In our Discover HK Connect series, we aim to help our investors understand the flow of southbound trades via the Hong Kong Connect, as analyzed by our proprietary data engine. We will discuss the stocks that experienced the most inflow and outflow by mainland investors in the past seven days.
We split the stocks eligible for the Hong Kong Connect trade into three groups: those with a market capitalization of above USD 5 billion, those with a market capitalization between USD 1 billion and USD 5 billion, and those with a market capitalization between USD 500 million and USD 1 billion.
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
Since autumn of 2014, the HK-Shanghai Connect, and later the HK-Shenzhen Connect mechanisms have provided means for mainland investors to buy Hong Kong-listed stocks.
We have been tracking the H/A relationships and the Southbound flows per name on a weekly basis and occasionally writing commentary about it since late 2016.
This report provides a brief synopsis of the SOUTHBOUND flows into Hong Kong-listed stocks over the course of 2018, by sector, by average percentage change in mainland ownership of HK shares outstanding subject to the Connect mechanisms, and the top and bottom five names per sector per quarter.
Tim Cook passed the buck to the weak sales in China. However, we believe China’s retailing is running well based on our visits to shopping malls with Apple stores.
Luxury goods sold better in China than all other major markets in the world in 2018.
We believe that the price reduction in Mainland China is just taking market share from Apple Stores in Hong Kong, but not from competitors.
We also believe that the app review process is the fatal shortcoming for AAPL.
Overall, the company has continued to show that its undergraduate program is the driver behind its growth. It grew its 8M 2018 revenue and gross profit both by about 24% YoY. However, there are significant near-term risks if the MOJ Draft for Comments gets implemented. It may result in Kepei registering its schools as for-profit private schools which would shrink its net profit margin.
In this insight, we will provide updates on the company’s 8M 2018 financials and operating performance, the potential impact of policy change and compare its valuation to other listed education peers. We will also run the deal through our framework.
We noted in Ten Years On – Asia Outperforms Advanced Economies Asia’s economies and companies have outperformed advanced country peers in the ten years to 2017. Growing by 6.8%, real, through the crisis the region is 188% larger in US dollar terms while US dollar per capita incomes 170% higher compared with 2007. In this note we argue even though Asian stock markets have underperformed since 2010 and the bulk of global capital flows have gone to advanced countries, Asia’s time is coming. Valuations are cheap. Growth fundamentals strong. There are few external or internal imbalances. Macroeconomic management has been better than in advanced economies and the scope to ease policy to ward off headwinds in 2019 is greater. China has already started.
A nine-day winning streak until Thursday, January 10, had put Brent and WTI back in the bull market (gains of >20% from their 52-week lows). It was capped by a highly volatile trading day and a lower close of the benchmark crude futures on Friday, pointing to a return of uncertainty and indecisiveness in the market.
US-China trade talks over January 7-8, which were extended to January 9, set last week off to a flying start. There were no deals for sure, but the two sides appeared to have narrowed their differences. That was enough to send the stock markets climbing, with crude prices in tow.
Follow-up negotiations at a higher level are expected in the US later this month, though no dates have been announced yet. For now, it seems the financial markets, probably in gloom fatigue and perhaps oversold, needed any excuse to recover and a baby step towards the resolution of the US-China trade dispute was as good as any.
Of course, one can’t ignore the US Fed’s dovish turn, which also provided a major boost to sentiment. US Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell said on Thursday that the central bank would be “patient” over future rate hikes. It was music to investors’ ears.
OPEC heavyweight Saudi Arabia repeated its promise to slash exports, with the energy minister providing specific figures for the benefit of the media and the market, and fundamentals had done their bit to help crude’s rally.
However, macroeconomic data and business outlook from companies across the world continues to be weak and disappointing. And crude remains firmly in the grip of the economic sentiment, maintaining a very strong correlation with the equity markets since last October.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
Xiaomi Corp (1810 HK) is likely to break HK$10 this morning again after a placement equal to about 1% of shares outstanding was proposed to buyers last night at a sharp discount to the close. This insight attempts to nail down the shape and size of the ongoing overhang.
After the HK Stock Exchange announced in late April 2018 that it would permit companies with Weighted Voting Rights (WVRs) to list on the HKEx, after sticking to the one-share one-vote principle for years (losing the Alibaba Group Holding (BABA US) listing to NASDAQ in the process), Xiaomi Corp (1810 HK) quickly raised its hand with the prospect of a US$10bn IPO and a US$100bn market cap – heady numbers even for a fast-growing company. This was quickly followed by the launch of the China Depositary Receipt program which saw a quick establishment and even quicker acceptance of a Xiaomi application, potentially setting up a situation where demand was pulled from HK to China.
Then investors got cold feet, and what was a $100bn valuation dropped to $90bn then $70bn. The CSRC also pushed back on the possible CDR issuance to such an extent that Xiaomi withdrew its application, and then pricing delivered a valuation of approximately US$50bn at a sharply reduced IPO price of HK$17/share.
Day1 saw a 6% fall on the open and the shares closed down 1%. After the Day 1 close, fast-track inclusion into the Hang Seng indices was a pleasant and somewhat unexpected surprise for IPO buyers and responded by rising almost 12% on Day 2 on sharply higher volume. MSCI did not follow suit (it had not been expected) but several days later on inclusion day, the stock was 25% higher than the IPO price. 10 days later the over-allotment option had been fully-exercised.
Xiaomi last year grew its ecosystem and its hardware base, but saw lower market share in China (13%) than in 2017 (14%) according to several sources, including Counterpoint Research quoted in the media. The company, which has targeted 50% of revenue from overseas is now just shy of that mark at 44% after ramping up sales in India, Europe, and MENA.
Global weakness in handsets on mobile tech led by Apple did not spare Xiaomi, but MOST notable was the sharp drop in the share price in December from HK$14.30-50 area to just below HK$13 at year end. The first day of the new year saw the shares fall 5.5%, and the next day the price fell another 3.6%. The shares fell a little more in the next few days but somewhat stabilised until the morning of the 8th.
Then the volume picked up. The lockup had expired.
data: capitalIQ, exchange data
In five days, the shares have traded 880mm shares, and that is before a large placement proposed after the close on 15th January.
Following Yaskawa’s second downward revision at 3Q earnings, we are shifting towards a more positive stance on the stock, even from a long-term perspective. We had been negative on the stock from late 2017 and as the stock tumbled we maintained that it was still too early buy for the long-term, though by mid-late 2018 we did (incorrectly) feel that there was the potential for a short term rally due to the severity of underperformance.
With the stock selling off harshly in the recent market fall but rebounding following its weak earnings we feel that much of the bad news is now priced in and expectations have corrected to the point where this is once again interesting on the long side.
Based on CRC’s (China Railway Corporation) 2019 plan on rail investment, CRRC’s earnings from rail business might be better than estimated. With a 45% increase on new rail delivery mileage, and significantly increase on HSR train (Multiple Units) repair demand, we estimate CRCC’s EPS increase by another 20% yoy to RMB0.53 in 2019E, following a 17% yoy increase in 2018E.
Also, a better earnings outlook might trigger a mild valuation re-rating. The stock trades at 12.8x P/E 2019E (our estimates), attractive vs. its 15.5x historical P/E average since the merger in 2015.
Three key emerging risks to the Starbucks’ growth story: 1) New entrant poses a threat to China growth story; 2) New CEO is missing the magic of the beans; and 3) New Uber partnership could erode Starbucks’ brand equity.
In our January 8 research note, we cautioned that Starbucks had outperformed the NASDAQ by 37% since we turned positive on August 8 but we were concerned about two new developments that we viewed as red flags: shelving of Reserve coffee bar expansion and aggressive China expansion plans of Luckin Coffee. While we do not believe this represents a short opportunity, we do believe it foreshadows emerging risks to Starbucks’ long-term growth story.
Credit demand is deteriorating; credit risks are rising; Eurodollar costs are edging higher
A de-escalation in trade tensions and a Fed pause could ease the pain
Will Fed recently turning more dovish (possible shift to slower QT & Fed rate cut in 2019?) + concomitant USD drift provide sufficient respite to put a floor under risk assets?
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
An undisclosed institutional shareholder of Xiaomi Corp (1810 HK) is looking to sell 231m shares of the company for approximately US$273m.
There will likely to be more selling pressure in the near term. The 594m shares sold down by Apoletto and the anonymous shareholder who sold at a 14% discount does not inspire confidence. Furthermore, there will be even more overhang to come from the twelve-month lock-up expiry. The deal also scores poorly on our framework owing to its expensive valuation and the lack of information on the seller.
China’s 2018 auto demand came to 27.8m units according to CAAM’s published statistics, bringing the YoY decline to 3.9%. The results were consistent with our expectations since 1H18, that:
We estimate that the acquisition tax reduction for 1.6L and smaller engine displacement vehicles in 2016 and 2017 front-loaded about 2.0-2.2m units to PC demand in those two years, similar to the impact of tax reduction effect seen in 2009-10. This is a segment that saw 1.1m units in volume reduction in 2018 which should be seen as a natural result of the end of the tax subsidies. In fact we believe that these after-effects of front-loaded demand were most likely more influential on China’s 2018 demand downturn than any headline narratives about negative impacts of trade wars.
Our initial expectations for 2019 are:
The 1.6L and smaller engine displacement segment should see stable to slightly lower annual demand, but there is nothing currently in the statistics that suggests that higher segments should also see declines. This should at least partly be a natural pattern of second and third time car buyers trading up.
As we have pointed out in May China Auto Demand: Weak SAAR Leaves Lingering Headwinds for 2H , CV SAAR was unusually strong in 1H18 so this could be an obvious segment of weakness going into 2019, especially if 4Q average CV SAAR of 3.7m units (vs. 4.2m unit FY18 demand) is any indicator of what to expect going forward.
While we expect some residual effects of the 1.6L and lower segment tax subsidy ending in 2017 to remain in effect in 2019 we do not expect its impact to be as large as it was in 2018. Our low single digit decline scenario considers a lower CV SAAR in YoY terms which appears likely as we head into 2019.
Weimob.com (2013 HK) IPO was priced at the low-end at HKD2.80/share. The retail tranche was 0.79x covered while the institutional tranche was slightly over-subscribed.
I’ve covered most aspects of the deal in my earlier insights:
In this insight, I’ll provide an update on the deal dynamics, valuations and provide a table with the implied valuations at different share price levels.
-Sky news presenter to UK MP Boris Johnson ahead of the Brexit parliament vote planned for today
Best of luck for the week and new year- Rickin, Venkat and Arun
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
Luckin Coffee could be looking to IPO. lululemon raises Q4 guidance. WeWork rebrands to The We Company.
Starbucks: Luckin Coffee could start to flash red on the radar screen for investors in Starbucks as it is apparently looking to IPO on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.
Apparel, Accessories & Luxury Goods: As evidence of how vertically integrated, high-margin retailers like apparel, accessories & luxury goods companies with social missions are uniquely positioned to originate value, lululemon just raised its Q4 guidance on strong holiday sales momentum.
WeWork: Proving our controversial thesis that WeWork is more of a human capital play than a real estate play, it is re-branding to The We Company.
In yesterday’s research report, I posed the controversial question, “Could Starbucks’ Beans Start to Lose Their Magic?”, expressing my concern that Starbucks’ beanstalk could start to wilt with Schultz no longer around to cultivate his high-fidelity community-based social mission to “inspire and nurture the human spirit—one person, one cup and one neighborhood at a time”, which brings the real magic to its beans. The key emerging risk is that Starbucks faces a highly aggressive disruptive entrant, Luckin Coffee, which could start to flash red on investors’ radar screens as it is apparently looking to IPO on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. Interestingly, in 1998, 11 years after Howard Schultz planted the magic beans for his Starbucks movement, another community-based social mission took root, with Chip Wilson starting his lululemon movement to “create components for people to live a longer, healthier, and more fun life”. Although Chip Wilson was forced out of his company in early 2015, which he recounts in his new tell-all book, “Little Black Stretchy Pants”, the cult-like following he built is bearing real fruit as lululemon is able to leverage it to build DTC distribution channels and the company just raised its Q4 guidance. And 11 years later, in 2009, Adam Neumann and Miguel McKelvey put together the pitch deck for “The we brand companies”, planting the seeds for their WeWork movement, inspired by their community-based social mission to empower people to “Make a Life. Not Just a Living.” A decade later, guided by their original vision, they have re-branded WeWork to The We Company, signaling their intent for global domination as they advance beyond office leasing.
In this report we detail our U.S. investment thesis and provide a detailed technical appraisal of the broad market, as well as highlighting attractive investment opportunities within each of our 12 Sectors.
The fate of the global economy in 2019 will hinge on the willingness of China and the US to combat decelerating domestic growth via invoking appropriate policy support.
Given current fiscal backdrops, both China and the US have less capacity to ease policy to boost growth compared to the available monetary measures at their disposal.
Pressure is increasing on Beijing to aggressively cut taxes in March to stimulate growth, as well as structurally boosting consumption.
China’s consumers have become increasingly more discerning in their attitude towards foreign brands, partly due to the rise of credible local competitors.
The current economic and financial environment is somewhat reminiscent of 2016 when a deal between the Fed and China averted protracted economic and financial turbulence, but the current China-US nexus makes an accord in 2019 extremely unlikely.
China is unlikely to act again as buyer of last resort for the world economy courtesy of another credit binge, but policy will instead focus on stabilising growth at 6.0%-6.5%.
Today’s data from the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) on new home prices for 70 major cities shows on average an accelerating year-on-year price growth and a slower month-on-month increase. This contrasts with a picture of a slowing price growth based on a different index from SouFun-CREIS.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
Xiaomi Corp (1810 HK)’s shares are around 43% below the IPO price partly due to the recent well-documented selling of shares following the end of a lock-up period. Ultimately, every share has a “right” value and the investors buying into the recent share placement presumably have the view that the shares are attractive at current levels.
While there is no longer a strong case to sell the shares at current levels, we do not recommend diving head first to buy the shares due to limited upside, potentially worsening market outlook and ongoing share overhang from lockup expiry.
68.30 long entry was recommended to close at the 77-80 area with 80 acting as the macro bull/bear line in our insight Ping An Long Pair Working – Risk of New Lows . The rejection call at 80 was expected to usher in selling pressure to press on new lows.
Ping An’s safe haven status has evaporated and does exhibit future vulnerabilities in HK’s underlying cycle (late Q1 into Q2). In our last insight we outlined that Ping An shows increasing risk that its safer have position will come under pressure and so it has.
New lows are still targeted. The current bounce is knocking on formidable resistance that should be used to sell stale long positions or even take a short bet.
Our deep-dive segment profitability analysis reveals that Meituan Dianping’s (3690 HK) core business (combined food delivery and in-store, hotel & travel) has made good progress toward profitability.
The ballooning consolidated operating losses mainly stem from new initiatives (particularly car hailing and Mobike).
Furthermore, lower S&M expenses to sales ratio plus food delivery’s higher take rate suggests that competition with Ele.me is more manageable than anticipated.
Our SOTP yields intrinsic value of HK$61.07/share, that represents 37% upside potential.
The multipronged stimulus policy announcement in China appears significant and should help Chinese investor and economic confidence recover. The market is probably braced for weaker Chinese December activity reports next week and should look forward with some increased confidence in Chinese equities. This is likely to contribute to a firmer outlook for the EUR that has suffered from a slump in its industrial activity that appears to reflect weaker demand from China. The AUD has been highly correlated with Chinese equities in the last year, and it may also respond positively to prospects for some recovery in China. However, its upside may be hampered by the increasing concern over more rapidly falling house prices in Australia, weaker construction activity and fears that households may have slowed spending. RBA rate cut expectations have increased and Australian rates have lagged the recent rebound in US rates.
Monetary diarrhoea has inflated the debt structure.
The death of the Bretton Woods monetary system in 1971 paved the way for unbridled money printing. The resulting Great Inflation inflicted huge negative real returns on bondholders and stockholders until 1982. Thereafter, many countries, especially EMs, linked their exchange rates to the dollar, resulting in the fastest ever-growth in global foreign exchange reserves. In addition, central bank puts and then extraordinary fiscal and monetary policies turned it into the most virulent asset bubble in history, despite monetary mayhem, exemplified by numerous banking crises and three big stock market drawdowns.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
Trawling through >1500 global banks, based on the last quarter of reported Balance Sheets, we apply the discipline of the PH Score™ , a value-quality fundamental momentum screen, plus a low RSI screen, and a low Franchise Valuation (FV) screen to deliver our latest rankings for global banks.
While not all of top decile 1 scores are a buy – some are value traps while others maybe somewhat small and obscure and traded sparsely- the bottom decile names should awaken caution. We would be hard pressed to recommend some of the more popular and fashionable names from the bottom decile. Names such as ICICI Bank Ltd (ICICIBC IN) , Credicorp of Peru, Bank Central Asia (BBCA IJ) and Itau Unibanco Holding Sa (ITUB US) are EM favourites. Their share prices have performed well for an extended period and thus carry valuation risk. They represent pricey quality in some cases. They are not priced for disappointment but rather for hope. Are the constituents of the bottom decile not fertile grounds for short sellers?
Why pay top dollar for a bank franchise given risks related to domestic (let alone global) politics and the economy? Some investors and analysts have expressed “inspiration” for developments in Brazil and Argentina. But Brazilian bonds are now trading as if the country is Investment Grade again. (This is relevant for banks especially). Guedes and co. may deliver on pension/social security reform. If so, prices will become even more inflated. But what happens if they don’t deliver on reform? Why pay top dollar for hope given the ramp up in prices already? Argentina is an even more fragile “hope narrative”. More of a “Hope take 2”. Similar to Brazil, bank Franchise Valuations are elevated. While the current account adjustment and easing inflation are to be expected, the political and social scene will be a challenge. LATAM seems to be “hot” again with investment bankers talking of resilience. But resilience is different from valuation. Banks from Chile, Peru, and Colombia feature in the bottom decile too. If an investor wants to be in these markets and desires bank exposure, surely it makes sense to look for the best value on offer. Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores (AVAL CB) may represent one such opportunity.
Our bottom decile rankings feature a great deal of banks from Indonesia. In a promising market such as Indonesia, given bank valuations, one needs to tread extremely carefully to not end up paying over the odds, to not pay for extrapolation. In addition, India is a susceptible jurisdiction for any bank operating there – no bank is “superhuman” and especially not at the prices on offer for the popular private sector “winners”. Saudi Arabia is another market that suddenly became popular last year. We are mindful of valuations and FX.
Does it not make more sense to look at opportunity in the top decile? While some of the names here will be too small or illiquid (mea culpa), there are genuine portfolio candidates. South Korea stands out in the rankings. Woori Bank (WF US) is top of the rankings after a share price plunge related to a stock overhang but this will pass. Hana Financial (086790 KS) , Industrial Bank of Korea (IBK LX) and DGB Financial Group (139130 KS) are portfolio candidates. Elsewhere, Russia and Vietnam rightly feature while Sri Lanka and Pakistan contribute some names despite very real political and macro risks. We would caution on some of the relatively small Chinese names but recommend the big 4 versus EM peers – they are not expensive. In fact some of the big 4 feature in decile 2 of our rankings. There are many Japanese banks here too. And many, like some Chinese lenders, are cheap for a reason. While the technical picture for Japanese banks is bearish, at some stage selective weeding out of opportunity within Japan’s banking sector may be rewarding. The megabanks are certainly not dear. Europe is another matter. Despite valuations, we are cautious on French lenders and on German consolidation narratives – did a merger of 2 weak banks ever deliver shareholder value? The inclusion of two Romanian banks in the top decile is somewhat of a headscratcher. These are perfectly investable opportunities but share prices have been poor of late.
Corrigenda: There is an error in this insight. Please note the correction.
Correction: Please ignore the incomplete sentence at the end of the second paragraph in the blue box below (“On the valuation end,…”).
Aequitas Research puts out a weekly update on the deals that have been covered by Smartkarma Insight Providers recently, along with updates for upcoming IPOs.
It has been a fairly busy week. Activity in the ECM space seems to be picking up with block trades taking the lead this week. We had Xiaomi Corp (1810 HK), Ayala Corporation (AC PM), Puregold Price Club (PGOLD PM), and Longfor Properties (960 HK) placements this week and most of them secondary sell-downs except for Puregold which was a top-up placement. Most placements performed well, trading above their IPO price, except for Longfor which only managed to claw back to its deal price on Friday.
Starting with Xiaomi, we think that there would likely be more selling considering that there is a massive overhang after the lock-up expired on 9th of January. Our calculation indicated that major shareholders may have about 6bn shares to be sold. Even if we exclude the founders’ shares, there will still be about 4bn shares left to be sold. The share price has managed to claw back above HK$10 level on Friday and we also heard that the books were several times covered with allocation being concentrated among a handful of investors. The tighter discount of this placement compared to the one earlier that crossed at 14% discount probably indicated demand is relatively better for this placement. On the valuation end, we
Ayala Corp’s placement was upsized and has also done well contrary to our view. We thought that the sell-down may perhaps indicate that there is an overhang from Mitsubishi’s remaining stake. But, we heard that books were well covered.
For IPOs this week, Weimob.com (2013 HK) traded well on the first day but took a spectacular dive on the second day of trading. It was down 30% intraday before bouncing back up and finally closing at IPO price on Friday. On the other hand, Chengdu Expressway Company Limited (1785 HK) hovered around its IPO price with little liquidity.
In terms of upcoming deals, PH Resorts Group (PHR PM) is looking to launch a US$350m share sale in about two months time. Maoyan Entertainment (EPLUS HK) has already launched its IPO on Friday while there will be more IPOs heading to the US. Jubilant Pharma is said to have turned to the US for its US$500m IPO after trying to list in Singapore last year. Home Credit Group and Sinopec’s retail unit might be seeking to this in Hong Kong this year. Luckin Coffee is also said to be seeking an IPO in Hong Kong.
Accuracy Rate:
Our overall accuracy rate is 71.9% for IPOs and 64.1% for Placements
(Performance measurement criteria is explained at the end of the note)
New IPO filings
Shenwan Hongyuang Group (Hong Kong, >US$1bn)
Tai Hing Holdings (Hong Kong, ~US$200m)
Changsha Broad Homes Industrial Group (Hong Kong, >US$100m)
Shanghai Gench Education (Hong Kong, >US$100m)
China Yunfang Holdings (Hong Kong, ~US$100m)
Below is a snippet of our IPO tool showing upcoming events for the next week. The IPO tool is designed to provide readers with timely information on all IPO related events (Book open/closing, listing, initiation, lock-up expiry, etc) for all the deals that we have worked on. You can access the tool here or through the tools menu.
Uzbekistan’s economy is a frontier market stand out and has a large number of attractive characteristics:
Uzbekistan’s stock market trades at a substantial discount to other frontier markets, though the extremely illiquid nature of the market makes it hard to trade. However, there still is foreign interest in the market.
The IMF projects that the economy will grow by 5% during 2018 and 2019, and eventually reach 6% by 2022, though this is still below its historical high.
Market reforms were spearheaded in December 2016 when the newly elected president, Shavkat Mirziyoyev decided to transition towards a market- oriented economy led by private sector growth, as the public sector was unable to create enough jobs. This represents a significant shift given that Uzbekistan had been a closed, centrally planned economy until 2016.
Tourist arrivals grew by 91.6% during H1 2018, and this is poised to improve greater in the future due to the impact of the visa liberalization measures.
Twin deficits have remained under control and Uzbekistan is one of few current account surplus frontier markets.
Uzbekistan is also very attractive compared to other markets in the frontier space given that its minimum wage is only US$24/month, compared to around $70-75/month in Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan.
The market reforms that the country recently implemented will be a major catalyst for future economic growth and makes investment in this market appealing. Apart from strong growth, the market is also appealing due to its high foreign exchange reserves ( nearly 2 years of import cover), consistent CA surplus, and stable currency. My latest frontier and emerging market recap highlights the appeals of markets such as Bangladesh, Vietnam, and Egypt, while expressing concerns for markets such as Sri Lanka and Pakistan. Uzbekistan is a suitable addition given its stable macro/political picture, and the main negative factor of this market is the highly inaccessible nature of the equity market. The ADTV is less than $100,000, which is a far cry from other frontier markets like Romania, Sri Lanka and Kenya.
Highlights of significant recent happenings include:
Substantive Deep Dive – Canada’s BlackBerry Ltd (BB CN) seeks to be the go-to provider of web Security: Why we believe investors should look at Blackberry as a way to hedge their exposures to the increasing list of companies who are susceptible to adverse impact from security breaches.
Feeding the Dragon – Chinese buying of US firms brakes abruptly, obliterating the long-term trend, and now Japan has become the second-largest market for outbound M&A globally. Also, South Korean food giant Cj Cheiljedang (097950 KS) is continuing its aggressive expansion into the U.S. market
Wars in old times were made to get slaves. The modern implement of imposing slavery is debt. Ezra Pound
Governments used public sector balance sheets to bail out private financial institutions and assist private companies to emerge from bankruptcy in the GFC. These actions transferred credit risk from the private to the public sector, yet falling nominal interest rates minimised, and in some cases froze, the cost of servicing the mounting government debt until late 2016. Since then, many borrowers have paid rising interest rates on increasing amounts of debt. Debt service charges are rising faster than nominal GDP in a growing number of nations as a result. It is estimated that the US federal funding requirement will rise from minus US$ 700bn to US$ 2tr in 2022.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
Tracking Traffic/Chinese Express & Logistics is the hub for our research on China’s express parcels and logistics sectors. Tracking Traffic/Chinese Express & Logistics features analysis of monthly Chinese express and logistics data, notes from our conversations with industry players, and links to company and thematic notes.
This month’s issue covers the following topics:
December express parcel pricing fell by over 9% Y/Y. Average pricing per express parcel fell by 9.1% Y/Y, the worst decline since Q216 (excluding January/February figures distorted by the Lunar New Year holiday).
Express parcel revenue growth remained well below 20% last month. Weak pricing dragged sector revenue growth down to 17% in December, the 4th consecutive month of sub-20% growth.
Intra-city pricing (ie, local delivery) was strong in 2018. Relative to weak inter-city pricing (down 3.1% Y/Y in 2018), pricing for intra-city express shipments was firm, rising by 0.1% last year. In fact, average pricing for intra-city express shipments has risen in four of the last five years.
Underlying domestic transport demand remained firm in December. Although demand for inter-city express shipments appears to be moderating (from high levels), underlying transportation activity in December remained firm. The three modes of freight transport we track (rail, highway, air) in aggregate rose 6.6% Y/Y in December, even as the growth of air freight slowed.
We retain a negative view of China’s express industry’s fundamentals: demand growth is slowing and pricing for inter-city shipments appears to be falling faster than costs can be cut, leading to margin compression.
The recent collapse of Xiaomi Corp (1810 HK)’s shares after the end of its six-month lock-up period has focused minds on upcoming lockup expirations. Pinduoduo (PDD US) is the next major Chinese tech company with an upcoming lock-up expiration – its six-month lock-up period expires on 22 January.
We have been bulls on Pinduoduo with the shares up 32% since its IPO. While we are not privy to the shareholding plans of Pinduoduo’s shareholders, we believe that Pinduoduo will likely not mirror Xiaomi’s share price collapse after the end of its six-month lock-up period.
No longer playing catch up? The “world-leading” PLA
In my weekly digest China News That Matters, I will give you selected summaries, sourced from a variety of local Chinese-language and international news outlets, and highlight why I think the news is significant. These posts are meant to neither be bullish nor bearish, but help you separate the signal from the noise.
After 6.5bn+ shares came off lockup last week (by Travis Lundy’s estimate), Xiaomi made a placement equal to about 1% of shares outstanding at a sharp discount to the close. This follows a block of 120mm shares last Thursday at HK$8.80 (at a 13+% discount); Apoletto reported a distribution (sale) of 594+mm shares on January 9th to reduce their total position across all funds from 9.25% to 4.99%; and there was a block placement launched earlier in the week for 231mm shares for sale between HK$9.28 and HK$9.60.
While as much as 1bn shares may have already transacted (assuming most of the 594mm shares distributed by Apoletto have been sold in the market), there were ~6.5 billion shares which could be sold and an additional 1bn+ of additional conversions designed to be sold.
In another 6 months, there will be another 4bn+ shares which come off LockUp. In total, that is up to 10-11bn shares coming off lockup between a week ago and 6 months from now. That is four times the total IPO size, and 70-80% of the total position coming off lock-up has an average in-price of HK$2.00 or less. Apoletto’s average in-price was HK$9.72.
Travis is also skeptical that the company’s capital deserves a premium to peers, and is not entirely convinced that the pre-IPO profit forecasts are going to be met in the medium-term. In the meantime, a lot of the current capital structure base is looking to get out.
Nota Bene: Bloomberg’s 3bn-shares-to-come-off-lockup number was confirmed by Travis (the day he published the piece linked below) with the people who tallied the info for the CACS function. They had neglected to count a certain group of shareholders. The actual number will be well north of 6 billion shares.
After the close of trading on the 15 January, NTT announced it had repurchased 3.395mm shares for ¥15.349bn in the first 7 trading days of the month, purchasing 10.9% of the volume traded. This announcement was bang in line with Travis’ insight the prior day, where he anticipated the buybacks would soon be done.
The push to buy shares on-market at NTT vs off-market at NTT Docomo has had some effect but not a huge effect. The NTT/Docomo price ratio is a bit more than 5% off its late October 2018 lows prior to the “Docomo Shock”, but the ratio is off highs. Off the lows, the Stub Trade has done really well.
NTT DoCoMo bought back ¥600bn of shares from NTT at the end of 2018. That means NTT DoCoMo could buy back perhaps ¥300-400bn of shares from the market over the next year or so before ‘feeling the need’ to buy back shares from NTT again. NTT will likely buy back at least ¥160bn of NTT shares from the government in FY19 starting April 1st, which means there will be room to buy back another ¥100bn from the government before not having any more room to do so.
There could be an NTT buyback from the market in FY2019, and one should expect that for the company to buy back shares from the government again, if NTT follows the pattern shown to date, there should be another ¥400-500bn of buybacks from the market over the next two years, and if EPS threatens a further fall on NTT DoCoMo earnings weakness, NTT might boost the buyback to make up for that.
The very large sale by NTT of NTT Docomo shares this past December will free up a significant amount of Distributable Capital Surplus.
On a three-year basis, Travis would rather own NTT than NTT Docomo. But he expects the drift on the ratio will not be overwhelming unless NTT does “something significant”.
Singaporean real-estate group Capitaland has entered into a SPA to buy Ascendas-Singbridge (ASB) from its controlling shareholder, Temasek. The proposed acquisition values ASB at an enterprise value of S$10.9bn and equity value of S$6.0bn. Capitaland will fund the acquisition through 50% cash and 50% in shares (862.3mn shares @$3.25/share – ~17% dilution). Capitaland-ASB will have a pro-forma AUM of S$116bn, making it the largest real estate investment manager in Asia and the ninth largest global real estate manager.
Hitachi Ltd (6501 JP)announced it had received approvals from the relevant government authorities, and its Tender Offer for Yungtay (at TWD 60/share) has now launched. The Tender Offer will go through March 7th 2019 with the target of reaching 100% ownership. Son of the founder, former CEO, and Honorary Chairman Hsu Tso-Li (Chou-Li) of Yungtay has agreed to tender his 4.27% holding. The main difference between the offer details as discussed in Going Up! Hitachi Tender for Yungtay Engineering (1507 TT) back in October, is a minimum threshold for success of reaching just over one-third of the shares outstanding, with a minimum to buy of 88,504,328 shares (21.66%, including the 4.27% to be tendered by Hsu Tso-Li).
This deal looks pretty straightforward, but the stock has been trading reasonably tight to terms, with annualized spreads on a reasonable expectation of closing date in the 3.5-4.5% annualized range for a decent part of December, rising into early January before seeing a jump in price and drop in annualized on the second trading day of the year. This shows some expectation of a fight and a bump.
To avoid that fight and bump – the Baojia Group, which supported Hsu Tso-Ming’s board revolt last summer (discussed in the previous insight), has reportedly accumulated a 10% stake – Hitachi has lowered its minimum threshold to complete the deal to get to one-third plus a share. Given that it controls 11.7% itself as the largest shareholder, and has another 4.3% from the chairman in the bag, that means it needs about 17.3% of the remaining 84% to be successful.
Because the minimum is only about 21% of the float, this deal has quite decent odds of getting up unless someone makes a more serious run for it. As an arb, Travis sees a small chance of a bump because of some potential harassment value by Hsu Tso-Ming’s friends at Baojia Group. Hitachi has already taken that into account with the lowering of the minimum, but it is possible that enough noise can be created to obtain a bump.
Courts, a leading electrical, consumer electronics and furniture retailer predominantly in Singapore and Malaysia, has announced a voluntary conditional offer from Japanese big box electronics retailer Nojima Corp (7419 JP) at $0.205/share, a 34.9% premium to the last closing price. The key condition to the Offer is the valid acceptances of 50% of shares out. Singapore Retail Group, with 73.8%, has given an irrevocable to tender. Once tendered, this offer will become unconditional. The question is whether minorities should hold on.
Barings/Topaz-controlled Singapore Retail Group are exiting, having not altered their shareholding since CAL’s 2012 listing. If Nojima receives acceptances from 90% of shareholders, it will move to compulsory delisting of the shares. If the Offer closes with Nojima holding >75% of shares, it could still launch an exit/delisting offer pursuant to Rule 1307 and Rule 1308.
Long-suffering shareholders may wish to hold on for a potential turnaround should Nojima extract expected synergies. But this looks like a decent opportunity (of sorts) to also exit along with the controlling shareholder.
The board of Navitas, a global education provider, has unanimously backed a revised bid by 18.4% shareholder BGH Consortium of A$5.825/share, 6% higher than its previous rejected offer and a 34% premium to undisturbed price.
The revised proposal drops the “lock out” conditions attached to BGH Consortium’s previous offer, enabling BGH to support a superior proposal. BGH has also been granted an exclusivity period until the 18 Feb.
Panalpina Welttransport announced that it had received an unsolicited, non-binding proposal from DSV A/S (DSV DC) to acquire the company at a price of CHF 170 per share, consisting of 1.58 DSV shares and CHF 55 in cash for each Panalpina share. The offer comes at a premium of 24% to Panalpina’s closing share price of CHF 137.5 as of 11 January 2019 and 31% to the 60-day VWAP of CHF 129.5 as of 11 January 2019. Following the announcement, Panalpina’s shares surged above the terms of the offer implying that the market was anticipating a higher bid from DSV or one of its competitors.
Investors lashed out at Panalpina’s board last year (after years of griping by some of the top holders), eventually forcing the main shareholder to support the installation of a new chairman of the board.
The stock is clearly in play. And the sector is seeing ongoing consolidation. DSV’s approach to Panalpina comes just months after it failed in an attempt to buy Switzerland’sCeva Logistics AG (CEVA SW). Media reports suggested Switzerland’s Kuehne & Nagel are also rumoured to be considering an offer for Panalpina.
Panalpina’s largest shareholder, Ernst Goehner Foundation, owns a stake of approximately 46%. If EGS wants to see OPMs up at global standards level – in the area of DSV and KNIN – then they may need to see someone else manage the assets. If EGS is steadfastly against Panalpina losing its independence, a deal will not get done. That said, if a deal does not get done because the board reflects the interest of EGS, that proves the board is not as independent as previously claimed. But one must imagine there is a right price for everything.
Earlier this month, Bristol Myers Squibb Co (BMY US)and Celgene announced a definitive agreement for BMY to acquire Celgene in a $74bn cash and stock deal. The headline price of $102.43 per Celgene share plus one CVR (contingent value right) is a 53.7% premium to CELG’s closing price of $66.64 on January 2, 2019, before assigning any value to the CVR. The CVR has a binary outcome: it will either be worth zero or will be worth a $9 cash payment upon the FDA approval of three drugs.
While there don’t appear to be any major problems in commercial products, it remains to be seen whether the antitrust authorities go further into the pipeline to determine whether potential competition from drugs still in clinical trials could present issues in the future.
Overall, the merger agreement appears fairly standard, but it does (also) require BMY shareholder approval which typically overlays a higher risk premium. For John DeMasi, the attraction for this arb is the current risk/reward.
ANTYA Investments Inc. chimes in on the deal and considers it unlikely that a suitor for CELG emerges at a higher price, whereas rumours of suitors for BMY abound, and would therefore make a long bet on BMY.
On the 10 January, PAH announced CKI had entered into a placing agreement to sell 43.8mn shares (2.05% of shares out) at HK$52.93/share (a 4.7% discount to last close), reducing CKI’s holding in PAH to 35.96%. This is CKI’s first stake sale in PAH since the 2015 restructuring of the Li Ka Shing group of companies, and it has been over three years since the CKI/PAH scheme merger was blocked by minority shareholders. It is also around two months since FIRB blocked CKI/PAH/CKA/CKHH in its scheme offer for APA Group (APA AU).
I don’t see a sale of PAH as being a realistic outcome – this is more likely an opportunity to take some money (the placement is just US$328mn) off the table. CKI remains intertwined with PAH via their utility JVs in Australia, Europe and UK, and in most investments, together they have absolute control.
I would also not discount a merger re-load. The pushback in 2015 was that the (revised) merger ratio of 1.066x (PAH/CKI) was too low and took advantage of CKI’s outperformance prior to the announcement. That ratio is now around 0.9x. A relaunched deal at ~1x would probably get up – the average since the deal-break is 1.02x and the 12-month average is 0.95x. And a merger ratio at these levels would ensure Ck Hutchison Holdings (1 HK)‘s holding into the merged entity would be <50%, so it would not be required to consolidate. This recent sell-down does not, however, elevate the near-term chances of a renewed merger.
The takeaway is that the stub is very choppy, it often (but not always) widens after the full-year results, and the highest implied stub/EBITDA occurred outside of FY16, its most profitable year. The downward trend since January last year reflects the anticipated ~17% decline in EBITDA for FY18 to ₩148bn, its lowest level in the past four years.
Sanghyun mentioned that there are signs of improving fundamentals for local cosmetics stocks (as reflected in CapIQ) and that Holdcos have traditionally been more susceptible to fundamental changes. This should augur a shift to the upside in the implied stub.
I see the discount to NAV at 27%, right on the 2STD line and compares to a 12-month average of 3%. This looks like an interesting set-up level.
The Offer for Selangor Properties (SPR MK)has been bumped again, to RM6.30 from RM6.00. The original Offer was pitched at RM5.70/share. This latest proposal is a 55% premium to the undisturbed price and 10% above the initial bid. This is starting to look reasonable, at 0.89x P/B. On balance, this will probably now get up. (link to my earlier insight: Selangor Props – Privatisation Offer Does Not Reflect Full Value)
My ongoing series flags large moves (~10%) in CCASS holdings over the past week or so, moves which are often outside normal market transactions. These may be indicative of share pledges. Or potential takeovers. Or simply help understand volume swings.
Often these moves can easily be explained – the placement of new shares, rights issue, movements subsequent to a takeover, amongst others. For those mentioned below, I could not find an obvious reason for the CCASS move.
Offer close date, (failing which) 31-Jan-2019 – Termination Date
C
Source: Company announcements. E = Smartkarma estimates; C =confirmed
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
The globe is facing more than an ordinary business cycle.
Joseph C. Sternberg, editorial-page editor and European political-economy columnist for the Wall Street Journal’s European edition, recently interviewed Claudio Borio, head of the Monetaryand Economic Department of the BIS. Mr. Borio said that politicians have relied far too much on central banks, which are constrained by economic theories that offer little meaningful guidance on how to sustain growth and financial stability. The only tool they have is an interest rate that can affect output in the short run but ends up affecting only inflation in the end.
Maoyan Entertainment (formerly Entertainment Plus) launched its institutional book building last Friday. We covered the company’s background, industry backdrop, financials, shareholders and the regulatory overhang in our previous two notes.
In this note, we will look at the recent development of the company, based on the data from the prospectus and our channel checks. We will also discuss the valuation of the company.
Reports of overtures and concessions from both Washington and Beijing were coming thick and fast by the time last week came to a close, providing a big boost to stock markets across the globe as well as crude.
The US-China trade spat has hung like an ominous and growing cloud over the prospects of global economic growth in 2019, becoming one of the major reasons for increasing risk aversion among investors since last October. As stock markets plummeted amid a sustained and steep sell-off, oil was dragged along for the ride.
If the US and China manage a rapprochement in the coming days and weeks, investor sentiment will recover, stocks will rebound, and so will crude prices.
Benchmark Brent and WTI crude futures settled at two-month highs on January 18, having retraced 24% and 27% respectively from their 52-week lows hit on Christmas eve. However, they are still 27% and 30% below the four-year peak hit on October 3.
How much further does crude have to go? In the next few days and weeks, it could claw back some more of its Q4 losses, especially if the US and China take concrete steps to unwind their bruising trade war. Once this big pressure is removed (excepting any last-minute surprises that stall or worsen the tensions), leading to a rosier outlook for global oil demand growth, crude will reconnect with its fundamentals. That could put OPEC back in the driver’s seat, and see market sentiment recovering as the OPEC/non-OPEC cuts mop up surplus barrels. Our most bullish scenario for the first quarter sees Brent climbing from the low-$60s towards $70/barrel. We see WTI $8-10 below Brent.
Just as Pinduoduo (PDD US) lock-up expiry date (22nd January) is approaching, there was news of a massive bug that could result in an RMB20bn loss for PDD. According to the company’s official Weibo account, the bug has already been rectified and a police report has been filed.
In this insight, we will analyze the potential impact of the bug and the number of shares that could potentially be sold upon lock-up expiry.
In our Discover HK Connect series, we aim to help our investors understand the flow of southbound trades via the Hong Kong Connect, as analyzed by our proprietary data engine. We will discuss the stocks that experienced the most inflow and outflow by mainland investors in the past seven days.
We split the stocks eligible for the Hong Kong Connect trade into three groups: component stocks in the HSCEI index, stocks with a market capitalization between USD 1 billion and USD 5 billion, and stocks with a market capitalization between USD 500 million and USD 1 billion.
In this week’s HK Connect Discovery, we highlight that Tencent topped the weekly inflow by quantum and its shares held by mainland investors via Stock Connect is at one year low. Stocks exposed to mobile game sector experienced inflow too. In addition, we continue to observe that the mainland investors holding on Yichang HEC continue to rise.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
2018 was a year to forget for many active GEM managers. Absolute returns were the worst since 2011 and, relative to the I-Shares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF, active funds registered their first average underperformance since 2008. Here we share some of the key data points on active fund performance for 2018 and over the longer term.
Now that we know China’s GDP posted the lowest growth rate in decades in December 2018, a lot of attention has turned to stimulus. A key outlier of stimulus is getting consumers to spend, so today we take a look at consumer spending and household consumption overall. Yet, first we need to take a look at disposable income and just where it is coming from.
China’s quarterly numbers are in and China’s economic growth decreased to 6.4%. We are reviewing the most recent numbers and examining some inconsistencies.We believe there are pronounced weak spots in China’s GDP growth and expect to see that downward pressure in the Chinese economy going forward.
Maoyan Entertainment (EPLUS HK) is the largest online movie ticketing service provider in China. The mid-point of Maoyan’s IPO price range of HK$14.8-20.4 per share implies a market value of $2.5 billion (HK$19.8 billion). Five cornerstone investors have agreed to buy $30 million or 10% of the offering at the IPO mid-point. The cornerstone investors are Imax China Holding (1970 HK), Hylink Digital Solutions, Prestige of The Sun, Welight Capital and Xiaomi Corp (1810 HK).
Our analysis suggests Maoyan is being offered at a material premium to a peer group of major Chinese internet companies. Due to challenging prospects faced by Maoyan as outlined in our previous research, we believe a premium rating is unwarranted. Consequently, we are inclined to sit out this IPO.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
