hedge funds a bad name, but when cloaked in the finery of “Private Equity”, it looks like renewal of a business.

• This company is an example of why investors should be spending more time on their stewardship and the governance of their portfolio companies.

• It is also why investors should be taking a very close look at the METI request for public comment on what constitutes “Fair M&A.”

  It is a decent premium but an underwhelming valuation. Because of the premium, and its smallcap nature, I expect this gets done. 

  If deals like this start to not get done, that would be a bullish sign. Investors will finally be taking the blinders off to unfair M&A practices.

Shortly afterwards, an activist did come forward. Long-time Japan activist Yoshiaki Murakami bought 5% through his entity Reno KK, and later lifted his stake (combined with affiliates) to 9.55%. I thought the stock had run too far at that point (¥775/share). While still cheap, I did not expect Bain to lift its price by 30+% and I did not expect a white knight to arrive quickly enough.  This was discussed in Kosaido: Activism Drives Price 30+% Through Terms. 

The New News

In the wee hours of Monday 18 February, with 11 days left to the Tender Offer, toyokeizai.net published an article (partially paywalled) suggesting that the longstanding external auditor Mr. Nakatsuji and lead shareholder Sakurai Mie (descendent of the founder of Kosaido, who originally founded a company called 桜井謄写堂 (Sakurai Transcription) in 1949, which later became Sakurai Kosaido, then just Kosaido) were against the takeover. 

THAT is interesting. And the backstory here is even more interesting. 

5. Best World (BEST SP): Not the Best Financials to Disprove The Business Times Allegations

Best World International (BEST SP) is a direct-selling company that distributes premium skincare and wellness products. On Monday, The Business Times claimed that it is difficult to verify Best World’s strong sales in China based on “an unimpressive online and offline footprint.” On the back of the Business Times article, Best World shares slid 17% before the company was granted a trading halt pending a clarification announcement.