TMT/Internet

In this briefing:

1. Last Week in Event SPACE: Navitas, Harbin Electric, Yungtay, Kosaido, Ophir, Tesla/CATL, Ecopro
2. ECM Weekly (23 March 2019) – ESR, Sun Car, Ruhnn, CanSino, Frontage, Wuxi Bio, WiseTech,
3. Micron: Things Are Bad, and Getting Worse!
4. CATL Could Be Tesla’s New Battery Supplier- Panasonic in Trouble?
5. Tencent (700 HK): The Worst Part Online Game Recovered in Q4 Before Restarting License Approval

1. Last Week in Event SPACE: Navitas, Harbin Electric, Yungtay, Kosaido, Ophir, Tesla/CATL, Ecopro

Last Week in Event SPACE …

• Agreed deal with no rival bidders coming, expect Navitas Ltd (NVT AU) to trade tight.
• The risk/reward is simply not present in Harbin Electric Co Ltd H (1133 HK)‘s low-ball offer.
• One wonders if there is a “gotcha” coming against the foreigner in Hitachi Ltd (6501 JP)‘s tilt for Yungtay Engineering (1507 TT) 
• We should have seen this coming as Murakami-San Goes Hostile on Kosaido Co Ltd (7868 JP).
  
• Medco Energi Internasional T (MEDC IJ)‘s offer for Ophir Energy (OPHR LN) should get up after a small bump and a chunk of the registry giving an irrevocable undertaking.
• A Tesla Motors (TSLA US) / CATL (A) (300750 CH) tie-in lacks credibility.

• Ecopro Co Ltd (086520 KS) is looking “cheap” as 56%-held Ecopro BM Co Ltd (247540 KS) pops 48% since its IPO, and now is now worth 115% of its market cap.

• Plus other events, CCASS movements and upcoming key dates for M&A transactions.

(This insight covers specific insights & comments involving Stubs, Pairs, Arbitrage, share Classification and Events – or SPACE – in the past week

Navitas Ltd (NVT AU) (Mkt Cap: $1.4bn; Liquidity: $4mn)

After 6 months of haggling and due diligence, debt negotiation, and structuring, global education company Navitas has now signed a Scheme Implementation Deed with a consortium led by Australian Private Equity firm BGH Capital consortium, which includes Navitas Founder Rod Jones (also the largest holder at 13%) and AustralianSuper. The Scheme Price of A$5.825 is a 6% uplift from the original A$5.50 offered in the preliminary, indicative, non-binding offer announced on 10 October 2018 and a 34% premium to the undisturbed price of 9 October 2018 of A$4.35/share.

• At an equity valuation of A$2.1bn, this is being done at a TTM EV/EBITDA of ~15.5x (and probably around 0.8 turns less for FY19 forecast, which is healthy, but the company spins off prodigious cashflow, which makes it doable for private equity with leverage. 
• Given the lack of any real news or rumour of competing offer in the last five months, or in the period since the lockup, Travis Lundy doesn’t think it likely we will see one. Because he thinks this deal has very few hurdles, expect it to trade tight.

(link to Travis’ insight: Navitas Gets An Agreed Deal with BGH)

Harbin Electric Co Ltd H (1133 HK) (Mkt Cap: $898mn; Liquidity: $4mn)

Harbin Electric’s (“HE”) composite doc for its merger by absorption has been dispatched. HE’s major shareholder Harbin Electric Corporation, an SOE, is seeking to delist the company by way of a merger by absorption at HK$4.56/share, an 82.4% premium to last close. The offer has been declared final and the IFA considers the offer fair & reasonable. The significant offer premium to last close, the material drop in FY18 profit, and the lack of possibility of a competitive bidder emerging suggests this Offer falls over the line.

• Seeing it blocked at the H-share meeting is a risk, although no single shareholder has the requisite stake to block the deal. The tendering acceptance condition in this two-step hybrid Offer of 90% of H shares out, has been seen in prior PRC-incorporated takeovers.

• However, I still consider a “fair” price to be something like the distribution of net cash (~$3.48/share by my calcs) to zero then taking over the company on a PER with respect to peers. Dissension rights are available, although I am not aware of any precedents from discussions with both the PRC and HK tribunals, nor the calculation methodology of a “fair price” under such a dissension, nor the timing of payment.

• Trading at a wide gross/annualised spread of 8.3%/54.5%, implying a >80% chance of completion. The current downside should this break is 45%. Not an attractive risk/reward.

(link to my insight: Harbin Electric’s Offer: One For The Brave)

Yungtay Engineering (1507 TT) (Mkt Cap: $793mn; Liquidity: $1mn)

On March 6th, a day before Hitachi Ltd (6501 JP)‘s Tender Offer for a minimum of just over a third of Yungtay was expected to close, the closing date was extended to 22 April, as Taiwan regulators (MEIC and FTC) had not signed off. The proposed purchase price was unchanged at NT$60. 

• An EGM called by independent director Chen – who has been against the deal – was expected to take place on the 18 April. It was not clear the underlying purpose of the EGM other than to change the directors in place and gain management rights for the Baojia Group and Hsu Tso-Ming. Perhaps IF the board were to be renewed with less support for Hitachi, then the board could change its support/opinion and that might affect retail investor support for the deal. Retail tends to vote with management. In any event Hitachi filed an injunction to stop the EGM.
• IF Hitachi is unlikely to get the required number of shares, then it could easily be the case that they lose board and management control. If they do get the support, they will effectively control the board and management for the foreseeable future.
• Travis’ expectation was that this deal was still “Safe” and would get done, most likely at NT$60 but with the option of a “kiss” to NT$63 or so in the case of more public awareness and castigation of Hitachi and the board for ignoring competing indications at higher prices.
• Helpfully, after the close on Friday, Hitachi gave it a kiss, raising the Tender Offer price to NT$65/share.
• Travis has opinions on what to do here. Read the insights.

(link to Travis’ insights:
Yungtay Tummy Rumblings Continue But Not Clear To What Avail
Hitachi Bumps Yungtay Bid to NT$65. Take It.

Kosaido Co Ltd (7868 JP) (Mkt Cap: $165mn; Liquidity: $2mn)

On the 8th of March, Bain Capital raised the Tender Offer Price by 14.8% to ¥700/share and extended the Tender Offer by almost two weeks to the 25th of March. It also lowered the amount which needs to be bought to 50.1% from 66.67%. So, on the 21 March, Murakami-san launched a Tender Offer of his own. 

• Murakami-affiliated entities Minami Aoyama Fudosan KK and Reno KK’s Tender Offer at ¥750/share is to buy a minimum of 9,100,900 shares and a maximum of all remaining shares. The entities currently own 3,355,900 shares (13.47%). That minimum should be easier than buying a minimum of 12,456,800 shares at ¥700/share under Bain Capital’s offer.
• There is a theoretical possibility that Japanese retail investors decide to tender their shares into Bain’s bid because it is supported by management rather than sell to a higher bid which is not. Travis doubted it will go this way but stranger things have happened. Bain should be willing to walk.
• After Travis wrote the first two insights listed below with the content above, the stock soared 16.5% on Friday and ended at a 14.5% premium to the Murakami tender of ¥750/share (i.e. closed at ¥859/share). The company maintained its support for the Bain Capital bid at ¥700/share, but withdrew its recommendation that investors tender into it. The company did not yet offer a real opinion on Murakami-san’s offer. That must come in the next 9 business days.
• Travis has opinions on what to do here. Read the insights below.

link to Travis’ insight:
Murakami-San Goes Hostile on Kosaido (7868 JP), Overbids Bain’s “Final” Offer.
Kosaido (7868 JP) – Reno Goes Bigger But TOB Price (This Time) Is Final So What Next?
Kosaido (7868 JP) Reaches Value You Can Sell

Villa World Ltd (VLW AU) (Mkt Cap: $200mn; Liquidity: $1mn)

Australian property developer, Villa World Ltd (VLW AU) announced that it had received an unsolicited proposal, by way of a scheme, from AVID Property Group Australia at an offer price A$2.23, or a 12% premium to last close. AVID’s indicative offer translates to an LTM PER and P/B of 6.4x and 0.9x, with the P/B metric roughly in line peers.

• During 2018, VLW’s share price declined by 36% to A$1.76 from A$2.77, with a large chunk of that downward move occurring in December after VLW withdrew its FY19E earnings guidance. That forecast withdrawal was exacerbated by the fact VLW had maintained the 2019 forward guidance at its mid-November AGM.
• Ho Bee Land Ltd (HOBEE SP), VLW’s largest shareholder and JV partner, responded to AVID’s proposal by buying 2.2mn shares (~1.8% of shares out) at an average of A$1.95/share – and a high of A$2.18/share – lifting its stake to 9.41%. VLW has also recently bought back and cancelled 1.76mn shares or ~1.4% of shares out. The highest price paid was $2.09.
• AVID’s offer looks opportunistic and it’s doubtful VLW will want to engage. VLW is trading below its book, paying out one of the highest yields among its peers, and with ~21% of the share register potentially defending their position- the largest shareholder actively buying – there’s likely upside from here. Shares closed Friday at $2.24.

(link to my insight: Ho Bee Ups Stake In Villa World After AVID Lobs An Offer)

Aveo Group (AOG AU) (Mkt Cap: $806mn; Liquidity: $3mn)

Aveo announced in early February a number of indicative non-binding bids were received for a “whole of company transaction” with the AFR reporting (paywalled) that Lone Star had joined the bidding. Other interested parties are believed to include Blackstone and Cerberus Capital. Aveo’s share price is up ~11% since announcing the receipt of the indicative bids – and closing at $1.97 on Friday – having drifted down from a (recent) closing peak of $2.14 earlier this month.

• Aveo is currently trading at an attractive 0.52x P/B vs. 1.8x for its peer group, with the next closest peer valuation at 0.7x P/B. An offer of >0.7x, a level last traded as recently as June 2018, appears reasonable with ~92% of assets in investment property. 

(link to my insight: Aveo: Take Advantage of the Lull To Take a Second Crack)

Descente Ltd (8114 JP) (Mkt Cap: $1.7bn; Liquidity: $7mn)

The partial offer has successfully closed, with no major surprise in the expected pro-ration and the back end traded higher than one’s purchase price – not down. Some of this may be due to lack of stock borrow, and conversely, some of the strength may be due to those who had shorted their borrow buying back their short.

• That left us with a question – do we want to own a residual here? Or instantiate a new position? The current post-tender price was 35.7% higher than the undisturbed price.
• Travis could not recommend an outright buy on fundamental reasons. He thinks the Itochu story is reasonably compelling, or will be, but the lack of near-term observable fundamental turnaround may disappoint some. There may not be a lot of IR or analyst coverage of the situation either. For that, if you have a residual trade, he would sell it here. 
• This is not a short recommendation. This is a “It was a good arb trade and now the arb trade is over so don’t become a long-term investor just because it is doing better than you thought.”

(link to Travis’ insight: Descente Tamed, Itochu Delicacy Required And Investors Can Probably Wait)

CATL (A) (300750 CH) (Mkt Cap: $28.5bn; Liquidity: $95mn)

CATL which grabbed Panasonic Corp (6752 JP)’s leading position in the battery supplier industry last year now seems to be grabbing the latter’s key customer as well. The news circulating states that CATL could power Tesla Motors (TSLA US)’s Model 3 cars which Tesla is planning to start assembling at Tesla’s new factory near Shanghai.

• However, the news lacks credibility as neither company has commented on the matter, while Tesla has already agreed with Tianjin Lishen to supply batteries for its Chinese Plant.
• But if true, Tesla would be the key one to benefit, while CATL could be taking up a considerable share of risk in terms of stable future orders.

(link to LightStream Research‘s insight: CATL Could Be Tesla’s New Battery Supplier- Panasonic in Trouble?)

Ophir Energy (OPHR LN) (Mkt Cap: $525mn; Liquidity: $7mn)

The boards of Medco Energi Internasional T (MEDC IJ) and Ophir have agreed to increase the Offer price to £0.575 from £0.55, representing a 73.2% premium to the undisturbed price. All other details of the scheme remain unchanged. The court meeting is to take place on the 25 March, while the long stop is the 20 June – unless both companies agree to an extension.

• Subsequent to the bump, Coro Energy PLC (CORO LN), which had previously submitted a non-binding cash/scrip reverse takeover offer, declared it has no intention to bid. Sand Grove has also announced it has given an irrevocable undertaking to vote its 18.73% in favour of the scheme. Coro held discussions with Sand Grove before abandoning its bid.
• Petrus, which previously estimated a £0.64 – £1.42/share range  – just for Ophir’s SEA investments, has yet to respond to the Offer increase; but it’s wholly doubtful their position has altered. Shortly before the bump, it said it would vote its 3.95% stake against the scheme.
• While I consider the offer for Ophir sub-optimal – and shares have closed above terms on 30% of the trading days since Medco’s initial offer – Petrus alone cannot disrupt the vote. Medco’s Offer is conditional on 75%+ approval from Ophir’s shareholders, which appears less tenuous following the 4.5% bump and Sand Grove’s irrevocable undertaking. Shares closed at £0.569 on Friday.

(link to my insight: Medco’s Bump For Ophir Won’t Sway Petrus)

Ceva Logistics AG (CEVA SW) (Mkt Cap: $1.7bn; Liquidity: $5mn)

CMA CGM SA (144898Z FP) has 89.47% of CEVA and will now move to squeeze out and delist. The additional tender period will run from 20 March to 2 April. CEVA’s board of directors have reversed their earlier opinion and recommend shareholders to tender. 

• If delisting occurs, it is expected concurrently occur with a squeeze-out, which would be expected to take place in the third quarter of 2019 once all stock exchange and other legal conditions are fulfilled.
• Depending on the final tendered %, the squeeze-out will occur via the simpler market squeeze-out process if CMA gets 98%+; or the more complex off-market merger/squeeze out route if the % tendered is between 90%-98%.

(link to my insight: CEVA Logistics: Okay, Now You Can Tender)

Ecopro Co Ltd (086520 KS)/Ecopro BM Co Ltd (247540 KS)

Ecopro BM is up 48% since its IPO on March 5th. Ecopro, which holds 56% in Ecopro BN is up just 1%. That stake is now worth 115% of its market cap.

• The stub assets primarily comprise a 100% stake in Ecopro Innovation, which is involved in the processing of lithium for lithium ion batteries. Innovation’s net profit increased to ₩26.3bn in the 1Q-3Q18 from ₩10.4bn in 2017. Innovation’s book value also increased to ₩35.3bn at the end of 3Q18 from ₩7.4bn at end of 2017. 
• Douglas Kim recommended going long Ecopro Co and shorting Ecopro BM. Plugging in his numbers, I back out a discount to NAV of 55%. Both legs are pretty liquid.

(link to Douglas’ insight: Korean Stubs Spotlight: A Pair Trade Between Ecopro Co and Ecopro BM)

Amorepacific Group (002790 KS)/Amorepacific Corp (090430 KS)

Curtis Lehnert closes this set-up trade as levels have reverted to the average. Both companies recently reported so-so results, suggesting the core business continues to face declining revenue from “roadshop” brands aimed at the lower-end of the market.

• More surprising was the stock buyback announced at both companies 20 days after the earnings announcement, which spurred a 15% rally in the Group’s share price while Corp rallied nearly 11%. The buyback announcement seems to have caught the market by surprise and also caused the stub to revert to its 6-month average level of ~16% discount to NAV.
• The pair trade made 2.84% ex-costs in two months.

(link to Curtis’ insight: TRADE IDEA – Amorepacific Stub (002790 KS): Buyback Helped, Close the Trade)

Hyosung Corporation (004800 KS)/Hyosung TNC Co Ltd (298020 KS)

Douglas recommended closing the Hyosung unwind trade, which has returned ~8.2% before comms and borrowing cos. 

• The reason for Hyosung TNC’s recent move upwards? Right place, right time it would seem, as its trading value substantially increased, touching  ₩8.9bn on the 19 March, the highest level this year, and the highest level since August 22nd, 2018.

(link to Douglas’ insight: Korean Stubs Spotlight: Close Out the Pair Trade Between Hyosung TNC & Hyosung Corp)

Linkbal Inc (6046 JP)(Mkt Cap: $4.2bn; Liquidity: $5mn)

On November 13th last year, Linkbal announced it was looking to move from MOTHERS to the TSE First Section. The stock rallied. Then it fell a lot. On March 5th, the company announced a forthcoming tachiaigai bunbai offering designed to increase the float. This would get it most of the way towards meeting the requirements, but likely not all the way.

• An inclusion is still months off. And there would likely be another sale to increase shareholder count by 800-1000 before then, whether in the form of a Public Offering/Uridashi or in the form of another tachiaigai bunbai.
• The company’s market cap is not large enough to warrant analyst coverage, and float will remain relatively small. I expect the stock to get re-evaluated by small-cap managers. There are some. There probably should be more.
• Travis recommended investors buy the stock – which traded over 2% of shares outstanding at -2% in the first five minutes, and 3% of outstanding in the first 20 minutes, before rising to close +13.6% on Wednesday. The stock fell 6% on Friday.

(link to Travis’ insight: Linkbal (6046 JP) SmallCap Growth Stock: Offering This Morning, TOPIX Inclusion Late Summer 2019?)

• Hopewell Holdings (54 HK)‘s “Egregiously Bad” scheme has passed with 96.27% of disinterested shareholders approving the resolution. Shares will now be suspended at the close of trading on the 17 April. Cheques are expected to be dispatched on the 14 April. Seems like I’m not the only one as David Webb was also unimpressed with the Offer.

• Xenith Ip (XIP AU) has surprisingly concluded IPH’s proposal is not superior to the offer by Qantm Intellectual Property (QIP AU). Also the ACCC will not oppose the Qantm/ Xenith merger. Separately, IPH Ltd (IPH AU) encourages XIP shareholders to vote against the QANTM merger, stating its offer is superior in value.

• After Eclipx (ECX AU) announced a 42.4% decline in NPATA in the first five months vs. FY18, and other significant issues in the Right2Drive and Grays divisions, Mcmillan Shakespeare (MMS AU) said it did “not believe it will be possible to complete the proposed scheme“. Eclipx closed down 60% on the week.

• Brookfield has received FIRB approval in its tilt for Healthscope Ltd (HSO AU). The AFR is reporting (paywalled) that BGH is now out of the running for Healthscope. Which leaves Brookfield’s twin bids ($2.50 via a scheme or $2.40 via an off-market takeover) as the expected winner.  Norges Bank announced it now holds 5.08%.

• Kian Joo Can Factory (KJC MK)‘s offer is now unconditional.

• China Power New Energy Development Co (735 HK) is suspended pending an announcement pursuant to he takeovers Code.
• Larsen & Toubro (LT IN) launched India’s first ever hostile takeover in the tech sector, to acquire a 20.3-66.3% stake in Mindtree Ltd (MTCL IN)through a three-step transaction – 20.3% from Mindtree’s largest shareholder, V G Siddhartha, 15% from the open market, and an open offer for 31%. All purchases up to Rs980/share, a 4% premium to the undisturbed price. (link to Arun George ‘s insight: Mindtree (MTCL IN): L&T’s Hostile Takeover Offer Is an Awkward Opening Gambit)

My ongoing series flags large moves (~10%) in CCASS holdings over the past week or so, moves which are often outside normal market transactions.  These may be indicative of share pledges.  Or potential takeovers. Or simply help understand volume swings. 

Often these moves can easily be explained – the placement of new shares, rights issue, movements subsequent to a takeover, amongst others. For those mentioned below, I could not find an obvious reason for the CCASS move.   

2. ECM Weekly (23 March 2019) – ESR, Sun Car, Ruhnn, CanSino, Frontage, Wuxi Bio, WiseTech,

Aequitas Research puts out a weekly update on the deals that have been covered by Smartkarma Insight Providers recently, along with updates for upcoming IPOs.

Accuracy Rate:

Our overall accuracy rate is 72.3% for IPOs and 64.3% for Placements 

(Performance measurement criteria is explained at the end of the note)

New IPO filings

• Yunji (the U.S, ~US$200m)
• 360 LuDaShi (Hong Kong, potentially >US$100m)
• CMGE Tech (Hong Kong, re-filed)
• Mulsanne Group – FKA Alpha Smart – AKA GXG (Hong Kong, re-filed)
• Xinyi Energy (Hong Kong, re-filed)

Below is a snippet of our IPO tool showing upcoming events for the next week. The IPO tool is designed to provide readers with timely information on all IPO related events (Book open/closing, listing, initiation, lock-up expiry, etc) for all the deals that we have worked on. You can access the tool here or through the tools menu.

News on Upcoming IPOs

• Chinese AI start-up Megvii mulls IPO in either Hong Kong or New York to raise  US$800m
• Lendlease planning to raise up to US$500m with retail Reit listing on SGX
• Indonesia’s Lion Air Starts Work on $1 Billion IPO
• Chinese Tower Operator Guodong Is Said to Plan Hong Kong IPO
• Feihe International ‘revisits plan for Hong Kong IPO’
• Solar co Xinyi Energy revives Hong Kong IPO plan

This week Analysis on Upcoming IPO

• Ruhnn (如涵) Pre-IPO Review- Significant Concentration Risk
• Frontage Holding (方达控股) IPO: Updates from 2018 Numbers
• Sun Car Insurance Agency (盛世大联) IPO: Over Valued Vs P&C Companies
• ESR Cayman Pre-IPO – Earnings and Segment Analysis
• CanSino Biologics (康希诺) IPO: Valuation Attractive, Lilly Asia Doubling Up (Part 4)
• PagerDuty IPO Preview

3. Micron: Things Are Bad, and Getting Worse!

Today’s Micron earnings call underscored how difficult the memory business is getting, and the company’s guidance indicated that this is only the start of it.  Revenues for 2FQ19 were down 26% Q/Q at $5.8 billion, and the company projects 3QF19 revenues to fall to $4.8 billion.

4. CATL Could Be Tesla’s New Battery Supplier- Panasonic in Trouble?

The news released on the 11^th of March, about Tesla Motors (TSLA US) choosing CATL (A) (300750 CH) as battery supplier has focused much attention on the two companies and other battery suppliers. CATL which grabbed Panasonic Corp (6752 JP)’s leading position in the industry last year now seems to be grabbing the latter’s key customer as well. The news circulating states that, CATL could power Tesla’s Model 3 cars which Tesla is planning to start assembling at Tesla’s new factory near Shanghai. Following the release of this supposed deal, the stocks of the two companies moved positively, with CATL surging by almost 6.7% while Tesla rose by almost 2.4% during the day.  However, both parties have not commented on this news yet or made any formal announcement regarding such a potential deal. In our Insight, Tesla Drifting Away Could Leave Panasonic Struggling to Gain Traction in China, we mentioned that Tesla was looking to locally source its batteries in China and that CATL could potentially be one such supplier. However, in January this year, it was reported that Tesla had signed a preliminary agreement with China’s Tianjin Lishen to supply batteries for its new Shanghai car factory, making the current news look less believable. Although it seems like the ongoing news about a Tesla-CATL pair up lacks integrity, with CATL sort of denying its intend to work with Tesla (according to an updated news release), the news does look interesting and its effect upon the related companies seems noteworthy.

5. Tencent (700 HK): The Worst Part Online Game Recovered in Q4 Before Restarting License Approval

• The worst business, online game, recovered in 4Q2018, because small competitors died.
• The growth rate of game broadcast also bounced up in 4Q2018, as an important competitor Panda TV went bankrupt.
• In fact, games are only a small part of Tencent and other businesses have been growing strongly.
• The re-organization in October 2018 controlled expenses well.
• The 5-year P/E band suggests that Tencent’s stock price has upside of 26%.

In this briefing:

1. Semiconductors Are Breaking Out — Add Exposure/Overweight
2. Up Fintech (Tiger Brokers) IPO Trading Update – First Day Volume Was Higher than Futu, Close to QTT
3. Mercari (4385) A Great Business but over Priced
4. Tencent Music: A Case of Failing to Live up to Hyped Expectations
5. TRADE IDEA – Amorepacific Stub (002790 KS): Buyback Helped, Close the Trade

1. Semiconductors Are Breaking Out — Add Exposure/Overweight

Relative strength for the PHLX Semiconductor index began a bottoming process in November of 2018. In mid-December. Since then we have expanded our recommendations substantially and upgraded Technology to overweight in late-January. Despite four months of outperformance, we believe the move for semis is just beginning. In today’s report we highlight our favorite technical setups, including: AMAT, MRVL, AMBA, STM, ON, MU, NVDA, SWKS, MCHP, TXN, AVGO, LRCX, NXPI, ASML, TER, MKSI, ICHR, ACLS, and TSEM.

2. Up Fintech (Tiger Brokers) IPO Trading Update – First Day Volume Was Higher than Futu, Close to QTT

Up Fintech (TIGR US)‘s IPO was priced at US$8/share, above its range of US$5-7/ADS raising at total of US$111m, including the proceeds from the private placement with Interactive Brokers Group, Inc (IBKR US). 

In my earlier insights, I looked at the company’s background,  past financial performance, scored the deal on our IPO framework and compared it to Futu Holdings Ltd (FHL US): 

• Futu Holdings IPO Quick Note – Comparison with Tiger Brokers – Same Market, Different Economics
• Up Fintech (Tiger Brokers) Pre-IPO Quick Note – Much Too Reliant on IBKR
• Up Fintech (Tiger Brokers) IPO Quick Take – It’s Not like Futu, Won’t Perform like It Either

In this insight, I will re-visit some of the deal dynamics, comment on share price drivers and provide a table with implied valuations.

3. Mercari (4385) A Great Business but over Priced

Established in 2013, this has been a huge success story in Japan. The company operates the largest C to C mobile app that allows customers to trade in second hand goods with each other. Growth has been phenomenal. In the year to 6/15, Mercari had revenue of Y4.2bn, three years later (6/18) this had risen to Y35.7bn. This growth carries on, first half revenue this year to December 2018 rose 45% to Y23.7bn. It has begun an operation in the US, currently loss making, and has just introduced “Merpay”, a prepaid card incorporated into one’s mobile phone along the lines of Suica that allows users to purchase goods and pay bills. Funds can be deposited following a sale on Mercari’s site or transferred from a bank. Revenue will probably continue to grow at a rapid pace and whilst there are some that will jump on board, it is impossible to come up with any sensible valuation that can really justify a purchase here. There is no p.e.r. and the company will be loss making for the next couple of years. Its market cap of Y440bn means that it is trading on perhaps 6x 6/20 sales. On top of this, there are risks with regards to the viability of its US operation. Management appear to be aware to this and have set certain time limits for a turn around. There are many BUYS out on this name, thematically it has much going for it, but the valuation leaves us cold.

4. Tencent Music: A Case of Failing to Live up to Hyped Expectations

• One word to describe Tencent Music Entertainment’s (TME US) first conference call post IPO is uninspiring.
• Management does not provide concrete 2019/1Q19 guidance, but hints margin pressures persist largely due to investments in music contents.
• We expect that consensus still has to revise down TME’s 2019-20E net profits forecast by 17-26%.
• On our earnings forecast, TME unattractively trades at 46.3x/37x 2019-20E PE, a whopping 48-52% premium to peers average.

5. TRADE IDEA – Amorepacific Stub (002790 KS): Buyback Helped, Close the Trade

In my original insight on January 15, 2019 TRADE IDEA: Amorepacific (002790 KS) Stub: A Beautiful Opportunity, I proposed setting up a stub trade to profit from the mis-priced stub business of Amorepacific that was trading at its widest discount to NAV in at least three years. During the 65 calendar days that followed, Amorepacific Group (002790 KS) has gained 7.3% and the outperformed Amorepacific Corp (090430 KS) by 2.84%. The trade has reverted to average levels in a period of about two months and in this insight I will outline why I think the trade is over.

In this insight I will discuss:

• Performance of ALL my recommended stub trades
• a post-trade analysis on the Amorepacific stub

In this briefing:

1. Nexon to Increase Focus on Mobile Gaming Amidst Talks of Possible Sale of the Company
2. Nexon Controlling Stake Sale: Tax Situation Assessment & Tender Implications
3. Last Week in Event SPACE: Nissan, Naspers, Lynas, Xenith, Versum, Scout24, PCCW
4. Japan Mobile: MVNO Data for Q3 Includes Slowest Growth Since 2014 but that Makes Sense for Rakuten
5. Scout24 Tender Offer Launched: Price Still Not Quite Full

1. Nexon to Increase Focus on Mobile Gaming Amidst Talks of Possible Sale of the Company

• The global gaming market is transitioning towards mobile gaming, which currently captures around 50% of market share. This has resulted in Korean gaming company Nexon slowly shifting its focus towards mobile games.
• Over the year’s Nexon’s mobile gaming segment has grown faster than the PC online segment. When looking at the five-year revenue CAGR between the two business segments, the PC online segment has grown at a CAGR of 9.4% over FY2013-18 while the mobile games segment has grown at a double digit CAGR of 14.1% over the same period.
• For the mobile gaming segment, in the future, Nexon’s primary focus includes developing mobile games based on IPs of older PC games.
• The company has a steady line up of mobile games planned for FY2019, with ten titles set to release in the first half.
• On our estimates, Nexon seems over-valued, currently trading at a FY1 EV/OP of 9.6x compared to its five-year historical median of 7.7x.

2. Nexon Controlling Stake Sale: Tax Situation Assessment & Tender Implications

This post looks at the tax situations that Nexon’s Kim may be facing for each of the two options and the signals that he may be sending with regard to his decision. Also, this post discusses how each option may impact on mandatory tender offer which is a crucial point for current massive short buildup on Nexon Japan shares.

3. Last Week in Event SPACE: Nissan, Naspers, Lynas, Xenith, Versum, Scout24, PCCW

Last Week in Event SPACE …

• The fog lifts, slowly, on Nissan Motor (7201 JP), but merger talks will have to wait until the company gets its governance in order, and a full-on merger seems remote at best.
• The value enhancement to Naspers Ltd (NPN SJ) from spinning off and separately listing its stake in Tencent Holdings (700 HK) is not apparent.
• Trading around its “undisturbed” levels, Lynas Corp Ltd (LYC AU) looks like a short after rejecting Wesfarmers Ltd (WES AU)‘s left-field unsolicited proposal.
• The gloves are off as Merck KGaA (MRK GR) announced an unsolicited $48/share cash tender offer for Versum Materials (VSM US). 
• With the ACCC’s blessing, now is a good time for Xenith Ip (XIP AU) to jettison Qantm Intellectual Property (QIP AU) and engage with IPH Ltd (IPH AU).
• While the deal for Scout24 AG (G24 GR) is likely to get up, someone else coming over the top at this late stage is not impossible.
• PCCW Ltd (8 HK) is “cheap” relative to HKT Ltd (6823 HK) – a catalyst to narrow the discount would be helpful.

• Plus other events, CCASS movements and upcoming key dates for M&A transactions.

(This insight covers specific insights & comments involving Stubs, Pairs, Arbitrage, share Classification and Events – or SPACE – in the past week)

Nissan Motor (7201 JP) (Mkt Cap: $32bn; Liquidity: $98mn)

Both Mio Kato, CFA and Travis Lundy tackled a report in the FT suggesting that Renault “aims to restart merger talks with Nissan within 12 months” and the long-awaited release of Nissan’s Special Committee for Improving Governance (SCIG) report.

• Governance weakness under Ghosn was inexcusably bad. Worse than previously reported. Ghosn unilaterally decided the compensation of directors, top management and himself, while Kelly held broad sway over essentially everyone else, acting as a gatekeeper even against auditors and the accounting department. And it appears that there is zero understanding at Renault that Renault itself is not blameless for bad governance at Nissan over the years. The SCIG recommendations to the board now are, on the whole, pretty decent.
• If France and Renault “push” for a merger, Nissan will continue to push back for the foreseeable future. As the governance report shows, the house is nowhere near being in order. All that has happened is that the steps which need to take place for it to be put in order have been identified.
  
• Where Mio and Travis diverge – click to both insights below – is that Mio thinks a breakup of the alliance is more likely than a merger near term, especially if Paris continues to ignore Nissan’s priorities and constantly push for a merger ASAP.  He does not feel scale is quite as necessary as people seem to assume, as long as you have access to a strong supply chain.
• Travis thinks an outright merger is also unlikely, as the trust is not there, but is a big fan of the existing single platform design to lower costs and reduce parts count. There would be no need to replicate the R&D for parts and platforms across multiple marks, so he thinks the production alliance stays in place even if the capital alliance does not move further.

Links to:
Mio’s insight: Nissan: Atrocious Governance Should Be Rectified Before Even Thinking of a Merger.
Travis’ insight: Nissan Governance Structure Report Out: Fog Dissipating Slowly. Sunny in Summer. Storms Next Winter?

Samsung Electronics (005930 KS) (Mkt Cap: $265bn; Liquidity: $464mn)

Sanghyun Park concluded the market had misinterpreted Amazon’s server DRAM demand cut in 4Q18. It wasn’t a sign of falling demand nor is there any convincing sign of server DRAM demand drop-off. It’s more a technical issue and by the time SamE gets the optimization issues right, server DRAM demand of Amazon and Google will return, stabilising DRAM prices.

• And that demand may come sooner, potentially by the end of 2Q. This will lead to a ₩4tn quarterly addition to the current street consensus, which backs out a current PER of ~9x.
• SamE is up since Micron announced it plans to reduce its output of DRAM and NAND by ~5% this year. From a Common-1P perspective, Sanghyun recommends going long the Common.

(link to Sanghyun’s insight: Samsung Electronics DRAM Economics: Adj. Valuation Shows Upside Potential at Current Price)

Briefly …

Aqila Ali discusses Denso Corp (6902 JP) investment in Airbiquity Inc, one of the leading companies in the connected vehicle services sector and one of the companies that has continuously developed automotive telematics technology. This proposal follows its investment in Quadric.io this year. Denso is in full swing in the development of its autonomous driving business and next-generation technologies development, and it wouldn’t be a surprise to see Denso emerge as the first mover in next-generation technologies such as AD and connectivity solutions. (link to Aqila’s insight: Denso Continues to Strengthen Its Investment CASE with Acquisitions)

Lynas Corp Ltd (LYC AU) (Mkt Cap: $1bn; Liquidity: $7mn)

Wesfarmers Ltd (WES AU) surprised the market and announced a non-binding proposal to acquire Lynas at A$2.25/share (cash) by way of a scheme.  This is a 44.7% premium to the one-day price and a 36.4% premium to the 60-day price. However, it is a 0% premium to the price at which Lynas was trading on 3 December 2018, the day before the Malaysian government imposed two pre-conditions on the rolling over of the processing licence (later in 2019), and it is a 3.2% premium to the one-year average as of 4 December 2018. Lynas rejected the proposal the next day.

• Lynas shares have, since mid-December, been trading as if there is significant risk to the renewal of their operating license in Malaysia. 

• This is a long-term bet by Wesfarmers. But seeing it through would require that Lynas shareholders decide once Malaysia has approved the renewal of their license that this business won’t be able to see better margins ahead the way there was a dream to see them a year ago.  Travis did not think that the increased buying on the dip by Greencape Pty and FIL since the Dec 4th announcement are omens of a desire to sell at A$2.25. 
• A priori, the bid by Wesfarmers does not increase the likelihood of a good outcome on the Malaysian regulatory front. And it disappears if Lynas can’t sort its problems satisfactorily. Therefore, it is not clear what value the bid brings to Lynas shares today. If neither the outcome’s probabilities nor the outcome’s price levels change, the bid should have no material impact on Lynas shares.
• At the time of his report, Travis thought this would be a short if the stock pops to the very high A$1 range or A$2.00 area. One caveat to shorting too low: if you think WES would conceivably bid quite a bit higher to enable Lynas to have a processing plant and battery plant at WES in Australia and maintain processing in Malaysia, that might be a different story.
  

(link to Travis’ insight: Wesfarmers Puts Out A Bid for Lynas)

Xenith Ip (XIP AU) (Mkt Cap: $115mn; Liquidity: $1mn)

The ACCC said will not oppose a tie in between IPH Ltd (IPH AU) and Xenith. Xenith acknowledged the ACCC decision resolves a major uncertainty, but stops short of supporting IPH’s offer as there still exist a number of concerns as detailed in its 19 March announcement.

• None of these remaining concerns raised by Xenith appear deal-breakers, and Xenith’s general pushback fails to mention the benefits of leveraging off IPH’s Asia-based presence, IPH’s superior liquidity (versus QANTM limited liquidity), together with the certainty of value under IPH’s offer via the large cash portion.
• With IPH’s 19.9% blocking stake, the QANTM/Xenith scheme is a non-starter. Xenith still should engage with IPH, whose offer provides a gross/annualised spread of 7.5%/24.5% – a decent risk/reward – assuming late July completion. The scheme meeting to decide on the QANTM Offer, scheduled for the 3 April, has now been postponed.

(link to my insight: Xenith Is Running Out Of Excuses)

China Power New Energy Development Co (735 HK) (Mkt Cap: $581mn; Liquidity: $1mn)

SOE State Power Investment Corporation (SPIC) is seeking to privatise China Power New Energy Development Co (735 HK) by way of a Scheme at $5.45/share, a 41.9% premium to last close and a 78.1% premium to the 30-day average. A scrip alternative (6 New shares for one Scheme shares) into an unlisted vehicle under SPIC is also available, but presumably just for SOE shareholders. China Three Gorges, CPNED’s largest shareholder with 27.10%, have given an irrevocable undertaking to vote for the Scheme and to elect the share alternative.

• This looks like a pretty clean, straightforward privatization. It is priced above the highest close since its listing by way of introduction on the 18 July 2017, while the excitement over the potential injection of all nuclear power assets and businesses from State Nuclear Power Technology Company has been removed after the restructuring was cancelled in July last year.
• Clarity is required as to whether China Three Gorges can vote at the court meeting. Based on the Code, it appears evident they cannot. In addition, the final dividend is expected to be added to the offer price, but again, the announcement is not explicit on this.
• The stock is currently trading at an attractive gross/annualised spread of 7.5%/25.7% conservatively assuming a late July completion, and inclusive of the final dividend. 

(link to my insight: China Power New Energy To Be Delisted After SOE Injection Abandoned)

Versum Materials (VSM US) (Mkt Cap: $5.4bn; Liquidity: $79mn)

Merck KGaA (MRK GR) has launching an unsolicited, fully financed tender offer on VSM at $48/share cash, a 52% premium to VSM’s stock price on January 25, the day before it agreed to sell itself to Entegris Inc (ENTG US)‘s in an all-stock deal.

• Conditions include a minimum acceptance threshold (a majority of shares), the rejection of ENTG’s offer, HSR/CFIUS clearance, plus the usual MACs. Merck does not rule out an increase in the Offer price.
• The shareholder vote on the VSM/ENTG is scheduled for April 26^th, 2019. The record date to vote is April 2, 2019. This means the last day to buy and participate was this past Friday.
• Merck said “the Versum board’s hasty rejection of our proposal and unwillingness to engage in discussions with us has forced us to take this proposal directly to shareholders. … Tell the Versum board to start doing its job and put your interests first.”

(link to John DeMasi‘s: Versum Materials – Merck KGaA Dials Up the Pressure and Launches Unsolicited Tender Offer (Part III))

Scout24 AG (G24 GR) (Mkt Cap: $5.6bn; Liquidity: $20mn)

A combination of Blackstone and Hellman & Friedman LLC launched an non-LBO LBO for Scout24 in mid-January at €43.50/share (€4.7bn), which was about an 8% premium to the then-current market price, which had already been juiced because of speculation starting after the FT article in late December. Scout24’s Board rejected the Offer.  The two buyers came back in mid-February with a Takeover Offer priced at €46.00/share. Both Scout24’s Management Board and Supervisory Board agreed to support the offer. The BidCo has now officially launched its Tender Offer.

• The unusual thing about this deal is that the two PE firms are looking to buy a minimum of 50% plus one share, and leave the company listed. The stock has been trading above terms since the new €46 bid. It appears the idea is that another bidder might come in over the top. Travis tends to think the occasional trading at just above €46 is due to arbitrageurs looking at this as a put option. Plus, the lack of additional noise means another bid may not be forthcoming. 
• Because Scout24 is basically a pure play inline classifieds business, it gets a decent multiple (17x 2019e EV/EBITDA). That said, it is not overwhelmingly expensive for a business which has strong network effects and significant ability to create niche marketplaces using existing technology/IP.
• Travis would see nothing wrong with selling in the market here, but as an arb, he is still a buyer at €46.01/share.

(link to Travis’ insight: Scout24 Tender Offer Launched: Price Still Not Quite Full)

Naspers Ltd (NPN SJ) / Tencent Holdings (700 HK)

Naspers announced the intended listing of its international internet assets on Euronext Amsterdam “no earlier than H2 2019“, together with a secondary, inward listing on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. The Newco spin-off will include Naspers’ holdings in listcos Tencent and Mail.Ru (MAIL LI), together with ex-South African internet assets. Naspers will maintain a 75% stake in Newco plus Takealot, Media24, and net cash.

• Newco’s discount is likely to be narrower than Naspers presently, on account of the smaller free float, and >$2.26bn of investment just from index funds. It will however, still be a Tencent holding vehicle, while Newco’s assets comprise ~94% of Nasper’s assets.
• The remaining Naspers, post-spin off could have a wider discount – or “discounts on discounts”.  It will be one layer removed from what investors are most interested in – the Tencent holding. As witnessed in other holdco restructurings, providing additional clarity on investments/holdings within a company via spin-offs does not necessarily translate to the parent company’s discount narrowing. 
• Assigning a 20-25% discount to the Newco and keeping the discount constant (optimistically) at Naspers, gives a negative ~7-13% return.  I simply don’t see the value enhancement here, while there is no change in governance and no monetisation at the parent level.

(link to my insight: StubWorld: Naspers Embeds Another Layer Into Tencent)

PCCW Ltd (8 HK) / HKT Ltd (6823 HK)

Using a Sum of the Parts analysis, Curtis Lehnert calculated the current discount to NAV to be 37%, the widest level it has been since at least 2015, and approaching the -2 standard deviation level relative to its 6 month average.

• The current dividend yield on PCCW was 6.62% vs. 5.55% for HKT. That 1% yield differential is also near the widest since HKT’s listing in 2011.
• As Curtis notes, a catalyst for re-rating is hard to find. Still, he argues that the discount has widened out so much that the statistical advantages of mean reversion are in your favor.

(link to Curtis’ insight: TRADE IDEA – PCCW (8 HK) Stub: The Li Legacy Lives On)

• Hong Kong International Construction Investment Management Group Co., (687 HK)‘s SPA has completed – you can see the movement in shares on CCASS – triggering the MGO.

  Separately – and as expected – the composite document issuance for HKCIM has been delayed until (on or before) the 18 April.

• Eclipx (ECX AU) has rallied after a market update confirming it will sell two divisions (Grays and Right2Drive) and use the proceeds to pay down corporate debt.

• Ophir Energy (OPHR LN)‘s shareholders approved Medco Energi Internasional T (MEDC IJ)‘s Offer. Completion of the Offer remains subject to the receipt of clearances from the relevant authorities in Tanzania and not losing all or substantially all of its Bualuang interests in Thailand.

• 9.12% of shares out have tendered into Delta Electronics Thai (DELTA TB)‘s Offer, bringing the Offeror’s total holding to 30.05%. 
• The Offer docs for Healthscope Ltd (HSO AU) have been pushed out to the 24 April so as to incorporate the Scheme and Takeover Documents into a single integrated booklet.

My ongoing series flags large moves (~10%) in CCASS holdings over the past week or so, moves which are often outside normal market transactions.  These may be indicative of share pledges.  Or potential takeovers. Or simply help understand volume swings. 

Often these moves can easily be explained – the placement of new shares, rights issue, movements subsequent to a takeover, amongst others. For those mentioned below, I could not find an obvious reason for the CCASS move.   

4. Japan Mobile: MVNO Data for Q3 Includes Slowest Growth Since 2014 but that Makes Sense for Rakuten

The Ministry of Industry Affairs and Communications (MIC, the regulator) released Q3 (Dec 2018) data for industry mobile virtual network operator (MVNO) subs today (29 March) characterized by continued declines in growth YoY (+15% in Q3 v 18% in Q2) and the lowest absolute net adds (+480K) since Q2 2014.  Growth for the largest consumer-focused MVNO Rakuten Inc (4755 JP) also appears to be the lowest since data has become available but that is not necessarily a sign of strength for the existing network operators as it makes sense for Rakuten to slow MVNO growth before its October real network launch.  

5. Scout24 Tender Offer Launched: Price Still Not Quite Full

In December (13 Dec after trading hours), the FT had an article noting that Germany’s leading property classifieds firm Scout24 AG (G24 GR) (also known for auto classifieds across Europe) was possibly looking to sell itself and that PE firms were lining up to bid. Silver Lake, which had bought British player ZPG (which operates property portals Zoopla and PrimeLocation) for $2.8bn in July 2018, was mentioned as a bidder. Once owned by Deutsche Telekom, control of Scout24 was sold to Blackstone and Hellman & Friedman LLC in 2013-14 (H&F spent €1.5 billion to take a 70% stake in 2013, and Blackstone bought a stake of undisclosed size in 2014), and they listed the company in 2015 with an initial market cap of €3.2 billion. The IPO was €1.16 billion and both sold down, with H&F fully exiting in a placement in 2016.

The share price had been doing well until Q3 last year when German lawmakers, anxious with skyrocketing property prices, started looking at revamping the structure of real estate transaction costs so that they were borne by sellers rather than loaded onto buyers. The shares fell.

A combination of Blackstone and Hellman & Friedman LLC launched an non-LBO LBO for Scout24 AG (G24 GR) in mid-January at €43.50/share (€4.7 billion) which was about an 8% premium to the then-current market price, which had already been juiced because of speculation starting after the FT article in late December. The company rejected the Offer saying it was too low. 

The two buyers came back in mid-February with a Takeover Offer priced at €46.00/share, 5.7% higher than January’s foray and 27% higher than the level pre-FT article; that was about 25x earnings and 28x 2019e cashflow, which is a bit lower than Silver Lake’s ZPG buy multiple. Both Scout24’s Management Board and Supervisory Board agreed to support the offer and said they believed that the transaction is in the best interest of the Company, and an Investment Agreement was signed between the three companies.

The unusual thing about this deal is that the two PE firms are looking to buy a minimum of 50% plus one share, and leave the company listed. The shares jumped to €46 and have been trading at just below to slightly through, leaving many to think that this was a setup for a strategic buyer or possibly Silver Lake to come in over the top. 

The New News

Yesterday, the BidCo officially launched its Tender Offer at €46, due to run through 9th May.

More discussion below.

In this briefing:

1. StubWorld: Naspers Embeds Another Layer Into Tencent
2. Ruhnn (如涵) IPO Review – Expensive Influence
3. Samsung Electronics Voluntary Red Flag on 1Q Earnings
4. China Mobile 4Q18 Trends Improved Slightly. It Remains Most Exposed to 5G Capex Uncertainty.
5. China Telecom Mobile Business Recovered in 4Q. Broadly in Line with Expectations

1. StubWorld: Naspers Embeds Another Layer Into Tencent

This week in StubWorld …

• There is no apparent value enhancement to Naspers Ltd (NPN SJ)‘s spinning-off and separately listing Tencent Holdings (700 HK), while there is no change in governance and no monetisation at the parent level.

Preceding my comments on Naspers are the weekly setup/unwind tables for Asia-Pacific Holdcos.

These relationships trade with a minimum liquidity threshold of US$1mn on a 90-day moving average, and a % market capitalisation threshold – the $ value of the holding/opco held, over the parent’s market capitalisation, expressed in percent – of at least 20%.

2. Ruhnn (如涵) IPO Review – Expensive Influence

Ruhnn Holding Ltd (RUHN US) is looking to raise up to US$155m in its upcoming IPO. We have previously covered the company’s fundamentals in: Ruhnn (如涵) Pre-IPO Review- Significant Concentration Risk.

In this insight, we will value the company business segments by parts, look at the deal dynamics, and run the deal through our IPO framework.

3. Samsung Electronics Voluntary Red Flag on 1Q Earnings

• SamE voluntarily red flagged its 1Q19 earnings even before 1Q ends. SamE mentioned two things: 1. Falling memory chip prices and 2. slowing demand for display panels. Given the ‘usual’ profit size of DP business, this should be all about memory chips, specifically server DRAM.
• Memory chip price falling should not be enough to explain this much 1Q profit loss. It must be that SamE has decided to reflect huge inventory losses and pay bills from Amazon and Google on the book in this first quarter. Of course, SamE wouldn’t want to talk about this explicitly.
• SamE shares aren’t reacting to this a lot right now. It is mainly because local street already heavily adjusted 1Q OP to as low as ₩6.5~7tril. This 1Q earnings shock factor must have been already reflected into the price. Even below ₩6tril level wouldn’t be taken as a huge surprise.
• SamE said last month that memory sales would be revived starting 2H this year. I think this is still a valid and crucial point. This suggests that server DRAM demand from Amazon and Google will likely be back starting 3Q19. This means SamE is confident that it can handle the server DRAM optimization issue by then.
• I’m still sticking to my previous OP forecast for FY19. It should be ₩8tril more than the current street consensus. At this, SamE Common is trading at a 8.73x PER. SamE is scheduled to deliver 1Q19 interim numbers next week on Apr 5.

4. China Mobile 4Q18 Trends Improved Slightly. It Remains Most Exposed to 5G Capex Uncertainty.

Chris Hoare downgraded China Mobile (941 HK) some time ago on rising concerns that 5G capex would be higher than expected. While China Unicom (762 HK) and China Telecom (728 HK) both laid out very modest 2019 5G capex plans, China Mobile did not.  And despite what we saw as reasonable results, earnings guidance was weak and the lack of a rising dividend payout suggests internal concerns over 5G spending.  We had seen China Mobile as a defensive stock, but recent strong performance and rising 5G worries led us to downgrade our recommendation. It remains at Reduce with a HK$75 target. 

5. China Telecom Mobile Business Recovered in 4Q. Broadly in Line with Expectations

China Telecom (728 HK), having delivered strong revenue growth but weak margins in 3Q18, delivered better 4Q numbers. Like its peers however, the business is under some pressure with ARPUs weak despite strong data growth.  We see the Chinese Telcos as vulnerable to policy demands for accelerated 5G spending. While the market may like the look of a joint roll-out of 5G with China Unicom (762 HK), that may be simplistic. Chris Hoare thinks the cost of a combined roll-out is likely to be even higher than China Mobile (941 HK). Recent price strength makes our Reduce recommendation clearer.

In this briefing:

1. Tesla: Would the Last One Off the Sinking Ship Please Turn Off the Lights?
2. Last Week in GER Research: Navitas, Mindtree, PG&E, Delta Electronics, GDS, Myob, Sigma and Ruhnn
3. Ruhnn IPO Valuation: Face Value
4. Samsung Electronics DRAM Economics: Adj. Valuation Shows Upside Potential at Current Price
5. Hitachi Bumps Yungtay Bid to NT$65. Take It.

1. Tesla: Would the Last One Off the Sinking Ship Please Turn Off the Lights?

Roughly nine months ago, as Elon Musk was bizarrely attacking one of the heroes of the Thai rescue mission, we noted in Tesla: As Musk’s Reputation Disintegrates, The Only Positive for the Stock Is Disappearing that

We think it is pertinent to identify the moment when the crowd turns… and we think it just happened.

concluding that

Our main point is that there is now significantly more risk of being long and wrong on Tesla, not just in terms of portfolio performance, but in terms of career risk. With Tesla’s rising profile and increasingly bizarre behaviour the ability to justify being long and wrong is diminishing rapidly.

Since then, the roller-coaster ride has, if anything, been even more volatile and the vehemence of both bulls and bears has not decreased.

With recent developments such as the collapse in unit volumes following the reduction of subsidies for Tesla, the departure of CFO Deepak Ahuja and the underwhelming Model Y reveal, we highlight what we believe are the most important indicators of failure amongst the deluge of bad news, below.

2. Last Week in GER Research: Navitas, Mindtree, PG&E, Delta Electronics, GDS, Myob, Sigma and Ruhnn

Below is a recap of the key Event-driven, IPO and placement research produced by the Global Equity Research team. This week we highlight Arun’s analysis on the takeover deals for Navitas Ltd (NVT AU) and Mindtree Ltd (MTCL IN) and the valuation range for Delta Electronics Thai (DELTA TB) . In addition, Arun recommends taking the Gds Holdings (Adr) (GDS US) placement while recommending the deal for MYOB Group Ltd (MYO AU) and contends investors may need to be patient for the rejected Sigma Healthcare (SIG AU) deal. Venkat looks into the bankruptcy arbitrage situation for P G & E Corp (PCG US) and contends PG&E has no equity value due to pending litigation risks. Finally, Arun initiates on the IPO of Chinese e-commerce company Ruhnn Holding Ltd (RUHN US)

Best of luck for the new week – Arun, Venkat and Rickin

3. Ruhnn IPO Valuation: Face Value

Ruhnn Holding Ltd (RUHN US) is an e-commerce platform which drives sales through KOLs (key opinion leaders), backed by Alibaba Group Holding (BABA US) which an 8.6% shareholder. It announced its IPO price range of $11.50-13.50 per ADS. At the mid-point of the IPO price range, Ruhnn will raise net proceeds of $113 million, resulting in a fully diluted market cap of $1 billion.

4. Samsung Electronics DRAM Economics: Adj. Valuation Shows Upside Potential at Current Price

• The market misinterpreted Amazon’s server DRAM demand cut in 4Q18. It wasn’t a sign of falling demand. There isn’t still any convincing sign of server DRAM falling demand. By the time SamE gets the optimization issue right, server DRAM demand of Amazon and Google will come. This will stabilize DRAM price as well. Micron’s production reduction will help it.
• There seem to be several signs that it will be over much sooner than initially feared. I expect it to be over by the end of 2Q. This will lead to a ₩4tril addition quarterly to the current street consensus. At this, current PER falls to 9x.
• SamE got up 6.5% since the Micron announcement. It still seems to have more upside potential even at the current price. Common-1P perspective, I’d wrap up my previous position Samsung Electronics Share Class Trade: Common at +2σ, Expect Reversion After AGM This Week. This paid a 3.3% return. I’d initiate a new one reversely. Common is now at -1.65σ.

5. Hitachi Bumps Yungtay Bid to NT$65. Take It.

This was the basis of the trade. Hitachi Ltd (6501 JP) has been susceptible to pressure for a bump since even before the Tender Offer was announced because of the proxy fight at last year’s board meeting for management rights. Hitachi supported the incumbent who consequently retired as chairman, but kept the continuity. The board was split 6:3. 

Since late January or early February when it became clear that board support for the deal was still split 6:3 and one of the points in a couple of the independent directors’ comments as reasons why the deal was not supported was that Hitachi’s bid at NT$60/share did not match an informal offer from Otis at $63/share, it has been clear that one way to extinguish that criticism was to bid NT$63 or higher. 

And now Hitachi has. After the close on Friday, a release from Yungtay Engineering (1507 TT) hit the mops system saying that Hitachi had amended the Public Purchase statement by raising the Purchase Price to NT$65/share. This is closer to the high end of the original valuations provided by the law firm and public accountancy firms of NT$40.27-68.31 and NT$55.15-67.83. Taiwan Hitachi Elevator released a press release carried by the ChinaTimes here.

Past coverage of this situation can be found at:
28 Oct 2018 – Going Up! Hitachi Tender for Yungtay Engineering (1507 TT)
17 Jan 2019 – Hitachi Tender for Yungtay Engineering Launches
26 Feb 2019 – Yungtay Noises Haven’t Produced a Result Yet
18 Mar 2019 – Yungtay Tummy Rumblings Continue But Not Clear To What Avail

In this briefing:

1. China Unicom Weak 4Q18 Mobile Results Offset by Strength in Fixed Line Business
2. SEC 47k Rejection Targets Base Case Support
3. Yunji IPO Preview: Balance Sheet Points to Waning Engagement
4. Micron. Things May Be Getting Worse But They Are Still Remarkably Good.
5. Pinterest IPO Preview

1. China Unicom Weak 4Q18 Mobile Results Offset by Strength in Fixed Line Business

China Unicom’s (762 HK) recent 4Q18 results were not great. The overall figures look ok due to strength in the fixed line business which offset weakness in mobile. However, they were the weakest of the three operators and the stock, which has had a strong run, now looks due for a pause. We have turned more cautious on the Chinese telcos on concerns that 5G spending could be higher than expected. Chris Hoare believes a major reason for the Chinese telcos outperforming in the past year has come from declining capex spending expectations. That trend may now start to reverse. While China Unicom has guided for only modest 5G capex in 2019 the focus will turn to 2020 where it is a much bigger issue and while we expect China Unicom to do a joint roll-out with China Telecom (728 HK) we expect the scale of the spending to be larger than an individual build. 

2. SEC 47k Rejection Targets Base Case Support

Samsung Electronics (005930 KS) met our rally target outlined in 28 January insight SEC and SK Hynix Breakouts at 70.3k. In that insight we outlined the tactical rise would give way to a pullback toward ideal pocket support that would offer a better risk to reward intermediate entry point for SEC.

Multiple rejection at that 47.2-5k barrier call for fresh lows toward preferred pocket and buy support. Only external pressures would adjust our downside bias to lower pattern support that comes in at 35k.

MACD basing support is expected to create a solid support for price on weakness. Risk lies with the MACD slipping back within the pattern range.

3. Yunji IPO Preview: Balance Sheet Points to Waning Engagement

Yunji Inc. (YJ US) is a leading membership-based social e-commerce platform in China which primarily sells merchandise through its Yunji app. Yunji is also referred to as a multi-level revenue sharing platform as the business model is based on providing incentives to members to promote products and invite new members through their social networks. Yunji is seeking to raise $200 million through a Nasdaq IPO.

4. Micron. Things May Be Getting Worse But They Are Still Remarkably Good.

On Thursday March 21’st 2019, Micron announced latest quarter (Q2FY19) revenues of $5.8 billion, at the bottom end of their forecast range and down 26% sequentially. The midrange of their forecast for the current quarter (Q3FY19) will see revenues drop another 17% sequentially to $4.8 billion, roughly equivalent to the same quarter two years ago. On the earnings call, CEO Sanjay Mehrotra stated that the company would be cutting back both DRAM and NAND production by ~5% in response to a further deterioration in the CY2019 demand outlook. Furthermore, he refused to be drawn as to whether or not the current quarter would be the downturn trough despite reiterating his belief in the widely anticipated 2H CY2019 recovery thesis.

The challenging environment notwithstanding, there were some key positives also from the earnings call. The company is taking decisive and unprecedented actions to reduce their bit supply, actions we believe will be matched by Samsung Electronics  and SK Hynix. Gross margin coming into this downturn was a historic high at 61% and NAND gross margins have remained in the high 30% range despite ASP’s falling for five of the past six quarters. Furthermore, as forecasted three months ago, Micron still expects DRAM bit shipments to increase in the current quarter.

Integrating the latest updates from company, we now model Micron revenues declining for two further quarters to reach a trough at $4.5 billion in the company’s Q4FY19. We further model net income in the trough quarter at $1 billion. Thereafter we model a return to modest, sustained growth in the following quarters. Yes, things may be getting worse for Micron but they are still remarkably good.

5. Pinterest IPO Preview

Pinterest Inc (PINS US), a leading digital media platform in the US, is getting ready for an IPO in the next several weeks. In our view, this is one of the most exciting global tech IPOs since the Elastic NV (ESTC US) IPO in October 2018. Pinterest has one of those rare combinations of strong sales growth, leading website brand awareness, loyal users network effect, and a clear path to profitability. Pinterest was most recently valued at $12.3 billion in private market valuation when it raised $150 million in 2017. 

One of the attractive features about Pinterest is the fact that it has a very loyal user base among moms in the US. According to the company,  about two thirds of its total user base are female, mostly in the US. Nearly 8 out of 10 moms (who are often the decision makers for purchasing household goods) and about half of the millennials in the US regularly use Pinterest.  

The company has a very attractive income statement. Its revenue increased 59% CAGR from 2016 to 2018 and its operating losses have been declining nicely. Operating loss as a percentage of sales declined from 62.9% in 2016 to 9.9% in 2018. 

In this briefing:

1. LYFT: Wouldn’t It Be Ironic if This Was an IPO to Rent but Not Own?
2. A Reality Check for Money Forward (3994 JP): Key Takeaways from Our Recent Visit
3. SNK Corp IPO Preview
4. TRADE IDEA – PCCW (8 HK) Stub: The Li Legacy Lives On
5. Cracking the Keyence Conundrum

1. LYFT: Wouldn’t It Be Ironic if This Was an IPO to Rent but Not Own?

Lyft Inc (LYFT US) announced an increase in its IPO price range from $62-68 to $70-72 after previous reports had indicated that the IPO became oversubscribed very early.

There has been significant coverage of the name on Smartkarma but a disappointing lack of obvious puns:

Lyft IPO: Key Takeaways from In-Depth Interviews with Drivers by Johannes Salim, CFA

Lyft IPO: Valuation Analysis (Prudent Investment or Quasi-Gambling?) and Lyft IPO Preview by Douglas Kim

Lyft IPO Preview: Maybe We’ll Just Walk? by Rickin Thakrar

LYFT Pre-IPO – Drivers and Shared Rides Hold the Key But the Numbers Are Missing by Sumeet Singh

We would highlight Johannes’ interview piece as being well worth a read to understand the driver perspective, as well as Sumeet’s piece and the comments sections for discussions of business model strengths and weaknesses.

Ultimately, this issue isn’t going to be bought for its cheapness and we would guess that it will be successful (initially) due to pent up demand and relatively strong broad stock market performance over the last few months. Below, however, we examine NY transportation data to point out what we feel are misconceptions about the overall value proposition of the ride sharing industry.

2. A Reality Check for Money Forward (3994 JP): Key Takeaways from Our Recent Visit

In our previous note, Money Forward (3994 JP): Solid Mid-Term Prospects for the Fintech Pro, but Overvalued, published July last year (2018), we suggested that Money Forward (3994 JP) (MF) was overvalued despite its strong growth profile. MF’s share price, which was at an all-time high (close to JPY6,000) around this time, fell below its IPO price (JPY3,000) in December, reinforcing our bearish view.

Since then, Money Forward’s share price has picked up (closing at JPY4,400 on 26th March 2019), on the back of strong topline guidance for FY11/19E (+55%-65% YoY growth) and “aggressive” medium-term profit targets (positive EBITDA by FY11/21E).

However, following our recent conversation with MF’s IR team, we believe that the above guidance needs to be slightly toned down.

3. SNK Corp IPO Preview

SNK Corp (950180 KS), a Japanese game company founded in 1978, is trying to complete its IPO in the Korean stock market (KOSDAQ) in April. SNK is well known its The King of Fighters game. The IPO price range is between 30,800 won and 40,400 won. The IPO base deal size ranges from $114 million to $150 million. 

This is the second time that SNK Corp is trying to complete the IPO after a failed attempt in late 2018. The company has reduced the average IPO price range by 12% this time compared to the first try in late 2018.

The bankers used four comparable companies including Webzen, NCsoft, Pearl Abyss, and Netmarble Games to value SNK Corp. Using P/B valuation method, the bankers derived an average P/B multiple of 4.1x. The bankers then took the applied equity (controlling interest) of the company and applied the P/B multiple of 4.1x to derive an implied value of the company. After applying additional 8.57% to 32.99% IPO discount, the bankers derived an IPO price range of 34,300 – 46,800 won.  

4. TRADE IDEA – PCCW (8 HK) Stub: The Li Legacy Lives On

Have you ever wondered how a company secures the Chinese lucky number “8” as their ticker in Hong Kong? I’ll explain later on, but let’s just say that being the son of Li Ka Shing helps. 

Li Ka Shing is a name that hardly needs introduction in Hong Kong and Richard Li, Li Ka Shing’s youngest son and Chairman of PCCW Ltd (8 HK), follows suit. After being born into Hong Kong’s richest family, Richard Li was educated in the US where he worked various odd jobs at McDonald’s and as a caddy at a local golf course before enrolling at Menlo College and eventually withdrawing without a degree. As fate would have it, Mr. Li went on to set up STAR TV, Asia’s satellite-delivered cable TV service, at the tender age of 24. Three years after starting STAR TV, Richard Li sold the venture, which had amassed a viewer base of 45 million people, to Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp (NWS AU) for USD 1 billion in 1993. During the same year, Mr. Li founded the Pacific Century Group and began a streak of noteworthy acquisitions. 

You may be starting to wonder what all of this has to do with a trade on PCCW Ltd (8 HK) and I don’t blame you. In the rest of this insight I will:

• finish the historical overview of the Li family and PCCW
• present my trade idea and rationale
• give a detailed overview of the business units of PCCW and the associated performance of each
• recap ALL of my stub trades on Smartkarma and the performance of each  

5. Cracking the Keyence Conundrum

Keyence Corp (6861 JP) has long been a standout within the Japanese machinery sector for its exceptional margins, with only Fanuc Corp (6954 JP) and perhaps Smc Corp (6273 JP)  really operating in the same the stratosphere. But while Fanuc has faded, with its OPM now struggling to stay over 30% and SMC has only recently peaked its head over the 30% level, Keyence has been powering ahead and is on the cusp of recording five straight years over 50% OPM.

With relatively limited disclosures to go along with such stellar performance it is understandable then that some investors are concerned that the story is too good to be true, and even the FT has written a series of articles with a slightly critical bent: 1 2 34

Having recently visited the company, we analyse below, the nature of its competitive advantages by comparing it with its most similar peer Cognex Corp (CGNX US).

In this briefing:

1. Last Week in GER Research: Lyft, Rakuten, Lynas, Yunji IPO, Xinyi IPO and Ruhnn IPO
2. Qutoutiao Offering: Funding a Costly Battle
3. QTT Placement: Liquidity Warrants a Quick Trade
4. Optex (6914 JP): Factory Automation Slowdown in the Price
5. Sumco: Well Positioned to Expand Capacity Faster than Its Competitors if Demand Picks Up

1. Last Week in GER Research: Lyft, Rakuten, Lynas, Yunji IPO, Xinyi IPO and Ruhnn IPO

Below is a recap of the key analysis produced by the Global Equity Research team. This week, we update on Lyft Inc (LYFT US) now that it is below its IPO price and remind of the potentially muted impact for strategic holder Rakuten Inc (4755 JP). On the M&A front, Arun digs into the conditional deal for Lynas Corp Ltd (LYC AU) from Wesfarmers Ltd (WES AU). With regards to IPO research, we initiate on e-commerce player Yunji Inc. (YJ US) and solar company Xinyi Energy Holdings Ltd (1671746D HK) while we update on the IPO valuation of Ruhnn Holding Ltd (RUHN US). 

In addition, we have provided an updated calendar of upcoming catalysts for EVENT driven names below. 

Best of luck for the new week – Arun, Venkat and Rickin

2. Qutoutiao Offering: Funding a Costly Battle

On Friday, Qutoutiao Inc (QTT US) unveiled plans to raise around $11 million (based on the closing price of $11.45 per ADS) through a public offering of 1.1 million ADS. Also, certain selling shareholders will offer 7.5 ADS in the offering. The public offering comes hot on the heels of the announcement of a $171.1 million convertible loan from Alibaba Group Holding (BABA US) on 28 March.

3. QTT Placement: Liquidity Warrants a Quick Trade

Qutoutiao Inc (QTT US) announced a USD 100 million share sales by the company and its shareholders, slightly more than two weeks after the lock-up expiration on March 13th.  In this insight, we will provide our quick thought on the deal. 

4. Optex (6914 JP): Factory Automation Slowdown in the Price

According to management, weak demand for factory automation sensors had a significant negative impact on sales and profits in 1Q of FY Dec-19. Also, in our estimation, it is likely to cause 1H results to fall short of guidance. But this should be in the share price, which has dropped by nearly 50% from its 52-week high. 

In the year to December 2018, operating profit was up only 2.1% on a 7.0% increase in sales, largely due to an increase in machine vision marketing expenses. In January and February 2019, factory automation orders and sales dropped abruptly as customers sought to reduce excess inventories. In March, some new orders were received for delivery in May, indicating that the situation may stabilize in 2H. Demand for security and automatic door sensors continues to grow at low single-digit rates.

For FY Dec-19 as a whole, management is guiding for a 6.2% increase in operating profit on a 7.2% increase in sales. Our forecast is for flat operating profit on a 2% increase in sales. Sales and profit growth should pick up over the following two years, in our estimation, but remain in single digits.

At ¥1,765 (Friday, March 29, closing price), Optex is selling at 18x our EPS estimate for FY Dec-19 and 17x our estimate for FY Dec-20. Over the past 5 years, the P/E has ranged from 13x to 36x. On a trailing 12-month basis, Japan Analytics calculates 5% upside to a no-growth valuation, which is in line with our forecast for this fiscal year. This suggests: buy either for the bounce or for the long term. 

5. Sumco: Well Positioned to Expand Capacity Faster than Its Competitors if Demand Picks Up

• The semiconductor silicon wafer market saw continued growth in demand for all wafer diameters supported by applications for servers, data centers, automobiles and IoT applications.
• While the demand for semiconductors, data centers and other IoT applications are declining, Sumco expects firm demand from power semiconductors, sensors and automotive uses. The management expects the demand from the 5G market also to aid in top-line growth.
• Sumco has posted an extraordinary loss following the early termination of a long-term polysilicon purchasing agreement. The long-term contract with Osaka Titanium is expected to end in March 2019. We expect this move to help Sumco switch to cheaper polysilicon which in turn should help reduce costs. That being said, some of the long-term contracts for polysilicon are still continuing, and there is still significant inventory built-up so this impact could take four to five years to be fully realised.
• Having visited the company recently, Sumco still has more potential brownfield capacity available, which we believe can be used in the event the demand picks up enabling the company to add new capacity faster than its competitors and enjoy the benefits from growing demand and increasing prices.

In this briefing:

1. BabyTree(1761.HK) FY18 Results: E-Com Further Hit by ‘integration’ with Alibaba; India Foray Timely
2. Japan Display: Deal to Raise JPY110bn from China-Taiwan Consortium and Japanese Investment Fund
3. Bilibili Offering: Unnecessary and Opportunistic
4. Bilibili Placement: Momentum Bodes Well
5. Mercari: Why Mercari Is Likely to Be a Winner in the Cashless Wars

1. BabyTree(1761.HK) FY18 Results: E-Com Further Hit by ‘integration’ with Alibaba; India Foray Timely

BabyTree (1761.HK)’s reported results for FY2018 continues to be impacted by the ‘shift in e-commerce strategy’ post collaboration with Alibaba Group Holding (BABA US) (also a key investor).  China’s leading parenting community platform that went public in November 2018 has announced a revenue decline of 4% during 2H2018; its e-commerce revenues were down 70% as its being ‘integrated’ with Alibaba. This is expected to be completed by 2Q2019. While the details of the collaboration (and revenue share, if any) are not given, Management has stated that Alibaba will manage the back-end e-commerce at a reduced cost and better efficiency while it will ‘manage’ users. Despite the fall in revenues, gross profits were up 18% helped by growth in advertisement revenues which now account for 85% of the total. Advertising as a revenue source has limited long term growth and valuation potential compared to e-commerce. The stock is up 25% since results announcement on March 27th, likely enthused by Net profit for FY2018 at Rmb526.2 mn and EPS of Rmb0.29 (implied current Year P/E of 23x). Key risk will be failure to revive e-commerce revenues post ‘integration’.

BabyTree also announced its first global foray – it has invested USD8mn in Healofy, amongst the top 3 leading parenting apps in India currently. India’s online Parenting app segment has numerous players and revenue generation/growth may not be easy in the near term for Healofy. However,  our analysis suggests that India’s overcrowded parenting app segment is now witnessing consolidation and this funding could probably help Healofy solidify its ranking amongst top 3 parenting platforms in India. In this context, BabyTree’s foray into India seems well timed. Healofy could potentially follow BabyTree’s operating model and fit into Alibaba Group Holding (BABA US) ‘s India e-commerce strategy (Refer our earlier report Alibaba’s India Game Plan – More than Meets the Eye; Investor Day Analysis (Part II) ).  

In the detailed report that follows, we briefly comment on BabyTree’s reported 2018 results and also present a quick overview of India Parenting App segment – key players, investors and why we think it may be on a consolidation mode. 

2. Japan Display: Deal to Raise JPY110bn from China-Taiwan Consortium and Japanese Investment Fund

• It was reported over the weekend that the troubled display supplier to iPhone maker Apple, Japan Display (JDI) has almost finalized a deal to raise more than JPY110bn (US$990m) from a China-Taiwan consortium and Japanese public-private fund INCJ Ltd.
• The China-Taiwan consortium is expected to secure some 50% stake in Japan Display while the top shareholder INCJ’s current stake of 25.3% is expected to be halved.
• The consortium is aiming to restructure JDI’s remaining debt payments of about JPY100bn from Apple for the construction of its plant while it also aims to procure parts for the latest iPhone. In addition, the consortium is also trying to modify a contract stipulating that Apple can seize plants if JDI’s cash and deposits fall below a certain amount.
• The consortium along with JDI is planning to build an OLED panel plant in China with JDI providing the technological know-how while the consortium partners invest in capital expenditures and equity.
• Japan Display has been struggling to navigate its display business due to the slowdown in iPhone sales, falling behind competition on OLED technology and facing stiff price competition from Chinese panel makers.
• We expect the proposed OLED plant in China could help the company stabilize its panel business with Chinese smartphone makers Huawei and Xiaomi who prefer to source panels locally from domestic panel makers such as BOE Technology and Tianma.

3. Bilibili Offering: Unnecessary and Opportunistic

On Monday, Bilibili Inc (BILI US) unveiled plans to raise around $192 million (based on the closing price of $18.95 per ADS) through a public offering of 10.6 million ADS and a concurrent offering of $300 million convertible senior notes. Also, certain selling shareholders will offer 6.5 ADS in the offering.

4. Bilibili Placement: Momentum Bodes Well

Bilibili announced a USD 300 million share placement and a USD 300 million convertible note placement after market close on Monday. This is the first major placement since Bilibili’s IPO in March 2018. In this insight, we will provide our thoughts on the deal and score the deal in our ECM Framework. 

5. Mercari: Why Mercari Is Likely to Be a Winner in the Cashless Wars

While we have been sceptical about Mercari Inc (4385 JP)‘s efforts in the US, we have always appreciated the domestic business and have only been put off by the rather demanding multiples. After speaking to the company, we continue to like the domestic business and feel that recent initiatives to broaden the user base are likely to be successful. In addition, while we still feel that there are numerous question marks about whether the business model can work in the US, we have come around to a more positive view on the company’s execution there. Lastly, we believe Merpay’s edge in the cashless wars is underappreciated and the fall in the share price is starting to make the stock attractive.

We discuss the details below.

In this briefing:

1. Nexon Sale: Nexon Japan Tender Price Estimations
2. Telecom Review (April 2019): DTAC Calls for Truce With CAT
3. Last Week in Event SPACE: Altaba, Nexon, MYOB, Panalpina, Ezion, Naspers, Melco
4. Kingboard Starts Voluntary Unconditional Offer for 88% Held Sub Kingboard Copper Foil
5. ECM Weekly (6 April 2019) – Bilibili, Huya, Qutoutiao, Polycab, PNB Metlife, CIMC Vehicle

1. Nexon Sale: Nexon Japan Tender Price Estimations

This post estimates Nexon Japan tender price. For this, I use the same approach that a local PE named “MBK Partners” would use based on EBITDA multiple and IRR on a 3 year exit. From their position, the only proven value-up path would be KOSPI moving. MBK must try to stay as conservative as possible. Whatever Netmarble value addition should be an extra when deciding on a tender price. So, I base my estimation solely based on KOSPI moving effect. For this, I use NCsoft as a sole valuation comp.

2. Telecom Review (April 2019): DTAC Calls for Truce With CAT

On April 4, we attended the DTAC shareholders’ meeting and listened to how management defended their strategic decisions in various areas such as legal settlements, marketing, and spectrum bidding. This is our take on their responses to various issue:

• Settlement with CAT. DTAC plans to do a further settlement worth Bt9.05bn nett with CAT to resolve all past bilateral issues, but will resume paying dividends in H2’19.
• Spectrum. Since they still have less spectrum than both AIS and True Move, we can’t really fault them for bidding for the 900MHz spectrum, especially since competition has come down considerably.
• Marketing. Like AIS, they are looking beyond just voice airtime. Mobile gaming is one area they will look at. DTAC’s subsidy on game-centric iPhones and the data airtime that comes with it is significantly more than both True Move and AIS.
• Others. They also managed to get a raise for the Chairman and do finishing touches on the PaySabai  (a payment platform) consolidation. In our view, these are really formalities at this phase, since PaySabai is pretty much wholly owned.

3. Last Week in Event SPACE: Altaba, Nexon, MYOB, Panalpina, Ezion, Naspers, Melco

Last Week in Event SPACE …

• Here it is. The end – the culmination of years of effort and high balance sheet usage by hedge funds. Altaba Inc (AABA US) is going out with a whimper plus a little upside.
• Reportedly plans for the sale of NHC have been abandoned with a focus on selling its Nexon Co Ltd (3659 JP)gaming unit.
• That’s a wrap, as Manikay blinks and concedes to KKR’s Offer for MYOB Group Ltd (MYO AU).
• Ezion Holdings (EZI SP) is tendered a necessary lifeboat from Yinson Holdings (YNS MK).
• We now have an agreed deal for Panalpina Welttransport Holding (PWTN SW) supported by the Ernst Göhner Foundation, the major activist shareholders, and Panalpina management.
• Naspers Ltd (NPN SJ)‘s discount to NAV narrows as it teases out more information on spinning-off and separately listing Tencent Holdings (700 HK).
• Melco International Development (200 HK) is potentially mispriced against Melco Resorts & Entertainment (MLCO US) after the release of FY18 earnings.

• Plus other events, CCASS movements and upcoming key dates for M&A transactions.

(This insight covers specific insights & comments involving Stubs, Pairs, Arbitrage, share Classification and Events – or SPACE – in the past week)

Altaba Inc (AABA US) (Mkt Cap: $42bn; Liquidity: $452mn)

Altaba will sell or distribute, in stages, its remaining net assets to shareholders, with a “pre-dissolution liquidating distribution to stockholders (in cash, Alibaba ADSs or a combination thereof), which Altaba currently expects will be made in the fourth quarter of 2019 and estimates will be in an amount between $52.12 and $59.63/share in cash and/or Alibaba ADSs (which estimates assume, among other things, an Alibaba Share price realized on sale and, if applicable, an Alibaba share value at the time of distribution, of $177.00/Alibaba share).”

• As p55 of the preliminary proxy makes clear, based on the same US$177/share assumption of value realized or distributed per Alibaba share held, the total distributed would be in a range of $76.72 and $79.72 based on some other assumptions.
• A larger portion of the remaining amount could take 12 months to arrive, and there could be other residual portions which will take longer (years), as discussed in the proxy and call transcript.
• It looks like there is upside as the stock closed at US$72.76 (at the time of the insight). But there is less than you think simply because it will take time to get out of it. And discount rates of the first portion may be low, but discount rates applied to the later payments post-delisting and post court workout for the Holdback Amount could be higher.
• Travis Lundy has opinions on what to do once you start getting into the arb risks. Do read his insight.

(link to Travis’ insight: ALTABA UNWINDING – Not Much Juice, and Considerably Different Skew)

Nexon Co Ltd (3659 JP) (Mkt Cap: $14bn; Liquidity: $50mn)

Sanghyun Park discussed Nexon sale after the FT reported bankers has stopped plans to sell the holding company NXC. The sale of NXC is probably the simplest exit path for Kim Jung-ju as it would be a more attractive tax outcome than selling Nexon Japan outright.

• But there’s a lot of other stuff in NXC that suitors don’t want to, which ideally should be sold before selling NXC. There’s also the issue of whether a tender offer would be required whether the sale of NXC or Nexon – Travis concludes an offer would be required while Sanghyun does not.

• Korean local news outlet reported that Tencent Holdings (700 HK)‘s US$6bn bond issuance may be a fund raising for a Nexon takeover. Still, South Korea would prefer keep Nexon’s ownership domestic, which may favour Kakao Games (1404796D KS) or PE outfit MBK.

(link to Sanghun’s insight: Nexon Sale: Key Questions at This Point & Most Realistic Answers)

Summit Ascent Holdings (102 HK) (Mkt Cap: $270mn; Liquidity: $1mn)

Summit Ascent announced that First Steamship (the major shareholder) and Kuo Jen Hao (chairman) are in talks to sell their entire shareholdings. No numbers were disclosed. This stake sale would not trigger an MGO and there was no reference to the release of an announcement pursuant to the Codes on Takeovers and Mergers and Share Buy-Backs in Hong Kong. Shares are up 35%.

• Summit is trading at a trailing PER of 267x. CapIQ forecasts point to a threefold increase in earnings in FY19, although I would advise caution on those numbers given the tight cluster of target prices; historically, target prices for Summit have been wide of the mark.
• First Steamship bought in at $1.06 in December 2017, around the same price when this announcement was made. Should this sale complete, this would result in the third time the shares of the major shareholder have changed hands. This looks like a great opportunity to exit.

(link to my insight: Summit Ascent’s Slippery Slope)

MYOB Group Ltd (MYO AU) (Mkt Cap: $1.4bn; Liquidity: $10mn)

On the 20th March, MYO announcing receipt of a letter from KKR saying that the A$3.40 price was their “best and final offer”, making it clear under Truth in Takeovers language that Manikay was not going to get a higher price out of them. Manikay continued to buy shares on the 20th and the 21st, getting to 16.16% of the company as filed on the 22nd.

• On Monday 1 April, MYOB announced a supplemental disclosure to the Scheme documents noting KKR’s final intention, and that the directors continued to unanimously recommend the Scheme.
• Mid-week, Manikay caved and said intends to vote all its shares for the upcoming Scheme, subject to there being no proposal that we consider to be superior prior to the vote. This is now MUCH closer to being a done deal. It will trade tight.

• Travis is a trifle surprised Manikay did not wait a little longer. They were able to increase their stake in the low A$3.30s because of the uncertainty of their intentions, and they could probably have gone close to 20% in the low 3.30s before saying “Yes.” That would have been a welcome extra profit.

(link to Travis’ insight: Manikay Caves and Accepts KKR’s Reduced (And Now Final) Offer)

Ezion Holdings (EZI SP) (Mkt Cap: $219mn; Liquidity: $2mn)

Lifeboat market play Ezion has received a bail-out from Malaysia’s Yinson Holdings (YNS MK) via a capitalisation of debt and option agreement. Ezion remains suspended.

• On the surface, this looks like a bargain for Yinson which is ostensibly taking over Ezion for US$200mn. However, Yinson said that it is still negotiating with the designated lenders of the US$916mn debt on the terms and conditions..
• Yinson’s business risks include contact risk, oil price fluctuations and the level of activities in the O&G industry. These risks do not change should the Ezion proposal complete.
• And offshore support companies face a raft of challenges: Ezra Holdings (EZRA SP) entered bankruptcy in 2017, Pacific Radiance (PACRA SP) has been voluntarily suspended since 28 Feb 2018 as it seeks a way to complete its debt restructuring; while Swiber Holdings (SWIB SP)recently announced its own US$200mn injection from Seaspan Corp. (SSW US), after the company had laboured in judicial management for the past two years.

(link to my insight: Yinson Tenders a Lifeboat for Ezion)

Kingboard Copper Foil Hldgs (KCF SP) (Mkt Cap: $320mn; Liquidity: <$100k)

For the second time in two years parent Kingboard Laminates Holdings (1888 HK) (ultimate parent being Kingboard Holdings (148 HK)) has launched an Offer to fully privatize KCF. This time at SGD 0.60/share vs SGD 0.40 two years ago.

• The last time came on the heels of a long independent review by EY which found KCF had given up profit to the parent through a series of relatively unfair interested party transaction agreements.
• At the end, the Bermudan Court of Appeals went against a Supreme Court decision which had decided that a replacement counterparty decision was prejudiced against minorities, and despite the April 2017 deal being not fair and not reasonable according to the IFA, the parent acquired ~10% (of the 28% it did not own) bringing their stake to 82.3%. A year later the parent acquired another 5.5% bringing them to almost 88%.
• Now an offer at SGD 0.60/share (compared to the Revalued NTA of SGD 0.7086/share from the IFA report (p36) of two years ago gets closer to the mark, but crucially, it is designed to squeeze out minorities with the threat of delisting. Kingboard Laminates only needs 2.05% to oblige a delisting from the SGX. As far as Travis can tell, it would require more – at least 95% of shares – to oblige a mandatory squeezeout of minorities according to Section 102-103 of Bermuda Companies Act.
• Travis thinks this one gets through.

(link to Travis’ insight: Kingboard Starts Voluntary Unconditional Offer for 88% Held Sub Kingboard Copper Foil)

Ying Li International Real Estate Ltd (YINGLI SP) (Mkt Cap: $260mn; Liquidity: truly tiny)

China Everbright (165 HK) has launched an MGO at SGD 0.14/share for the rest of Ying Li International Real Estate Ltd (YINGLI SP) after last week purchasing the 30.00% stake formerly held by the CEO, bringing its stake to 58.9%.

• The deal is at a negligible premium and is far, far below Tangible Book Value Per Share (which is almost three times the offer price). Given that the acquirer bought a large stake in the company and offered perpetual capital of almost the current market cap at a significant premium to the MGO price, Travis thinks it an unattractive offer.
• It is puzzling as to why the CEO would sell his shares at such a discount, especially when the company and Everbright co-own some of the assets.
• While the stated intention of the Offeror is to keep the stock listed, and the MGO is presented almost as “technical”, it would be enormously to Everbright’s benefit to buy as many shares as they could down at this price level. It will go from being underwater on an equity affiliate stake purchase to having a huge writeup in value if Everbright consolidates the asset post MGO.
• For that, Travis thinks there is a possibility of a bump just to make it more attractive, though the IFA report could come out with a not fair and reasonable result which shows NTA or NAV far, far higher than the Offer Price, which is not yet declared final.

(link to Travis’ insight: Everbright Mandatory Offer for Ying Li Intl Real Estate – Going Cheap)

Briefly …

In a mainly technical piece, I explained why China Three Gorges, China Power New Energy Development Co (735 HK)‘s largest shareholder with 27.1% is currently required to abstain from voting at the forthcoming court meeting, despite the misleading statement in the  announcement that China Three Gorges has given an irrevocable undertaking to vote for the Scheme. (link to my insight: China Three Gorges’ Rebuttable Presumption)

Panalpina Welttransport Holding (PWTN SW) (Mkt Cap: $4.8bn; Liquidity: $27mn)

What was once a tough deal is now an agreed deal. The deal is 2.375 shares of DSV for every share of Panalpina, which as of the previous Friday’s close had a value of CHF 195.80/share which is a 43% premium to the CHF 137/share, where Panalpina was trading the day before DSV’s first bid.

• Panalpina is getting taken out at 28.1x reported 2018 EV/EBITDA multiple (pre-IFRS 16) calculated at a CHF 195.8 price. Panalpina shareholders will own ~23% of DSV shares out if all shares are exchanged and the Ernst Göhner Foundation will be the largest shareholder at ~11%.
• 69.9% of shares have irrevocably agreed to support the Exchange Offer. The customary condition is 80% to make it go through, meaning DSV needs another 10.1% out of the 30% extant (or just over one-third).
• Travis expects there is another 10-15% held by arbitrageurs and 5-7% held by indexers already so this deal looks to me like it is done. He expects the Exchange Offer may settle as early as early-August. If it trades tight, he would get out because DSV is probably priced to a very good level. 

(link to Travis’ insight: DSV Improves Bid and Göhner Foundation and Panalpina Agree)

Lenta Ltd (LNTA LI) (Mkt Cap: $1.7bn; Liquidity: $2mn)

Reuters reported that Alexey Mordashov’s Severgroup had reached an agreement to buy a 41.9% stake, excluding treasury shares, in Lenta from those TPG and European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, for a total of US$721mm, or US$18 per share or US$3.60 per GDR. That implies a price of US$1.75bn for the whole company. This was followed by Lenta announced confirming the cash offer. The Offer Price is an 8.11% premium to the last trade on 26 March – the undisturbed price, and a premium of 9.76% to the 6mo average price of US$3.28 for the GDRs. 

• The first 41.9% are sold conditional on FAS Clearance (presumably Mordashov has cleared this transaction with “the right people”) expected in May 2019, a few easily achieved conditions, and the condition of no sanctions being in play for any of the selling or buying parties. 
• Once cleared – expected in May 2019 – this becomes a straightforward offer with no minimum acceptances meaning that investors can sell shares into the deal or decide not to do so.
• It’s not an attractive offer price, with the possibility of a bump if enough people complain.  If you want to buy and hold, this deal is a put option.

(link to Travis’ insight: Severgroup Puts in a Cheeky Bid for Lenta – TPG and EBRD Bail)

Naspers Ltd (NPN SJ) / Tencent Holdings (700 HK)

Since announcing the intended listing of its international internet assets on Euronext Amsterdam “no earlier than H2 2019” – together with a secondary, inward listing on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange – I calculate Naspers discount to NAV has narrowed to 34.4% from 37.1%, the day before the announcement, placing the current discount a shade below the 12-month average.

• The likelihood of NewCo trading at a tighter discount to where Naspers’ previously (& currently trades) is universally accepted. Naspers will benefit from that reduced discount via its 75% stake; but it is not known where Naspers’ own discount will trade after the spin-off.
• There are indications the management want to see the group discount narrow to 30%, possibly down to the 20% level, which implies a significantly lower discount for Naspers, potentially around 10%. That would seem optimistic as investors focus more on the directly-held Tencent vehicle, and the fact Naspers is a holding company, holding a stake in another holding company.
• Naspers’ discount may drift narrower on the expectation Naspers’ spin-off works its magic. Greater clarity on the option into Naspers or NewCo may provide an additional boost; but conversely, if such an option is limited, there is likely to be disappointment.

(link to my insight: StubWorld: Naspers’ Restructuring Update)

Melco International Development (200 HK) / Melco Resorts & Entertainment (MLCO US)

With Melco trading at a (then) 32% discount to NAV, Curtis Lehnert recommends a set-up trade on a dollar for dollar basis. The current level, as I write, is statistically the most attractive according to the Smartkarma Holdco Tool, sitting at -1.8 standard deviations from the 180 DMA.

• Stub assets are minimal – around 8% of GAV – if excluding gaming licenses, goodwill and trademarks. Net cash is $6.4bn or $4.27/share.
• Those stub assets are still loss-making, after deconsolidating out MLCO, to the tune of $386mn in EBITDA, but that was an improvement on (HK$682mn) figure in FY17.
• Still, Curtis thinks now is the time to enter the trade to take advantage of both the statistical and fundamental supports to the trade. 

(link to Curtis’ insight: TRADE IDEA – Melco (200 HK) Stub: Lose a Little Sleep in Macau)

For the month of March, ten new deals were discussed on Smartkarma with a cumulative deal size of US$22.3bn. This overall number includes Blackstone and Hellman & Friedman’s proposal for Scout24 AG (G24 GR) after the Tender Offer was officially launched in March. This deal was first proposed in mid-January – which was rejected by the board – and subsequently an improved offer was tabled, which was then supported.

The average premium to last close for the new deals announced in March was 18%, while the average for the first quarter of 2019 is 33%.

(link to my insight: M&A: A Round-Up of Deals in March 2019)

• Delta Electronics Thai (DELTA TB)‘s results of the CVTO have been announced.  42.85% of shares tendered, therefore the offeror held 63.78% of shares at the close of the offer. The MSCI downweight occurred at the close Thursday, however shares popped 17.5%.

• Hanergy Thin Film Power (566 HK)‘s Scheme document has been delayed until the 25 April, from the 2 April.

• The Dairy Crest (DCG LN) takeover by Saputo was approved at the Court Meeting and Scheme Meeting yesterday.

• Ap Eagers Ltd (APE AU), Automotive Holdings (AHG AU)‘s largest shareholder, has proposed an all-scrip merger offer. AHG recommends shareholders take no action at this time.

• Glow Energy Pcl (GLOW TB)‘s IFA recommends shareholders tender into Global Power Synergy Company Ltd (GPSC TB)‘s offer.

My ongoing series flags large moves (~10%) in CCASS holdings over the past week or so, moves which are often outside normal market transactions.  These may be indicative of share pledges.  Or potential takeovers. Or simply help understand volume swings. 

Often these moves can easily be explained – the placement of new shares, rights issue, movements subsequent to a takeover, amongst others. For those mentioned below, I could not find an obvious reason for the CCASS move.   

4. Kingboard Starts Voluntary Unconditional Offer for 88% Held Sub Kingboard Copper Foil

April 4th after the close, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hong Kong-listed Kingboard Laminates Holdings (1888 HK) (which itself is 70.93% owned by Kingboard Holdings (148 HK) (formerly known as “Kingboard Chemical“)) launched a VOLUNTARY UNCONDITIONAL CASH OFFER for Kingboard Copper Foil Hldgs (KCF SP). 

This is a “clean-up” as Kingboard Laminates owns 87.96% of Kingboard Copper Foil already. 

It is unconditional in all respects and the Offeror owns 87.96%. The goal is delisting. If they get 17.03% of the minority, they will be able to engineer a delisting. Squeezeout is a bit further out but is far from impossible. 

This looks like a done deal. This one should trade at shouldn’t trade at a premium UNLESS…

Quiddity’s new Quiddity Singapore M&A Guide 2019 is now published with guidelines to the relevant rules, regulations, documentation, and pointers to the Singapore M&A landscape. Watch for more in the series to be published shortly.

5. ECM Weekly (6 April 2019) – Bilibili, Huya, Qutoutiao, Polycab, PNB Metlife, CIMC Vehicle

Aequitas Research puts out a weekly update on the deals that have been covered by Smartkarma Insight Providers recently, along with updates for upcoming IPOs.

Accuracy Rate:

Our overall accuracy rate is 72.4% for IPOs and 63.5% for Placements 

(Performance measurement criteria is explained at the end of the note)

New IPO filings

• Changliao AKA 派派(Hong Kong, ~US$100m)

Below is a snippet of our IPO tool showing upcoming events for the next week. The IPO tool is designed to provide readers with timely information on all IPO related events (Book open/closing, listing, initiation, lock-up expiry, etc) for all the deals that we have worked on. You can access the tool here or through the tools menu.

News on Upcoming IPOs

• Leong Hup – comeback sunny side up
• Polycab India eyes to raise around Rs 1,345 crore through IPO
• Carlyle-backed Metropolis Healthcare’s IPO nears halfway mark on second day
• Eagle Hospitality Trust eyes Singapore IPO to raise up to US$575m
• Cancer Treatment Firm Plans Hong Kong IPO
• Goldman-Backed Chinese Online Pet Store Boqii Plans IPO
• China drone maker EHang delays IPO plan, eyes private funding-sources

This week Analysis on Upcoming IPO

• Map Aktif Follow-On Offering – Lace up for a Potential Long Run
• Zhongliang (中梁地产) Pre-IPO Review – Incredible Growth Bogged Down by Related Party Transactions
• CIMC Vehicle (中集车辆): Market Leader of Semi-Trailers but Little Growth Ahead
• PNB Metlife Pre-IPO Quick Take – Doesn’t Stack up Well Versus Its Larger Peers
• Polycab India Limited IPO – Probably Near Peak Margins, Improvements Unexplained