CONS Archives | Page 11 of 68 | Smartkarma

In this briefing:

1. ECM Weekly (16 March 2019) – Embassy Office REIT, Tiger Brokers, Dongzheng Auto, Koolearn, CanSino
2. Isetan-Mitsukoshi Unveils Digital Strategy
3. Tesla  – Now We Know The Y, But Not the How
4. Indonesia Property – In Search of the End of the Rainbow – Part 4 – Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ)
5. Koolearn (新东方在线) IPO Review – Yet to See Results from Increased Spending

1. ECM Weekly (16 March 2019) – Embassy Office REIT, Tiger Brokers, Dongzheng Auto, Koolearn, CanSino

Aequitas Research puts out a weekly update on the deals that have been covered by Smartkarma Insight Providers recently, along with updates for upcoming IPOs.

Accuracy Rate:

Our overall accuracy rate is 72.4% for IPOs and 63.7% for Placements 

(Performance measurement criteria is explained at the end of the note)

New IPO filings

• FriendTimes Inc. (Hong Kong, >US$100m)
• Frontage (Hong Kong, re-filed)

Below is a snippet of our IPO tool showing upcoming events for the next week. The IPO tool is designed to provide readers with timely information on all IPO related events (Book open/closing, listing, initiation, lock-up expiry, etc) for all the deals that we have worked on. You can access the tool here or through the tools menu.

News on Upcoming IPOs

• UBS and Rivals to Pay $100 Million to Settle Hong Kong IPO Cases
• Chinese Luxury Car Finance Firm Seeks $428 Million in Hong Kong IPO
• Online Educator Koolearn to Raise up to $233 Million in Hong Kong IPO
• Resurgence in Indian IPO market likely only after general elections
• Homeplus K-REIT Withdraws $1.5 Billion Korean IPO on Weak Demand
• Prospa may revive listing plan after beating prospectus forecasts
• Luckin Coffee chairman said to tap banks for $200m loan in exchange for IPO role

This week Analysis on Upcoming IPO

• Homeplus REIT IPO: A Key Landmark Deal in the History of the Korean REIT Market
• Up Fintech (Tiger Brokers) IPO Quick Take – It’s Not like Futu, Won’t Perform like It Either
• Embassy Office Parks REIT IPO – FY19 Revised Down, Yield Propped up by Zero Coupon Bond
• CanSino Biologics (康希诺) IPO: Valuation Update (Part 3)
• Dongzheng Auto Finance (东正汽车金融) IPO Review – Better off Buying the Parent
• Koolearn (新东方在线) IPO Review – Yet to See Results from Increased Spending

2. Isetan-Mitsukoshi Unveils Digital Strategy

Three years ago, Isetan-Mitsukoshi attempted to reverse a strategy of shifting to small format retailing.

At the same time, the department store operator made a final ditch effort to avoid closing department stores and sacked its CEO who had had the temerity to suggest closure was the only way to revive the business.

Last year new management finally realised the old CEO had been right and that culling stores was the only way to improve profit growth.

Now the company is diversifying again but, instead of just small stores, it is planning a big investment into e-commerce with a projected ¥145 billion in sales from personal styling alone.

3. Tesla  – Now We Know The Y, But Not the How

Tesla Motors (TSLA US) unveiled Model Y on, perhaps not coincidentally, March 14th which also is Pi Day. Pi is the fundamental ratio which demonstrates that all circles are related–as Model Y is overwhelmingly related with the seminal Model 3 which contributes 75-80% of the newcomer’s platform and technology.

Which means Model Y may be originating with Model 3’s many inherent problems, as I discussed in Tesla’s Plan B 2.0; Y Not, just as Tesla also is juggling the ramp-up of the newly launched $35,000-base model of Model 3 along with sales expansion into Europe and China as well as building a new plant on a shoestring in Shanghai. All this just as the company also has lurched into a radical new online-only sales model with apparently little if any considered preparation (see Tesla’s New Plan: Buy Before You Try).

No wonder Tesla’s Vice President of Engineering Michael Schwekutsch just quit, an ominous signal.

Another is that Model Y won’t be available until late 2020–at best–which is much later than expected. It’s still not clear when or where Model Y will be in full production or, even more critical, when Tesla will make even a penny of profit on it. Model 3 only recently became marginally profitable, excluding the likely money-losing $35k version, and sales of more profitable but aging Models S and X are in accelerating decline.

And, as I observed last week, Tesla’s track record of long delays in delivering new models coupled with Model 3’s alarming quality and reliability may seriously diminish the hoped-for early bird reservation cash which the company sorely needs to ease its liquidity crunch. At the same time, the pending arrival of Model Y over the next year or so is likely to further dampen already waning demand for Model 3.

In any case, it’s too late for Tesla to preserve profitability in the calamitous first quarter, if not for the full year.

Continue reading for Bond Angle analysis.

4. Indonesia Property – In Search of the End of the Rainbow – Part 4 – Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ)

In this series under Smartkarma Originals, CrossASEAN insight providers AngusMackintosh and Jessica Irene seek to determine whether or not we are close to the end of the rainbow and to a period of outperformance for the property sector. Our end conclusions will be based on a series of company visits to the major listed property companies in Indonesia, conversations with local banks, property agents, and other relevant channel checks. 

The fourth company that we explore is township developer Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ), which provides an interesting exposure to a mix of landed housing, high-rise and low-rise condominiums through its Alam Sutera Township near Serpong and its Pasir Kemis township 15 km further out on the toll road. 

Given the diminishing area of high-value land bank in Alam Sutera, the company has shifted emphasis towards selling low-rise condominiums and commercial lots for shop houses, which has been a success story. 

Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ) also has a contract with a Chinese developer, China Fortune Land Development (CFLD), to develop a total of 500 ha over a five year period in its Pasir Kamis Township.  This has provided a fillip for the company during a quiet period of marketing sales and will continue to underpin earnings for the next 2 years.

The company stands to benefit from the completion of two new toll-roads, one soon to be completed to the south connecting directly to BSD City and longer term a new toll to Soekarno Hatta Airport to the north.

It will start to utilise new land bank in North Serpong in 2021, which will extend the development potential in the area significantly longer-term. 

Management is optimistic about marketing sales for 2019 and expects growth of +16% versus last year’s number, which already exceeded expectations.

Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ) has less recurrent income than peers at around 10% of total revenue but has the potential to see better contributions from the Garuda Wisnu Kencana Cultural Centre (GWK) in Bali. 

The new regulations on the booking of sales financed by mortgages introduced in August 2018 will benefit Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ) from a cash flow perspective. Given that the company is consistently producing free cash flow, this is also a strong deleveraging story.

One of the biggest risks for the company is its US$ debt, which totals US$480m and is made up of two bonds expiring in 2020 and 2022. 

From a valuation perspective, Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ) looks very interesting, trading on 4.9x FY19E PER, at 0.67x PBV, and at a 71% discount to NAV. On all three measures, at 1 STD below its historical mean. Our target price of IDR600 takes a blended approach, based on the company trading at historical mean on all three measures implies upside of 91% from current levels. Catalysts include better marketing sales from its low-rise developments at its Alam Sutera township and further cluster sales there, a pick-up in sales and pricing at its Pasir Kemis township, a sale of its office inventory at The Tower, a pick up in recurrent income driven by improving tenant mix at GWK. Given that the company has high levels of US$ debt, a stable currency will also benefit the company. A more dovish outlook on interest rates will also be a positive, given a large and rising portion of buyers use a mortgage to buy its properties. 

5. Koolearn (新东方在线) IPO Review – Yet to See Results from Increased Spending

Koolearn (1797 HK) is looking to raise up to US$S234m in its upcoming IPO.  We have previously covered the company in:

• Koolearn (新东方在线) Pre-IPO – Profitable Online Edu Company but Poor Sentiment Weighs
• New Regulatory Tightening on Online Education Reads Badly on Koolearn IPO

In this insight, we will look at the updates on financials and operating metrics, compare it to other listed online education companies, and run the deal through our framework.

The increase in spending on marketing has not yielded the intended results as the growth rates of student enrollment and gross billings slowing down. Furthermore, aggressive spending behavior is similar to that of STG and LAIX and both companies did not perform well post listing.

In this briefing:

1. Sell Prada (1913 HK): Accounting Inflates Margins and Facilitates Excessive Dividends
2. Descente Tamed, Itochu Delicacy Required And Investors Can Probably Wait
3. NIO: A Survivor Among All the Chinese Start-Ups
4. After You Looks Beyond Thailand For Opportunities
5. Hyundai Autoever IPO Bookbuilding: Surprising Results, Local Street Bets on Autoever/Glovis Merger

1. Sell Prada (1913 HK): Accounting Inflates Margins and Facilitates Excessive Dividends

In our first report on Prada S.P.A. (1913 HK): An expensive luxury, we explained how creative accounting was disguising their business reality.  Since then, the stock has fallen 44% and the dividend has been cut. However, we think the key issues have yet to be addressed. They report growth, good operating cashflow and a solid financial position, but in-store sales are stagnant, margins falling, inventory rising and credit quality declining. It seems that profits are being inflated in order to pay dividends, largely to the controlling family.

2. Descente Tamed, Itochu Delicacy Required And Investors Can Probably Wait

I started writing this over the weekend after the results of the Itochu Corp (8001 JP) Tender Offer for 9.56% of Descente Ltd (8114 JP) were announced late Friday. 

Itochu planned on buying 7.21 million shares out of the 75.37mm shares which bear voting rights (as of the commencement of the Tender), and 15,115,148mm shares were tendered, which led to a pro-ration rate of 47.7% which was 0.3% below my the middle of my “wide range” expected pro-ration rate of 42-54% and 0.7% beyond the 44-47% tighter range discussed in Descente Descended and Itochu Angle Is More Hostile of 28 February.

Two more central ideas were discussed in that piece:

1. The hostility shown by Descente management during the Tender Offer had led Itochu to abandon discussions about post-tender management until after the Tender Offer was completed. Both sides indicated a willingness to pick up where things had left off – at Descente’s request – but Descente needed to stew a bit.
2. The revelation by ANTA Sports in an interview with the CEO in the Nikkei in late February that ANTA supported Itochu meant that the likelihood of Itochu NOT having enough votes to put through its own slate of directors was almost zero. At a combined 47.0% of post-Tender voting rights, if 94% or less of shares were to vote, it would mean Itochu could get the majority of over 50% and determine the entire slate of directors themselves. If there was another shareholder holding a couple of percent which supported Itochu, it would be a done deal even if everyone voted. And that 2-3% existed.

So… the threat that Itochu would hold an EGM to seat new directors to oblige a stronger course for management was a very strong probability. Management who was rabidly opposed to Itochu owning the stake could not very well bow down in front of Itochu post-tender just to save its own hide – not after the employee union and the OB group came out against. President Ishimoto had effectively put himself in an untenable position unless a miracle occurred because Itochu could not legally walk away from its offer, and Ishimoto-san was bad-mouthing Itochu even as they were negotiating during the Tender Offer Period. 

It was not, therefore, any surprise that President Ishimoto would step down. The surprise for me was that the news he would go came out as talks commenced over the weekend (but did not “bridge the gap” as the Nikkei reported), before we got to the first business day post-results. 

Talks apparently continue with no resolution, and the media reports offer no hint as to what the issues might be. 

3. NIO: A Survivor Among All the Chinese Start-Ups

Since its announcement on 4Q2018 results and termination of Jiading plant construction, NIO’s share price has been halved. We believe the market has over-reacted on NIO’s cashflow risk. With the expected 30-50% reduction on NEV (New Energy Vehicle) subsidies, all the Start-ups would have worse-than-ever cashflow pressure in 2019. But NIO might survive.

In China’s NEV market, NIO’s market position remains unique among all the Chinese Start-ups. Tesla is still NIO’s main competitor. NIO’s ES6 has capability to compete with Tesla’s Model Y, based on our comparison. Tesla and NIO both have to rely on external funding. The other Chinese Start-ups have to compete with traditional OEMs who have much less cash flow pressures.

NIO’s 4Q2018 financial data were in good trend. We estimate its net loss in 2019 to be further narrowed to Rmb6.1bn. With estimated Rmb13.2bn cash balance at end-Feb 2019, NIO have enough money to cover its estimated cash outflow in the next two year. And it would be able to get another round of external funding in 2020/2021, as long as its business operation ramps up as expected.

4. After You Looks Beyond Thailand For Opportunities

We met up with management of two companies whose industries couldn’t have been more different. This is the quick run-down on what they are up to recently:

• After You posted 14% earnings growth on the back of 20% revenue growth. While this remains healthy, it realizes that domestic market opportunities will become more limited and has started to look abroad with HK as its first market.
• Locally, the desserts leader is still planning a slew of new products and some in exclusive partnerships with various airlines such as Air Asia and Thai Smile.
• In an effort to reduce storefront expenses, they will start selling certain products outside stores and even online, now 3% of total sales.
• Amata’s earnings crashed 28% in 2018 on the back of 2% revenue decline, as Vietnam retroactively forbid certain land sales and even fines the company for past transactions that abided with the law back then!

5. Hyundai Autoever IPO Bookbuilding: Surprising Results, Local Street Bets on Autoever/Glovis Merger

• Subscription rate is 797 to 1. Offer price was fixed at ₩48,000, substantially higher than the upper end. Deal size is now ₩168.5bil. Company value is put at slightly higher than ₩1tril. Demands are spread out pretty well between long-term funds and hot money and local and foreign investors as well. All of the orders are universally placed at 75% of upper end or higher.
• Local street is betting on Autoever/Glovis merger not long after this IPO. That is, HMG is still wanting the initial Glovis/Mobis merger plan. To better manage to win shareholder support, they must be thinking that bigger Glovis can be an answer. This means HMG should do whatever it takes to make Autoever bigger in the immediate future.
• This is what local street is betting on and why they went really aggressive on this IPO. As witnessed in the bookbuilding results, this street mentalitywon’t be changed any time soon. We should expect even stronger prices after new shares are listed on Mar 28.

In this briefing:

1. NVIDIA’s $6.9 Billion Mellanox Band-Aid Is A Strategic Misstep
2. HK Connect Discovery Weekly: Eligibility Adjustment (2019-03-15)
3. SUTL: Puteri Harbor Construction Started Last Week, Membership Sales to Follow, Cash = 84% of MktCap
4. Re-Launching Coverage of ZTO Express with Sell Rating and US$13.31 Target Price
5. BGF Stub Trade: Sub Price Diverged Further than Usual, I’d Make Trade on Reversion

1. NVIDIA’s $6.9 Billion Mellanox Band-Aid Is A Strategic Misstep

On March 11’th 2019, Nvidia announced the acquisition of market leading high-speed interconnect company Mellanox for $6.9 billion in an all-cash deal. At first blush, the benefits touted by both companies and accepted by most commentators make sense and the deal will be immediately accretive to both EPS and revenues upon closing according to NVIDIA. 

However, the clear and present threat to NVIDIA’s future success has little to do with interconnect technologies. Rather, it is the competitive challenge to their GPU solutions for data center acceleration from a broad spectrum of alternatives from the likes of Alphabet, Baidu, Intel, Xilinx, Advanced Micro Devices etc, not to mention the host of custom-ASIC accelerator startups poised to launch their products this year. The acquisition of Mellanox will do nothing to address this situation and we see it as being a distraction from where the company really needs to be focusing.

It will serve one purpose though, as a BandAid to mask the otherwise inevitable decline in its data center revenue growth in the face of ever-increasing competition. 

2. HK Connect Discovery Weekly: Eligibility Adjustment (2019-03-15)

In our Discover HK Connect series, we aim to help our investors understand the flow of southbound trades via the Hong Kong Connect, as analyzed by our proprietary data engine. We will discuss the stocks that experienced the most inflow and outflow by mainland investors in the past seven days.

We split the stocks eligible for the Hong Kong Connect trade into three groups: component stocks in the HSCEI index, stocks with a market capitalization between USD 1 billion and USD 5 billion, and stocks with a market capitalization between USD 500 million and USD 1 billion.

In this insight, we will provide an analysis of the performance of selected stocks that just joined the Stock Connect last week. 

3. SUTL: Puteri Harbor Construction Started Last Week, Membership Sales to Follow, Cash = 84% of MktCap

Sutl Enterprise (SUTL SP) did not grow revenues in 2018 as it continued to operate only its flagship Sentosa marina. Change is coming as it has 9 projects in the pipeline which could dramatically alter the financial future of the company by FY21. 

The biggest news is the groundbreaking of Puteri Harbor in Malaysia last week. With a sales gallery opening by May 2019, it will be very interesting to follow the progress on this project and its contribution to SUTL’s top/bottom-line results in FY19/FY20.

SUTL is misunderstood by investors because management disclosure is lacking and liquidity is poor. The valuation of SUTL could be improved if investors had a better understanding of the earnings trajectory we could expect in FY19-FY21.

We realize the Tay family is not looking to sell its stake anytime soon so is not concerned about its current market cap. We caution that this might not be a smart way to run a publicly listed company as a more expensive ‘currency’  (stock price) might help the company be taken more seriously when attempting to make acquisitions overseas. 

However, this does not alter the fact that 84% of the market cap is cash and the EV of this consistently profitable company is barely 6.7M USD. SUTL is undeniably one of the cheapest stocks on SGX.

4. Re-Launching Coverage of ZTO Express with Sell Rating and US$13.31 Target Price

ZTO Express (ZTO US)‘s earnings will fail to meet the high expectations of sell-side analysts and investors who seeit as a cheap proxy for Chinese e-commerce activity.

China’s express sector revenue grew 43.5% YoY in 2016, the year ZTO went public. Last year, revenue growth was just half that (21.8%), and we expect the sector’s growth to continue to moderate over the next few years.

The express sector is also evolving in ways that will put downward pressure on profitability and require greater investment from the express companies.

We expect the profitability of ZTO’s express business to decline in the medium-term as the company adjusts to slowing demand and emerging sector trends. Our earnings estimates, which are far below consensus figures, reflect these challenges.

ZTO suffers from declining earnings quality and two accounting issues that we feel make it a risky, unattractive investment. Our 12-month target price for ZTO is US$13.31, based on 16 times our blended 2019-20 EPS estimates. We rate the stock Sell.

5. BGF Stub Trade: Sub Price Diverged Further than Usual, I’d Make Trade on Reversion

• BGF Holdco/Sub have been oscillating within ±1σ since early Feb. Last Friday, Sub again made a move. This time it diverted a little further. They are now close to -2σ. Holdco is now at a 46% discount to NAV.
• Overall sector outlook is still unpromising. Local street sentiments are still divided. BGF Retail is showing interest in Korea’s third internet bank. This may become a price divergence factor. But this issue is still too early to have real impact.
• Shorting is still going pretty heavy on Sub. Sub price divergence shouldn’t last any further from this point. I’d make my trade here.

In this briefing:

1. China New Higher Education: Negatives Mostly Baked-In
2. Dongzheng Auto Finance (东正汽车金融) IPO Review – Relaunched at Lower Price
3. Tesla: Would the Last One Off the Sinking Ship Please Turn Off the Lights?
4. Last Week in GER Research: Navitas, Mindtree, PG&E, Delta Electronics, GDS, Myob, Sigma and Ruhnn
5. Ruhnn IPO Valuation: Face Value

1. China New Higher Education: Negatives Mostly Baked-In

• China New Higher Education’s (CNHE) share price has more than halved since my bearish note in June last year.
• The fall in share price was caused by a few factors, namely uncertainties caused by regulations, a negative report by a short-seller, and below-consensus earnings.
• Market expectations of the education provider’s growth have come down, providing us an opportunity to relook at the stock.

2. Dongzheng Auto Finance (东正汽车金融) IPO Review – Relaunched at Lower Price

Dongzheng Automotive Finance (2718 HK) (DAF) re-launched its IPO at a lower fixed price of HK$3.06 per share, expecting to raise about US$208m. We have covered the fundamentals and valuation of the company in:

• Dongzheng Auto Finance (东正汽车金融) Pre-IPO Review – Dependent on Dealership Network for Growth
• Dongzheng Auto Finance (东正汽车金融) IPO Review – Better off Buying the Parent

In this insight, we will only look at the company’s updated valuation and re-run the deal through IPO framework.

3. Tesla: Would the Last One Off the Sinking Ship Please Turn Off the Lights?

Roughly nine months ago, as Elon Musk was bizarrely attacking one of the heroes of the Thai rescue mission, we noted in Tesla: As Musk’s Reputation Disintegrates, The Only Positive for the Stock Is Disappearing that

We think it is pertinent to identify the moment when the crowd turns… and we think it just happened.

concluding that

Our main point is that there is now significantly more risk of being long and wrong on Tesla, not just in terms of portfolio performance, but in terms of career risk. With Tesla’s rising profile and increasingly bizarre behaviour the ability to justify being long and wrong is diminishing rapidly.

Since then, the roller-coaster ride has, if anything, been even more volatile and the vehemence of both bulls and bears has not decreased.

With recent developments such as the collapse in unit volumes following the reduction of subsidies for Tesla, the departure of CFO Deepak Ahuja and the underwhelming Model Y reveal, we highlight what we believe are the most important indicators of failure amongst the deluge of bad news, below.

4. Last Week in GER Research: Navitas, Mindtree, PG&E, Delta Electronics, GDS, Myob, Sigma and Ruhnn

Below is a recap of the key Event-driven, IPO and placement research produced by the Global Equity Research team. This week we highlight Arun’s analysis on the takeover deals for Navitas Ltd (NVT AU) and Mindtree Ltd (MTCL IN) and the valuation range for Delta Electronics Thai (DELTA TB) . In addition, Arun recommends taking the Gds Holdings (Adr) (GDS US) placement while recommending the deal for MYOB Group Ltd (MYO AU) and contends investors may need to be patient for the rejected Sigma Healthcare (SIG AU) deal. Venkat looks into the bankruptcy arbitrage situation for P G & E Corp (PCG US) and contends PG&E has no equity value due to pending litigation risks. Finally, Arun initiates on the IPO of Chinese e-commerce company Ruhnn Holding Ltd (RUHN US)

Best of luck for the new week – Arun, Venkat and Rickin

5. Ruhnn IPO Valuation: Face Value

Ruhnn Holding Ltd (RUHN US) is an e-commerce platform which drives sales through KOLs (key opinion leaders), backed by Alibaba Group Holding (BABA US) which an 8.6% shareholder. It announced its IPO price range of $11.50-13.50 per ADS. At the mid-point of the IPO price range, Ruhnn will raise net proceeds of $113 million, resulting in a fully diluted market cap of $1 billion.

In this briefing:

1. Wesfarmers Puts Out A Bid for Lynas
2. Yunji IPO Preview: Balance Sheet Points to Waning Engagement
3. HK Connect Discovery Weekly: Mainland Investors Buying WH Group (2019-03-22)
4. Leong Hup Pre-IPO – Hard to Pinpoint What’s Going to Be the Revenue Driver Going Forward
5. Zozo: Never Meet a Margin Call

1. Wesfarmers Puts Out A Bid for Lynas

This morning, Wesfarmers Ltd (WES AU) announced an indicative, non-binding proposal to the Board of Directors of Lynas Corp Ltd (LYC AU) to acquire Lynas at A$2.25/share, payable in cash in the form of a Scheme of Arrangement.  

This is a 44.7% premium to the one-day price and a 36.4% premium to the 60-day price.

It is, however, a 0% premium to the price at which Lynas was trading on 3 December 2018, the day before the Malaysian Minister for Energy, Science, Technology, Environment and Climate imposed two pre-conditions on the rolling over of the processing licence (later in 2019), and it is a 3.2% premium to the one-year average as of 4 December 2018. On December 5th, the shares fell to A$1.65 and they have not recovered.

David Blennerhassett gave an overview of the license renewal issues and timeline in Lynas: Between a Hard Place and Just Rock just a few weeks ago. It is definitely worth a read as background for those not up to speed on the situation. 

This is very early, non-binding, conditional in the extreme, and conditional non-binding offers are a graveyard of Australian arbitrageurs. The Offer is not all that attractive to boot. But I expect the stock will go up anyway, and that may make for some interesting trading opportunities.

2. Yunji IPO Preview: Balance Sheet Points to Waning Engagement

Yunji Inc. (YJ US) is a leading membership-based social e-commerce platform in China which primarily sells merchandise through its Yunji app. Yunji is also referred to as a multi-level revenue sharing platform as the business model is based on providing incentives to members to promote products and invite new members through their social networks. Yunji is seeking to raise $200 million through a Nasdaq IPO.

3. HK Connect Discovery Weekly: Mainland Investors Buying WH Group (2019-03-22)

In our Discover HK Connect series, we aim to help our investors understand the flow of southbound trades via the Hong Kong Connect, as analyzed by our proprietary data engine. We will discuss the stocks that experienced the most inflow and outflow by mainland investors in the past seven days.

We split the stocks eligible for the Hong Kong Connect trade into three groups: component stocks in the HSCEI index, stocks with a market capitalization between USD 1 billion and USD 5 billion, and stocks with a market capitalization between USD 500 million and USD 1 billion.

In this insight, we highlight the WH Group, which led the inflows last week. 

4. Leong Hup Pre-IPO – Hard to Pinpoint What’s Going to Be the Revenue Driver Going Forward

Leong Hup International (LEHUP MK) (LHI) plans to raise up to US$400m in its Malaysian IPO. LHI is one of the largest integrated poultry producer in Southeast Asia. 

LHI was listed on Bursa Malaysia from 1990 to 2012.  Since delisting, it has consolidated  its Southeast Asia operations under a single entity and is now looking to relist the larger entity.

While revenue has been growing steadily, margins have been volatile. In addition, its difficult to pinpoint which products are performing well in which geographies. The feedmills business seems to be a more consistent performer as compared to the livestock business. It’s also a larger revenue contributor in the faster growing regions.

5. Zozo: Never Meet a Margin Call

Yusaku Maezawa is once again in the news. This time due to speculation that he is auctioning off at least part of his art collection at Sotheby’s in Hong Kong on April 1st.

Following on from the share buyback that was conducted in May last year which:

• Allowed Maezawa to sell 6m out of his then 118.227m shares into a buyback that totalled just 6.35m shares.
• Led to a ¥38.3bn swing in net cash from +¥24.6bn to -¥13.8bn (the buyback totaled ¥24.4bn)
• Was conducted at the same time that share options for up to 31m shares were issued, of which Maezawa could have been allocated more than 90%.

this looks a lot like a sudden need to raise cash.

In this briefing:

1. Golden Agri: El Nino Back on the Front Burner; Bullish Catalyst for GAR
2. S: Outshines Thai Property Peers on High Recurring Profit
3. TRADE IDEA – Amorepacific Stub (002790 KS): Buyback Helped, Close the Trade
4. Murakami-San Goes Hostile on Kosaido (7868 JP), Overbids Bain’s “Final” Offer
5. Ruhnn (如涵) Pre-IPO Review- Significant Concentration Risk

1. Golden Agri: El Nino Back on the Front Burner; Bullish Catalyst for GAR

INVESTMENT VIEW:
The Australian Bureau of Meteorology raised its ENSO Outlook back to El Nino ALERT from WATCH, which is linked to regional droughts, lower yields and higher prices for agriculture across South East Asia.  As such, we believe the recent correction in Crude Palm Oil (CPO) prices is over and recommend buying back into shares of key producers with leverage to higher CPO prices, like Golden Agri Resources (GGR SP) (GAR). 

2. S: Outshines Thai Property Peers on High Recurring Profit

We initiate coverage of S with a BUY rating, based on a target price of Bt4.2 derived from a sum-of-the-parts (SOTP) methodology and implying 16.5xPE’19E, a 23% discount to the average of its peers in the Thai real estate sector.

The story:

• Asset value to drive long-term sustainable growth
• 19 projects under development worth a combined Bt36bn to drive sales over the next three years
• REITs will be a key catalyst to boost recurring income
• Higher revenue contribution from hotel business

Risks:

• Tightened credit approval
• Raw material costs & F/X fluctuation

Background: In 2014, Santi Bhirombhakdi** and his property arm, Singha Property Management, acquired a major stake in RASA, a listed property company on the SET, and changed its name to “Singha Estate Public Company Limited”,  or “S”. This new major shareholder quickly unveiled plans to transform S into a holding company. During 2015-17, the company made several acquisitions including (1) a 51.56% stake in NVD, a low-rise property developer that operates under the “Nirvana” brand with a current market value of Bt2.7bn; (2) Suntowers, an office complex worth Bt4.5bn; and (3) a mixed-use commercial complex owned by the major holder’s family business worth over Bt6bn. It also set up a joint venture with a partner to invest in and operate 26 hotels in the UK worth Bt8.6bn.

Revenue breakdown:

The residential property segment contributed 41% of S’s 2018 total revenue. This segment includes the development and sale of high-rise and-low rise projects such as single detached houses, townhomes, home offices, and condominiums.

The commercial property segment contributed 36% of total revenue. This business includes space for rent, common-service charges for utilities, security systems, and other service fees. The company owns two commercial property projects — The Lighthouse (a community mall) and Suntowers (an office complex).

S owns 37 hotels with a combined 4,271 rooms comprising (1) two hotels with 297 rooms in Thailand, namely Santiburi Beach Resort & Spa and Phi Phi Island Village Beach Resort; (2) 22 hotels in England and 7 in Scotland (total of 3,115 rooms) under a 50:50 JV with FICO Group; and (3) 6 Outrigger-branded hotels with 859 rooms. This segment accounts for 18% of sales.

The company also provides construction materials such as precast concrete and aluminum, as well as hotel management services. These two segments contribute 3% and 2% respectively.

3. TRADE IDEA – Amorepacific Stub (002790 KS): Buyback Helped, Close the Trade

In my original insight on January 15, 2019 TRADE IDEA: Amorepacific (002790 KS) Stub: A Beautiful Opportunity, I proposed setting up a stub trade to profit from the mis-priced stub business of Amorepacific that was trading at its widest discount to NAV in at least three years. During the 65 calendar days that followed, Amorepacific Group (002790 KS) has gained 7.3% and the outperformed Amorepacific Corp (090430 KS) by 2.84%. The trade has reverted to average levels in a period of about two months and in this insight I will outline why I think the trade is over.

In this insight I will discuss:

• Performance of ALL my recommended stub trades
• a post-trade analysis on the Amorepacific stub

4. Murakami-San Goes Hostile on Kosaido (7868 JP), Overbids Bain’s “Final” Offer

I should have seen this coming. The asset is juicy enough, and they have a large enough stake, and the company is small enough, that this is an easy trade to do if you can get the funding. It makes eminent sense to be able to put the money down and go for it. 

I have covered this minor disaster of an MBO (Management BuyOut) of Kosaido Co Ltd (7868 JP) since it was launched, with the original question of what one could do (other than refuse). Famed/notorious Japanese activist Yoshiaki Murakami and his associated companies started buying in and then the stock quickly cleared the Bain Capital Japan vehicle’s bid price. The deal was extended, then the Bain bid was raised to ¥700/share last week with the minimum threshold set at 50.01% not 66.67% but still the shares had not traded that low, and did not following the news. But Bain played chicken with Murakami and the market in its amended filing, including the words 「公開買付者は、本開買付条件の変更後の本公開買付価格を最終的なものとし、今後、本公開買付価格を一切変更しないことの決定をしております。」which roughly translates to “The Offeror, having changed the terms, has made This Tender Offer Price final, and from this point onward, has decided to absolutely not raise the Tender Offer Price.”

So now Murakami-san has launched a Tender Offer of his own. Murakami-affiliated entities Minami Aoyama Fudosan KK and Reno KK have launched a Tender Offer at ¥750/share to buy a minimum of 9,100,900 shares and a maximum of all remaining shares. The entities currently own 3,355,900 shares (13.47%) between them – up from 11.71% reported up through yesterday [as noted in yesterday’s insight, it looked likely from the volume and trading patterns prior to yesterday’s Large Shareholder Report that they had continued buying]. 

Buying a minimum of 9,100,900 shares at ¥750/share should be easier for Murakami-san’s bidding entity than buying a minimum of 12,456,800 shares (Bain Capital’s minimum threshold) at ¥700/share, but the Murakami TOB Tender Agent is Mita Securities, which is a lesser-known agent and it is possible that the main agent for the Bain tender (SMBC Securities) could make life difficult for its account holders.

The likelihood that Murakami-san doesn’t have his bid funded or won’t follow through is, in my eyes, effectively zero. Tender Offer announcements are vetted by both the Kanto Local Finance Bureau and the Stock Exchange. You know this has been in the works for a couple of weeks simply because of that aspect. But one of the two documents released today includes an explanation of the process Murakami-san’s companies have gone through to arrive at this bid, and that tells you it may have gone on longer.

So what next? The easy answer is there is now a put at ¥750/share. Unless there is not. Weirder things have happened.

Read on…

And now there is more below.

5. Ruhnn (如涵) Pre-IPO Review- Significant Concentration Risk

Ruhnn Holding Ltd (RUHN US) is looking to raise about US$200m in its upcoming IPO.

The company is an internet key opinion leader (KOL) incubator in China. Revenue and GMV grew at impressive rates of 63% and 57% YoY in FY2018, respectively.

The idea of being able to leverage on KOLs influence over consumers to understand demand and retain consumers is interesting but Ruhnn has yet to demonstrate that it has a sustainable business model. 

Gross margin has deteriorated and losses widened as a percentage of revenue. Service fee paid to KOLs as a percentage of revenue has increased and showed little improvement in 9M FY2019.  The company depends heavily on the top KOL, Zhang Dayi, to generate revenue, almost half of the company’s GMV and revenue is generated from her.

In this briefing:

1. Last Week in Event SPACE: Navitas, Harbin Electric, Yungtay, Kosaido, Ophir, Tesla/CATL, Ecopro
2. Tesla Bonds Go Boom
3. Hankyu Invests ¥1.75 Billion in Hankyu Men’s Tokyo
4. After Zozo: Onward Sets Sights on Digital Renaissance
5. Snippets #21: Bremain, TMB Rights Issue

1. Last Week in Event SPACE: Navitas, Harbin Electric, Yungtay, Kosaido, Ophir, Tesla/CATL, Ecopro

Last Week in Event SPACE …

• Agreed deal with no rival bidders coming, expect Navitas Ltd (NVT AU) to trade tight.
• The risk/reward is simply not present in Harbin Electric Co Ltd H (1133 HK)‘s low-ball offer.
• One wonders if there is a “gotcha” coming against the foreigner in Hitachi Ltd (6501 JP)‘s tilt for Yungtay Engineering (1507 TT) 
• We should have seen this coming as Murakami-San Goes Hostile on Kosaido Co Ltd (7868 JP).
  
• Medco Energi Internasional T (MEDC IJ)‘s offer for Ophir Energy (OPHR LN) should get up after a small bump and a chunk of the registry giving an irrevocable undertaking.
• A Tesla Motors (TSLA US) / CATL (A) (300750 CH) tie-in lacks credibility.

• Ecopro Co Ltd (086520 KS) is looking “cheap” as 56%-held Ecopro BM Co Ltd (247540 KS) pops 48% since its IPO, and now is now worth 115% of its market cap.

• Plus other events, CCASS movements and upcoming key dates for M&A transactions.

(This insight covers specific insights & comments involving Stubs, Pairs, Arbitrage, share Classification and Events – or SPACE – in the past week

Navitas Ltd (NVT AU) (Mkt Cap: $1.4bn; Liquidity: $4mn)

After 6 months of haggling and due diligence, debt negotiation, and structuring, global education company Navitas has now signed a Scheme Implementation Deed with a consortium led by Australian Private Equity firm BGH Capital consortium, which includes Navitas Founder Rod Jones (also the largest holder at 13%) and AustralianSuper. The Scheme Price of A$5.825 is a 6% uplift from the original A$5.50 offered in the preliminary, indicative, non-binding offer announced on 10 October 2018 and a 34% premium to the undisturbed price of 9 October 2018 of A$4.35/share.

• At an equity valuation of A$2.1bn, this is being done at a TTM EV/EBITDA of ~15.5x (and probably around 0.8 turns less for FY19 forecast, which is healthy, but the company spins off prodigious cashflow, which makes it doable for private equity with leverage. 
• Given the lack of any real news or rumour of competing offer in the last five months, or in the period since the lockup, Travis Lundy doesn’t think it likely we will see one. Because he thinks this deal has very few hurdles, expect it to trade tight.

(link to Travis’ insight: Navitas Gets An Agreed Deal with BGH)

Harbin Electric Co Ltd H (1133 HK) (Mkt Cap: $898mn; Liquidity: $4mn)

Harbin Electric’s (“HE”) composite doc for its merger by absorption has been dispatched. HE’s major shareholder Harbin Electric Corporation, an SOE, is seeking to delist the company by way of a merger by absorption at HK$4.56/share, an 82.4% premium to last close. The offer has been declared final and the IFA considers the offer fair & reasonable. The significant offer premium to last close, the material drop in FY18 profit, and the lack of possibility of a competitive bidder emerging suggests this Offer falls over the line.

• Seeing it blocked at the H-share meeting is a risk, although no single shareholder has the requisite stake to block the deal. The tendering acceptance condition in this two-step hybrid Offer of 90% of H shares out, has been seen in prior PRC-incorporated takeovers.

• However, I still consider a “fair” price to be something like the distribution of net cash (~$3.48/share by my calcs) to zero then taking over the company on a PER with respect to peers. Dissension rights are available, although I am not aware of any precedents from discussions with both the PRC and HK tribunals, nor the calculation methodology of a “fair price” under such a dissension, nor the timing of payment.

• Trading at a wide gross/annualised spread of 8.3%/54.5%, implying a >80% chance of completion. The current downside should this break is 45%. Not an attractive risk/reward.

(link to my insight: Harbin Electric’s Offer: One For The Brave)

Yungtay Engineering (1507 TT) (Mkt Cap: $793mn; Liquidity: $1mn)

On March 6th, a day before Hitachi Ltd (6501 JP)‘s Tender Offer for a minimum of just over a third of Yungtay was expected to close, the closing date was extended to 22 April, as Taiwan regulators (MEIC and FTC) had not signed off. The proposed purchase price was unchanged at NT$60. 

• An EGM called by independent director Chen – who has been against the deal – was expected to take place on the 18 April. It was not clear the underlying purpose of the EGM other than to change the directors in place and gain management rights for the Baojia Group and Hsu Tso-Ming. Perhaps IF the board were to be renewed with less support for Hitachi, then the board could change its support/opinion and that might affect retail investor support for the deal. Retail tends to vote with management. In any event Hitachi filed an injunction to stop the EGM.
• IF Hitachi is unlikely to get the required number of shares, then it could easily be the case that they lose board and management control. If they do get the support, they will effectively control the board and management for the foreseeable future.
• Travis’ expectation was that this deal was still “Safe” and would get done, most likely at NT$60 but with the option of a “kiss” to NT$63 or so in the case of more public awareness and castigation of Hitachi and the board for ignoring competing indications at higher prices.
• Helpfully, after the close on Friday, Hitachi gave it a kiss, raising the Tender Offer price to NT$65/share.
• Travis has opinions on what to do here. Read the insights.

(link to Travis’ insights:
Yungtay Tummy Rumblings Continue But Not Clear To What Avail
Hitachi Bumps Yungtay Bid to NT$65. Take It.

Kosaido Co Ltd (7868 JP) (Mkt Cap: $165mn; Liquidity: $2mn)

On the 8th of March, Bain Capital raised the Tender Offer Price by 14.8% to ¥700/share and extended the Tender Offer by almost two weeks to the 25th of March. It also lowered the amount which needs to be bought to 50.1% from 66.67%. So, on the 21 March, Murakami-san launched a Tender Offer of his own. 

• Murakami-affiliated entities Minami Aoyama Fudosan KK and Reno KK’s Tender Offer at ¥750/share is to buy a minimum of 9,100,900 shares and a maximum of all remaining shares. The entities currently own 3,355,900 shares (13.47%). That minimum should be easier than buying a minimum of 12,456,800 shares at ¥700/share under Bain Capital’s offer.
• There is a theoretical possibility that Japanese retail investors decide to tender their shares into Bain’s bid because it is supported by management rather than sell to a higher bid which is not. Travis doubted it will go this way but stranger things have happened. Bain should be willing to walk.
• After Travis wrote the first two insights listed below with the content above, the stock soared 16.5% on Friday and ended at a 14.5% premium to the Murakami tender of ¥750/share (i.e. closed at ¥859/share). The company maintained its support for the Bain Capital bid at ¥700/share, but withdrew its recommendation that investors tender into it. The company did not yet offer a real opinion on Murakami-san’s offer. That must come in the next 9 business days.
• Travis has opinions on what to do here. Read the insights below.

link to Travis’ insight:
Murakami-San Goes Hostile on Kosaido (7868 JP), Overbids Bain’s “Final” Offer.
Kosaido (7868 JP) – Reno Goes Bigger But TOB Price (This Time) Is Final So What Next?
Kosaido (7868 JP) Reaches Value You Can Sell

Villa World Ltd (VLW AU) (Mkt Cap: $200mn; Liquidity: $1mn)

Australian property developer, Villa World Ltd (VLW AU) announced that it had received an unsolicited proposal, by way of a scheme, from AVID Property Group Australia at an offer price A$2.23, or a 12% premium to last close. AVID’s indicative offer translates to an LTM PER and P/B of 6.4x and 0.9x, with the P/B metric roughly in line peers.

• During 2018, VLW’s share price declined by 36% to A$1.76 from A$2.77, with a large chunk of that downward move occurring in December after VLW withdrew its FY19E earnings guidance. That forecast withdrawal was exacerbated by the fact VLW had maintained the 2019 forward guidance at its mid-November AGM.
• Ho Bee Land Ltd (HOBEE SP), VLW’s largest shareholder and JV partner, responded to AVID’s proposal by buying 2.2mn shares (~1.8% of shares out) at an average of A$1.95/share – and a high of A$2.18/share – lifting its stake to 9.41%. VLW has also recently bought back and cancelled 1.76mn shares or ~1.4% of shares out. The highest price paid was $2.09.
• AVID’s offer looks opportunistic and it’s doubtful VLW will want to engage. VLW is trading below its book, paying out one of the highest yields among its peers, and with ~21% of the share register potentially defending their position- the largest shareholder actively buying – there’s likely upside from here. Shares closed Friday at $2.24.

(link to my insight: Ho Bee Ups Stake In Villa World After AVID Lobs An Offer)

Aveo Group (AOG AU) (Mkt Cap: $806mn; Liquidity: $3mn)

Aveo announced in early February a number of indicative non-binding bids were received for a “whole of company transaction” with the AFR reporting (paywalled) that Lone Star had joined the bidding. Other interested parties are believed to include Blackstone and Cerberus Capital. Aveo’s share price is up ~11% since announcing the receipt of the indicative bids – and closing at $1.97 on Friday – having drifted down from a (recent) closing peak of $2.14 earlier this month.

• Aveo is currently trading at an attractive 0.52x P/B vs. 1.8x for its peer group, with the next closest peer valuation at 0.7x P/B. An offer of >0.7x, a level last traded as recently as June 2018, appears reasonable with ~92% of assets in investment property. 

(link to my insight: Aveo: Take Advantage of the Lull To Take a Second Crack)

Descente Ltd (8114 JP) (Mkt Cap: $1.7bn; Liquidity: $7mn)

The partial offer has successfully closed, with no major surprise in the expected pro-ration and the back end traded higher than one’s purchase price – not down. Some of this may be due to lack of stock borrow, and conversely, some of the strength may be due to those who had shorted their borrow buying back their short.

• That left us with a question – do we want to own a residual here? Or instantiate a new position? The current post-tender price was 35.7% higher than the undisturbed price.
• Travis could not recommend an outright buy on fundamental reasons. He thinks the Itochu story is reasonably compelling, or will be, but the lack of near-term observable fundamental turnaround may disappoint some. There may not be a lot of IR or analyst coverage of the situation either. For that, if you have a residual trade, he would sell it here. 
• This is not a short recommendation. This is a “It was a good arb trade and now the arb trade is over so don’t become a long-term investor just because it is doing better than you thought.”

(link to Travis’ insight: Descente Tamed, Itochu Delicacy Required And Investors Can Probably Wait)

CATL (A) (300750 CH) (Mkt Cap: $28.5bn; Liquidity: $95mn)

CATL which grabbed Panasonic Corp (6752 JP)’s leading position in the battery supplier industry last year now seems to be grabbing the latter’s key customer as well. The news circulating states that CATL could power Tesla Motors (TSLA US)’s Model 3 cars which Tesla is planning to start assembling at Tesla’s new factory near Shanghai.

• However, the news lacks credibility as neither company has commented on the matter, while Tesla has already agreed with Tianjin Lishen to supply batteries for its Chinese Plant.
• But if true, Tesla would be the key one to benefit, while CATL could be taking up a considerable share of risk in terms of stable future orders.

(link to LightStream Research‘s insight: CATL Could Be Tesla’s New Battery Supplier- Panasonic in Trouble?)

Ophir Energy (OPHR LN) (Mkt Cap: $525mn; Liquidity: $7mn)

The boards of Medco Energi Internasional T (MEDC IJ) and Ophir have agreed to increase the Offer price to £0.575 from £0.55, representing a 73.2% premium to the undisturbed price. All other details of the scheme remain unchanged. The court meeting is to take place on the 25 March, while the long stop is the 20 June – unless both companies agree to an extension.

• Subsequent to the bump, Coro Energy PLC (CORO LN), which had previously submitted a non-binding cash/scrip reverse takeover offer, declared it has no intention to bid. Sand Grove has also announced it has given an irrevocable undertaking to vote its 18.73% in favour of the scheme. Coro held discussions with Sand Grove before abandoning its bid.
• Petrus, which previously estimated a £0.64 – £1.42/share range  – just for Ophir’s SEA investments, has yet to respond to the Offer increase; but it’s wholly doubtful their position has altered. Shortly before the bump, it said it would vote its 3.95% stake against the scheme.
• While I consider the offer for Ophir sub-optimal – and shares have closed above terms on 30% of the trading days since Medco’s initial offer – Petrus alone cannot disrupt the vote. Medco’s Offer is conditional on 75%+ approval from Ophir’s shareholders, which appears less tenuous following the 4.5% bump and Sand Grove’s irrevocable undertaking. Shares closed at £0.569 on Friday.

(link to my insight: Medco’s Bump For Ophir Won’t Sway Petrus)

Ceva Logistics AG (CEVA SW) (Mkt Cap: $1.7bn; Liquidity: $5mn)

CMA CGM SA (144898Z FP) has 89.47% of CEVA and will now move to squeeze out and delist. The additional tender period will run from 20 March to 2 April. CEVA’s board of directors have reversed their earlier opinion and recommend shareholders to tender. 

• If delisting occurs, it is expected concurrently occur with a squeeze-out, which would be expected to take place in the third quarter of 2019 once all stock exchange and other legal conditions are fulfilled.
• Depending on the final tendered %, the squeeze-out will occur via the simpler market squeeze-out process if CMA gets 98%+; or the more complex off-market merger/squeeze out route if the % tendered is between 90%-98%.

(link to my insight: CEVA Logistics: Okay, Now You Can Tender)

Ecopro Co Ltd (086520 KS)/Ecopro BM Co Ltd (247540 KS)

Ecopro BM is up 48% since its IPO on March 5th. Ecopro, which holds 56% in Ecopro BN is up just 1%. That stake is now worth 115% of its market cap.

• The stub assets primarily comprise a 100% stake in Ecopro Innovation, which is involved in the processing of lithium for lithium ion batteries. Innovation’s net profit increased to ₩26.3bn in the 1Q-3Q18 from ₩10.4bn in 2017. Innovation’s book value also increased to ₩35.3bn at the end of 3Q18 from ₩7.4bn at end of 2017. 
• Douglas Kim recommended going long Ecopro Co and shorting Ecopro BM. Plugging in his numbers, I back out a discount to NAV of 55%. Both legs are pretty liquid.

(link to Douglas’ insight: Korean Stubs Spotlight: A Pair Trade Between Ecopro Co and Ecopro BM)

Amorepacific Group (002790 KS)/Amorepacific Corp (090430 KS)

Curtis Lehnert closes this set-up trade as levels have reverted to the average. Both companies recently reported so-so results, suggesting the core business continues to face declining revenue from “roadshop” brands aimed at the lower-end of the market.

• More surprising was the stock buyback announced at both companies 20 days after the earnings announcement, which spurred a 15% rally in the Group’s share price while Corp rallied nearly 11%. The buyback announcement seems to have caught the market by surprise and also caused the stub to revert to its 6-month average level of ~16% discount to NAV.
• The pair trade made 2.84% ex-costs in two months.

(link to Curtis’ insight: TRADE IDEA – Amorepacific Stub (002790 KS): Buyback Helped, Close the Trade)

Hyosung Corporation (004800 KS)/Hyosung TNC Co Ltd (298020 KS)

Douglas recommended closing the Hyosung unwind trade, which has returned ~8.2% before comms and borrowing cos. 

• The reason for Hyosung TNC’s recent move upwards? Right place, right time it would seem, as its trading value substantially increased, touching  ₩8.9bn on the 19 March, the highest level this year, and the highest level since August 22nd, 2018.

(link to Douglas’ insight: Korean Stubs Spotlight: Close Out the Pair Trade Between Hyosung TNC & Hyosung Corp)

Linkbal Inc (6046 JP)(Mkt Cap: $4.2bn; Liquidity: $5mn)

On November 13th last year, Linkbal announced it was looking to move from MOTHERS to the TSE First Section. The stock rallied. Then it fell a lot. On March 5th, the company announced a forthcoming tachiaigai bunbai offering designed to increase the float. This would get it most of the way towards meeting the requirements, but likely not all the way.

• An inclusion is still months off. And there would likely be another sale to increase shareholder count by 800-1000 before then, whether in the form of a Public Offering/Uridashi or in the form of another tachiaigai bunbai.
• The company’s market cap is not large enough to warrant analyst coverage, and float will remain relatively small. I expect the stock to get re-evaluated by small-cap managers. There are some. There probably should be more.
• Travis recommended investors buy the stock – which traded over 2% of shares outstanding at -2% in the first five minutes, and 3% of outstanding in the first 20 minutes, before rising to close +13.6% on Wednesday. The stock fell 6% on Friday.

(link to Travis’ insight: Linkbal (6046 JP) SmallCap Growth Stock: Offering This Morning, TOPIX Inclusion Late Summer 2019?)

• Hopewell Holdings (54 HK)‘s “Egregiously Bad” scheme has passed with 96.27% of disinterested shareholders approving the resolution. Shares will now be suspended at the close of trading on the 17 April. Cheques are expected to be dispatched on the 14 April. Seems like I’m not the only one as David Webb was also unimpressed with the Offer.

• Xenith Ip (XIP AU) has surprisingly concluded IPH’s proposal is not superior to the offer by Qantm Intellectual Property (QIP AU). Also the ACCC will not oppose the Qantm/ Xenith merger. Separately, IPH Ltd (IPH AU) encourages XIP shareholders to vote against the QANTM merger, stating its offer is superior in value.

• After Eclipx (ECX AU) announced a 42.4% decline in NPATA in the first five months vs. FY18, and other significant issues in the Right2Drive and Grays divisions, Mcmillan Shakespeare (MMS AU) said it did “not believe it will be possible to complete the proposed scheme“. Eclipx closed down 60% on the week.

• Brookfield has received FIRB approval in its tilt for Healthscope Ltd (HSO AU). The AFR is reporting (paywalled) that BGH is now out of the running for Healthscope. Which leaves Brookfield’s twin bids ($2.50 via a scheme or $2.40 via an off-market takeover) as the expected winner.  Norges Bank announced it now holds 5.08%.

• Kian Joo Can Factory (KJC MK)‘s offer is now unconditional.

• China Power New Energy Development Co (735 HK) is suspended pending an announcement pursuant to he takeovers Code.
• Larsen & Toubro (LT IN) launched India’s first ever hostile takeover in the tech sector, to acquire a 20.3-66.3% stake in Mindtree Ltd (MTCL IN)through a three-step transaction – 20.3% from Mindtree’s largest shareholder, V G Siddhartha, 15% from the open market, and an open offer for 31%. All purchases up to Rs980/share, a 4% premium to the undisturbed price. (link to Arun George ‘s insight: Mindtree (MTCL IN): L&T’s Hostile Takeover Offer Is an Awkward Opening Gambit)

My ongoing series flags large moves (~10%) in CCASS holdings over the past week or so, moves which are often outside normal market transactions.  These may be indicative of share pledges.  Or potential takeovers. Or simply help understand volume swings. 

Often these moves can easily be explained – the placement of new shares, rights issue, movements subsequent to a takeover, amongst others. For those mentioned below, I could not find an obvious reason for the CCASS move.   

2. Tesla Bonds Go Boom

Remember last week when Tesla Motors (TSLA US) was set to dazzle the world with the eagerly awaited unveiling of the long-promised Model Y, on Pi Day! (see my report Tesla: Now We Know the Y But Not the How). Good times. 

Then, this happened:

• Model Y turned out to look and act just like Model 3, but with unconvincing features (third-row seat? Seriously?) and a much later than expected delivery target in 2020-2021 when, I warned, it could be so outdated it’s competitively irrelevant.
• CEO Elon Musk escalated his fight in the federal court considering the charge of contempt against him lodged by the SEC with a palpably arrogant defense. The SEC said Musk’s “brazen disregard of this court’s order is unacceptable and unworkable going forward.”
• Tesla made dubious claims about orders and deliveries that seems to be more alarming than inspiring to investors already spooked by the company’s calamitous strategy blunders which seem to be increasingly fueled by severe liquidity pressure (see Tesla’s Plan B 2.0; Y Not and Tesla: Now We Know the Y But Not the How).

Which means Tesla stock and bonds closed this week near six-month lows, with the spread on the benchmark 5.3% notes trading at a record 600 bps on Friday as they slumped back to 85.

Read on as Bond Angle analysis continues.

3. Hankyu Invests ¥1.75 Billion in Hankyu Men’s Tokyo

Hankyu Hanshin has outperformed the department store sector in the last few years and continues to invest to lock in its dominance of the Osaka market.

It is now about to unveil a major new update to its Tokyo store, creating a more luxurious Men’s Emporium.

The investment is an example of how the better department stores are repositioning individual buildings to better meet target market needs and find relevance in an e-commerce age.

4. After Zozo: Onward Sets Sights on Digital Renaissance

Onward Holdings (8016 JP) made a bold stand against price discounts in January when it announced plans to stop selling on ZOZO (3092 JP) but the timing was not ideal as Onward lowered its FY2018 sales guidance shortly thereafter..

With Zozo no longer a partner, Onward is investing in the growth of its own e-commerce business and has installed a new 50-person digital strategy group to make this happen.

If the plan works, Onward could finally break away from its dependence on the contracting department store apparel market but the journey to reach this goal will be a long one.

5. Snippets #21: Bremain, TMB Rights Issue

These are the five developments/news flows/trends and their potential impact on Thai equities you should be aware of in recent weeks: 

• Reversing Brexit. A special report highlighting the possible reversal of Brexit should have limited impact on Thai equities, though a few names like SSI, Thai Union, and Minor do float up on the screen.
• TMB announces a 5 for 1 rights issue at Bt2.07/sh, which could raise US$570m of new capital for their acquisition of Thanchart and imply a 65-35 split of ownership between the two banks.
• Politically motivated wage hike. Some of the political campaigns by smaller parties are even more populist than the major parties, implying wage increases between 10-30% from current levels. This could really destabilize Thailand’s long-term prospects as an investment base. 
• Italian-Thai Chairman thrown into prison. Premchai Karnasutra, who killed one of Thailand’s last 9 black leopards, is sentenced to 16 months in jail. Share prices actually rose!
• Bangkok’s third airport! The Navy is putting up the UTaPao airport construction up for bid. Front runners include the CP-led consortium, which includes ITD, but contenders include the BTS-STEC consortium and another smaller one.

In this briefing:

1. CATL Could Be Tesla’s New Battery Supplier- Panasonic in Trouble?
2. Is There Still a Bright Future for FutureBright?
3. Navitas Gets An Agreed Deal with BGH
4. Navitas (NVT AU): BGH Heads Towards Its First Major Acquisition
5. Korean Stubs Spotlight: Close Out the Pair Trade Between Hyosung TNC & Hyosung Corp

1. CATL Could Be Tesla’s New Battery Supplier- Panasonic in Trouble?

The news released on the 11^th of March, about Tesla Motors (TSLA US) choosing CATL (A) (300750 CH) as battery supplier has focused much attention on the two companies and other battery suppliers. CATL which grabbed Panasonic Corp (6752 JP)’s leading position in the industry last year now seems to be grabbing the latter’s key customer as well. The news circulating states that, CATL could power Tesla’s Model 3 cars which Tesla is planning to start assembling at Tesla’s new factory near Shanghai. Following the release of this supposed deal, the stocks of the two companies moved positively, with CATL surging by almost 6.7% while Tesla rose by almost 2.4% during the day.  However, both parties have not commented on this news yet or made any formal announcement regarding such a potential deal. In our Insight, Tesla Drifting Away Could Leave Panasonic Struggling to Gain Traction in China, we mentioned that Tesla was looking to locally source its batteries in China and that CATL could potentially be one such supplier. However, in January this year, it was reported that Tesla had signed a preliminary agreement with China’s Tianjin Lishen to supply batteries for its new Shanghai car factory, making the current news look less believable. Although it seems like the ongoing news about a Tesla-CATL pair up lacks integrity, with CATL sort of denying its intend to work with Tesla (according to an updated news release), the news does look interesting and its effect upon the related companies seems noteworthy.

2. Is There Still a Bright Future for FutureBright?

Almost 12 months after posting our initial thesis on Future Bright Holdings (703 HK)Gambling on a Bright Future, we review FutureBright’s most recent results, raising questions on whether stalling improvement in the core restaurant business performance warrants taking chips off the table while waiting for key catalysts to materialise.

3. Navitas Gets An Agreed Deal with BGH

After 6 months of haggling and due diligence, debt negotiation, and structuring, global education company Navitas Ltd (NVT AU) has now signed a Board-recommended Scheme Implementation Deed with a consortium led by Australian Private Equity firm BGH Capital consortium which includes Navitas Founder Rod Jones (also the largest holder at 13%) and AustralianSuper.

The agreed Scheme Price of A$5.825 is a 6% uplift from the original A$5.50 offered in the preliminary, indicative, non-binding offer announced on 10 October 2018 and a 34% premium to the undisturbed price of 9 October 2018 of A$4.35/share.

This history is that the consortium came in at A$5.50 (plus another cash+RollCo scrip offer), a month or so later the company effectively rejected it by not allowing the consortium to do due diligence after management lifted earnings guidance. This upset a number of shareholders. In November the share price ranged from A$4.95-5.25 or so and Chairman Tracey Horton got only 51% support at the AGM that month. The shares fell briefly below A$4.70 in early January this year before BGH came back in mid-January with a “revised indicative offer” of A$5.825 whereupon the shares bounced from about A$4.90 to about A$5.50 then climbed to A$5.60+ on 10mm shares volume in 3 days. 

The shares hovered around A$5.58-5.62 for 6-7 weeks until the beginning of March, briefly traded into the A$5.70s, and then traded back down the last few days this week to the A$5.59-5.63 area.

On Thursday 21 March the shares were halted for the day, StreetTalk had an article about the deal being imminent, and late in the afternoon, the BGH SID was announced. 

Now we start the official process. The Scheme document is expected to be dispatched in May 2019 with a deal completed by end-June or early July. I expect this deal gets up.

4. Navitas (NVT AU): BGH Heads Towards Its First Major Acquisition

Navitas Ltd (NVT AU), an Australian-listed education company, entered into a binding agreement to be acquired by the BGH Consortium. As a reminder on 15 January 2019, the BGH Consortium bid against itself by offering a revised proposal of A$5.825 cash per share, 6% higher than its previous rejected offer.

5. Korean Stubs Spotlight: Close Out the Pair Trade Between Hyosung TNC & Hyosung Corp

On March 12th, 2019, we wrote a report on initiating a pair trade of going long Hyosung TNC Co Ltd (298020 KS) and going short Hyosung Corporation (004800 KS). (Korean Stubs Spotlight: A Pair Trade Between Hyosung Corp and Hyosung TNC).  This trade has worked out well and now we think this is a good time to close this trade.

The return on this pair trade was 8.2%. (This assumes no commission costs, pricing spreads, taxes, or borrowing cost) using closing share price as of March 12th to March 21st, 2019. This trade was made over a period of 9 days so the annualized returns would be 332%. 

We believe that Hyosung TNC is up so much in the past 9 days mainly because it appears that a few investors saw this stock as an undervalued stock that was being ignored by the market. In our report, Korean Stubs Spotlight: A Pair Trade Between Hyosung Corp and Hyosung TNC,  we mentioned that Hyosung TNC appears to be a turnaround story driven by the following four key factors: 

• Decline in raw material prices 
• Aggressive spandex investment in India 
• Stabilization of spandex prices in 2H19 
• Consolidation of the global spandex industry

In this briefing:

1. StubWorld: Naspers Embeds Another Layer Into Tencent
2. Ruhnn (如涵) IPO Review – Expensive Influence
3. Golden Agri Bull Pivots to Get Involved
4. Yunji (云集) Pre-IPO Review – Poor Disclosure on Data
5. F&F: Time to Take Profits – Up 95% This Year Driven by MLB Baseball Hats Potential in China

1. StubWorld: Naspers Embeds Another Layer Into Tencent

This week in StubWorld …

• There is no apparent value enhancement to Naspers Ltd (NPN SJ)‘s spinning-off and separately listing Tencent Holdings (700 HK), while there is no change in governance and no monetisation at the parent level.

Preceding my comments on Naspers are the weekly setup/unwind tables for Asia-Pacific Holdcos.

These relationships trade with a minimum liquidity threshold of US$1mn on a 90-day moving average, and a % market capitalisation threshold – the $ value of the holding/opco held, over the parent’s market capitalisation, expressed in percent – of at least 20%.

2. Ruhnn (如涵) IPO Review – Expensive Influence

Ruhnn Holding Ltd (RUHN US) is looking to raise up to US$155m in its upcoming IPO. We have previously covered the company’s fundamentals in: Ruhnn (如涵) Pre-IPO Review- Significant Concentration Risk.

In this insight, we will value the company business segments by parts, look at the deal dynamics, and run the deal through our IPO framework.

3. Golden Agri Bull Pivots to Get Involved

Golden Agri Resources (GGR SP) has started a basing process below pivot support at 0.30 as the daily MACD cycle has not been confirming recent lows for a case of underlying supportive bull divergence (sell pressure dwindling as downside momentum tapers off).

Bull divergence outlined in the MACD is supportive on a macro basis, however there is downside risk stemming from the micro rising wedge. A fresh diverging low is expected to market a price low to work into.

Immediate inflection levels at 0.30 and 0.26 will dictate near term direction out of the micro rising wedge. Ideal downside projections are noted along with a bullish resistance threshold.

4. Yunji (云集) Pre-IPO Review – Poor Disclosure on Data

Yunji Inc. (YJ US) is looking to raise about US$200m in its upcoming IPO. 

YJ is a membership-based social e-commerce platform. Growth from FY2016 to FY2018 has been stupendous. Revenue has grown at a 218% CAGR while gross profit grew at 175% CAGR. Losses have been shrinking as a percentage of revenue and the company seems to be close to break even.

However, the disclosure of data is poor. There is no clear explanation how the company has achieved such strong growth in FY2018 without having to provide a proportionately larger incentive in the same period. 

5. F&F: Time to Take Profits – Up 95% This Year Driven by MLB Baseball Hats Potential in China

F&F Co Ltd (007700 KS) shares have been soaring this year (up 95% YTD), versus KOSPI which is up only 5% YTD. F&F Co has been one of the top performing stocks in KOSPI this year. We believe it is time to take profits on this name and take it out of our model portfolio. 

One of the main reasons why F&F Co has been soaring this year has been due to the MLB (Major League Baseball) apparel business expansion in China. In February 2019, F&F Co secured the selling rights of the MLB branded apparel products in China from the MLB headquarters in the US. 

Baseball is becoming increasingly popular in China. According to the Chinese Baseball Association, more than 4 million Chinese play the game. The historical resistance to baseball is breaking down in China. For example, In April 2018, Tencent announced a deal to live stream 125 MLB games on platforms such as its its Tencent Sports app to Chinese audiences via their computers and mobile devices.

In this briefing:

1. Hankook Tire Stub Trade: Sub Clearly Oversold Relative to Holdco on Hanon Takeover
2. ECM Weekly (30 March 2019) – ESR, Yunji, Ruhnn, Jinxin Fertility, Metropolis Health, Viva Biotech
3. Billionaire Carl Icahn’s Run at Caesars Has yet to Move Stock. What Doesn’t the Market See?
4. Japan Mobile: MVNO Data for Q3 Includes Slowest Growth Since 2014 but that Makes Sense for Rakuten
5. Havells India

1. Hankook Tire Stub Trade: Sub Clearly Oversold Relative to Holdco on Hanon Takeover

• Hankook Tire Holdco/Sub are at +2σ for 5 consecutive days now. It was reported on Mar 25 that Sub (Hankook Tire) was on the verge of taking over Hanon Systems at a hefty 70% premium. Hankook Tire pays ₩5tril for Hahn & Co’s 50% stake.
• ₩5tril is really a lot for the Group. Holdco will also have to be heavily involved in funding. Whatever suffering Sub will have to endure should also be nearly equally applied to Holdco.
• Only long-term oriented local public offering funds had heavily dumped Sub shares. In contrast, highly short-term oriented local hedge funds (PEs) had rather shorted Holdco in the same time span. Sub disappoints and alienates a lot of long-term investors but it was Holdco who attracted the attention of short-term traders.
• Current +2σ divergence stayed for several days now. Considering where local short sellers are, I don’t think it will last much longer. I’d join local short-sellers. Just for a safer setup, I’d do pair trades, go long Sub and short Holdco.

2. ECM Weekly (30 March 2019) – ESR, Yunji, Ruhnn, Jinxin Fertility, Metropolis Health, Viva Biotech

Aequitas Research puts out a weekly update on the deals that have been covered by Smartkarma Insight Providers recently, along with updates for upcoming IPOs.

Accuracy Rate:

Our overall accuracy rate is 72.4% for IPOs and 63.9% for Placements 

(Performance measurement criteria is explained at the end of the note)

New IPO filings

• Haitong UniTrust International Leasing (Hong Kong, re-filed)

Below is a snippet of our IPO tool showing upcoming events for the next week. The IPO tool is designed to provide readers with timely information on all IPO related events (Book open/closing, listing, initiation, lock-up expiry, etc) for all the deals that we have worked on. You can access the tool here or through the tools menu.

News on Upcoming IPOs

• As IPO flood recedes, Asia bankers bet on follow-on capital raising
• Bitmain forced to delay Hong Kong IPO amid crypto-mining decline

This week Analysis on Upcoming IPO

• Viva Biotech (维亚生物) IPO: Warning Signs from 2018 Numbers (Part 2)
• Metropolis Healthcare IPO – Fairly Valued, at Best
• Jinxin Fertility (锦欣生殖) Pre-IPO: Strong Foothold in Sichuan but Weak Sentiment for Sector
• Ruhnn (如涵) Pre-IPO Review- Significant Concentration Risk
• Yunji (云集) Pre-IPO Review – Poor Disclosure on Data
• ESR Cayman Pre-IPO- First Stab at Valuation
• Leong Hup Pre-IPO – Hard to Pinpoint What’s Going to Be the Revenue Driver Going Forward
• Dongzheng Auto Finance (东正汽车金融) IPO Review – Relaunched at Lower Price
• SNK Corp (950180 KS)

3. Billionaire Carl Icahn’s Run at Caesars Has yet to Move Stock. What Doesn’t the Market See?

• Carl Icahn has built his position since February 7th to where he now controls over 28% of the stock of Caesars Entertainment Corporation.
• He has already put three members on the board and will get a fourth seat if management can’t name a new CEO by April 15th.
• Icahn’s track record in casino deals has made him over $2.5bn since 1998/ Investors who joined him have made solid returns, deal after deals.

4. Japan Mobile: MVNO Data for Q3 Includes Slowest Growth Since 2014 but that Makes Sense for Rakuten

The Ministry of Industry Affairs and Communications (MIC, the regulator) released Q3 (Dec 2018) data for industry mobile virtual network operator (MVNO) subs today (29 March) characterized by continued declines in growth YoY (+15% in Q3 v 18% in Q2) and the lowest absolute net adds (+480K) since Q2 2014.  Growth for the largest consumer-focused MVNO Rakuten Inc (4755 JP) also appears to be the lowest since data has become available but that is not necessarily a sign of strength for the existing network operators as it makes sense for Rakuten to slow MVNO growth before its October real network launch.  

5. Havells India

As the summer sets in, we visit distributor and retailers of air conditioners in our home town Vadodara, Gujarat where temperatures soar really high in summer and air conditioning is becoming a necessity.  Our checks are focused on Havells India (HAVL IN) and its’ consumer brand Llyod. Our takeaways from visits suggest celebrity endorsements unlikely to work, competition intensifying with the entry of Daikin in the mass premium segment, Ifb Industries (IFBI IN) joins the price war with its ACs, the season is off to a muted start due to prolonged winters.  At current price of INR 776, risk-reward offered is not in favour for Havells investors with a medium-term horizon. Using consensus estimates and average 3 year forward PE of 41x, target price works out to be INR 807. Investors will be better off waiting for an attractive entry point.