In this briefing:
- TRACKING TRAFFIC/Chinese Express & Logistics: Parcel Pricing Weak, Again
- Elastic: Why Is It Outperforming In Recent Tech Carnage?
- Horiba (6856 JP): Bad News Largely Discounted
- FBN Holdings: A Contrarian Call from Behind the Hydrocarbon Clouds and Shadows
1. TRACKING TRAFFIC/Chinese Express & Logistics: Parcel Pricing Weak, Again
Tracking Traffic/Chinese Express & Logistics is the hub for our research on China’s express parcels and logistics sectors. Tracking Traffic/Chinese Express & Logistics features analysis of monthly Chinese express and logistics data, notes from our conversations with industry players, and links to company and thematic notes.
This month’s issue covers the following topics:
- November express parcel pricing remained weak. Average pricing per express parcel fell by 7.8% Y/Y to just 11.06 RMB per piece. November’s average price represents a new all-time low for the industry, and November’s Y/Y decline was the steepest monthly decline in over two years (excluding Lunar New Year months, which tend to be distorted by the timing of the holiday).
- Express parcel revenue growth dipped below 15% last month. Weak per-parcel pricing pulled express sector Y/Y revenue growth down to just 14.6% in November, the worst on record (again excluding distorted Lunar New Year comparisons). Chinese e-commerce demand has slowed and we suspect ‘O2O’ initiatives, under which online purchases are fulfilled via local stores, are also undermining express demand growth.
- Intra-city pricing (ie, local delivery) remains firm relative to inter-city. Relative to weak inter-city express pricing (where ZTO Express (ZTO US) and the other listed express companies compete), pricing for local, intra-city express deliveries remained firm. In the first 11 months of 2018, express pricing rose 1.7% Y/Y versus a -2.9% decline in inter-city shipments (international pricing fell sharply, -14.5% Y/Y). Relatively firm pricing on local shipments may make it hard for local food delivery companies like Meituan Dianping (3690 HK) and Alibaba Group Holding (BABA US) ‘s ele.me to beat down unit operating costs.
- Underlying domestic transport demand held up well again in November. Although demand for speedy, relatively expensive express service (and air freight) appears to be moderating, demand for rail and highway freight transport has held up well. The relative strength of rail and water transport (slow, cheap, industry-facing) versus express and air freight (fast, expensive, consumer-oriented) suggests a couple of things: a) upstream industrial activity is stronger than downstream retail activity and b) the people in charge of paying freight are shifting to cheaper modes of transport when possible.
We retain a negative view of China’s express industry’s fundamentals: demand growth is slowing and pricing appears to be falling faster than costs can be cut. Overall domestic transportation demand, however, remains solid and shows no signs of slowing.
2. Elastic: Why Is It Outperforming In Recent Tech Carnage?
- Elastic NV (ESTC US) has been one of the best tech IPOs globally in 2018. Its current price is $62.53, up 74% from its IPO price of $36. Elastic’s share price has been holding up very nicely since its IPO on October 5th, 2018. Meanwhile, from October 5th to December 21st 2018, many tech stocks have experienced brutal declines. Elastic’s ability to outperform the top US tech stocks in a very difficult environment for the stock market sets the stage for a continued out-performance once the stock market starts to stabilize.
- Since the IPO, the company reported better than expected second quarter results (quarter ending October 31, 2018) on December 4th. The company’s adjusted net loss in FY2Q19 was $0.38 per share, beating analysts’ consensus estimate by 9 cents. It generated revenue of $63.6 million, up 72% YoY. Calculated billings were also strong at $88.5 million, up 73% YoY.
- The company’s guidance for FY3Q19 (quarter ending January 31, 2019) is to generate revenue in the range of $64 million to $66 million, representing a 56% YoY growth rate at the midpoint of the guidance. It expects to generate operating margin of negative 28% to negative 30% in FY3Q19.
- A combination of major investors shifting their assets away from FAANG and semiconductor stocks has resulted in some improved performance of many software related stocks in recent months relative to other major tech stocks. In general, these stocks face less negative impact from a prolonged trade war between China and the US. Plus, they are not as exposed to the higher cycle volatility as the semiconductor related stocks. In many respects, Elastic shares many business similarities with these software driven companies, and thus has been more immune from the decline in the stock prices since early October. We remain positive on Elastic NV (ESTC US).
3. Horiba (6856 JP): Bad News Largely Discounted
Horiba combines high gearing to semiconductor capital spending with a large and growing automotive test business characterized by upward trending but uneven profitability. At ¥4,545 (Friday, December 21, closing price), its share price has dropped by 53% from an all-time high of ¥9,590 reached last May. Falling demand for semiconductor production equipment and a downward revision to FY Dec-18 sales and profit guidance announced in November appear to be largely in the price.
The downward revision, which cut projected full-year operating profit growth from 15.5% to 2.5%, followed a 22.2% year-on-year decline in operating profit in 3Q and implies a similar rate of decline in 4Q. The weakness is concentrated in Semiconductor Equipment and Automotive Test, the former due to a cyclical downturn in overall demand, the latter due to M&A-related and other one-time expenses. New Automotive Test orders continued to outpace sales, leading to a 9.5% increase in the order backlog during 3Q.
Automotive Test sales and profits should rise next year, while semiconductor equipment sales and profits seem likely to bottom out. In a report issued on December 17, SEMI (the semiconductor equipment and materials industry organization) forecasts a further decline in wafer fab equipment sales in 1H of 2019, followed by recovery in 2H. Other industry sources we talked to before the report was issued had similar views.
This scenario could fall apart due to general economic weakness, American attempts to stifle China’s semiconductor industry, or both. On December 21, Reuters reported that Foxconn “…is in the final stages of talks with the local government of the Chinese city of Zhuhai to build a chip plant there with a total investment of about $9 billion… most of which would be shouldered by the Zhuhai government through subsidies and tax breaks…” This looks like a perfect target for the Americans, but whether or not they will notice or care remains to be seen.
Horiba is now selling at 9.6x our EPS estimate for this fiscal year, 13.4x our estimate for next year and 12.1x our estimate for FY Dec-20. These and other projected valuations are near the bottom of their 5-year historical ranges. If the Semiconductor Equipment division does not recover in 2H of 2019, historical data suggest that its operating profit could drop by 70% rather than the 47% we are now forecasting, resulting in a P/E ratio of 17x. Nevertheless, it is time to start considering when and at what price to buy Horiba.
Horiba is a diversified Japanese maker of precision and analytical devices and systems with a significant presence in the global markets for automotive test, industrial process and environmental analysis, hematology, semiconductor production equipment and scientific instruments. It is by far the world’s leading producer of automotive emission measurement systems (EMS), having supplied about 80% of the installed base worldwide, and also the world’s top manufacturer of mass flow controllers for the semiconductor industry, with an estimated global market share of nearly 60%.
4. FBN Holdings: A Contrarian Call from Behind the Hydrocarbon Clouds and Shadows
FBN Holdings Plc (FBNH NL) is the oldest and second-largest bank in Nigeria with a market share of 14% of domestic loans.
FBN’s solid franchise provides robust revenue generation capacity (especially in e-business and insurance) plus a solid and cheap funding base complemented by a strong liquidity profile. The Group’s solid funding base of low cost retail deposits, mainly CASA, underpins one of the most competitive in the sector.
Under new management, FBN is focused on a legacy asset quality clean-up and enhancing risk controls. The franchise has exhibited resilience in the face of system-wide asset quality problems, related to some extent to the concentration of oil/gas exposures. Moving forward, profitability can strengthen with improving asset quality though the recent plunge in oil prices represents a threat to this de-risking process. A plus point is the vibrant income streams from e-business and insurance growth drivers.
The operating environment in Nigerian remains challenging: while the country has emerged from a recession, vulnerabilities remain. Lower oil prices, tighter external market conditions, heightened security issues, and delayed policy responses are the main downside risks. The recent fall in oil prices is a concern given Nigeria’s dependency on the commodity and its knock-on effect to the hydrocarbon-exposed Banking System. Although access to foreign currency has eased, due to FX reforms, many borrowers retain limited capacity to service obligations and there are modest opportunities for banks to grow their loan portfolios.
FBN is thus somewhat of a contrarian call given the weakness in the oil market. But one should buy a hydrocarbon “play” when prices are low, not high. Shares trade at a 60% discount to Book Value and stand on a low Mkt Cap./Deposits rating of 8%, far below the global and EM median. FBN commands a dividend-adjusted PEG of 1.3x. Dividend and earnings yields are 3.3% and 15%, respectively. A quintile 1 PH Score™ of 7.7 captures the valuation dynamic while metric change is satisfactory. Combining franchise valuation and PH Score™, FBN stands in the top quintile of opportunity globally. The asset quality position and interrelated lower profitability vis-a-vis peers is a reason behind FBN’s lower credit rating and relatively low valuation. We are somewhat sceptical that FBN’s underlying creditworthiness and valuation are efficiently evaluated versus more popular counterparts.
