bullish

JD Logistics

Last Week in Event SPACE: Japan Post Ins, Straits Trad., Invesco Office, Chong Hing, Toshiba, JD.com

308 Views23 May 2021 06:47
SUMMARY

Last Week in Event SPACE ...

  • A hugely accretive buyback for Japan Post Insurance (7181 JP) leads to a huge business opportunity for a hugely undervalued life insurer (about to become substantially more undervalued on Price/EEV terms) which has been handcuffed for its whole existence.
  • Equity financing from SMBC is a precursor to an imminent listing of Straits Trading (STRTR SP)'s asset manager Ara.
  • There is a decent chance this deal for Invesco Office J Reit (3298 JP) could get done by Invesco parent at ¥22,500/share, but it definitely deserves a wide gross spread.
  • Despite the impressive premium, the P/B multiple under Yue Xiu's Offer for Chong Hing Bank (1111 HK) is less than half the average P/B multiple for Hong Kong bank takeovers over the past twenty years.
  • If the ¥150bn to "Return" to Toshiba Corp (6502 JP) shareholders to be clarified in early June is a buyback, it means something like 33 million shares at the current price. That is a lot.
  • Given JD Logistics (2618 HK)'s nosebleed valuations, JD.com Inc. (9618 HK) is a preferable play.
  • Plus, other events, CCASS movements, and Mood Spins.

(This insight covers specific insights & comments involving Stubs, Pairs, Arbitrage, share Classifications, and Events - or SPACE - in the past week)

M&A - ASIA

Japan Post Insurance (7181 JP) (Mkt Cap: $8.4bn; Liquidity: $25mn)

On the 16 May, Japan Post Insurance announced a buyback of up to 162,906,300 shares (29.0%) spending up to ¥439.8bn. This was done in a ToSTNeT-3 transaction this past Monday. Japan Post Holdings announced they would sell a similar number of shares into the buy order, and would sell an additional 400,000 shares held in a trust. By so doing, the percentage of Japan Post Insurance voting rights held by Japan Post Holdings would drop to 49.90%. Despite the signalling by the JPH last November which was quickly followed in December by the release/leak of a plan to buy back JPI shares to get JPH below 50%, and the substantial shift in interest rates lifting EEV, JPI hasn't performed that well since December. But that period was probably the time to buy.

  • The dividend is up to ¥90/share, or 4.1% as per the previous Friday's close. Over time, the Panel on Postal Privatization has urged JPH to sell down to nothing. As long as JPI shares are this inexpensive (say below 0.4-0.5x) on a Price/EEV basis), expect the JPI to be willing to buy back more shares over time. That is a lot of accretion as long as the shares are substantially lower than say 0.70x Price/EEV (where, depending on the RoEV and the recent contribution of economic variance, a buffer starts to be warranted).
  • If you have been long and waiting for this to get out, expect a bounce. Travis Lundy would not sell too soon. In the short-term, the shares should bounce because I half think people were not really expecting it to get done - that December's leak was an ill-fated trial balloon. ¥2660-2930/share would be an estimate of like-for-like Price/EEV for JPI as of 16 December prior to the newsleak, not considering the lifting of restrictions and getting out of the penalty box.
  • If you are not long, consider this the trigger to think about why not. This is not a big market cap. There is much less float than you think there is. But this has both rebound growth, and new product new limits growth ahead of it. It pays a decent dividend. This is now a long-term prospect as a desirable asset. Business growth. Accretion. Undervaluation.

Chong Hing Bank (1111 HK) (Mkt Cap: $2.6bn; Liquidity: $1mn)

Yue Xiu (the investment arm of the Guangzhou municipal government) has made an Offer, by way of a Scheme, for Chong Hing shares not owned, at HK$20.80/share, a 51.2% premium to last close, and a 97% premium to the day preceding the last trading day. The Cancellation Price, which is a 10.1% discount to the NAV, will NOT be increased. Standard Scheme conditions apply. Chong Hing is Hong Kong-incorporated, therefore there is no headcount test.

  • A final dividend of HK$0.23/share was declared at Chong Hing's final results on the 4 March, and approved by shareholders the EGM on the 14 May. That dividend will be added to the Cancellation Price and will be paid on 8 June 2021 to shareholders whose names appear on the register as at the close of business on 31 May 2020. So the effective Cancellation Price is HK$21.03/share if you own on 31 May (if you purchase for record date after 31 May, consideration is HK$20.80/share).
  • Chong Hing's one, three, five & ten-year average P/B is 0.37x, 0.48x, 0.55x, & 0.79x. On that basis, ~0.9x appears reasonable. However, taking over a bank at below book, not just with respect to precedent transactions, appears too cheap. As an aside, Chong Hing's total equity as at December 2021 was HK$27.9bn according to its FY20 annual report - page 86, which gives a book value of HK$28.72/share. However, the announcement mentions the NAV for Chong Hing of HK$23.14/share as at 31 December excludes equity instruments, without providing more granularity.
  • I think this is being done too cheaply. However, no other suitor will emerge. Ultimately, this is where long-suffering shareholders cash out. Play the arb. Assuming payment mid-late September, pay up to HK$20.40/share.

(link to my insight: Chong Hing Bank (1111 HK): Yue Xiu's Offer Is Light)


Invesco Office J Reit (3298 JP)(Mkt Cap: $1.bn; Liquidity: $9mn)

After the close this past Thursday, the fortunes of the unitholders of Invesco Office may have changed again. The company and its manager announced they had received a proposal for a Tender Offer bid by Invesco Real Estate (Cayman) for all the shares of Invesco Office J-REIT. The tender offer price of the Tender Offer will be 22,500 yen per investment unit, representing a 15.33% premium to the closing unit price of the investment units of the Investment Corporation as of May 19, 2021 and a 3.45% premium to the tender offer price of the Starwood Tender Offer.

  • At ¥20,800/share - as it as at the time of the announcement - one starts to believe that the likelihood of Invesco parent getting this done at ¥22,500/share is better than a 50/50 proposition. It might be, but it is not a GREAT bet. It was going to be difficult to get done for Starwood at ¥20,000/share, then still difficult at ¥21,750/share. It is marginally easier for Invesco Real Estate at ¥22,500/share but even if Starwood walks away, it is not a done deal, even if IRE decides it only needs 50.1% less whatever IIB has purchased until then. It gets easier with a lower threshold of remaining shares, but it is not a guaranteed thing.
  • If this gets to ¥22,000/share, Travis would sell and walk away. I'd walk at ¥21,750. From a financial perspective, it would make eminent sense for all holders to sell at ¥22,500/share but the passive position is, as far as Travis can tell, at least 50% of shares out. He believe it to be more.
  • UPDATE: Invesco Office traded up here at ¥22530/share on Friday. This is a place to take profits and walk away. Travis thinks this is not a bad place to put on a short. The upside to Starwood coming over the top with an agreed offer is somewhat limited. Travis notes, however, that Invesco bidder did not put forth a full proposal and Invesco Office did not put forth an opinion. Invesco Office could come out and say that a ¥22600 bid by Starwood would be too low. IF a Tender Offer goes through at ¥22500 (or higher), most of those selling will have to spend what is now $1.5bn+ to buy OTHER REITs.

Straits Trading (STRTR SP) (Mkt Cap: $0.8bn; Liquidity: $1mn)

Straits has a 22.06% stake in ARA Asset Management, after adding 1.1% in May of last year for S$30.2mn. There is talk of IPO'ing ARA, some four years after it was taken private. Straits' stake in ARA, based on that stake increase, is worth ~60% of its current market cap. Yet that figure is likely conservative based on the increase in ARA's AUM.

  • Earlier this week, ARA announced a $500mn round of equity financing from SMBC. With SMBC joining as a strategic shareholder, this has all the hallmarks of an imminent IPO.
  • Back in 2016, JL Investment Group, Straits, Cheung Kong Property, in partnership with Warburg Pincus, privatised ARA Asset Management at S$1.78/share by way of a Scheme. Straits held an effective stake of 20.95% after delisting. ARA's EV at the time was $1.795bn with an implied market cap S$1.78bn. Just prior to the Scheme, ARA had AUM of S$35.6bn.

  • Based on the Scheme value of ARA in 2016, and its then AUM, ARA is potentially worth upwards of S$6bn now. That backs out a value of S$1.3bn for Straits' stake, ~30% above its current market cap. Straits is cheap. Either major shareholder Tecity takes the company private; or you buy the company as an indirect investment into an expected listing of ARA.

(link to my insight: Straits Trading: ARA's Pre-IPO Funding From SMBC)


Toshiba Corp (6502 JP) (Mkt Cap: $18.9bn; Liquidity: $187mn)

During its full-year results, Toshiba announced a ¥150bn of "additional shareholder return" of unspecified return method, with details to be announced in early June. The "Return" could be an enhancement of a dividend going forward, or could be a buyback. Travis personally expects buyback because it helps remove some activist pressure, and some pressure on PE Funds bidding (because if the stock goes up, they have to bid more).

  • Results were noisy. Forecasts are a little noisy. That is par for the course. Better quality of forward-looking order book and good asset sale results means extra net income, which means a larger-than possibly expected potential return to shareholders. Travis had not expected a buyback at all, but obviously, activist shareholders will have been lobbying hard for this. It is not an overly large reduction or optimization of capital. They probably could have done more. It is also a BIG IMPACT announcement. A ¥150bn buyback could be 30-40+% of Real World Float.
  • Travis assumes readers are long. He likes the idea of trading the range on this. Sell large pops, buy large dips. If readers are not long already, he suggests the same thing. The shares may dip on the lackluster guidance. The numbers look "easy-to-reach" to him. Not very challenging.

KDDI Corp (9433 JP) announced in-line results, decent forecasts, yet another dividend hike (20 consecutive years of dividend hikes), and in something of a surprise, a big buyback. The buyback of ¥150bn is non-negligible. This is five years in a row that KDDI has bought back shares and because neither NTT (Nippon Telegraph & Telephone) (9432 JP) nor Softbank Corp (9434 JP) announced buybacks, this puts KDDI on the front foot relatively speaking regarding flows. The forecast and the buyback are both bullish. The combination of this should allow for upward drift on the shares near-term. Be long KDDI vs Softbank Corp. Be long NTT. Buy dips on KDDI vs Softbank Corp. Link to Travis': KDDI Results and Yet Another Buyback.


On the 10 May, Blackstone increased its non-binding proposal for Crown Resorts (CWN AU) by 4% to $12.35. Shortly after, Crown's domestic rival Star Entertainment Grp (SGR AU)lobbed an unsolicited, non-binding, and indicative proposal, by way of a Scheme, either via the issuance of 2.68 new Star shares for every Crown share, or a possible cash alternative of A$12.50/share, subject to clawback. In Crown Resorts: Blackstone & Star Place Their Bets, I concluded both Offers were light. Crown now agrees that Blackstone's Offer undervalued the company. But that it required more information from Star before finalising its view on the cash/scrip Offer. Based on the pushback to Blackstone's Offer, it is difficult to see the board recommending Star's A$0.15/share premium. Link to my insight: Crown Says Blackstone's Bid Is Light. Undecided On Star.


AOI TYO Holdings (3975 JP) (Mkt Cap: $0.2bn; Liquidity: $1mn)

On the 14th May, Japanese small-cap advertising company Aoi Tyo announced a Management Buyout (MBO) backed by Studio Cruise - a company managed by the Carlyle Group. Aoi Tyo mainly produces advertising video content. They also offer post-production services, xR (various forms of computer-altered reality) content production services, and PR, event, and spatial design solutions for the advertising and marketing sector. The Tender Offer Price is ¥900/share in cash which translates to a deal size of ¥21.4bn(~US$196mn). The Tender Offer Period will be from 17th May to 5th July 2021. The Deal has a minimum acceptance condition which requires the Acquirer to reach two-thirds control (15,844,900 shares). Friendly shareholders collectively hold around 4,984,889 shares (20.1%) and are expect them to accept the Deal.

  • The Tender Offer Price translates to FY21E EV/EBITDA of 9.1x which is quite light when considering the projected EBITDA CAGR of 21.4% for FY21E-FY25E. However, the Offer Price translates to a decent premium of +47.5% to the undisturbed price. It is also +45.2%, +50.6%, +63.2%, and +83.2% higher than the stocks 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, and 12-months VWAPs respectively. Given the attractive Offer premia, the Deal should go through in the absence of a superior proposal. However, there is fundamental backing for a bump.

Meisei Electric (6709 JP) (Mkt Cap: $0.1bn; Liquidity: $1mn)

On 13th May, small-cap electronic and communications technology firm Meisei Electric announced they had agreed to merge with their parent IHI Corp (7013 JP) which will result in Meisei getting delisted from the Second Section of the Tokyo Stock Exchange. Meisei shareholders will receive 0.42 IHI shares per Meisei share. The Meisei Shareholder meeting for approving the Deal is expected to be on 23rd June 2021 and the Merger is expected to become effective on 1st August 2021.

  • This is a friendly scrip deal. Both managements have agreed to the Terms and the Deal will be completed if Target shareholders agree to the Transaction. Acquirer shareholder approval will not be required as the transaction follows simplified share exchange procedure pursuant to the provisions of Article 796, paragraph (20) of the Companies Act. The Exchange Ratio seems reasonable and Janaghan expects Target shareholders to accept the Deal. Expect this to be a short-dated Rate-of-Return trade with a high likelihood of Deal completion.
  • IHI is listed in the First Section while Meisei is listed in the Second Section of the Tokyo Stock Exchange. This means that subsequent to this Merger, there will be TOPIX Index Upweight implications.

(link to Janaghan's insight: Meisei (6709 JP) - IHI (7013 JP): Small Merger with Minor Additional Consequences)


Honshu Chemical Industry (4115 JP) (Mkt Cap: $0.2bn; Liquidity: <$1mn)

Last November, Mitsui & Co Ltd (8031 JP) and Mitsui Chemicals (4183 JP) jointly announced they would launch a Tender Offer for the 46% of shares of Honshu Chem that they did not own. Travis wrote about it in Honshu Chemical (4115) - An Embarrassment of Riches. and again with Honshu Chemical - What WAS the Wrong Price Gets Wronger. after Q3 earnings. With full-year results now out, the extra cash added to the firm amounts to 3.3% of the Tender Offer Price.

  • Travis thinks this is the wrong price. He thinks it is the wrong process too. The lack of update to the management forecasts is disappointing. The lack of explanation for why a company trading below book and earning a high teens ROE on assets (after deducting all the cash) should require a 10% discount rate is disappointing. He expects it is because it is the only way they could get the DCF price range down to where it is. Otherwise, it is inexplicable.
  • Travis does not know who the noisemaker will be or should be in this case but I believe there should be one and I believe that it is not impossible that investors get one. It is also up to non-traditionally activist investors to get upset at these things and make noise. For that, he thinks the "right trade" is to be long at or just above terms.

On the 9 March, Vocus Communications (VOC AU) and MIRA/Aware entered into a Scheme Implementation Deed. The consideration under the Offer remained unchanged at $5.50/share compared to the co-operation agreement entered into on the 23 February. Vocus' board unanimously recommended the Offer. The Scheme Doc has now been despatched. The key condition to the Scheme is the shareholder vote on the 22 June with an expected implementation on the 22 July. The Independent Expert assessed a fair value range of $4.98-$5.60/share in a comprehensive valuation report. This is done and trading tight to terms. Link to my insight: Vocus Comms (VOC AU): MIRA/​Aware’s Scheme Doc Despatched. EGM On 22 June

On 14th May 2021, Shopping information website operator Locoguide (4497 JP) and real-estate web portal operator Kufu (4399 JP) announced (J-only) plans to merge in a Deal that would see both companies get delisted from the Tokyo Stock Exchange and get re-listed as a new combined entity. The Exchange Ratio for the Deal is set at 4.10 Kufu shares per Locoguide share. The Locoguide Shareholder Meeting and Kufu Shareholder Meeting for approving the Deal are expected to take place on 24th June 2021 and 7th July 2021, respectively. This Merger will require Shareholder Approval from both Kufu and Locoguide Shareholders. However, that is unlikely to be a major hurdle. This would be a standard Rate-of-Return Trade. Expect this to trade tight until completion. Link to Janaghan's: Locoguide (4497 JP) - Kufu (4399 JP): Merger Is a Done Deal.


Aomori Bank (8342 JP) / Michinoku Bank (8350 JP)

Amori Bank and fellow Aomori Prefecture bank Michinoku agreed in 2019 to form an operational alliance, which was widely seen as a precursor to merging. Last year on September 6, the Nikkei carried an article saying that Aomori Bank and Michinoku Bank could consider a merger, and the CEO of Aomori Bank was quoted as saying he didn't rule out the possibility. The two banks had 95 and 94 banks, respectively, last year, and they mostly competed against each other in each major city, minor city, and even small town, and officials from both banks had said that was too many to support. The previous Friday, the two banks announced they would merge.

  • Based on an income basis or a BVPS basis, Michinoku is cheap to Aomori Bank. But Michinoku has ¥20bn of pref shares outstanding, which if converted in the next three years would dilute Michinoku common holders by 50%. And if Michinoku were to somehow pay them back at "par" and take a capital hit, the differing capital ratios would be dramatic.
  • Aomori - knowing it will gain operational synergies by working with Michinoku - had previously set a target ROE of 3.0% for 2021. Michinoku does a little better, but this is not going to turn out to be a better bank until a lot of costs (branches and employees) are cut, and systems are unified. The combined entity can probably buy back the shares from the RCC but I do not believe Michinoku common shareholders are likely to get a big gift here.
  • Travis sees no reason to expect upside to Michinoku vs Aomori here. He thinks Michinoku shareholders could end up getting the short end of the stick, and does not see this pairing as being a great example of regional bank consolidation adding value going forward.

(link to Travis' insight: Aomori Bank & Michinoku Bank Merger - Nothing To Write Home About Yet)


On 14th May, Pharmaceutical company Biofermin Pharmaceutical Co (4517 JP) ("Biofermin") announced they had agreed to merge with their parent Taisho Pharmaceutical Holdin (4581 JP) ("Taisho") which will result in Biofermin getting delisted from the Tokyo Stock Exchange. Biofermin shareholders will receive 0.5 Taisho shares per Biofermin share. The Biofermin shareholder meeting for approving the Deal is expected to be on 24th June 2021 and the Merger is expected to become effective on 1st August 2021. This is a friendly scrip deal. Both managements have agreed to the Terms and the Deal will be completed if Target shareholders agree to the Transaction. This looks a "Done Deal" as the Target Shareholder Approval be easily obtained. Link to Janaghan's: Biofermin (4517 JP) - Taisho (4581 JP): Merger Is a Done Deal.

STUBS

JD.com Inc. (9618 HK) / JD Logistics (2618 HK)

JD Logistics, the logistics spin-off of JD.com, will price its shares between HK$39.36 and HK$43.36 each, raising HK$25.2bn using the half-way price, before over-allotment. JD.com's stake will decline to 64.4% (63.5% including the over-allotment) from 71.57% currently. The listing of JD. Logistics would be the second-largest IPO on the Hong Kong bourse this year after Kuaishou Technology (1024 HK), and including its secondary listing, JD's third listing in Hong Kong in the past year.

  • Late last month, Chinese regulators called on 13 online platforms to adhere to tighter regulations in their financial divisions and "rectify prominent problems", as the net widened subsequent o the scrapping of Ant Financial Services Group (6688 HK) last November. As a result, JD.com's shares were down 35% (at the time of the insight) from its recent high in February. That's a significant move - and value at the stub level is emerging.
  • There are a lot of positive assumptions baked into JD Logistics price, yet if retail take-up is any indication, this hasn't dampened enthusiasm. I think valuations look punchy, and SF Holdings' surprise 1Q20 loss is a good reason for investors to take pause.
  • Given its reliance on its parent, I'd prefer to play JD.com; a 35% discount to NAV doesn't appear overly stretched, but it may widen further amid the ongoing scrutinisation of internet platforms by the regulator. For now, I would keep JD.com on the watch list. Oshadhi Kumarasiri reckons there is limited downside to JD.com here.

Links to:
my insight: JD.com's Stub Trading Cheapish Ahead Of Logistics Spin-Off
Oshadhi's insight: Examining JD.com from a Holdco Angle as the Company Prepares to List Its Logistics Unit


Guoco Group Ltd (53 HK)

Following Yue Xiu's privatization Offer for Chong Hing Bank (1111 HK), Hong Kong's remaining "family"-owned banks, such as Bank of East Asia (23 HK) (BEA), are back in focus. Guoco Group Ltd (53 HK) is trading cheap to its historical NAV discount range, and the 14.94% holding in BEA accounts for 15% of its NAV. I estimate Guoco is trading at a ~37% discount to NAV, compared to its 12-month average of 27%, and around its 12-month low of ~38%.

  • On the 29 June 2018, Guoco received a privatization offer from Guoline (the Quek family) by way of a Scheme at $135/share (in cash OR cash & scrip vs. the undisturbed price of $118/share. On a market price-related value, as at the latest practicable date in the 2018 Circular, the IFA calculated a value of $178.70/share. That equated to a discount to NAV of 24%. In the 2012/2013 failed privatisation attempt, the market-based value was $162 (December 2012), implying a discount of 38%. I calculate a current market-based value of $169.67/share. Guoline is free to re-launch an Offer at any time, but it will full price is pitched - perhaps a 15% discount, or $140/share - First Eagle will block the Scheme vote, again, or block the 90% acceptance threshold condition if an Offer was done via a VGO.

  • Nevertheless, with the news Chong Hing is (likely) to be privatised by Yue Xiu, BEA is in play. BEA is not without issue, as discussed in BEA (23 HK): Big Banc Theory And Elliott's Hard Slog. But taking the view BEA is privatised at a super-conservative 1.0x P/B - BEA is 2.5x Chong Hing's market cap and currently at ~0.4x P/B - that's worth around $17bn to Guoco, or ~55% of its market cap. Assuming the remaining listed companies, the property holding, and the investment portfolio are assigned a similar discount of 37% as it is now, and cash proceeds of $17bn from the sale of BEA is assigned no discount, then shares would theoretically trade at ~HK$130/share.

(link to my insight: StubWorld: Guoco/BEA Into Focus Post Chong Hing Bank Bid)


And continuing with the Chong Hing Bank (1111 HK) / Bank of East Asia (23 HK) theme, I think one could be long both Dah Sing Financial (440 HK) and Dah Sing Banking (2356 HK). DSF is cheaper, and because of the securities holdings, the discount is more egregious. Link to my insight: Dah Sing (2356 HK): Trading Cheap As Chong Hing Gets Bid.

M&A - EUROPE

On 14 May, Greiner communicated that it had reached a preliminary deal to acquire a 27.03% stake in Recticel SA (REC BB) from Compagnie du Bois Sauvage SA (COMB BB), for a total of €203.8 mn, subject to conditions. The purchase price is €13.5/share, post dividend distribution of €0.26. In Greiner/Recticel: Two-Year Old Takeover Battle, based on his DCF calculations, implying a value of €18.71, a 38.6% premium to the prospective offer, Jesus Rodriguez Aguilar believes the prospective offer price undervalues Recticel.

In Siemens/Siemens Gamesa: Bid Rumours, Jesus discusses reports that Siemens AG (SIE GR) was planning to launch a delisting bid for Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy, S.A. (SGRE SM). For an implied equity value (fully diluted) of €778.6 mn and an implied EV of €798.4 mn (dividend-adjusted). This represents 7.1x EV/21e EBITDA and 18.5x Fwd P/E. Link to Jesus' insight: Siemens/Siemens Gamesa: Bid Rumours.


In LVMH/Tod's: Unlikely Deal for Now, Jesus discusses the non-deal between Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton (MC FP) and Tod's SpA (TOD IM).

INDEX REBALS

Hang Seng TECH Index Rebalance Preview. In Hang Seng TECH Index Rebalance Preview: 1 Deletion & Another Potential Change, Brian Freitas sees Zte Corp H (763 HK) as a deletion to bring the number of index constituents back to 30. If Bilibili Inc (9626 HK) is added to the index, then Archosaur Games (9990 HK) could be deleted.


HSCI Index Rebalance and Stock Connect. The June review will see the inclusion of stocks that were newly listed from 1 January to 31 March and meet the criteria for joining the index. Although there are almost no assets indexed to the HSCI, the index forms the basis of stocks that are eligible for Southbound Stock Connect. Stocks that are included in the HSCI and subsequently included in the Stock Connect program get inflows from mainland investors. Link to Brian's insight: HSCI Index Rebalance and Stock Connect: Potential Changes in June and September.


Marine Shipping Stocks and Index Inclusion. Stocks of marine shipping companies have been moving higher over the last year and there has been an acceleration in the move over the last few months. The stocks of larger companies have performed better than the stocks of smaller companies. HMM Co., Ltd. (011200 KS), Yang Ming Marine Transport (2609 TT), and Wan Hai Lines (2615 TT) will be included in the MSCI Standard Index, while we expect Evergreen Marine Corp (2603 TT), Yang Ming Marine Transport (2609 TT) and Wan Hai Lines (2615 TT) will be included in the FTSE TWSE Taiwan 50 Index at the June QIR. We currently expect Cosco Shipping Holdings Co., Ltd (H) (1919 HK) to be included in the FTSE China 50 Index at the June SAIR. Link to Brian's insight: Marine Shipping Stocks and Index Inclusion: Big Run-Up.


HSI Index Rebalance. For the Hong Kong Hang Seng Index (HSI INDEX) there are 3 inclusions - Xinyi Solar Holdings (968 HK), BYD (1211 HK), and Country Garden Services Holdings (6098 HK). Link to Brian's insight: HSI Index Rebalance: Only 3 Additions but BIG Turnover.


HSCEI Index Rebalance. The inclusions are BYD (1211 HK) and Evergrande Property Services (6666 HK), while Guangdong Investment (270 HK), China Unicom Hong Kong (762 HK), and China Tower (788 HK) have been deleted from the index. Link to Brian's insight: HSCEI Index Rebalance: BYD's Double Inclusion; Capping Changes Lead to High Turnover.


HSTECH Index Rebalance. For the Hang Seng Tech Index (HSTECH INDEX), the inclusions are Autohome (2518 HK) and Bilibili Inc (9626 HK) while the deletions are ZTE Corp H (763 HK), Fit Hon Teng (6088 HK) and Archosaur Games (9990 HK). Link to Brian's insight: HSTECH Index Rebalance: Back to 30 with 2 Adds and 3 Deletes.

OTHER M&A & EVENT UPDATES

CCASS

My ongoing series flags large moves (~10%) in CCASS holdings over the past week or so, moves that are often outside normal market transactions. These may be indicative of share pledges. Or potential takeovers. Or simply help understand volume swings.

Often these moves can easily be explained - the placement of new shares, rights issue, movements subsequent to a takeover, lock-up expiry, amongst others. For those mentioned below, I could not find an obvious reason for the CCASS move.

Name

% chg

Into

Out of

Dragon King (8493 HK)19.37%YuzhouOutside of CCASS
Synertone Communication (1613 HK) 14.40%ChaoshangOutside of CCASS
Core Economy (339 HK) 24.10%BonusZhongtai
C-Link (1463 HK)21.75%FutuOutside of CCASS
Vinco Financial (8340 HK) 21.69%YuantaGrand Cap
Moody Tech (1400 HK)16.67%SilverbacksOutside of CCASS
Source: HKEx
Get started on the Smartkarma Research Network with a complimentary Preview Pass to:
  • Unlock all research summaries
  • Follow top, independent analysts
  • Receive personalised alerts and emails
  • Access Briefings, Analytics, and Events

Upgrade anytime to our paid plans for full-length research, real-time analyst discussions, and more.

Join a thriving community of 45,000+ investors, including the top global asset managers managing over $13trn in assets.

or
Already have an account? Sign In Now
Discussions
(Paid Plans Only)
chart-bar
x