Monthly Archives

December 2018

Daily Event-Driven: Last Week in Event SPACE: Familymart, Takeda, Harbin Electric, Motherson, Young Poong, NTT and more

By | Event-Driven

In this briefing:

  1. Last Week in Event SPACE: Familymart, Takeda, Harbin Electric, Motherson, Young Poong, NTT
  2. Sathorn Series M: TMB-Thanachart Courtship

1. Last Week in Event SPACE: Familymart, Takeda, Harbin Electric, Motherson, Young Poong, NTT

22%20dec%20%202018

Last Week in Event SPACE …

(This insight covers specific insights & comments involving Stubs, Pairs, Arbitrage, share Classification and Events – or SPACE – in the past week)

M&A – ASIA-PAC

Recapping the original plan: when Familymart Uny Holdings (8028 JP) (“FM”) sold the remaining 60% of UNY to Don Quijote Holdings (7532 JP) (DQ), it entered into an agreement to buy 20+% in DQ, for one of two reasons; 1) a company wants to prove to the employees of a division being sold that they are maintaining a watchful eye over them, or (as is now evident) 2) the buyer wants to gain an equity method affiliate and the income from it (including the placeholder for frontrunner status to future capital events). 

  • FM launched a Partial Tender Offer at a 20% premium to last in order to buy these shares, and in the MOU to launch the tender offer there was a clause which said that if FM did not reach the full 20%, it had made arrangements to borrow shares in order to get to 20% of the voting rights. And if FM did not manage to get to the full 20%, there was an agreement between DQ which allowed FM to buy shares in the market to get to a 20% (but not larger) position. 
    • If FM managed to get the shares, it was going to buy from the weak hands.  Growth stock managers don’t like selling growth stocks until the growth stops growing. DQ is still growing, and with UNY, DQ may grow faster than previously expected. The upshot is that everyone decided they’d stand pat – FM got nothing in the tender (0.08% of the total desired).
  • Shares in DQ could fall because of a lack of hard strategy announced by FM to buy all the shares at a higher price immediately. That shouldn’t be a big worry – it wasn’t going to happen.
  • Travis Lundy sees DQ having a performance skew which includes a “cushion of sorts” in the ¥5500-6600/share zone where he would expect FM to acquire shares. He does not see a cushion for the shares of FM, and expects them to be volatile. 

(link to Travis’ insight: FamilyMart Tender Offer for Don Quijote Misses The Mark as Mr. Partridge Stands Pat)  


Harbin Electric Co Ltd H (1133 HK) (Mkt Cap: $546mn; Liquidity: $0.4mn)

Power generation equipment manufacturer Harbin Electric Co Ltd H (1133 HK) is currently suspended pursuant to Hong Kong’s Codes on Takeovers and Mergers and Share Buy-backs, suggesting a privatisation offer from parent Harbin Electric Corporation (“HEC”) is pending. As HE is PRC incorporated, a privatisation by way of a merger by absorption may be proposed, similar to Advanced Semiconductor Mfg Corp Ltd. (3355 HK) as discussed in ASMC’s Merger By Absorption. 

  • It is possible this suspension is not in relation to a takeover, but a major sale of assets, for example, from the parent to the sub. This would make sense given the recent share purchase by HEC (completed in January this year), and the fact HE is playing catch-up to Dongfang Electric Corporation (1072 HK) Shanghai Electric Group Company (2727 HK). Arguably, launching a takeover shortly after subscribing for more shares is unusual.  Then again, when the two SOE railway behemoths CNR and CSR merged in 2015, a merger was disputed (at the time) when both were suspended on account of the fact CNR was only listed (on the HK exchange) in 2Q14.
  • HE has perennially traded at discount to net cash. As at its last traded price, the discount to net cash (using the 2018 interim figure of HK$12.4bn, or HK$7.27/share) was 65%.
  • “Fair” pricing to me would be something like the distribution of net cash to zero then taking over the company on PER. I simply don’t see this happening. And if it doesn’t, the fiduciary duty of independent directors will be tested/scrutinised if they recommend an offer to shareholders at any price less than the net cash/share of the company.

(link to my insight: Harbin Electric Expected To Be Privatised)  


Motherson Sumi Systems (MSS IN) (Mkt Cap: $7.7bn; Liquidity: $1.6mn)

Reportedly Motherson has entered merger/acquisition talks with Leoni AG (LEO GR), a leading provider of cables and cable systems for the automotive sector and other industries. Motherson has made four acquisitions so far in this business segment with the latest being PKC in 2017.

  • Motherson has always aimed at strengthening this business area internationally, therefore the news about a merger with Leoni comes as no surprise and was mentioned as a potential acquisition target in LightStream Research‘s earlier insight Two More Acquisitions on the Way for Motherson Sumi
  • Motherson has a strong balance sheet that could support this acquisition, although its ability to make further acquisitions in the short-to-medium term may be hampered – Leoni would be at the higher end of the price range for recent acquisitions. Should the acquisition go through, the company will be very well positioned to reach its US$18bn revenue target by 2020E, given that the combined revenue for FY2017 alone is ~US$13bn.
  • Currently, Motherson is trading at an FY1 EV/EBITDA of 10x, slightly above peers such as Mahindra Cie Automotive (MACA IN) (9x) and below peers such as Bosch Ltd (BOS IN) (25x). If the deal goes through, Motherson’s FY1 EV/EBITDA of ~12x would be at a slight premium to local players, but still reasonable compared to international players. 

(link to Aqila Ali ‘s insight: Motherson In Merger Talks with One of Our Previously Short-Listed Candidates – Leoni)  


MYOB Group Ltd (MYO AU) (Mkt Cap: $1.2bn; Liquidity: $7mn)

Kohlberg Kravis Roberts reduced its indicative offer to $3.40 from $3.77 on Thursday after sifting through MYOB’s books, with MYOB announcing:

Following completion of due diligence and finalisation of debt funding commitments, KKR has revised the offer price to $3.40 per share. …  The board has informed KKR that it is not in a position to recommend the revised proposal, however it remains in discussions with KKR regarding its proposal. (my emphasis)

(link to my insight: Friday Deadline Looms As MYOB Snubs KKR’s Reduced Offer)

EVENTS

NTT (Nippon Telegraph & Telephone) (9432 JP) (Mkt Cap: $75bn; Liquidity: $181mn)

The Nikkei carried an article noting that the Japanese government’s FY2019 budget currently being formed proposes a sale of ¥160bn of shares in NTT to help fund any revenue impact from the upcoming consumption tax rate hike from 8% to 10% next October. The article helpfully notes that they plan on selling when NTT is buying back shares. One of the longstanding features of buybacks for NTT is that NTT is subject to the NTT Law which requires (for the moment) that the government hold at least one-third of the shares outstanding in NTT.

  • Travis estimates NTT has ~1.95bn shares outstanding, or ~1.917bn shares outstanding ex-Treasury shares, after recent buybacks. If NTT cancelled the shares it has bought back prior to buying back shares from the government, this would allow NTT to buy back 59mm shares from the government (assuming those shares are also cancelled). If it did not, it would mean NTT could only buy back about 42-43mm shares. 59mm shares backs out ¥250bn; 43mm shares at a 10% discount would be  ¥180bn. That means there is about 10% leeway in stock price to buy ¥160bn from the government IF shares repurchased under the current buyback are not cancelled.
  • But that also means that there would be no more buybacks from the government after that until the company buys back more shares from the market. If the company wanted to buy back another ¥200bn from the government, ceteris paribus it would have to buy back something like ¥400-450bn first from the market in order to reduce the denominator. Travis concludes there is still more on-market buying to do.
  • At an NTT/ NTT Docomo Inc (9437 JP) ratio of 1.80x, buybacks coming, expected ongoing strong dividend policy (and lots of headroom to do so, unlike perhaps Softbank Corp (9434 JP)), and investor suspicion of what comes next for Docomo, NTT is the home of the cashflow.

(link to Travis’ insight: NTT Buybacks Will Roll On)  


Takeda Pharmaceutical (4502 JP) Softbank Corp (9434 JP)

The IPO of Softbank Corp and the Merger of Takeda and Shire Pharmaceuticals create significant changes in TOPIX, MSCI, and FTSE because of the addition of roughly ¥5tn of “new” market capitalization in major Japan indices. Pure passive investors have something like ¥1.35tn of Softbank Corp and Takeda Pharmaceutical to buy.

  • However, after Travis’ initial note (Softbank Corp, Takeda, and Newton’s Three Laws of Motion), TSE unhelpfully changed their mind on timing (for Takeda) based on an unhelpful change by the LSE. With the changes at FTSE and now TOPIX and JPX Nikkei 400, we no longer have quite the same clarity of forces on the bodies, and therefore less clarity on the resulting motion. The LSE’s announced market change appears to have led the MSCI to change its deletion date for Shire as well, now also (along with FTSE) deleting Shire at the close of the 21st. The new schedule is:
    Index DeletionShire
    (shs mm)
    Index InclusionTakeda
    (shs mm)
    Index Effect
    (US$ bn)
    Net Delta
    (US$bn)
    21 DecMSCI -50MSCI JP+75– $0.3bn+$1.3bn
    21 DecFTSE UK, All-Share,-100-130FTSE JP+15-$5.2bn+– $2.1bn

    rest of December – end of a pretty bad year for hedge funds, but illiquid

    all of January

    30 JanTOPIX-$1.9bnTOPIX, JPXN400

    +60

    +$2.1bn+$2.1bn
    30 JanTOPIX-$3.5bnTOPIXSoftbank+$3.5bn+$3.5bn
    all of February
    27 FebTOPIX, JPXN400+60+$2.1bn+$2.1bn
  • It doesn’t change the amounts but a lot more time allows for more risk and preparation and there will no longer be any potential settlement issues on the TOPIX side. There is still the same amount of Takeda to buy in TOPIX and JPX Nikkei 400. 
  • In principle, Travis would want to be long Takeda at the close of the year of 2018, but given the LSE and TSE changes there is less support to give and the payoff is substantially more distant. 

links to Travis’ insights
Softbank Corp, Takeda, and Newton’s Three Laws of Motion
Takeda: Move Over Newton! Now It’s Spooky Action At a Distance


Dic Corp (4631 JP) (Mkt Cap: $2.8bn; Liquidity: $15mn)

Speciality steel maker Nisshin Steel (5413 JP) is slated to merge with parent company Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal (5401 JP) as of January 1, 2019. For that, Nisshin Steel will be delisted on December 26th (i.e. the last day of trading is the 25th) and that means the Nikkei Inc was obliged to choose a replacement for Nisshin Steel in the Nikkei 225 and other indices. On December 11th, the Nikkei Inc announced Itoham Yonekyu Holdings Inc (2296 JP) would take Nisshin’s place in the Nikkei 500 Index; announced that Japan Post Holdings (6178 JP) would join the Nikkei 300 Index; and announced that Dic Corp (4631 JP) would replace Nisshin Steel in the Nikkei Stock Average, better known as the Nikkei 225.

  • Nisshin Steel’s deletion is a nothing-burger. 
  • The possibility of a DIC addition was well-flagged as early as May when sell-side brokers started compiling Annual and Ad Hoc Review lists for the Nikkei 225 changes to come in September and as a result of the Nisshin Steel merger. Travis would rather be long DIC than short DIC through the close of December 21st or probably December 25th. 

(link to Travis’ insight: Small Potatoes Nikkei 225 Changes on Christmas Day)

STUBS/HOLDCOS

Young Poong (000670 KS) / Korea Zinc (010130 KS)

YP appeared “cheap” back in April when I last discussed this Holdco, and is now cheaper, with its holding in KZ accounting for near-on 200% of its market cap.  I can’t think of any other parent/subsidiary relationship – one which is essentially a single stock structure – with such a deep discount. Especially one where the stub ops operate in a similar space to that of the listed holding. 

  • On the negative front, an investigation into YP’s Seokpo zinc smelter remains ongoing on account of perceived environmental transgressions. The Seokpo smelter is located in a national park on the Nakdong river. Wastewater containing above-legal limits of certain chemicals (fluoride and selenium) allegedly flowed downstream to residents, who are heavily reliant on this water.
  • YP’s stub and KZ are in the same business, but there are differences. YP does not have a balanced product mix as KZ does, with around 84% of its revenue coming from zinc-related production (for the 9M18 period), compared to 42.5% (on a revenue basis) for KZ, followed by lead (20.4%), silver (20.2%), and gold (7.6%).
  • However, YP and KZ remain inextricably intertwined and the current discount is unjustifiably steep. Just that YP’s liquidity, uncertainty on Seokpo, and lack of a near-term catalyst make for a difficult stub set-up.

(link to my insight: StubWorld: Young Poong Blows Out, Again)  


Softbank Group (9984 JP) / Softbank Corp (9434 JP)

A forgettable trading debut for Japan’s largest-ever IPO, with Softbank Corp, closing at ¥1,282/share, down from the IPO price of ¥1,500, and closing at ¥1,316/share on Friday, the same day as its FTSE inclusion.

TOPIX INCLUSIONS!

With seven stocks promoted/reassigned from TSE2, MOTHERS, and JASDAQ in November 2018 leading to the same seven stocks being included in TOPIX at the end of December, Travis tested 340+ TOPIX inclusions over the past five years to see what really happens around TOPIX inclusions?

  • If you own all but the smallest stocks (with a market cap of less than ¥15bn), odds are that, ON AVERAGE, they will underperform TOPIX from inclusion date or the day after, for many months.
  • The larger the market cap, the more marked the AVERAGE underperformance immediately following inclusion. 
  • For names in the ¥25-50bn sweet spot of “large enough to be “small cap” with somebody paying attention to it”, outperformance vs underperformance in the next 10 days is a 47/53 proposition. That is a bigger risk. It may be data-idiosyncratic, but it is not clear.
  • In the case of the 7 names going into TOPIX at month-end this month, the averages would suggest one could still be long the four largest (at the time of Travis’ insight), but one would not want to be long the others; and one could sell long positions in all the names as of the close of the 27th or 28th and have it be an ex-ante expected net positive outcome vs TOPIX over the following 10-60 trading days.

(link to Travis’ insight: Historical TOPIX Inclusions:  How Do They Do Around Inclusion Date?)

SHARE CLASSIFICATIONS

Ke Yan, CFA, FRM provided an update on the HK Connect/southbound flow. Fullshare Holdings (607 HK)Shandong Gold Mining Co Ltd (1787 HK) and Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical (Group) (2196 HK) rounded out the top three inflows relative to their free float in the past seven days.  Shandong Gold remained in the top inflow list for the third consecutive week. Top outflows relative to the free float are Wuxi Biologics (Cayman) Inc (2269 HK), China Southern Airlines (1055 HK) and Sino Biopharmaceutical (1177 HK)

(link to Ke Yan’s insight: Discover HK Connect: Mainlanders Are Buying Shandong Gold, and Pharmaceuticals (2018-12-17))  


Briefly …

OTHER M&A UPDATES

  • LCY Chemical Corp (1704 TT).  MOEA (Ministry of Economic Affairs) approval has now been received and LCY has applied for the delisting from the TWSE. The last trading day is the 23 Jan 2019 and the stock delists on the 30 Jan.  The settlement is expected to take place mid-Feb.
  • Healthscope Ltd (HSO AU). In an ASX announcement on Friday Brookfield said: “based on its enquiries and financing discussions to date, it has no reason to believe it will not be willing and able to proceed with the proposal“. The exclusivity provisions have been extended to 18 January. Separately, Healthscope has also received correspondence from the BGH-AustralianSuper Consortium that it has indicated it is able to commence due diligence immediately. HSO’s board stated it will consider the correspondence. These are both positive developments.

CCASS

My ongoing series flags large moves (~10%) in CCASS holdings over the past week or so, moves which are often outside normal market transactions.  These may be indicative of share pledges.  Or potential takeovers. Or simply help understand volume swings. 

Often these moves can easily be explained – the placement of new shares, rights issue, movements subsequent to a takeover, amongst others. For those mentioned below, I could not find an obvious reason for the CCASS move.   

Name

% change

Into

Out of

Comment

11.53%
CMBC
China Sec
37.50%
Kingston
Outside CCASS
17.24%
UBS
Outside CCASS
Source: HKEx

2. Sathorn Series M: TMB-Thanachart Courtship

Right before Christmas, the Ministry of Finance confirms that both Thanachart and KTB were in talks to merge with TMB. We note that:

  • Considering that KTB’s earlier courtship failed once, it is more likely, but by no means guaranteed, for the deal with Thanachart to happen.
  • A deal with Thanachart would leave TMB as the acquirer rather than the target. Thanachart’s management has better track record than TMB.
  • Both banks have undergone extensive deals before this one: 1) TMB acquired DBS Thai Danu and IFCT; and 2) Thanachart engineered an acquisition of the much bigger, but struggling, SCIB.
  • A merger between the two would still leave them smaller than BAY and not really change the bank rankings, but it would give TMB a bigger presence in asset management and hire-purchase finance and an re-entry into the securities business.

Daily Equities Bottom-Up: Recruit Holdings Down 30% From October; Still Not Cheap and more

By | Equity Bottom-Up

In this briefing:

  1. Recruit Holdings Down 30% From October; Still Not Cheap
  2. Hotel Properties Ltd– Dissolution of Wheelock-OBS Partnership Could Pave Way for Privatization Offer
  3. Larsen & Toubro (LT IN): Slowdown in New Orders Is Risk for 3Q, Markets Can’t Ignore It for Long
  4. Prabhat Dairy Ltd – Update: Revenues and Margins Continues to Increase in Line with Our Expectations
  5. Alkem Laboratories – En Route to Recovery, Valuations Attractive

1. Recruit Holdings Down 30% From October; Still Not Cheap

Capture

The share price of Recruit Holdings (6098 JP) has fallen by around 30% over the past three months from an all-time high of JPY3,826 (on 1st October 2018) to JPY2,705 on 24th December 2018. Prior to this, Recruit’s share price saw a strong upward rally during May-September following the company’s announcement that it would acquire Glassdoor Inc. (the company which operates the employment information website glassdoor.com).

We expect Recruit’s consolidated revenue to grow 7.7% and 6.5% YoY in FY03/19E and FY03/20E respectively, driven by the acquisition of Glassdoor and steady growth in Japanese staffing operations, partially offset by a likely slowdown in global labour market activity. We also expect Recruit’s consolidated EBITDA margin to improve by around 50bps due to higher margin from Glassdoor.

Despite the recent dip in share price and steady topline and bottom line growth over the forecast period, at a FY2 EV/EBITDA multiple of 14.0x, Recruit doesn’t look particularly attractive to us. Recruit’s internet advertising business and employment business peers, Yahoo Japan (4689 JP) and Persol Holdings (2181 JP) are trading at FY2 EV/EBITDAs of 7.7x and 9.6x respectively.

Key Financials FY03/18-20E

 

FY03/18

FY03/19E

FY03/20E

Consolidated Revenue (JPYbn)

2,171

2,338

2,490

YoY Growth %

11.9%

7.7%

6.5%

Consolidated EBITDA (JPYbn)

258

288

312

EBITDA Margin %

11.9%

12.3%

12.5%

Source: Company Disclosures/LSR Estimates

2. Hotel Properties Ltd– Dissolution of Wheelock-OBS Partnership Could Pave Way for Privatization Offer

Picture1

Hotel Properties (HPL SP)  (“HPL”) announced on Friday evening a significant change in its shareholdings relating to the HPL shares owned by 68 Holdings Pte Ltd. 

The restructuring of shareholding did not come as a surprise and was within expectations. 

Now, Wheelock holds only a significant minority interest of 22.53% and without a board seat in HPL. Wheelock’s influence in HPL has been reduced significantly. Without control, Wheelock’s investment in HPL is as good as any other non-strategic investment in quoted securities.

In the event that Wheelock Properties decides to sell its HPL shares, Mr Ong will be a likely buyer of the HPL shares. This will present a very good opportunity for Mr Ong to successfully privatise and delist HPL.

3. Larsen & Toubro (LT IN): Slowdown in New Orders Is Risk for 3Q, Markets Can’t Ignore It for Long

Larsen & Toubro (LT IN) has reported the new orders worth only Rs95 bn after 2Q FY19 results (reported on 31st October 2018). This is much lower run rate as compared to 2Q FY19 (Rs419 bn) or 1H FY19 (Rs781 bn). All these orders by Larsen & Toubro (LT IN) have been received from construction segment where margins are relatively poor e.g. the construction and infrastructure segment of Larsen & Toubro (LT IN) in 2H FY19 has reported 6.8% EBITDA margin, much lower than 11.8% for the company on an overall basis.

Unless new orders pick up in next few weeks, there is a strong likelihood that there could be a negative surprise in 3Q results on order inflow for Larsen & Toubro (LT IN) . This is despite the fact that overall number reported for a quarter for order inflow is a bit higher than the sum of individual orders announced and reported by the company. While the market has not noticed decline in new orders so far and may have been still hopeful about a recovery in order wins, it is highly unlikely that this will continue to get ignored by investors if the trend doesn’t change and get better in next couple of weeks.

4. Prabhat Dairy Ltd – Update: Revenues and Margins Continues to Increase in Line with Our Expectations

Prabhat%20share%20holding%20pattern%20q2fy19

Prabhat Dairy Ltd’s quarterly result is in line with our expectation. In Q2 FY19, the company registered a growth of 8.53% YoY, EBITDA margin was 9.4% improving by 119 bps since the same period last year, EBITDA grew by 24.2% YOY; the profit margin was at 2.95%  improving by 60 bps YoY, Net Income grew by 35.86% YOY.  For more details about the company, please refer to our initiation report  Prabhat Dairy Ltd – An Emerging Star in the Indian Milky Way. B2B business contributed to 70% of revenue and the remaining 30% was driven by B2C business. Value Added Products contributed to 25% of revenue in Q2FY19.

The stock is trading at 16.3x its TTM EPS, 13.8x its FY19F EPS. Margins have improved over the past quarters due to lower cost of raw materials, we expect raw materials to continue to be lower than their historic average in short term. Lower cost of raw material along with the improving contribution from B2C will lead to higher margins in medium to long term. The company also wants to increase its B2C contribution aggressively from the current 30% to 50% by 2020.

We will monitor the stock closely to firm up our views further, albeit we remain positive on the long-term prospects of the company.

5. Alkem Laboratories – En Route to Recovery, Valuations Attractive

Domestic%20pharma

Alkem Laboratories (ALKEM IN) produces branded generics, generic drugs, active pharmaceutical ingredients and neutraceuticals, which it markets in India and over 50 countries internationally. With a portfolio of over 700 brands covering all the major therapeutic segments and a pan-India sales and distribution network, Alkem has been ranked amongst the top ten pharmaceutical companies in India by sales for the past 13 years.

We are optimistic about Alkem because-

  • Alkem continues to grow significantly ahead of the segment growth rate of ~16% in the chronic therapy areas of Cardiac, Antidiabetic, Neuro / Central nervous system (CNS) and Derma. Alkem continues grow in the acute therapy areas of Anti-infective, Gastro-intestinal, Pain/ Analgesic and Vitamins / Minerals /Nutrients.
  • We expect India revenues to grow at CAGR 13% (FY18-21E) to Rs 64,687 mn in FY21E from Rs 44,900 mn in FY18. We expect US revenues to grow at CAGR 31% (FY18-21E) to Rs 30,438 mn from Rs 13,667 mn in FY18 and other international business revenues to grow at CAGR 11% (FY18-21E) to Rs 6,443 mn in FY21E from Rs 4,670 mn in FY18.
  • We expect EBITDA to grow at CAGR 21% (FY18-21E) to Rs 18,638 mn in FY21E from Rs 10,566 mn in FY18 and EBITDA margins to expand by ~ 190 bps to 18.4% in FY21E from 16.5% in FY18. We expect PAT to grow at CAGR 27% (FY18-21E) to Rs. 12,979 mn in FY21E from Rs 6,289 mn in FY18 and we expect PAT margins to expand by ~ 300 bps to 12.8% in FY21E from 9.8% in FY18.
  • We expect RoE to expand by ~530 bps to 19.0% in FY21E from 13.7% in FY18 and RoCE to expand by ~390 bps to 21.1% in FY21E from 17.2% in FY18

We initiate coverage on Alkem with fair value of Rs. 2,260/- representing a potential upside of 21% in the next 12 months. We arrived at the fair value by applying 22x multiple to September 20E EPS of Rs 102. Currently, the stock trades at 21x and 17x its earnings estimates for FY20E and FY21E respectively. After a very volatile 2018, we believe Alkem share price may have smooth upwards move in 2019 driven by strong PAT growth in the next 3 quarters.  

Particulars (Rs mn, Y/E March)

Net sales

EBITDA

PAT

EPS

ROE

ROCE

PE(x)

FY18

64,137

10,566

6,289

52.6

13.7%

17.2%

35

FY19E

74,075

12,406

8,130

68.0

16.0%

16.8%

27

FY20E

87,716

15,659

10,772

90.1

18.4%

20.4%

21

FY21E

1,01,568

18,638

12,979

108.6

19.0%

21.1%

17

 Source- Alkem Annual Report FY18, Trivikram Consultants Research as on 27/12/2018

Daily Equities Bottom-Up: Swaraj Engines: Positive Outlook But Growth Is Slowing and Valuation Is Rich and more

By | Equity Bottom-Up

In this briefing:

  1. Swaraj Engines: Positive Outlook But Growth Is Slowing and Valuation Is Rich
  2. Okinawa Cellular (9436 JP): Warm Tropical Breezes with KDDI
  3. KRI (KRI MK): Continued Capacity Expansion to Meet Solid Demand
  4. Kalbe Farma (KLBF IJ): Navigating Through the New Pharma Dynamics
  5. GMO Internet (9447 JP) – Grossly or Modestly Overrated?

1. Swaraj Engines: Positive Outlook But Growth Is Slowing and Valuation Is Rich

Share%20price%2027 12 2018

Swaraj Engines (SWE IN) (SEL)is primarily manufacturing diesel engines for fitment into Swaraj tractors manufactured by Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. (M&M). The Company is also supplying engine components to SML Isuzu Ltd used in the assembly of commercial vehicle engines. SEL was started as a joint venture between Punjab Tractor Ltd (now acquired by M&M Ltd) and Kirloskar Oil Engines Ltd. M&M holds 33.3% stake in SEL and is its key client.  

We are positive about the business because:

  • SEL’s growth is correlated with M&M’s tractor business growth. SEL supplies engines to the Swaraj division of M&M. M&M expects tractor growth to be around 12% YoY in FY19E. We forecast SEL’s tractor engine volumes will grow at a CAGR of 12% for FY18-21E.
  • The growth of the company is dependent on the monsoon and rural sentiments. We expect the profitability to improve with normal rainfall and government initiatives towards the rural sector. We expect the revenue/ EBITDA/ PAT CAGR for FY18-21E to be 14%/ 15%/ 14% respectively.
  • SEL is debt free and a cash generating company. It has a healthy and stable ROCE and ROE. SEL has increased its capacity from 75,000 engines in FY16 to 120,000 engines in FY18. We expect the capacity utilisation to reach 97% by FY20E from 90% in 1HFY19. SEL funds its capex through internal accruals. We forecast a capex of Rs 600 mn for FY19E to FY21E considering the requirement of the additional capacity, R&D and testing costs for new and higher HP engines & for upgradation of engines according to the TREM IV emission norms for >50 HP engines.

We initiate coverage on SEL with a fair value objective of Rs 1,655/- over the next 12 months. This represents a potential upside of 15% from the closing price of Rs 1,435/- (as on 26-12-2018). We arrive at the fair value by applying PE multiple of 18x to EPS of Rs 87/- to the year ending December-20E and add cash of Rs 82/- per share. While the business outlook is good, we think the upside in the share price is limited due to rich valuation.

Particulars (Rs mn) (Y/E March)

FY18

FY19E

FY20E

FY21E

Revenue

 7,712

 9,210

 10,478

 11,525

PAT

 801

 906

 1,063

 1,190

EPS (Rs)

 64.5

 74.8

 87.6

 98.1

PE (x)

 22.3

 19.2

 16.4

 14.6

Source: SEL Annual Report FY18, Trivikram Consultants Research as on 26-12-2018

Note: E= Estimates

2. Okinawa Cellular (9436 JP): Warm Tropical Breezes with KDDI

Churn

As the colder winter weather is felt and the icy blast of industry tariff cuts continues to chill sentiment, we seek some respite (at least mentally) in the warmer climes of Okinawa. Okinawa Cellular is a unique company. It’s a small cap telecom network operator in Japan with a focus on the sub-tropical islands of Okinawa Prefecture. As part of the KDDI group, the company benefits from its parent’s economies of scale, but with its local presence, it also benefits from being the hometown hero. 

Because the stock is relatively small, from an investment perspective it runs into liquidity constraints that the other telcos do not have, so it’s a different type of investment but one that we think is worth looking at. Over the past 12 months Okinawa Cellular’s stock has fallen by 12.3%, but over the past year the stock has delivered a return in the middle of its peer group and has outperformed the broad TOPIX by about 5.5%. Like most telcos, Okinawa Cellular is also ramping its dividend payments, and the current yield is about 3.5%.

3. KRI (KRI MK): Continued Capacity Expansion to Meet Solid Demand

  • More attractive to analysts, low price-to-sales, and low correlation with Western stock markets relative to its sector
  • To meet strong demand, KRI recently commissioned Plant 17, which increased capacity by 1.5bn. Upcoming Plants 18 and 19 to commission in 2019 should add another 5.5bn or a 20% capacity increase
  • High barriers to entry for medical gloves due to stringent compliance to regulatory requirement aids KPI market shares
  • Trades above ASEAN Health Care at 19CE* 4.1x PB, in line with offering a better ROE
  • Risks: Sudden jump in raw materials prices

* Consensus Estimates

4. Kalbe Farma (KLBF IJ): Navigating Through the New Pharma Dynamics

Klbf%20pharma%20gpm

The healthcare industry in Indonesia has undergone a massive change since the introduction of the National Health Insurance (JKN) in 2014. Although the program allows for better healthcare access for over 200mn Indonesians, the industry dynamics have shifted and Kalbe Farma (KLBF IJ) is one of the companies that has been on the losing side during this adjustment period.

With the Health and Social Security (BPJS) deficit forecast to grow to IDR16t by end of 2018, and with a continuing roll out of coverage to 250mn people by end of 2019, all parties in the healthcare industry are expected to continue subsidizing the program.  Hospitals and drug manufacturers have had to cope with relatively flat pricing from the INA-CBG (reimbursement) tariff since 2014, despite cost pressures stemming from the currency depreciation and inflation. KLBF has reported declines in its overall pharmaceutical margin, as well as low growth rates for its licensed and OTC (over the counter) drugs over the past five years.

Our recent meeting with the company revealed that to mitigate the JKN impact, KLBF has launched several strategies, including expanding into niche specialty products such as oncology and biosimilar drugs, as well as preventive and herbal supplements. We are also at a tipping point where KLBF’s non-OTC consumer health and nutritionals revenues are finally larger than the pharmaceutical revenues for the first time. In this insight, we will discuss whether the worst is already behind us, and if it is now time to take another look at the stock. 

5. GMO Internet (9447 JP) – Grossly or Modestly Overrated?

2018 12 22 12 18 45

Source: Japan Analytics

THE GMO INTERNET (9449 JP) STORY – GMO internet (GMO-i) has attracted much attention in the last eighteen months from an unusual trinity of value, activist and ‘cryptocurrency’ equity investors.

  • VALUE– Many traditional, but mostly foreign, value investors have seen the persistent negative difference between GMO-i’s market capitalisation and the value of the company’s holdings in its eight listed consolidated subsidiaries as an opportunity to invest in GMO-i with a considerable ‘margin of safety’.
  • ACTIVIST – Since July 2017, the activist investor, Oasis, has waged a so-far-unsuccessful campaign with the aim of improving GMO’s corporate governance, removing takeover defences, addressing a ‘secularly undervalued stock price we are not able to tolerate’ (sic), and redefining the role and influence of the company’s Chairman, President, Representative Director and largest shareholder, Masatoshi Kumagai.
  • CRYPTO!’ – In December 2017, GMO-i committed to spending more than ¥35b or 10% of non-current assets. The aim was threefold: to set up a bitcoin ‘mining’ headquarters in Switzerland (with the ‘mining’ operations being carried out at an undisclosed location in Scandinavia), to develop proprietary state-of-the-art 7nm-node ‘mining chips’, and, in due course, to sell GMO-branded and developed ‘mining’ machines. The move was hailed in the ‘crypto’ fraternity as GMO-i became the largest non-Chinese and the first well-established Internet conglomerate to make a major investment in ‘cryptocurrency’ infrastructure.

OUTSTANDING – Following the December 2017 announcement, trading volumes spiked into ‘Overtraded’ territory – as measured by our Volume Score. Many investors saw GMO-i shares as a safer way of gaining exposure to ‘cryptocurrencies’, even as the price of bitcoin began to subside. By early June 2018, GMO-i’s shares had reached a closing price of ¥3,020: up 157% from the low of the prior year and outperforming TOPIX by 135%. Whatever the primary driver of this outstanding performance, each of our trio of investor groups no doubt felt vindicated in their approach to the stock.

CRYPTO CLOSURE – On December 25th 2018, GMO-i’s shares reached a new 52-week low of ¥1,325, a decline of 56% from the June high. Year to date, GMO-i shares have now declined by 31%, underperforming TOPIX by nine percentage points. On the same day, GMO-i announced that the company would post an extraordinary ¥35.5b loss for the fourth quarter, incurring an impairment loss of ¥11.5b in relation to the closure of the Swiss ‘mining’ headquarters and a loss of ¥24b to cover the closure of the ‘mining chip’ and ‘mining machine’ development, manufacturing and sales businesses. GMO-i will continue to ‘mine’ bitcoin from its Tokyo headquarters and intends to relocate the ‘mining’ centre from Scandinavia to (sic) ‘a region that will allow us to secure cleaner and less expensive power supply, but we have not yet decided the details’. Unlisted subsidiary GMO Coin’s ‘cryptocurrency’ exchange will also continue to operate, and the previously-announced plans to launch a ¥-based ‘stablecoin’ in 2019 will proceed. In the two trading days following this announcement, the shares have recovered 13% to ¥1,505. 

RAIDING THE LISTCO PIGGY BANK – As we shall relate, this is the second time since listing that GMO-i has written off a significant new business venture which the company had commenced only a short time before. In both cases, the company was forced to sell stakes in its listed consolidated subsidiaries to offset the resulting losses. On this occasion, the sale of shares in GMO Financial (7177 JP) (GMO-F) on September 25 2018, and GMO Payment Gateway (3769 JP) (GMO-PG) on December 17 2018, raised a combined ¥55.6b and, after the deduction of the yet-to-be-determined tax on the realised gains, should more than offset the ‘crypto’ losses. According to CFO Yasuda, any surplus from this exercise will be used to pay down debt. Also discussed below and in keeping with this GMO-i ‘MO’, in 2015, the company twice sold shares in its listed subsidiaries to ‘smooth out’ less-than-desirable operating results.

In the DETAIL section below we will cover the following topics:-

I: THE GMO-i TRACK RECORD – TOP-DOWN v. BOTTOM UP

  • BOTTOM LINE No. 1: NET INCOME
  • BOTTOM LINE No.2 – COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

II: THE GMO-i BUSINESS MODEL – THROWING JELLY AT THE WALL

III: THE GMO-i BALANCE SHEET – NOT SO HAPPY RETURNS

IV: THE GMO-i CASH FLOW – DEBT-FUNDED CASH PILE

V: THE GMO-i VALUATION – TWO METHODS > SAME RESULT

  • VALUATION METHOD No.1 – THE ‘LISTCO DISCOUNT’
  • VALUATION METHOD No.2 – RESIDUAL INCOME

CONCLUSION – For those unable or unwilling to read further, we conclude that GMO-i ‘rump’ is a grossly-overrated business. Despite having started and spun off several valuable GMO Group entities, CEO Kumagai bears responsibility for two decades of serial and very poorly-timed ‘mal-investments’. As a result, the stock market has, except for the ‘cryptocurrency’-induced frenzy of the first six months of 2018, historically not accorded GMO-i any premium for future growth, and has correctly looked beyond the ‘siren song’ of the ‘HoldCo discount’. According to the two valuation methodologies described below, the company is, however, fairly valued at the current share price of ¥1,460. Investors looking for a return to the market-implied 3% perpetual growth rate of mid–2018 are likely to be as disappointed as those wishing for BTC to triple from here.

Daily Equities Bottom-Up: 58.com Inc. (NYSE: WUBA): Regulatory Pressure Has Long Term Implications and more

By | Equity Bottom-Up

In this briefing:

  1. 58.com Inc. (NYSE: WUBA): Regulatory Pressure Has Long Term Implications
  2. Tuan Sing: Beneficiary of Exuberant Demand for Prime Office Investment Properties
  3. ICT (ICT PM): Beneficiary of Higher Trading Activity
  4. Infosys Ltd (INFO IN): Another Buyback Coming? Not a Bad Idea, but How Much It Can Really Help?
  5. SoftBank Corp (9434 JP) & Arteria Networks (4423 JP): A Tale of Two IPOs

1. 58.com Inc. (NYSE: WUBA): Regulatory Pressure Has Long Term Implications

Image%201

● We notice that Anjuke’s Oct.-Nov. traffic declined. We attribute this decline to the tightening of registration requirement in various cities, which will reduce the number of housing leads on WUBA platform;

● We, however, believe new home business will deliver strong revenue for WUBA this year, contributing Rmb2bn in revenues by our estimate;

● We rate the stock Buy and cut TP from US$84 to US$79.

2. Tuan Sing: Beneficiary of Exuberant Demand for Prime Office Investment Properties

Gaw Capital is said to be paying a CLSA-managed fund S$710 mn for 77 Robinson, which is just 3 minutes’ walk away from Tuan Sing-owned prime freehold office building, Robinson Point. This works out to around S$2,300 psf based on NLA. 77 Robinson has a balance lease of 74 years. 

Evidently, institutional buying interest in Singapore’s prime commercial buildings remains strong as the Singapore office market is now still a “landlords’ market”. Grade A CBD office rents are expected to continue their upward growth trajectory into 2019.  Tuan Sing is a beneficiary of the strong office rental upturn as its prime freehold commercial assets in Singapore – 18 Robinson, Robinson Point, and 896 Dunearn – make up more than two-third of its total property portfolio value. Tuan Sing’s share price is down 17% in the last six months and lately, the company has been busy buying back its own shares at around S$0.33-0.345/share.

3. ICT (ICT PM): Beneficiary of Higher Trading Activity

  • Low downside risk, low correlation with Western stock markets, and good price momentum relative to its sector
  • Growing demand from emerging markets as seen by increase in trading activities e.g. Asia sales increased 10% YoY in 3Q18
  • Planned terminal expansions in Manila, Mexico, Iraq, and Honduras are underway and should provide about 7% capacity growth by end 2019
  • Trades below ASEAN Transportation at 19CE* 17.1x PE and offers much better EPS growth
  • Risk: Foreign exchange risk, disruption from US-China trade war

* Consensus Estimates

4. Infosys Ltd (INFO IN): Another Buyback Coming? Not a Bad Idea, but How Much It Can Really Help?

As per reports, Infosys Ltd (INFO IN) may consider a proposal for a share buyback of $1.60 billion very soon. The buyback announcement is likely to be made on January 11 when the company board meets to consider the 3Q FY19 results. Before this, in November 2017, Infosys Ltd (INFO IN) had announced a buyback and spent Rs130 bn to buy a total of 113mn equity shares. This fresh buyback could be an important development and could be an important support for the stock, it is also sensible for other reasons. 

There are no major acquisitions in recent times by Infosys Ltd (INFO IN) and if this is likely to be the trend for near future, share buyback is not a bad idea. The company is still struggling with some of the legacy issues and the priority as of now is to streamline the organic growth. We think Infosys Ltd (INFO IN) is also cautious with inorganic growth opportunities as the company had serious issues with acquisitions in the past. What could be another key driver behind this is that in valuation terms, Infosys Ltd (INFO IN) is not very expensive.

5. SoftBank Corp (9434 JP) & Arteria Networks (4423 JP): A Tale of Two IPOs

Arteria%20deal%20specifics

During the second half of December 2018, Japan saw two telecom companies list on the Tokyo Stock Exchange: Softbank Corp (9434 JP) and ARTERIA Networks (4423 JP). After years of industry consolidation, which saw several stocks delist, this felt like a Christmas miracle (at least for those watching the sector’s stocks).

It would be hard to find two companies in the same industry that are so different – both in their business models as well as in how their IPOs were positioned to investors. One stock is 100 times larger than the other, but this is not a story of David and Goliath. It is two unique stories in parallel. 

While each company took a very different approach to selling its stock, both have suffered from the subsequent broader market weakness, irrespective of company specifics. We can’t say it has been the worst of times, but it certainly has been a tough time with SoftBank Corp down 13% and Arteria down 20% from their IPO prices.

In this Insight we explore how each company approached its IPO and how each has fared since. 

Daily Equities Bottom-Up: GUNKUL (GUNKUL TB): Solar to Drive Top-Line Growth and more

By | Equity Bottom-Up

In this briefing:

  1. GUNKUL (GUNKUL TB): Solar to Drive Top-Line Growth
  2. ASAP: Weak Profitability Priced In, While Growth Still Intact
  3. Maruti Suzuki- Q2FY19 Results Update
  4. FGEN (FGEN PM): New Contract with Meralco to Support Cash Flow
  5. TRACKING TRAFFIC/Containers & Air Cargo: Container Rates Up

1. GUNKUL (GUNKUL TB): Solar to Drive Top-Line Growth

  • Good payout ratio, good growth in core profit, and strong long-term sales growth relative to its sector
  • Acquisition of 49% stake in a 30MW solar farm in Malaysia with a commercial operation date (COD) set for 1Q20 to support revenue growth
  • High volume of solar rooftop installation projects planned for Charoen Pokphand Foods Pub (CPF TB) and other private firms to boost GUNKUL’s construction revenue
  • Attractive at 19CE* PEG ratio of 0.5 relative to ASEAN Industry at 1.6
  • Risk: Lower than expected electricity demand, unfavorable weather conditions

* Consensus Estimates

2. ASAP: Weak Profitability Priced In, While Growth Still Intact

Picture4

We maintain a BUY rating on ASAP with new 2019E target price of Bt3.80 (from Bt6.50), derived from 19.6xPE, which is 1.0x PEG of earnings growth in 2019-20E.

The story:

  • Trimmed 2018-20F earnings forecast by 35%
  • Not a falling knife, but fallen angel
  • Potential disruptor in car rental industry
  • Expect a 20% CAGR for earnings in 2019-20E

Risks:

  • Contract termination of airport space leases
  • Participating in a highly competitive industry
  • Cash-flow management will be a challenge in a growth phase

3. Maruti Suzuki- Q2FY19 Results Update

Trend%20in%20model

Maruti Suzuki’s Q2FY19 results were below our expectations. Sales grew by only 2% YoY in Q2FY19 led by a 3.7% increase in realization per unit. But the volumes declined by 1.5% YoY in the same period. We analyze the results.

4. FGEN (FGEN PM): New Contract with Meralco to Support Cash Flow

  • Low correlation to the Thai market, low correlation with Western stock markets, and cheap on a PE basis relative to its sector
  • Stable cash flow from new contract for FGEN’s San Gabriel plant to sell its entire capacity of 414 MW to Meralco Manila Electric Company (MER PM)  until 2024
  • Geothermal-energy producer EDC has been delisted through a share buyback tender offer, FGEN to benefit from higher equity stake (47% vs 42%) and more control over the firm to implement longer-term strategies
  • Trades at discount to ASEAN Utilities at 19CE* 6.5x PE and offers much better EPS growth
  • Risks: Facility breakdowns, uncertainty regarding plans for LNG facility

* Consensus Estimates

5. TRACKING TRAFFIC/Containers & Air Cargo: Container Rates Up

Nov tw yields

Tracking Traffic/Containers & Air Cargo is the hub for all of our research on container shipping and air cargo, featuring analysis of monthly industry data, notes from our conversations with industry participants, and links to recent company and thematic pieces. 

Tracking Traffic/Containers & Air Cargo aims to highlight changes to existing trends, relationships, and views affecting the leading Asian companies in these two sectors. This month’s note includes data from about twenty different sources.

In this issue readers will find:

  1. An analysis of November container shipping rates, which our index suggests increased by over 20% Y/Y. We concede that our index skews toward volatile spot rates rather than contract rates, but we suspect higher average container rates in Q418, combined with moderating fuel prices, will result in surprisingly strong earnings for the quarter.
  2. A look at November air cargo activity and air cargo pricing, which diverged. The volume of air cargo handled by the five airlines we track declined slightly (-0.1% Y/Y) but some of those carriers reported sharply higher yields (circa +10% Y/Y), due to limited capacity expansion in the region.
  3. Some good news: fuel prices have continued to moderate. Bunker climbed by just 5.1% Y/Y as of mid-December, and jet fuel prices have fallen about 11% Y/Y. Given firm container rates and air cargo pricing, the drop in fuel prices bodes well for Q418 margins, though it’s unclear whether such gains are sustainable. 

Although slowing demand growth is unlikely to generate impressive top-line improvements, firmer pricing combined with lower fuel costs should support an ongoing improvement in profitability for container carriers and air cargo operations in the near-term. We believe many investors remain too pessimistic regarding near-term earnings for container carriers and airlines. 

Daily TMT & Internet: Hyosung Holdings: 10%p Drop in Discount to NAV Should Be Reverted Soon and more

By | TMT/Internet

In this briefing:

  1. Hyosung Holdings: 10%p Drop in Discount to NAV Should Be Reverted Soon
  2. Recruit Holdings Down 30% From October; Still Not Cheap
  3. Uber IPO: Its Sprawling Empire And Battle Lines (Part 3)
  4. Okinawa Cellular (9436 JP): Warm Tropical Breezes with KDDI
  5. GMO Internet (9447 JP) – Grossly or Modestly Overrated?

1. Hyosung Holdings: 10%p Drop in Discount to NAV Should Be Reverted Soon

1

  • Hyosung Corporation (004800 KS) had fallen 16% just in two days. Holdco is now at a 50% discount to NAV. This is a 10%p drop from 10 days ago (Dec 19). Holdco price must have been overly corrected. The ongoing police investigation on Cho Hyun-joon’s alleged crime won’t lead to a delisting. 10%p drop in discount to NAV must be a price divergence, not a sensible price correction.
  • Trade volume remained steady. Local hedge funds led the selling on Dec 27. Even they changed their position the following day. No short selling spike has been seen either. Hyosung is one of the highest yielding div holdco stocks. Hyosung Capital liquidation and Anyang Plant revaluation would be another short-term plus.
  • I’d exploit this price divergence. It would soon revert to the Dec 19 discount level. It should at least stay at the peer average.

2. Recruit Holdings Down 30% From October; Still Not Cheap

Capture

The share price of Recruit Holdings (6098 JP) has fallen by around 30% over the past three months from an all-time high of JPY3,826 (on 1st October 2018) to JPY2,705 on 24th December 2018. Prior to this, Recruit’s share price saw a strong upward rally during May-September following the company’s announcement that it would acquire Glassdoor Inc. (the company which operates the employment information website glassdoor.com).

We expect Recruit’s consolidated revenue to grow 7.7% and 6.5% YoY in FY03/19E and FY03/20E respectively, driven by the acquisition of Glassdoor and steady growth in Japanese staffing operations, partially offset by a likely slowdown in global labour market activity. We also expect Recruit’s consolidated EBITDA margin to improve by around 50bps due to higher margin from Glassdoor.

Despite the recent dip in share price and steady topline and bottom line growth over the forecast period, at a FY2 EV/EBITDA multiple of 14.0x, Recruit doesn’t look particularly attractive to us. Recruit’s internet advertising business and employment business peers, Yahoo Japan (4689 JP) and Persol Holdings (2181 JP) are trading at FY2 EV/EBITDAs of 7.7x and 9.6x respectively.

Key Financials FY03/18-20E

 

FY03/18

FY03/19E

FY03/20E

Consolidated Revenue (JPYbn)

2,171

2,338

2,490

YoY Growth %

11.9%

7.7%

6.5%

Consolidated EBITDA (JPYbn)

258

288

312

EBITDA Margin %

11.9%

12.3%

12.5%

Source: Company Disclosures/LSR Estimates

3. Uber IPO: Its Sprawling Empire And Battle Lines (Part 3)

Mexico%20stronghold

Although Uber aims to be an Amazon for transport, we will focus on the ride-hailing market in part 3 of this series. Here, we try to answer the following questions:

  1. What are the indicative ride-hailing market shares of Uber vs Lyft in North America?
  2. What is Uber’s share in other key countries?
  3. What are the lawsuits investors should watch out for?
  4. How do Uber’s revenue drivers compare with Lyft’s?
  5. What are the timelines and key figures for both companies’ IPOs?

This is the third note in a series about the expected 2019 IPO of global ride-hailing giant Uber Technologies (0084207D US) and Lyft. Please read the earlier two pieces in the series for better contexts:

Uber IPO Preview: Its Sprawling Empire and Battle Lines (Part 1) written by me.

Uber IPO Preview: Fast-Growing Uber Eats Has Become a Material Part of Uber (Part 2) written by Daniel Hellberg

4. Okinawa Cellular (9436 JP): Warm Tropical Breezes with KDDI

Churn

As the colder winter weather is felt and the icy blast of industry tariff cuts continues to chill sentiment, we seek some respite (at least mentally) in the warmer climes of Okinawa. Okinawa Cellular is a unique company. It’s a small cap telecom network operator in Japan with a focus on the sub-tropical islands of Okinawa Prefecture. As part of the KDDI group, the company benefits from its parent’s economies of scale, but with its local presence, it also benefits from being the hometown hero. 

Because the stock is relatively small, from an investment perspective it runs into liquidity constraints that the other telcos do not have, so it’s a different type of investment but one that we think is worth looking at. Over the past 12 months Okinawa Cellular’s stock has fallen by 12.3%, but over the past year the stock has delivered a return in the middle of its peer group and has outperformed the broad TOPIX by about 5.5%. Like most telcos, Okinawa Cellular is also ramping its dividend payments, and the current yield is about 3.5%.

5. GMO Internet (9447 JP) – Grossly or Modestly Overrated?

2018 12 22 12 18 45

Source: Japan Analytics

THE GMO INTERNET (9449 JP) STORY – GMO internet (GMO-i) has attracted much attention in the last eighteen months from an unusual trinity of value, activist and ‘cryptocurrency’ equity investors.

  • VALUE– Many traditional, but mostly foreign, value investors have seen the persistent negative difference between GMO-i’s market capitalisation and the value of the company’s holdings in its eight listed consolidated subsidiaries as an opportunity to invest in GMO-i with a considerable ‘margin of safety’.
  • ACTIVIST – Since July 2017, the activist investor, Oasis, has waged a so-far-unsuccessful campaign with the aim of improving GMO’s corporate governance, removing takeover defences, addressing a ‘secularly undervalued stock price we are not able to tolerate’ (sic), and redefining the role and influence of the company’s Chairman, President, Representative Director and largest shareholder, Masatoshi Kumagai.
  • CRYPTO!’ – In December 2017, GMO-i committed to spending more than ¥35b or 10% of non-current assets. The aim was threefold: to set up a bitcoin ‘mining’ headquarters in Switzerland (with the ‘mining’ operations being carried out at an undisclosed location in Scandinavia), to develop proprietary state-of-the-art 7nm-node ‘mining chips’, and, in due course, to sell GMO-branded and developed ‘mining’ machines. The move was hailed in the ‘crypto’ fraternity as GMO-i became the largest non-Chinese and the first well-established Internet conglomerate to make a major investment in ‘cryptocurrency’ infrastructure.

OUTSTANDING – Following the December 2017 announcement, trading volumes spiked into ‘Overtraded’ territory – as measured by our Volume Score. Many investors saw GMO-i shares as a safer way of gaining exposure to ‘cryptocurrencies’, even as the price of bitcoin began to subside. By early June 2018, GMO-i’s shares had reached a closing price of ¥3,020: up 157% from the low of the prior year and outperforming TOPIX by 135%. Whatever the primary driver of this outstanding performance, each of our trio of investor groups no doubt felt vindicated in their approach to the stock.

CRYPTO CLOSURE – On December 25th 2018, GMO-i’s shares reached a new 52-week low of ¥1,325, a decline of 56% from the June high. Year to date, GMO-i shares have now declined by 31%, underperforming TOPIX by nine percentage points. On the same day, GMO-i announced that the company would post an extraordinary ¥35.5b loss for the fourth quarter, incurring an impairment loss of ¥11.5b in relation to the closure of the Swiss ‘mining’ headquarters and a loss of ¥24b to cover the closure of the ‘mining chip’ and ‘mining machine’ development, manufacturing and sales businesses. GMO-i will continue to ‘mine’ bitcoin from its Tokyo headquarters and intends to relocate the ‘mining’ centre from Scandinavia to (sic) ‘a region that will allow us to secure cleaner and less expensive power supply, but we have not yet decided the details’. Unlisted subsidiary GMO Coin’s ‘cryptocurrency’ exchange will also continue to operate, and the previously-announced plans to launch a ¥-based ‘stablecoin’ in 2019 will proceed. In the two trading days following this announcement, the shares have recovered 13% to ¥1,505. 

RAIDING THE LISTCO PIGGY BANK – As we shall relate, this is the second time since listing that GMO-i has written off a significant new business venture which the company had commenced only a short time before. In both cases, the company was forced to sell stakes in its listed consolidated subsidiaries to offset the resulting losses. On this occasion, the sale of shares in GMO Financial (7177 JP) (GMO-F) on September 25 2018, and GMO Payment Gateway (3769 JP) (GMO-PG) on December 17 2018, raised a combined ¥55.6b and, after the deduction of the yet-to-be-determined tax on the realised gains, should more than offset the ‘crypto’ losses. According to CFO Yasuda, any surplus from this exercise will be used to pay down debt. Also discussed below and in keeping with this GMO-i ‘MO’, in 2015, the company twice sold shares in its listed subsidiaries to ‘smooth out’ less-than-desirable operating results.

In the DETAIL section below we will cover the following topics:-

I: THE GMO-i TRACK RECORD – TOP-DOWN v. BOTTOM UP

  • BOTTOM LINE No. 1: NET INCOME
  • BOTTOM LINE No.2 – COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

II: THE GMO-i BUSINESS MODEL – THROWING JELLY AT THE WALL

III: THE GMO-i BALANCE SHEET – NOT SO HAPPY RETURNS

IV: THE GMO-i CASH FLOW – DEBT-FUNDED CASH PILE

V: THE GMO-i VALUATION – TWO METHODS > SAME RESULT

  • VALUATION METHOD No.1 – THE ‘LISTCO DISCOUNT’
  • VALUATION METHOD No.2 – RESIDUAL INCOME

CONCLUSION – For those unable or unwilling to read further, we conclude that GMO-i ‘rump’ is a grossly-overrated business. Despite having started and spun off several valuable GMO Group entities, CEO Kumagai bears responsibility for two decades of serial and very poorly-timed ‘mal-investments’. As a result, the stock market has, except for the ‘cryptocurrency’-induced frenzy of the first six months of 2018, historically not accorded GMO-i any premium for future growth, and has correctly looked beyond the ‘siren song’ of the ‘HoldCo discount’. According to the two valuation methodologies described below, the company is, however, fairly valued at the current share price of ¥1,460. Investors looking for a return to the market-implied 3% perpetual growth rate of mid–2018 are likely to be as disappointed as those wishing for BTC to triple from here.

Daily Equities Bottom-Up: LIC Housing Finance Ltd. – Builder Loans and LAP to Drive Growth in Loan Book and more

By | Equity Bottom-Up

In this briefing:

  1. LIC Housing Finance Ltd. – Builder Loans and LAP to Drive Growth in Loan Book
  2. COM7 (COM7 TB): Acquisition to Support Aggressive Expansion
  3. TRACKING TRAFFIC/Chinese Express & Logistics: Parcel Pricing Weak, Again
  4. Elastic: Why Is It Outperforming In Recent Tech Carnage?
  5. Horiba (6856 JP): Bad News Largely Discounted

1. LIC Housing Finance Ltd. – Builder Loans and LAP to Drive Growth in Loan Book

Lichf

Lic Housing Finance (LICHF IN), founded by Life Insurance Corporation of India, is the 2nd largest Housing Finance Company (HFC) in India with a total outstanding loan book portfolio of Rs 1,759 bn as of 2QFY19. 94% of the company’s loans were to retail customers as home loans & Loan Against Properties (LAP) and the balance 6% were to project developers as of 2QFY19.

We like the business of LICHF for following reasons:

  • LICHF focuses on the salaried segment. 86% of the customers as of 2QFY19 were from the salaried class. This provides the company with stability in earnings and better asset quality. We expect the NIMs & Spreads to be stable at 2.4% & 1.2% respectively for the period of FY18-21E.
  • We expect LICHF’s total loan book to grow at a CAGR of 16% over the period of FY18-21E. This growth will be supported by LAP and Developer loans. We expect the retail home loan portfolio to grow at a CAGR of 11% over the same period.
  • As the company focuses on LAP & developer segment to grow the total loan book, we expect this to affect the asset quality adversely. We expect the Gross Non-Performing Assets (GNPA) & Net Non-Performing Assets (NNPA) to increase to 1.3% (from 1.2% as of Sept-18) & 0.5% (from 0.4% as of Sept-18) respectively.

We initiate coverage on LICHF with a fair value estimate of Rs 570/- over the next 12 months. This implies a potential upside of 19% from the closing market price of Rs 481 as on 20th December 2018.  This is arrived by applying P/ABV (Price to Adjusted Book Value) multiple of 1.7X to our Adjusted Book Value Estimate of Rs 337 per share for the period ending Sept-20E.

Particulars

FY18

FY19E

FY20E

FY21E

P/ABV (X)

2.1

1.7

1.5

1.3

ROE (%)

17.3

15.5

14.5

15.1

ROA (%)

1.3

1.2

1.2

1.2

Source: Trivikram Consultants Research as of 20th December 2018
Note: E= Estimates

2. COM7 (COM7 TB): Acquisition to Support Aggressive Expansion

  • Improving asset turnover, good risk adjusted price momentum, and relatively strong analyst recommendations relative to its sector
  • Larger distribution channel through acquisition of DNA Retail Link to add 95 more stores to current 518 stores
  • New mobile product launches in 4Q18 and COM7’s focus on high margin products, such as Android smartphones, should support high earnings growth which was up 56% YoY in 3Q18
  • Attractive at a 19CE* PEG of 0.9 versus ASEAN sector at a PEG of 2.7
  • Risks: Lower-than-expected demand for new IT products, slower-than-expected store expansions

* Consensus Estimates

3. TRACKING TRAFFIC/Chinese Express & Logistics: Parcel Pricing Weak, Again

Nov main exp

Tracking Traffic/Chinese Express & Logistics is the hub for our research on China’s express parcels and logistics sectors. Tracking Traffic/Chinese Express & Logistics features analysis of monthly Chinese express and logistics data, notes from our conversations with industry players, and links to company and thematic notes. 

This month’s issue covers the following topics:

  1. November express parcel pricing remained weak. Average pricing per express parcel fell by 7.8% Y/Y to just 11.06 RMB per piece. November’s average price represents a new all-time low for the industry, and November’s Y/Y decline was the steepest monthly decline in over two years (excluding Lunar New Year months, which tend to be distorted by the timing of the holiday).
  2. Express parcel revenue growth dipped below 15% last month. Weak per-parcel pricing pulled express sector Y/Y revenue growth down to just 14.6% in November, the worst on record (again excluding distorted Lunar New Year comparisons). Chinese e-commerce demand has slowed and we suspect ‘O2O’ initiatives, under which online purchases are fulfilled via local stores, are also undermining express demand growth. 
  3. Intra-city pricing (ie, local delivery) remains firm relative to inter-city. Relative to weak inter-city express pricing (where ZTO Express (ZTO US) and the other listed express companies compete), pricing for local, intra-city express deliveries remained firm. In the first 11 months of 2018, express pricing rose 1.7% Y/Y versus a -2.9% decline in inter-city shipments (international pricing fell sharply, -14.5% Y/Y). Relatively firm pricing on local shipments may make it hard for local food delivery companies like Meituan Dianping (3690 HK) and Alibaba Group Holding (BABA US) ‘s ele.me to beat down unit operating costs. 
  4. Underlying domestic transport demand held up well again in November. Although demand for speedy, relatively expensive express service (and air freight) appears to be moderating, demand for rail and highway freight transport has held up well. The relative strength of rail and water transport (slow, cheap, industry-facing) versus express and air freight (fast, expensive, consumer-oriented) suggests a couple of things: a) upstream industrial activity is stronger than downstream retail activity and b) the people in charge of paying freight are shifting to cheaper modes of transport when possible.

We retain a negative view of China’s express industry’s fundamentals: demand growth is slowing and pricing appears to be falling faster than costs can be cut. Overall domestic transportation demand, however, remains solid and shows no signs of slowing. 

4. Elastic: Why Is It Outperforming In Recent Tech Carnage?

Db 1

  • Elastic NV (ESTC US) has been one of the best tech IPOs globally in 2018. Its current price is $62.53, up 74% from its IPO price of $36. Elastic’s share price has been holding up very nicely since its IPO on October 5th, 2018. Meanwhile, from October 5th to December 21st 2018, many tech stocks have experienced brutal declines. Elastic’s ability to outperform the top US tech stocks in a very difficult environment for the stock market sets the stage for a continued out-performance once the stock market starts to stabilize. 
  • Since the IPO, the company reported better than expected second quarter results (quarter ending October 31, 2018) on December 4th. The company’s adjusted net loss in FY2Q19 was $0.38 per share, beating analysts’ consensus estimate by 9 cents. It generated revenue of $63.6 million, up 72% YoY. Calculated billings were also strong at $88.5 million, up 73% YoY. 
  • The company’s guidance for FY3Q19 (quarter ending January 31, 2019) is to generate revenue in the range of $64 million to $66 million, representing a 56% YoY growth rate at the midpoint of the guidance. It expects to generate operating margin of negative 28% to negative 30% in FY3Q19. 
  • A combination of major investors shifting their assets away from FAANG and semiconductor stocks has resulted in some improved performance of many software related stocks in recent months relative to other major tech stocks. In general, these stocks face less negative impact from a prolonged trade war between China and the US. Plus, they are not as exposed to the higher cycle volatility as the semiconductor related stocks. In many respects, Elastic shares many business similarities with these software driven companies, and thus has been more immune from the decline in the stock prices since early October. We remain positive on Elastic NV (ESTC US).

5. Horiba (6856 JP): Bad News Largely Discounted

Horiba%20spe

Horiba combines high gearing to semiconductor capital spending with a large and growing automotive test business characterized by upward trending but uneven profitability. At ¥4,545 (Friday, December 21, closing price), its share price has dropped by 53% from an all-time high of ¥9,590 reached last May. Falling demand for semiconductor production equipment and a downward revision to FY Dec-18 sales and profit guidance announced in November appear to be largely in the price. 

The downward revision, which cut projected full-year operating profit growth from 15.5% to 2.5%, followed a 22.2% year-on-year decline in operating profit in 3Q and implies a similar rate of decline in 4Q. The weakness is concentrated in Semiconductor Equipment and Automotive Test, the former due to a cyclical downturn in overall demand, the latter due to M&A-related and other one-time expenses. New Automotive Test orders continued to outpace sales, leading to a 9.5% increase in the order backlog during 3Q.

Automotive Test sales and profits should rise next year, while semiconductor equipment sales and profits seem likely to bottom out. In a report issued on December 17, SEMI (the semiconductor equipment and materials industry organization) forecasts a further decline in wafer fab equipment sales in 1H of 2019, followed by recovery in 2H. Other industry sources we talked to before the report was issued had similar views. 

This scenario could fall apart due to general economic weakness, American attempts to stifle China’s semiconductor industry, or both. On December 21, Reuters reported that Foxconn “…is in the final stages of talks with the local government of the Chinese city of Zhuhai to build a chip plant there with a total investment of about $9 billion… most of which would be shouldered by the Zhuhai government through subsidies and tax breaks…” This looks like a perfect target for the Americans, but whether or not they will notice or care remains to be seen.

Horiba is now selling at 9.6x our EPS estimate for this fiscal year, 13.4x our estimate for next year and 12.1x our estimate for FY Dec-20. These and other projected valuations are near the bottom of their 5-year historical ranges. If the Semiconductor Equipment division does not recover in 2H of 2019, historical data suggest that its operating profit could drop by 70% rather than the 47% we are now forecasting, resulting in a P/E ratio of 17x. Nevertheless, it is time to start considering when and at what price to buy Horiba.

Horiba is a diversified Japanese maker of precision and analytical devices and systems with a significant presence in the global markets for automotive test, industrial process and environmental analysis, hematology, semiconductor production equipment and scientific instruments. It is by far the world’s leading producer of automotive emission measurement systems (EMS), having supplied about 80% of the installed base worldwide, and also the world’s top manufacturer of mass flow controllers for the semiconductor industry, with an estimated global market share of nearly 60%.

Daily Equities Bottom-Up: FBN Holdings: A Contrarian Call from Behind the Hydrocarbon Clouds and Shadows and more

By | Equity Bottom-Up

In this briefing:

  1. FBN Holdings: A Contrarian Call from Behind the Hydrocarbon Clouds and Shadows

1. FBN Holdings: A Contrarian Call from Behind the Hydrocarbon Clouds and Shadows

FBN Holdings Plc (FBNH NL) is the oldest and second-largest bank in Nigeria with a market share of 14% of domestic loans.

FBN’s solid franchise provides robust revenue generation capacity (especially in e-business and insurance) plus a solid and cheap funding base complemented by a strong liquidity profile. The Group’s solid funding base of low cost retail deposits, mainly CASA, underpins one of the most competitive in the sector.

Under new management, FBN is focused on a legacy asset quality clean-up and enhancing risk controls. The franchise has exhibited resilience in the face of system-wide asset quality problems, related to some extent to the concentration of oil/gas exposures.  Moving forward, profitability can strengthen with improving asset quality though the recent plunge in oil prices represents a threat to this de-risking process. A plus point is the vibrant income streams from e-business and insurance growth drivers.

The operating environment in Nigerian remains challenging: while the country has emerged from a recession, vulnerabilities remain. Lower oil prices, tighter external market conditions, heightened security issues, and delayed policy responses are the main downside risks. The recent fall in oil prices is a concern given Nigeria’s dependency on the commodity and its knock-on effect to the hydrocarbon-exposed Banking System. Although access to foreign currency has eased, due to FX reforms, many borrowers retain limited capacity to service obligations and there are modest opportunities for banks to grow their loan portfolios.  

FBN is thus somewhat of a contrarian call given the weakness in the oil market. But one should buy a hydrocarbon “play” when prices are low, not high. Shares trade at a 60% discount to Book Value and stand on a low Mkt Cap./Deposits rating of 8%, far below the global and EM median. FBN commands a dividend-adjusted PEG of 1.3x. Dividend and earnings yields are 3.3% and 15%, respectively.  A quintile 1 PH Score™ of 7.7 captures the valuation dynamic while metric change is satisfactory. Combining franchise valuation and PH Score™, FBN stands in the top quintile of opportunity globally. The asset quality position and interrelated lower profitability vis-a-vis peers is a reason behind FBN’s lower credit rating and relatively low valuation. We are somewhat sceptical that FBN’s underlying creditworthiness and valuation are efficiently evaluated versus more popular counterparts.

Daily TMT & Internet: COM7 (COM7 TB): Acquisition to Support Aggressive Expansion and more

By | TMT/Internet

In this briefing:

  1. COM7 (COM7 TB): Acquisition to Support Aggressive Expansion
  2. TRACKING TRAFFIC/Chinese Express & Logistics: Parcel Pricing Weak, Again
  3. Elastic: Why Is It Outperforming In Recent Tech Carnage?

1. COM7 (COM7 TB): Acquisition to Support Aggressive Expansion

  • Improving asset turnover, good risk adjusted price momentum, and relatively strong analyst recommendations relative to its sector
  • Larger distribution channel through acquisition of DNA Retail Link to add 95 more stores to current 518 stores
  • New mobile product launches in 4Q18 and COM7’s focus on high margin products, such as Android smartphones, should support high earnings growth which was up 56% YoY in 3Q18
  • Attractive at a 19CE* PEG of 0.9 versus ASEAN sector at a PEG of 2.7
  • Risks: Lower-than-expected demand for new IT products, slower-than-expected store expansions

* Consensus Estimates

2. TRACKING TRAFFIC/Chinese Express & Logistics: Parcel Pricing Weak, Again

Nov main exp

Tracking Traffic/Chinese Express & Logistics is the hub for our research on China’s express parcels and logistics sectors. Tracking Traffic/Chinese Express & Logistics features analysis of monthly Chinese express and logistics data, notes from our conversations with industry players, and links to company and thematic notes. 

This month’s issue covers the following topics:

  1. November express parcel pricing remained weak. Average pricing per express parcel fell by 7.8% Y/Y to just 11.06 RMB per piece. November’s average price represents a new all-time low for the industry, and November’s Y/Y decline was the steepest monthly decline in over two years (excluding Lunar New Year months, which tend to be distorted by the timing of the holiday).
  2. Express parcel revenue growth dipped below 15% last month. Weak per-parcel pricing pulled express sector Y/Y revenue growth down to just 14.6% in November, the worst on record (again excluding distorted Lunar New Year comparisons). Chinese e-commerce demand has slowed and we suspect ‘O2O’ initiatives, under which online purchases are fulfilled via local stores, are also undermining express demand growth. 
  3. Intra-city pricing (ie, local delivery) remains firm relative to inter-city. Relative to weak inter-city express pricing (where ZTO Express (ZTO US) and the other listed express companies compete), pricing for local, intra-city express deliveries remained firm. In the first 11 months of 2018, express pricing rose 1.7% Y/Y versus a -2.9% decline in inter-city shipments (international pricing fell sharply, -14.5% Y/Y). Relatively firm pricing on local shipments may make it hard for local food delivery companies like Meituan Dianping (3690 HK) and Alibaba Group Holding (BABA US) ‘s ele.me to beat down unit operating costs. 
  4. Underlying domestic transport demand held up well again in November. Although demand for speedy, relatively expensive express service (and air freight) appears to be moderating, demand for rail and highway freight transport has held up well. The relative strength of rail and water transport (slow, cheap, industry-facing) versus express and air freight (fast, expensive, consumer-oriented) suggests a couple of things: a) upstream industrial activity is stronger than downstream retail activity and b) the people in charge of paying freight are shifting to cheaper modes of transport when possible.

We retain a negative view of China’s express industry’s fundamentals: demand growth is slowing and pricing appears to be falling faster than costs can be cut. Overall domestic transportation demand, however, remains solid and shows no signs of slowing. 

3. Elastic: Why Is It Outperforming In Recent Tech Carnage?

Db 1

  • Elastic NV (ESTC US) has been one of the best tech IPOs globally in 2018. Its current price is $62.53, up 74% from its IPO price of $36. Elastic’s share price has been holding up very nicely since its IPO on October 5th, 2018. Meanwhile, from October 5th to December 21st 2018, many tech stocks have experienced brutal declines. Elastic’s ability to outperform the top US tech stocks in a very difficult environment for the stock market sets the stage for a continued out-performance once the stock market starts to stabilize. 
  • Since the IPO, the company reported better than expected second quarter results (quarter ending October 31, 2018) on December 4th. The company’s adjusted net loss in FY2Q19 was $0.38 per share, beating analysts’ consensus estimate by 9 cents. It generated revenue of $63.6 million, up 72% YoY. Calculated billings were also strong at $88.5 million, up 73% YoY. 
  • The company’s guidance for FY3Q19 (quarter ending January 31, 2019) is to generate revenue in the range of $64 million to $66 million, representing a 56% YoY growth rate at the midpoint of the guidance. It expects to generate operating margin of negative 28% to negative 30% in FY3Q19. 
  • A combination of major investors shifting their assets away from FAANG and semiconductor stocks has resulted in some improved performance of many software related stocks in recent months relative to other major tech stocks. In general, these stocks face less negative impact from a prolonged trade war between China and the US. Plus, they are not as exposed to the higher cycle volatility as the semiconductor related stocks. In many respects, Elastic shares many business similarities with these software driven companies, and thus has been more immune from the decline in the stock prices since early October. We remain positive on Elastic NV (ESTC US).

Daily TMT & Internet: 58.com Inc. (NYSE: WUBA): Regulatory Pressure Has Long Term Implications and more

By | TMT/Internet

In this briefing:

  1. 58.com Inc. (NYSE: WUBA): Regulatory Pressure Has Long Term Implications
  2. MYOB (MYO AU): Shareholders Are Caught Between a Rock and a Hard Place
  3. Infosys Ltd (INFO IN): Another Buyback Coming? Not a Bad Idea, but How Much It Can Really Help?
  4. SoftBank Corp (9434 JP) & Arteria Networks (4423 JP): A Tale of Two IPOs
  5. MYOB Caves And Agrees To KKR’s Reduced Offer

1. 58.com Inc. (NYSE: WUBA): Regulatory Pressure Has Long Term Implications

Image%201

● We notice that Anjuke’s Oct.-Nov. traffic declined. We attribute this decline to the tightening of registration requirement in various cities, which will reduce the number of housing leads on WUBA platform;

● We, however, believe new home business will deliver strong revenue for WUBA this year, contributing Rmb2bn in revenues by our estimate;

● We rate the stock Buy and cut TP from US$84 to US$79.

2. MYOB (MYO AU): Shareholders Are Caught Between a Rock and a Hard Place

Valuation%2024%20dec

On 24 December, MYOB Group Ltd (MYO AU) announced that it entered into a scheme implementation agreement under which KKR will acquire MYOB at $3.40 per share, which is 10% lower than 2 November offer price of A$3.77. MYOB claims its decision to recommend KKR’s lower offer was based on current market uncertainty, long-term nature of its strategic growth plans and the go-shop provisions of the deal. 

We believe that KKR’s revised offer is opportunistic, but MYOB’s shareholders are caught between a rock and a hard place. Shareholders can take a short-term view and grudgingly accept the revised offer. Alternatively, shareholders can take a long-term view by rejecting the offer and hope MYOB’s strategic growth plans and a market recovery can reverse the inevitable share price collapse.

3. Infosys Ltd (INFO IN): Another Buyback Coming? Not a Bad Idea, but How Much It Can Really Help?

As per reports, Infosys Ltd (INFO IN) may consider a proposal for a share buyback of $1.60 billion very soon. The buyback announcement is likely to be made on January 11 when the company board meets to consider the 3Q FY19 results. Before this, in November 2017, Infosys Ltd (INFO IN) had announced a buyback and spent Rs130 bn to buy a total of 113mn equity shares. This fresh buyback could be an important development and could be an important support for the stock, it is also sensible for other reasons. 

There are no major acquisitions in recent times by Infosys Ltd (INFO IN) and if this is likely to be the trend for near future, share buyback is not a bad idea. The company is still struggling with some of the legacy issues and the priority as of now is to streamline the organic growth. We think Infosys Ltd (INFO IN) is also cautious with inorganic growth opportunities as the company had serious issues with acquisitions in the past. What could be another key driver behind this is that in valuation terms, Infosys Ltd (INFO IN) is not very expensive.

4. SoftBank Corp (9434 JP) & Arteria Networks (4423 JP): A Tale of Two IPOs

Arteria%20deal%20specifics

During the second half of December 2018, Japan saw two telecom companies list on the Tokyo Stock Exchange: Softbank Corp (9434 JP) and ARTERIA Networks (4423 JP). After years of industry consolidation, which saw several stocks delist, this felt like a Christmas miracle (at least for those watching the sector’s stocks).

It would be hard to find two companies in the same industry that are so different – both in their business models as well as in how their IPOs were positioned to investors. One stock is 100 times larger than the other, but this is not a story of David and Goliath. It is two unique stories in parallel. 

While each company took a very different approach to selling its stock, both have suffered from the subsequent broader market weakness, irrespective of company specifics. We can’t say it has been the worst of times, but it certainly has been a tough time with SoftBank Corp down 13% and Arteria down 20% from their IPO prices.

In this Insight we explore how each company approached its IPO and how each has fared since. 

5. MYOB Caves And Agrees To KKR’s Reduced Offer

Chart

It could have gone either way.

After securing a 19.9% stake from Bain in early October and initially pitching A$3.70/share, in a textbook bear hug, KKR (marginally) bumped its indicative offer to A$3.77/share to a get a look under the hood, then following seven weeks of due diligence, backtracked with a lower price of A$3.40/share, citing adverse market conditions.

MYOB Board’s response last week to the reduced offer was to inform KKR that it is not in a position to recommend the revised proposal, however, “it remains in discussions with KKR regarding its proposal”, leaving the door open for ongoing negotiations. KKR for its part, said there were no landmines following the DD process. The price action last Friday suggested the outcome was a coin toss.

Today, KKR and MYOB entered into Scheme Implementation Agreement (SIA) at $3.40/share, valuing MYOB, on a market cap basis, at A$2bn. MYOB’s board unanimously recommends shareholders to vote in favour of the Offer, in the absence of a superior proposal and subject to an independent expert concluding the Offer is in the best interest of shareholders. The Offer price assumes no full-year dividend is paid.

The agreement provides a “go shop” provision until the 22 February 2019 – when MYOB is expected to release its FY18 results – to solicit competing proposals.

The Offer appears reasonable when compared to peers and with regards to the 14% decline in the ASX technology index; but conversely, could be construed as being opportunistic.

A Scheme Booklet is expected to be dispatched mid-March with an estimated implementation date of 3 May. Currently trading at a 3.8%/11% gross/annualised spread. 1 January makes a new year and there will be investors who would want to take an agreed deal at 11%.